A rationale for tRNA modification circuits in the anticodon loop

Molecular basis of A. thaliana KEOPS complex in biosynthesizing tRNA t6A

In archaea and eukaryotes, the evolutionarily conserved KEOPS is composed of four core subunits-Kae1, Bud32, Cgi121 and Pcc1, and a fifth Gon7/Pcc2 that is found in fungi and metazoa. KEOPS cooperates with Sua5/YRDC to catalyze the biosynthesis of tRNA N6-threonylcarbamoyladenosine (t6A), an essential modification needed for fitness of cellular organisms. Biochemical and structural characterizations of KEOPSs from archaea, yeast and humans have determined a t6A-catalytic role for Kae1 and auxiliary roles for other subunits. However, the precise molecular workings of KEOPSs still remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated the biochemical functions of A. thaliana KEOPS and determined a cryo-EM structure of A. thaliana KEOPS dimer. We show that A. thaliana KEOPS is composed of KAE1, BUD32, CGI121 and PCC1, which adopts a conserved overall arrangement. PCC1 dimerization leads to a KEOPS dimer that is needed for an active t6A-catalytic KEOPS-tRNA assembly. BUD32 participates in direct binding of tRNA to KEOPS and modulates the t6A-catalytic activity of KEOPS via its C-terminal tail and ATP to ADP hydrolysis. CGI121 promotes the binding of tRNA to KEOPS and potentiates the t6A-catalytic activity of KEOPS. These data and findings provide insights into mechanistic understanding of KEOPS machineries.

Beyond the Anticodon: tRNA Core Modifications and Their Impact on Structure, Translation and Stress Adaptation

Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) are heavily decorated with post-transcriptional chemical modifications. Approximately 100 different modifications have been identified in tRNAs, and each tRNA typically contains 5-15 modifications that are incorporated at specific sites along the tRNA sequence. These modifications may be classified into two groups according to their position in the three-dimensional tRNA structure, i.e., modifications in the tRNA core and modifications in the anticodon-loop (ACL) region. Since many modified nucleotides in the tRNA core are involved in the formation of tertiary interactions implicated in tRNA folding, these modifications are key to tRNA stability and resistance to RNA decay pathways. In comparison to the extensively studied ACL modifications, tRNA core modifications have generally received less attention, although they have been shown to play important roles beyond tRNA stability. Here, we review and place in perspective selected data on tRNA core modifications. We present their impact on tRNA structure and stability and report how these changes manifest themselves at the functional level in translation, fitness and stress adaptation.

Anticodon stem-loop tRNA modifications influence codon decoding and frame maintenance during translation

RNAs are central to protein synthesis, with ribosomal RNA, transfer RNAs and messenger RNAs comprising the core components of the translation machinery. In addition to the four canonical bases (uracil, cytosine, adenine, and guanine) these RNAs contain an array of enzymatically incorporated chemical modifications. Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) are responsible for ferrying amino acids to the ribosome, and are among the most abundant and highly modified RNAs in the cell across all domains of life. On average, tRNA molecules contain 13 post-transcriptionally modified nucleosides that stabilize their structure and enhance function. There is an extensive chemical diversity of tRNA modifications, with over 90 distinct varieties of modifications reported within tRNA sequences. Some modifications are crucial for tRNAs to adopt their L-shaped tertiary structure, while others promote tRNA interactions with components of the protein synthesis machinery. In particular, modifications in the anticodon stem-loop (ASL), located near the site of tRNA:mRNA interaction, can play key roles in ensuring protein homeostasis and accurate translation. There is an abundance of evidence indicating the importance of ASL modifications for cellular health, and in vitro biochemical and biophysical studies suggest that individual ASL modifications can differentially influence discrete steps in the translation pathway. This review examines the molecular level consequences of tRNA ASL modifications in mRNA codon recognition and reading frame maintenance to ensure the rapid and accurate translation of proteins.

