1
|
Villalobos A, Pisanie JLD, Gandhi RT, Kokabi N. Yttrium-90 Radioembolization Dosimetry: Dose Considerations, Optimization, and Tips. Semin Intervent Radiol 2024; 41:63-78. [PMID: 38495257 PMCID: PMC10940044 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1779715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Villalobos
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Johannes L. du Pisanie
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Ripal T. Gandhi
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Nima Kokabi
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mirza-Aghazadeh-Attari M, Srinivas T, Kamireddy A, Kim A, Weiss CR. Radiomics Features Extracted From Pre- and Postprocedural Imaging in Early Prediction of Treatment Response in Patients Undergoing Transarterial Radioembolization of Hepatic Lesions: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Quality Appraisal Study. J Am Coll Radiol 2024:S1546-1440(24)00002-4. [PMID: 38220040 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.12.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is one of the most promising therapeutic options for hepatic masses. Radiomics features, which are quantitative numeric features extracted from medical images, are considered to have potential in predicting treatment response in TARE. This article aims to provide meta-analytic evidence and critically appraise the methodology of radiomics studies published in this regard. METHODS A systematic search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science. All relevant articles were retrieved, and the characteristics of the studies were extracted. The Radiomics Quality Score and Checklist for Evaluation of Radiomics Research were used to assess the methodologic quality of the studies. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in predicting objective response were determined. RESULTS The systematic review included 15 studies. The average Radiomics Quality Score of these studies was 11.4 ± 2.1, and the average Checklist for Evaluation of Radiomics Research score was 33± 6.7. There was a notable correlation (correlation coefficient = 0.73) between the two metrics. Adherence to quality measures differed considerably among the studies and even within different components of the same studies. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the radiomics models in predicting complete or partial response were 83.5% (95% confidence interval 76%-88.9%) and 86.7% (95% confidence interval 78%-92%), respectively. CONCLUSION Radiomics models show great potential in predicting treatment response in TARE of hepatic lesions. However, the heterogeneity seen between the methodologic quality of studies may limit the generalizability of the results. Future initiatives should aim to develop radiomics signatures using multiple external datasets and adhere to quality measures in radiomics methodology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Mirza-Aghazadeh-Attari
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Tara Srinivas
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Arun Kamireddy
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Alan Kim
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Clifford R Weiss
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Taswell CS, Studenski M, Pennix T, Stover B, Georgiou M, Venkat S, Jones P, Zikria J, Thornton L, Yechieli R, Mohan P, Portelance L, Spieler B. For Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Yttrium-90 Microspheres, Dose Volumetrics on Post-Treatment Bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT Predict Clinical Outcomes. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030645. [PMID: 36765603 PMCID: PMC9913422 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
In transarterial radioembolization (TARE) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with Yttrium-90 (Y-90) microspheres, recent studies correlate dosimetry from bremsstrahlung single photon emission tomography (SPECT/CT) with treatment outcomes; however, these studies focus on measures of central tendency rather than volumetric coverage metrics commonly used in radiation oncology. We hypothesized that three-dimensional (3D) isodose coverage of gross tumor volume (GTV) is the driving factor in HCC treatment response to TARE and is best assessed using advanced dosimetry techniques applied to nuclear imaging of actual Y-90 biodistribution. We reviewed 51 lobar TARE Y-90 treatments of 43 HCC patients. Dose prescriptions were 120 Gy for TheraSpheres and 85 Gy for SIR-Spheres. All patients underwent post-TARE Y-90 bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT imaging. Commercial software was used to contour gross tumor volume (GTV) and liver on post-TARE SPECT/CT. Y-90 dose distributions were calculated using the Local Deposition Model based on post-TARE SPECT/CT activity maps. Median gross tumor volume (GTV) dose; GTV receiving less than 100 Gy, 70 Gy and 50 Gy; minimum dose covering the hottest 70%, 95%, and 98% of the GTV (D70, D95, D98); mean dose to nontumorous liver, and disease burden (GTV/liver volume) were obtained. Clinical outcomes were collected for all patients by chart and imaging review. HCC treatment response was assessed according to the modified response criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) guidelines. