Value of a multileaf prescription preparation system for palliative external beam irradiation

Computerized tomographic simulation compared with clinical mark-up in palliative radiotherapy: A prospective study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of computed tomographic (CT) planning in comparison to clinical mark-up (CM) for palliative radiation of chest wall metastases.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In patients treated with CM for chest wall bone metastases (without conventional simulation/fluoroscopy), two consecutive planning CT scans were acquired with and without an external marker to delineate the CM treatment field. The two sets of scans were fused for evaluation of clinical tumor volume (CTV) coverage by the CM technique. Under-coverage was defined as the proportion of CTV not covered by the CM 80% isodose.

RESULTS

Twenty-one treatments (ribs 17, sternum 2, and scapula 2) formed the basis of our study. Due to technical reasons, comparable data between CM and CT plans were available for 19 treatments only. CM resulted in a mean CTV under-coverage of 36%. Eleven sites (58%) had an under-coverage of >20%. Mean volume of normal tissues receiving >/=80% of the dose was 5.4% in CM and 9.3% in CT plans (p = 0.017). Based on dose-volume histogram comparisons, CT planning resulted in a change of treatment technique from direct apposition to a tangential pair in 7 of 19 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

CT planning demonstrated a 36% under-coverage of CTV with CM of ribs and chest wall metastases.

Computed tomographic simulation in palliative radiotherapy: the Princess Margaret Hospital experience

AIM

To examine the pattern of palliative radiation planning and the use of computed tomographic simulation (CTSIM) for this purpose.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed our department's external radiotherapy database for all courses of treatment with a palliative intent during the period of April to June 2002. Patient characteristics and treatment details were compared based on whether CTSIM had been used or not.

RESULTS

During the above period, 593 courses of external radiation treatment were delivered with palliative intent in our department. Of these, 100 treatments (17%) were planned with the help of CTSIM. The mean age of patients with CTSIM (62.9 years) was not significantly different with the patients planned without CTSIM (63.6 years). CTSIM use varied by treatment location, being highest in mediastinum/oesophagus (48%) and pancreas/stomach (47%) treatments, and lowest in spine (6%), lung (3%) and long bones (4%) (P < 0.01). Only 3% of palliative treatments without CTSIM were prescribed using multiple/complex fields (all field arrangements more complex than a single field or two opposed parallel fields). Although significantly higher (P < 0.001), this proportion was also only 24% in the cases planned with CTSIM. Only 12% of treatments without CTSIM were prescribed with more than 5 fractions, whereas 32% of CT-simulated treatments included more than 5 fractions (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

CTSIM was used much less frequently in our department's palliative radiotherapy compared with its use in radical treatments. The relatively low rate of multiple/complex fields planned in CT-simulated cases suggested that CTSIM was mostly used to improve tumour localisation. The optimal role of CTSIM in palliative radiotherapy will most probably evolve, based on an enhanced understanding of the implications from improved localisation and optimal planning techniques on clinical outcomes, patient convenience and resource accessibility.