Analysis of the deterioration of photostimulable phosphor plates

Reduction of scratch or dirt artifacts on intraoral radiographs using dual imaging plates in image processing

OBJECTIVES

Artifacts including scratches and dirt artifacts on the digital intraoral radiographs finally contribute to making inaccurate diagnoses. The aim of this study was to reduce the incidence of artifacts using dual imaging plates (DIPs) in imaging processing.

METHODS

Conventional X-rays were taken of a porcine mandible embedded in acrylic resin using a DIP which consists of a front IP (FIP) and a back IP (BIP) with some scratches and dirt. The two images of the FIP and BIP were then synthesized and averaged to obtain a conventional DIP image. The following image processing method was used to make a DIP with artifact reduction (DIP+AR) image. A subtraction image of the FIP and BIP was constructed and the standard deviation (SD) was calculated. If the pixel value was over 3SD on the subtraction images, the pixel value of the DIP was swapped with the value on the opposite side of the non-artifact pixel. The conventional and DIP+AR images were also subjectively evaluated.

RESULTS

Image processing to create a DIP+AR image was able to reduce the number of artifacts. Medians of number of artifacts evaluated were 2.00 [interquartile range (IQR), 2.50] in DIP images and 0.67 (IQR, 1.29) in DIP+AR images, indicating a significant reduction of number of artifacts in DIP+AR images.

CONCLUSIONS

DIP+AR image processing can reduce the incidence of artifacts caused by scratches and dirt, and could extend the lifespan of the IP and contribute accurate diagnosis in oral radiology.

Influence of extensive use of a photostimulable phosphor receptor on the diagnosis of proximal carious lesions: An in vitro study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the extensive use of a photostimulable phosphor (PSP) receptor on the diagnosis of proximal carious lesions.

STUDY DESIGN

Forty posterior teeth were paired and mounted in 20 phantoms. Using a PSP receptor of the Express intraoral system, 1 radiograph of each phantom was acquired, totaling 20 radiographs (group 1). After 400 acquisitions, another radiograph of each phantom was obtained, totaling 20 new radiographs (group 2). This procedure was also done after 800 (group 3), 1,200 (group 4), and 1,600 (group 5) acquisitions, resulting in 100 radiographs. Another 40 radiographs (20 phantoms × 2 groups) were obtained with a second PSP sensor to evaluate the diagnostic replicability of the receptors. All 140 radiographs were assessed independently by 5 examiners for the presence of proximal caries. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated and compared among the groups by analysis of variance. The Student t test evaluated the diagnostic replicability of the receptors. The significance level was set at 5% (P < .05).

RESULTS

The diagnostic outcomes for proximal caries did not differ among the groups (P ≥ .37). The diagnostic values did not differ among the radiographs acquired with the 2 PSP receptors (P ≥ .75).

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of proximal carious lesions was not affected by extensive use of the PSP receptor.