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival estimates and multivariate regression analyses (MVA) were performed using STATA. Median survival was 22.5 months for patients achieving objective response (OR) in targeted lesions (complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per mRECIST) vs. 7.6 months for non-responders (NR, stable disease or disease progression per mRECIST). On MVA, the volume of underdosed tumor (GTV receiving less than 100 Gy) was the only significant dosimetric predictor for CR (p = 0.0004) and overall survival (OS, p = 0.003). All targets with less than CR (n = 39) had more than 20 cc of underdosed tumor. D70 (p = 0.038) correlated with OR, with mean D70 of 95 Gy for responders and 60 Gy for non-responders (p = 0.042). On MVA, mean dose to nontumorous liver trended toward significant association with grade 3+ toxicity (p = 0.09) and correlated with delivered activity (p < 0.001) and burden of disease (p = 0.05). Dosimetric models supplied area under the curve estimates of > 0.80 predicting CR, OR, and ≥grade 3 acute toxicity. Dosimetric parameters derived from the retrospective analysis of post-TARE Y-90 bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT after lobar treatment of HCC suggest that volumetric coverage of GTV, not a high mean or median dose, is the driving factor in treatment response and that this is best assessed through the analysis of actual Y-90 biodistribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Crystal Seldon Taswell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Matthew Studenski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Thomas Pennix
- Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, 1600 NW 10th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Bryan Stover
- Department of Radiology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Mike Georgiou
- Department of Radiology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Shree Venkat
- Department of Radiology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Patricia Jones
- Department of Medicine, Division of Digestive Health and Liver Diseases, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Joseph Zikria
- Department of Radiology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Lindsay Thornton
- Department of Radiology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Raphael Yechieli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Prasoon Mohan
- Department of Radiology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Lorraine Portelance
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Benjamin Spieler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Filippi L, Bagni O, Notarianni E, Saltarelli A, Ambrogi C, Schillaci O. PET/CT with 18F-choline or 18F-FDG in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Submitted to 90Y-TARE: A Real-World Study. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10112996. [PMID: 36428565 PMCID: PMC9687226 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10112996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Our aim was to assess the role of positron emission computed tomography (PET/CT) with 18F-choline (18F-FCH) or 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) submitted to 90Y-radioembolization (90Y-TARE). We retrospectively analyzed clinical records of 21 HCC patients submitted to PET/CT with 18F-fluorocholine (18F-FCH) or 18F-fluodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) before and 8 weeks after 90Y-TARE. On pre-treatment PET/CT, 13 subjects (61.9%) were 18F-FCH-positive, while 8 (38.1%) resulted 18F-FCH-negative and 18F-FDG-positive. At 8-weeks post 90Y-TARE PET/CT, 13 subjects showed partial metabolic response and 8 resulted non-responders, with a higher response rate among 18F-FCH-positive with respect to 18F-FDG-positive patients (i.e., 76.9% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.46). Post-treatment PET/CT influenced patients’ clinical management in 10 cases (47.6%); in 8 subjects it provided indication for a second 90Y-TARE targeting metabolically active HCC remnant, while in 2 patients it led to a PET-guided radiotherapy on metastatic nodes. By Kaplan−Meier analysis, patients’ age (≤69 y) and post 90Y-TARE PET/CT’s impact on clinical management significantly correlated with overall survival (OS). In Cox multivariate analysis, PET/CT’s impact on clinical management remained the only predictor of patients’ OS (p < 0.001). In our real-world study, PET/CT with 18F-FCH or 18F-FDG influenced clinical management and affected the final outcome for HCC patients treated with 90Y-TARE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Filippi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, “Santa Maria Goretti” Hospital, Via Antonio Canova, 04100 Latina, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-07736553591
| | - Oreste Bagni
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, “Santa Maria Goretti” Hospital, Via Antonio Canova, 04100 Latina, Italy
| | - Ermanno Notarianni
