Head and neck single- and dual-energy CT: differences in radiation dose and image quality of 2nd and 3rd generation dual-source CT

Image quality of virtual monochromatic and material density iodine images for evaluation of head and neck neoplasms using deep learning-based CT image reconstruction - A retrospective observational study

PURPOSE

To compare the quality of deep learning image reconstructed (DLIR) virtual monochromatic images (VMI) and material density (MD) iodine images from dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for the evaluation of head and neck neoplasms with CT scans from a conventional single-energy protocol.

METHOD

A total of 294 head and neck CT scans (98 VMIs operated at 60 keV, 102 MD iodine images, and 94 images from a 120 kVp single-energy CT (SECT) protocol) were retrospectively evaluated. VMIs and MD iodine images were generated using the Gemstone Spectral Imaging (GSI) mode using DLIR and metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithms. SECT images were generated using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V). Images were scored by two independent readers on a 6-point Likert-type scale for overall image quality, vessel contrast, soft tissue contrast, noise texture, noise intensity, artifact reduction, and sharpness.

RESULTS

Subjective overall image quality was rated as superior or excellent in 98 % of DLIR-based MD iodine images and VMIs, but only in 55 % of ASIR-V-based SECT images. For each individual quality criterion, image quality of VMIs and MD iodine images was rated as better than that of SECT images (p < 0.001 in each case). Noise texture and intensity were rated better in MD iodine images than in VMIs.

CONCLUSION

DECT using both DLIR and MAR for the generation of VMIs and MD iodine images resulted in higher subjective quality of oncologic head and neck images than ASIR-V-based SECT. Noise reduction and noise texture were best achieved with DLIR-based MD iodine images.

Ultra-High-Resolution CT of the Head and Neck with Deep Learning Reconstruction-Assessment of Image Quality and Radiation Exposure and Intraindividual Comparison with Normal-Resolution CT

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits of ultra-high-resolution CT (UHR-CT) with deep learning-based image reconstruction engine (AiCE) regarding image quality and radiation dose and intraindividually compare it to normal-resolution CT (NR-CT).

METHODS

Forty consecutive patients with head and neck UHR-CT with AiCE for diagnosed head and neck malignancies and available prior NR-CT of a different scanner were retrospectively evaluated. Two readers evaluated subjective image quality using a 5-point Likert scale regarding image noise, image sharpness, artifacts, diagnostic acceptability, and assessability of various anatomic regions. For reproducibility, inter-reader agreement was analyzed. Furthermore, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and slope of the gray-value transition between different tissues were calculated. Radiation dose was evaluated by comparing CTDIvol, DLP, and mean effective dose values.

RESULTS

UHR-CT with AiCE reconstruction led to significant improvement in subjective (image noise and diagnostic acceptability: p < 0.000; ICC ≥ 0.91) and objective image quality (SNR: p < 0.000; CNR: p < 0.025) at significantly lower radiation doses (NR-CT 2.03 ± 0.14 mSv; UHR-CT 1.45 ± 0.11 mSv; p < 0.0001) compared to NR-CT.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to NR-CT, UHR-CT combined with AiCE provides superior image quality at a markedly lower radiation dose. With improved soft tissue assessment and potentially improved tumor detection, UHR-CT may add further value to the role of CT in the assessment of head and neck pathologies.

Improved precision of noise estimation in CT with a volume-based approach

Assessment of image noise is a relevant issue in computed tomography (CT). Noise is routinely measured by the standard deviation of density values (Hounsfield units, HU) within a circular region of interest (ROI). We explored the effect of a spherical volume of interest (VOI) on noise measurements. Forty-nine chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients underwent CT with clinical protocol (regular dose [RD], volumetric CT dose index [CTDIvol] 3.04 mGy, 64-slice unit), and ultra-low dose (ULD) protocol (median CTDIvol 0.38 mGy, dual-source unit). Noise was measured in 27 1-cm² ROIs and 27 0.75-cm³ VOIs inside the trachea. Median true noise was 21 HU (range 17-29) for RD-CT and 33 HU (26-39) for ULD-CT. The VOI approach resulted in a lower mean distance between limits of agreement compared to ROI: 5.9 versus 10.0 HU for RD-CT (-40%); 4.7 versus 9.9 HU for ULD-CT (-53%). Mean systematic bias barely changed: -1.6 versus -0.9HU for RD-CT; 0.0 to 0.4HU for ULD-CT. The average measurement time was 6.8 s (ROI) versus 9.7 (VOI), independent of dose level. For chest CT, measuring noise with a VOI-based instead of a ROI-based approach reduces variability by 40-53%, without a relevant effect on systematic bias and measurement time.