Advances in the Structural and Functional Understanding of m1A RNA Modification

ConspectusRNA modification is a co- or post-transcriptional process by which specific nucleotides are chemically altered by enzymes after their initial incorporation into the RNA chain, expanding the chemical and functional diversity of RNAs. Our understanding of RNA modifications has changed dramatically in recent years. In the past decade, RNA methyltransferases (MTases) have been highlighted in numerous clinical studies and disease models, modifications have been found to be dynamically regulated by demodification enzymes, and significant technological advances have been made in the fields of RNA sequencing, mass spectrometry, and structural biology. Among RNAs, transfer RNAs (tRNAs) exhibit the greatest diversity and density of post-transcriptional modifications, which allow for potential cross-talks and regulation during their incorporation. N1-methyladenosine (m1A) modification is found in tRNAs at positions 9, 14, 16, 22, 57, and 58, depending on the tRNA and organism.Our laboratory has used and developed a large panel of tools to decipher the different mechanisms used by m1A tRNA MTases to recognize and methylate tRNA. We have solved the structures of TrmI from Thermus thermophilus (m1A58), TrmK from Bacillus subtilis (m1A22), and human TRMT10C (m1A9). These MTases do not share the same structure or organization to recognize tRNAs, but they all modify an adenosine, forming a non-Watson-Crick (WC) interaction. For TrmK, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) chemical shift mapping of the binding interface between TrmK and tRNASer was invaluable to build a TrmK/tRNA model, where both domains of TrmK participate in the binding of a full-length L-shaped tRNA and where the non-WC purine 13-A22 base pair positions the A22 N1-atom close to the methyl of the S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAM) TrmK cofactor. For TRMT10C, cryoEM structures showed the MTase poised to N1-methylate A9 or G9 in tRNA and revealed different steps of tRNA maturation, where TRMT10C acts as a tRNA binding platform for sequential docking of each maturation enzyme. This work confers a role for TRMT10C in tRNA quality control and provides a framework to understand the link between mitochondrial tRNA maturation dysfunction and diseases.Methods to directly detect the incorporation of modifications during tRNA biosynthesis are rare and do not provide easy access to the temporality of their introduction. To this end, we have introduced time-resolved NMR to monitor tRNA maturation in the cellular environment. Combined with genetic and biochemical approaches involving the synthesis of specifically modified tRNAs, our methodology revealed that some modifications are incorporated in a defined sequential order, controlled by cross-talks between modification events. In particular, a strong modification circuit, namely Ψ55 → m5U54 → m1A58, controls the modification process in the T-arm of yeast elongator tRNAs. Conversely, we showed that m1A58 is efficiently introduced on unmodified initiator tRNAiMet without the need of any prior modification. Two distinct pathways are therefore followed for m1A58 incorporation in elongator and initiator tRNAs.We are undoubtedly entering an exciting period for the elucidation of the functions of RNA modifications and the intricate mechanisms by which modification enzymes identify and alter their RNA substrates. These are promising directions for the field of epitranscriptomics.

Diversity in Biological Function and Mechanism of the tRNA Methyltransferase Trm10

Transfer ribonucleic acid (tRNA) is the most highly modified RNA species in the cell, and loss of tRNA modifications can lead to growth defects in yeast as well as metabolic, neurological, and mitochondrial disorders in humans. Significant progress has been made toward identifying the enzymes that are responsible for installing diverse modifications in tRNA, revealing a landscape of fascinating biological and mechanistic diversity that remains to be fully explored. Most early discoveries of tRNA modification enzymes were in model systems, where many enzymes were not strictly required for viability, an observation somewhat at odds with the extreme conservation of many of the same enzymes throughout multiple domains of life. Moreover, many tRNA modification enzymes act on more than one type of tRNA substrate, which is not necessarily surprising given the similar overall secondary and tertiary structures of tRNA, yet biochemical characterization has revealed interesting patterns of substrate specificity that can be challenging to rationalize on a molecular level. Questions about how many enzymes efficiently select a precise set of target tRNAs from among a structurally similar pool of molecules persist.The tRNA methyltransferase Trm10 provides an exciting paradigm to study the biological and mechanistic questions surrounding tRNA modifications. Even though the enzyme was originally characterized in Saccharomyces cerevisiae where its deletion causes no detectable phenotype under standard lab conditions, several more recently identified phenotypes provide insight into the requirement for this modification in the overall quality control of the tRNA pool. Studies of Trm10 in yeast also revealed another characteristic feature that has turned out to be a conserved feature of enzymes throughout the Trm10 family tree. We were initially surprised to see that purified S. cerevisiae Trm10 was capable of modifying tRNA substrates that were not detectably modified by the enzyme in vivo in yeast. This pattern has continued to emerge as we and others have studied Trm10 orthologs from Archaea and Eukarya, with enzymes exhibiting in vitro substrate specificities that can differ significantly from in vivo patterns of modification. While this feature complicates efforts to predict substrate specificities of Trm10 enzymes in the absence of appropriate genetic systems, it also provides an exciting opportunity for studying how enzyme activities can be regulated to achieve dynamic patterns of biological tRNA modification, which have been shown to be increasingly important for stress responses and human disease. Finally, the intriguing diversity in target nucleotide modification that has been revealed among Trm10 orthologs is distinctive among known tRNA modifying enzymes and necessitates unusual and likely novel catalytic strategies for methylation that are being revealed by biochemical and structural studies directed toward various family members. These efforts will no doubt yield more surprising discoveries in terms of tRNA modification enzymology.

