IAEA survey of dental cone beam computed tomography practice and related patient exposure in nine Central and Eastern European countries

Proposed Diagnostic Reference Levels in the Missouri/Southern Illinois Region Associated with Cone-beam Computed Tomography Use in Endodontics

INTRODUCTION

Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are intended to improve patient safety and ensure that patient ionizing radiation doses are as low as reasonably achievable. The purpose of this dosimetry study was to establish regional DRL levels for cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging for specialty endodontics. Another aim was to compare phantom-measured ionizing radiation dose index 1 (DI1) index doses to the manufacturer-provided dose area product (DAP) radiation output values for each of the CBCT machines studied, to ascertain their degree of correlation. DAP refers to the dose area product, a measure of radiation dose monitoring which represents the dose within the beam times the area within the beam at that position.

METHODS

A thimble ionization chamber and polymethyl methacrylate phantom were used to obtain DI1 values using the SEDENTEXTCT method from 21 different CBCT units. DRLs were calculated based on the 75th percentile (third quartile) of the median output values.

RESULTS

The proposed DRL from the CBCT units surveyed has a DAP value of 838 mGy cm2 and a DI1 value of 3.924 mGy. DAP versus DI1 values of 500.6 mGy cm2 versus 2.006 mGy, and 838 mGy cm2 versus 3.906 mGy represented the third quartile of the median values for the 4-cm × 4-cm and 5-cm × 5-cm field of views (FOVs), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The DI1 and DAP values strongly correlated when 3 outlier CBCT machines (J Morita Veraview X800) using a novel 360° (full rotation) acquisition mode were excluded. The importance of selectable exposure parameters as directly related to ionizing radiation output is illustrated among the CBCT units surveyed. Although the actual FOV that is selected is ultimately dictated by the specific clinical requirements, a 4-cm × 4-cm FOV is recommended for specialist endodontics practice, whenever clinically practical, based on the decreased ionizing radiation output, as compared to that from a 5-cm × 5-cm FOV.

Accuracy of Intra-Oral Radiography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Buccal Bone Loss

BACKGROUND

The use of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in dentistry started in the maxillofacial field, where it was used for complex and comprehensive treatment planning. Due to the use of reduced radiation dose compared to a computed tomography (CT) scan, CBCT has become a frequently used diagnostic tool in dental practice. However, published data on the accuracy of CBCT in the diagnosis of buccal bone level is lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of intra-oral radiography (IOR) and CBCT in the diagnosis of the extent of buccal bone loss.

METHODS

A dry skull was used to create a buccal bone defect at the most coronal level of a first premolar; the defect was enlarged apically in steps of 1 mm. After each step, IOR and CBCT were taken. Based on the CBCT data, two observers jointly selected three axial slices at different levels of the buccal bone, as well as one transverse slice. Six dentists participated in the radiographic observations. First, all observers received the 10 intra-oral radiographs, and each observer was asked to rank the intra-oral radiographs on the extent of the buccal bone defect. Afterwards, the procedure was repeated with the CBCT scans based on a combination of axial and transverse information. For the second part of the study, each observer was asked to evaluate the axial and transverse CBCT slices on the presence or absence of a buccal bone defect.

RESULTS

The percentage of buccal bone defect progression rankings that were within 1 of the true rank was 32% for IOR and 42% for CBCT. On average, kappa values increased by 0.384 for CBCT compared to intra-oral radiography. The overall sensitivity and specificity of CBCT in the diagnosis of the presence or absence of a buccal bone defect was 0.89 and 0.85, respectively. The average area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating curve (ROC) was 0.892 for all observers.

CONCLUSION

When CBCT images are available for justified indications, other than bone level assessment, such 3D images are more accurate and thus preferred to 2D images to assess periodontal buccal bone. For other clinical applications, intra-oral radiography remains the standard method for radiographic evaluation.

Minimum size and positioning of imaging field for CBCT-scans of impacted lower third molars: a retrospective study

Background

Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) is widely used for preoperative 3D imaging of lower third molars. Hence, for this imaging indication, the present study aimed to define the minimum field-of-view (FOV) size and its optimum placement, to decrease radiation exposure, and highlight the need of computer-assisted FOV centering technique for dental CBCT devices. To facilitate proper placement of image field, lower second molar was chosen as reference.

Methods

The retrospective study included 50 CBCT-scans of 46 patients with mean age of 34 years. Based on the lower second molar, a three-dimensional coordinate was formed and the location of mandibular canal (MC) and the dimensions and locations of the lower third molars, and possible associated pathological findings were assessed. Accordingly, the FOV size and position for third-molar imaging were optimized, while ensuring encompassment of all relevant structures.

Results

The minimum cylindrical volume, covering lower third molars and MC, was 32.1 (diameter) × 31.6 (height) mm, placed in relation to the second molar crown, top 2.2 mm above cusp tips, anterior edge 6.7 mm in the front of the most distal point of the crown, and lingual edge 7.9 mm on the medial side of the lingual wall.

Conclusions

The optimized FOV for lower third molars was smaller than common standard small FOVs. We recommend using FOV volume 3.5∅ × 3.5 cm for third molars without associated pathology. Accurate FOV protocols are essential for development of new CBCT-devices with computer-assisted and indication-specific FOV placement.

Dental cone beam CT: An updated review

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a diverse 3D x-ray imaging technique that has gained significant popularity in dental radiology in the last two decades. CBCT overcomes the limitations of traditional two-dimensional dental imaging and enables accurate depiction of multiplanar details of maxillofacial bony structures and surrounding soft tissues. In this review article, we provide an updated status on dental CBCT imaging and summarise the technical features of currently used CBCT scanner models, extending to recent developments in scanner technology, clinical aspects, and regulatory perspectives on dose optimisation, dosimetry, and diagnostic reference levels. We also consider the outlook of potential techniques along with issues that should be resolved in providing clinically more effective CBCT examinations that are optimised for the benefit of the patient.