- Diagnostic and Interventional Unit, “Santa Maria Goretti” Hospital, Via Antonio Canova, 04100 Latina, Italy
| | - Adelchi Saltarelli
- Diagnostic and Interventional Unit, “Santa Maria Goretti” Hospital, Via Antonio Canova, 04100 Latina, Italy
| | - Cesare Ambrogi
- Diagnostic and Interventional Unit, “Santa Maria Goretti” Hospital, Via Antonio Canova, 04100 Latina, Italy
| | - Orazio Schillaci
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Laidlaw GL, Johnson GE. Recognizing and Managing Adverse Events in Y-90 Radioembolization. Semin Intervent Radiol 2021; 38:453-459. [PMID: 34629713 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Transarterial radioembolization using yttrium-90 (Y-90) microspheres is an important therapy in the management of unresectable primary liver tumors or hepatic metastases. While radioembolization is generally well-tolerated, it is not free from adverse events, and familiarity with the prevention and treatment of radioembolization-specific complications is an important component of patient care. This article aims to review radioembolization-specific toxicities stratified by hepatic, extrahepatic, and systemic effects, with a focus on preventing and mitigating radioembolization-induced morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace L Laidlaw
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Guy E Johnson
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Treatment response assessment following transarterial radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:3596-3614. [PMID: 33909092 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03095-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Transarterial radioembolization with yttrium-90 microspheres is an established therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Post-procedural imaging is important for the assessment of both treatment response and procedural complications. A variety of challenging treatment-specific imaging phenomena complicate imaging assessment, such as changes in tumoral size, tumoral and peritumoral enhancement, and extrahepatic complications. A review of the procedural steps, emerging variations, and timelines for post-treatment tumoral and extra-tumoral imaging changes are presented, which may aid the reporting radiologist in the interpretation of post-procedural imaging. Furthermore, a description of post-procedural complications and their significance is provided.
Collapse
|
7
|
Proietti I, Skroza N, Filippi L, Bernardini N, Mambrin A, Tolino E, Rossi G, Marchesiello A, Marraffa F, Volpe S, Bagni O, Potenza C. Long-Term Maintained Response to Selective Internal Radiation Therapy in an Oligometastatic Uveal Melanoma Patient Treated with Concomitant Anti-PD-1 Therapy. Life (Basel) 2021; 11:692. [PMID: 34357064 PMCID: PMC8307638 DOI: 10.3390/life11070692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is a primary neoplasm of the eye arising from the melanocytes residing in the iris, ciliary body or choroid. It is the most frequent intraocular malignancy and often determines metastases at distant sites, with a peculiar tropism for the liver. Metastatic UM has a poor prognosis, as any treatment affects the natural course of this fatal disease. Herein, we report a case of a UM metastatic to the liver in a 54 year-old female patient, initially treated with nivolumab without success. The patient was then scheduled for selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) while continuing immunotherapy. This combination led to a complete and durable response and the patient is currently free of disease, two years after the diagnosis of the hepatic metastases. The association between SIRT and immunotherapy (IT) has very promising perspectives for metastatic UM, especially considering the disappointing or contradictory results of classic chemotherapies, IT alone and targeted therapies. Furthermore, this combination has been shown to have a good security profile. However, further studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of associating SIRT and IT and to clarify some unsolved problems, such as the timing of administration of these two therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Proietti
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Nevena Skroza
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Luca Filippi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, “Santa Maria Goretti” Hospital, Via Antonio Canova, 04100 Latina, Italy; (L.F.); (O.B.)
| | - Nicoletta Bernardini
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Alessandra Mambrin
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Ersilia Tolino
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Giovanni Rossi
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Anna Marchesiello
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Federica Marraffa
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Salvatore Volpe
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Oreste Bagni
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, “Santa Maria Goretti” Hospital, Via Antonio Canova, 04100 Latina, Italy; (L.F.); (O.B.)
| | - Concetta Potenza
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| |
Collapse
|