tRNA m1G9 modification depends on substrate-specific RNA conformational changes induced by the methyltransferase Trm10

The methyltransferase Trm10 modifies a subset of tRNAs on the base N1 position of the ninth nucleotide in the tRNA core. Trm10 is conserved throughout Eukarya and Archaea, and mutations in the human gene (TRMT10A) have been linked to neurological disorders such as microcephaly and intellectual disability, as well as defects in glucose metabolism. Of the 26 tRNAs in yeast with guanosine at position 9, only 13 are substrates for Trm10. However, no common sequence or other posttranscriptional modifications have been identified among these substrates, suggesting the presence of some other tRNA feature(s) that allow Trm10 to distinguish substrate from nonsubstrate tRNAs. Here, we show that substrate recognition by Saccharomyces cerevisiae Trm10 is dependent on both intrinsic tRNA flexibility and the ability of the enzyme to induce specific tRNA conformational changes upon binding. Using the sensitive RNA structure-probing method SHAPE, conformational changes upon binding to Trm10 in tRNA substrates, but not nonsubstrates, were identified and mapped onto a model of Trm10-bound tRNA. These changes may play an important role in substrate recognition by allowing Trm10 to gain access to the target nucleotide. Our results highlight a novel mechanism of substrate recognition by a conserved tRNA modifying enzyme. Further, these studies reveal a strategy for substrate recognition that may be broadly employed by tRNA-modifying enzymes which must distinguish between structurally similar tRNA species.

Different modification pathways for m1A58 incorporation in yeast elongator and initiator tRNAs

As essential components of the protein synthesis machinery, tRNAs undergo a tightly controlled biogenesis process, which include the incorporation of numerous posttranscriptional modifications. Defects in these tRNA maturation steps may lead to the degradation of hypomodified tRNAs by the rapid tRNA decay (RTD) and nuclear surveillance pathways. We previously identified m1A58 as a late modification introduced after modifications Ψ55 and T54 in yeast elongator tRNAPhe. However, previous reports suggested that m1A58 is introduced early during the tRNA modification process, in particular on primary transcripts of initiator tRNAiMet, which prevents its degradation by RNA decay pathways. Here, aiming to reconcile this apparent inconsistency on the temporality of m1A58 incorporation, we examined its introduction into yeast elongator and initiator tRNAs. We used specifically modified tRNAs to report on the molecular aspects controlling the Ψ55 → T54 → m1A58 modification circuit in elongator tRNAs. We also show that m1A58 is efficiently introduced on unmodified tRNAiMet, and does not depend on prior modifications. Finally, we show that m1A58 has major effects on the structural properties of initiator tRNAiMet, so that the tRNA elbow structure is only properly assembled when this modification is present. This observation provides a structural explanation for the degradation of hypomodified tRNAiMet lacking m1A58 by the nuclear surveillance and RTD pathways.

tRNA m1G9 modification depends on substrate-specific RNA conformational changes induced by the methyltransferase Trm10

