Comparison of the psychophysical properties of various intraoral film and digital systems by means of the perceptibility curve test

Preliminary evaluation of dual imaging plate intraoral radiography

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), spatial resolution, and subjective quality of dual imaging plates (DIP) intraoral radiography.

METHODS

The DIP and conventional single IP (CSIP) methods both used YCR DT-1 imaging plates (Yoshida Co.). The DIP, comprising a front IP (FIP) and back IP (BIP), was constructed. DIP images were synthesized from the FIP and BIP images. An aluminum step phantom was used to measure the CNR. A line pair gauge was used to measure the spatial imaging resolution. A phantom comprising a porcine mandible embedded in acrylic resin was used for subjective evaluation.

RESULTS

The CNR of the DIP image was 32% higher than that of the FIP image. The spatial resolution achieved using the FIP, DIP, and CSIP was highly comparable except above 4 line pairs/mm, where that of the CSIP was highest. In subjective evaluation, the noise in the DIP images was significantly lower than in those obtained using the FIP and CSIP.

CONCLUSION

The CNR of the DIP was higher than that of the FIP. The decrease in spatial resolution of the DIP was limited. The subjective image quality of the DIP was higher than that of the FIP.

The missing link in image quality assessment in digital dental radiography

Digital radiography is gaining popularity among general dental practitioners. It includes digital intraoral radiography, digital panoramic radiography, digital cephalography, and cone-beam computed tomography. In this study, we focused on the methods to assess image quality of these techniques, except for digital cephalography, in the light of historical issues. We stressed on the importance of the development of a standardized phantom and quantitative analysis of diagnostic image quality using it, especially in the aspect of psychophysical properties of these digital systems. There is no missing link in the image quality assessment in digital intraoral radiography and cone-beam computed tomography in dental use. However, there are missing links between physical and diagnostic image qualities in panoramic radiography. The development of a semi-standardized phantom and the corresponding quantitative analysis method for image quality may be required in digital panoramic radiography. Quantitative image quality assessment using a standardized phantom will also be promising in the future artificial intelligence era.

Evaluation of low-contrast perceptibility in dental restorative materials under the influence of ambient light conditions

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess how details on dental restorative composites with different radio-opacities are perceived under the influence of ambient light.

METHODS

Resin composite step wedges (six steps, each 1-mm thick) were custom manufactured from three materials, respectively: (M1) Filtek™ Z350 (3M/ESPE, Saint Paul, MN); (M2) Prisma AP.H™ (Dentsply International Inc., Brazil) and (M3) Glacier(®) (SDI Limited, Victoria, Australia). Each step of the manufactured wedge received three standardized drillings of different diameters and depths. An aluminium (Al) step wedge with 12 steps (1-mm thick) was used as an internal standard to calculate the radio-opacity as pixel intensity values. Standardized digital images of the set were obtained, and 11 observers independently recorded the images, noting the number of noticeable details (drillings) under 2 dissimilar conditions: in a light environment (light was turned on in the room) and in low-light conditions (light in the room was turned off). The differences between images in terms of the number of details that were observed were statistically compared using ANOVA, Cronbach's alpha coefficient and Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis tests, with a significance level setting of 5% (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

The M2 showed higher radio-opacity, the M1 displayed intermediate radio-opacity and the M3 showed lower radio-opacity, respectively; however, all three were without significance (p > 0.05) compared with each other. The differences in radio-opacity resulted in a significant variation (p < 0.05) in the number of noticeable details in the image, which were influenced by characteristics of details, in addition to the ambient-light level.

CONCLUSIONS

The radio-opacity of materials and ambient light can affect the perception of details in digital radiographic images.

Comparison of psychophysical properties of two intraoral digital sensors on low-contrast perceptibility

OBJECTIVES

The psychophysical properties of a new complementary metal oxide semi-conductor-based detector, ProSensor(®) (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland), in terms of dose response function and perceptibility curve test were performed and compared with those of a charged couple device-based sensor, Dixi(®) (Planmeca Oy).

METHODS

Dose response functions at 66 kVp for a Dixi and a ProSensor were determined by means of multiple exposures to a homogeneous X-ray field covering the whole exposure range. The entry dose of each exposure was measured and registered. The mean grey level in each image was plotted as function of the corresponding exposures for both digital systems. Radiographs of a test object containing ten holes of increasing depth were obtained throughout the exposure range of the two digital sensors at 66 kVp. 12 observers were asked to register the number of perceptible holes in each radiograph. Based on the mean value of the observers' evaluation, the perceptibility curves were constructed, and the integral value under the perceptibility curves were compared between two intraoral sensors.

RESULTS

The results based on dose response function showed that the ProSensor was more sensitive than the Dixi sensor. Paired t-test showed that the minimal perceptible low-contrast details were significantly higher for the ProSensor than for the Dixi sensor (p < 0.001). The integrals below the two perceptibility curves were 33.4 and 69.2 for the Dixi and ProSensor, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Applying the new ProSensor may be beneficial to patients owing to its reduced radiation dose and increased perception for low-contrast details in dentistry.

Perceptibility curve test for digital radiographs before and after application of various image processing algorithms

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to compare digital radiographs before and after the application of various digital image enhancement methods by means of a perceptibility curve (PC) test.

METHODS

Radiographs of an aluminium test object containing holes with sizes ranging from 0.5 mm to 1.5 mm were exposed at nine time settings, ranging from 0.05 s to 3.2 s using Digora (Soredex, Helsinki, Finland) storage phosphor system. Original digital images were then enhanced and displayed in colour-coded, contrast- and brightness-enhanced, histogram-equalized and negative modes. Thus, five series of images were created. Eight observers independently evaluated all of the images in the same random order and under the same viewing conditions. The object detail with the lowest perceptible contrast was recorded for each observer and each image type. Modified PCs were plotted according to the mean observer data. Repeated-measures ANOVA was used to compare the PCs and the perceptible number of details in original and enhanced images for each exposure (P=0.05). The Bonferroni/Dunn test was used to identify statistical differences among the groups.

RESULTS

Histogram equalization showed the maximum number of perceptible details in both the lowest optimal exposure time and the widest exposure range (P<0.05). Significant differences were present in low and middle exposure ranges of images enhanced with various modalities (P<0.05), while no difference was obtained among the number of details for different enhancements in the high exposure range (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Histogram-equalization enhancement of Digora images demonstrated subjectively superior image quality, followed by contrast and brightness enhancement.