The methyltransferase Trm10 modifies a subset of tRNAs on the base N1 position of the 9th nucleotide in the tRNA core. Trm10 is conserved throughout Eukarya and Archaea, and mutations in the human gene (TRMT10A) have been linked to neurological disorders such as microcephaly and intellectual disability, as well as defects in glucose metabolism. Of the 26 tRNAs in yeast with guanosine at position 9, only 14 are substrates for Trm10. However, no common sequence or other posttranscriptional modifications have been identified among these substrates, suggesting the presence of some other tRNA feature(s) which allow Trm10 to distinguish substrate from nonsubstrate tRNAs. Here, we show that substrate recognition by Saccharomyces cerevisiae Trm10 is dependent on both intrinsic tRNA flexibility and the ability of the enzyme to induce specific tRNA conformational changes upon binding. Using the sensitive RNA structure-probing method SHAPE, conformational changes upon binding to Trm10 in tRNA substrates, but not nonsubstrates, were identified and mapped onto a model of Trm10-bound tRNA. These changes may play an important role in substrate recognition by allowing Trm10 to gain access to the target nucleotide. Our results highlight a novel mechanism of substrate recognition by a conserved tRNA modifying enzyme. Further, these studies reveal a strategy for substrate recognition that may be broadly employed by tRNA-modifying enzymes which must distinguish between structurally similar tRNA species.

Queuosine-tRNA promotes sex-dependent learning and memory formation by maintaining codon-biased translation elongation speed

Queuosine (Q) is a modified nucleoside at the wobble position of specific tRNAs. In mammals, queuosinylation is facilitated by queuine uptake from the gut microbiota and is introduced into tRNA by the QTRT1-QTRT2 enzyme complex. By establishing a Qtrt1 knockout mouse model, we discovered that the loss of Q-tRNA leads to learning and memory deficits. Ribo-Seq analysis in the hippocampus of Qtrt1-deficient mice revealed not only stalling of ribosomes on Q-decoded codons, but also a global imbalance in translation elongation speed between codons that engage in weak and strong interactions with their cognate anticodons. While Q-dependent molecular and behavioral phenotypes were identified in both sexes, female mice were affected more severely than males. Proteomics analysis confirmed deregulation of synaptogenesis and neuronal morphology. Together, our findings provide a link between tRNA modification and brain functions and reveal an unexpected role of protein synthesis in sex-dependent cognitive performance.

Mitochondrial RNA m3C methyltransferase METTL8 relies on an isoform-specific N-terminal extension and modifies multiple heterogenous tRNAs

Methyltransferase-like 8 (METTL8) encodes a mitochondria-localized METTL8-Iso1 and a nucleolus-distributed METTL8-Iso4 isoform, which differ only in their N-terminal extension (N-extension), by mRNA alternative splicing. METTL8-Iso1 generates 3-methylcytidine at position 32 (m3C32) of mitochondrial tRNAThr and tRNASer(UCN). Whether METTL8-Iso4 is an active m3C32 methyltransferase and the role of the N-extension in mitochondrial tRNA m3C32 formation remain unclear. Here, we revealed that METTL8-Iso4 was inactive in m3C32 generation due to the lack of N-extension, which contains several absolutely conserved modification-critical residues; the counterparts were likewise essential in cytoplasmic m3C32 biogenesis by methyltransferase-like 2A (METTL2A) or budding yeasts tRNA N3-methylcytidine methyltransferase (Trm140), in vitro and in vivo. Cross-compartment/species tRNA modification assays unexpectedly found that METTL8-Iso1 efficiently introduced m3C32 to several cytoplasmic or even bacterial tRNAs in vitro. m3C32 did not influence tRNAThrN6-threonylcarbamoyladenosine (t6A) modification or aminoacylation. In addition to its interaction with mitochondrial seryl-tRNA synthetase (SARS2), we further discovered an interaction between mitochondrial threonyl-tRNA synthetase (TARS2) and METTL8-Iso1. METTL8-Iso1 substantially stimulated the aminoacylation activities of SARS2 and TARS2 in vitro, suggesting a functional connection between mitochondrial tRNA modification and charging. Altogether, our results deepen the mechanistic insights into mitochondrial m3C32 biogenesis and provide a valuable route to prepare cytoplasmic/bacterial tRNAs with only a m3C32 moiety, aiding in future efforts to investigate its effects on tRNA structure and function.

The diverse structural modes of tRNA binding and recognition

tRNAs are short noncoding RNAs responsible for decoding mRNA codon triplets, delivering correct amino acids to the ribosome, and mediating polypeptide chain formation. Due to their key roles during translation, tRNAs have a highly conserved shape and large sets of tRNAs are present in all living organisms. Regardless of sequence variability, all tRNAs fold into a relatively rigid three-dimensional L-shaped structure. The conserved tertiary organization of canonical tRNA arises through the formation of two orthogonal helices, consisting of the acceptor and anticodon domains. Both elements fold independently to stabilize the overall structure of tRNAs through intramolecular interactions between the D- and T-arm. During tRNA maturation, different modifying enzymes posttranscriptionally attach chemical groups to specific nucleotides, which not only affect translation elongation rates but also restrict local folding processes and confer local flexibility when required. The characteristic structural features of tRNAs are also employed by various maturation factors and modification enzymes to assure the selection, recognition, and positioning of specific sites within the substrate tRNAs. The cellular functional repertoire of tRNAs continues to extend well beyond their role in translation, partly, due to the expanding pool of tRNA-derived fragments. Here, we aim to summarize the most recent developments in the field to understand how three-dimensional structure affects the canonical and noncanonical functions of tRNA.

Coordination of RNA modifications in the brain and beyond

Gene expression regulation is a critical process throughout the body, especially in the nervous system. One mechanism by which biological systems regulate gene expression is via enzyme-mediated RNA modifications, also known as epitranscriptomic regulation. RNA modifications, which have been found on nearly all RNA species across all domains of life, are chemically diverse covalent modifications of RNA nucleotides and represent a robust and rapid mechanism for the regulation of gene expression. Although numerous studies have been conducted regarding the impact that single modifications in single RNA molecules have on gene expression, emerging evidence highlights potential crosstalk between and coordination of modifications across RNA species. These potential coordination axes of RNA modifications have emerged as a new direction in the field of epitranscriptomic research. In this review, we will highlight several examples of gene regulation via RNA modification in the nervous system, followed by a summary of the current state of the field of RNA modification coordination axes. In doing so, we aim to inspire the field to gain a deeper understanding of the roles of RNA modifications and coordination of these modifications in the nervous system.

The life and times of a tRNA

The study of eukaryotic tRNA processing has given rise to an explosion of new information and insights in the last several years. We now have unprecedented knowledge of each step in the tRNA processing pathway, revealing unexpected twists in biochemical pathways, multiple new connections with regulatory pathways, and numerous biological effects of defects in processing steps that have profound consequences throughout eukaryotes, leading to growth phenotypes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and to neurological and other disorders in humans. This review highlights seminal new results within the pathways that comprise the life of a tRNA, from its birth after transcription until its death by decay. We focus on new findings and revelations in each step of the pathway including the end-processing and splicing steps, many of the numerous modifications throughout the main body and anticodon loop of tRNA that are so crucial for tRNA function, the intricate tRNA trafficking pathways, and the quality control decay pathways, as well as the biogenesis and biology of tRNA-derived fragments. We also describe the many interactions of these pathways with signaling and other pathways in the cell.

Fluorescent labeling of tRNA for rapid kinetic interaction studies with tRNA-binding proteins

Transfer RNA (tRNA) plays a critical role during translation and interacts with numerous proteins during its biogenesis, functional cycle and degradation. In particular, tRNA is extensively post-transcriptionally modified by various tRNA modifying enzymes which each target a specific nucleotide at different positions within tRNAs to introduce different chemical modifications. Fluorescent assays can be used to study the interaction between a protein and tRNA. Moreover, rapid mixing fluorescence stopped-flow assays provide insights into the kinetics of the tRNA-protein interaction in order to elucidate the tRNA binding mechanism for the given protein. A prerequisite for these studies is a fluorescently labeled molecule, such as fluorescent tRNA, wherein a change in fluorescence occurs upon protein binding. In this chapter, we discuss the utilization of tRNA modifications in order to introduce fluorophores at particular positions within tRNAs. Particularly, we focus on in vitro thiolation of a uridine at position 8 within tRNAs using the tRNA modification enzyme ThiI, followed by labeling of the thiol group with fluorescein. As such, this fluorescently labeled tRNA is primarily unmodified, with the exception of the thiolation modification to which the fluorophore is attached, and can be used as a substrate to study the binding of different tRNA-interacting factors. Herein, we discuss the example of studying the tRNA binding mechanism of the tRNA modifying enzymes TrmB and DusA using internally fluorescein-labeled tRNA.

The importance of pseudouridylation: human disorders related to the fifth nucleoside

Pseudouridylation is one of the most abundant RNA modifications in eukaryotes, making pseudouridine known as the "fifth nucleoside." This highly conserved alteration affects all non-coding and coding RNA types. Its role and importance have been increasingly widely researched, especially considering that its absence or damage leads to serious hereditary diseases. Here, we summarize the human genetic disorders described to date that are related to the participants of the pseudouridylation process.

Functional analysis of tRNA modification enzymes using mutational profiling

Transfer RNA (tRNA) delivers amino acids to the ribosome and functions as an essential adapter molecule for decoding codons on the messenger RNA (mRNA) during protein synthesis. Before attaining their proper activity, tRNAs undergo multiple post-transcriptional modifications with highly diversified roles such as stabilization of the tRNA structure, recognition of aminoacyl tRNA synthetases, precise codon-anticodon recognition, support of viral replication and onset of immune responses. The synthesis of the majority of modified nucleosides is catalyzed by a site-specific tRNA modification enzyme. This chapter provides a detailed protocol for using mutational profiling to analyze the enzymatic function of a tRNA methyltransferase in a high-throughput manner. In a previous study, we took tRNA m1A22 methyltransferase TrmK from Geobacillus stearothermophilus as a model tRNA methyltransferase and applied this protocol to gain mechanistic insights into how TrmK recognizes the substrate tRNAs. In theory, this protocol can be used unaltered for studying enzymes that catalyze modifications at the Watson-Crick face such as 1-methyladenosine (m1A), 3-methylcytosine (m3C), 3-methyluridine (m3U), 1-methylguanosine (m1G), and N2,N2-dimethylguanosine (m22G).

The Transcriptome-Wide Mapping of 2-Methylthio-N6-isopentenyladenosine at Single-Base Resolution

Hundreds of modified bases have been identified and enzymatically modified to transfer RNAs (tRNAs) to regulate RNA function in various organisms. 2-Methylthio-N⁶-isopentenyladenosine (ms²i⁶A), a hypermodified base found at tRNA position 37, exists in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. ms²i⁶A is traditionally identified by separating and digesting each tRNA from total RNA using RNA mass spectrometry. A transcriptome-wide and single-base resolution method that enables absolute mapping of ms²i⁶A along with analysis of its distribution in different RNAs is lacking. Here, through chemoselective methylthio group bioconjugation, we introduce a new approach (redox activated chemical tagging sequencing, ReACT-seq) to detect ms²i⁶A transcriptome-wide at single-base resolution. Using the chemoselectivity between the methylthio group and oxaziridine group, ms²i⁶A is bio-orthogonally tagged with an azide group without interference of canonical nucleotides, advancing enrichment of methylthio group modified RNAs prior to sequencing. ReACT-seq was demonstrated on nine known tRNAs and proved to be highly accurate, and the reverse transcription stop (RT-stop) character enables ReACT-seq detection at single-base resolution. In addition, ReACT-seq identified that the modification of ms²i⁶A is conservative and may not exist in other RNAs.

Identification of a novel 5-aminomethyl-2-thiouridine methyltransferase in tRNA modification

The uridine at the 34th position of tRNA, which is able to base pair with the 3'-end codon on mRNA, is usually modified to influence many aspects of decoding properties during translation. Derivatives of 5-methyluridine (xm5U), which include methylaminomethyl (mnm-) or carboxymethylaminomethyl (cmnm-) groups at C5 of uracil base, are widely conserved at the 34th position of many prokaryotic tRNAs. In Gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli, a bifunctional MnmC is involved in the last two reactions of the biosynthesis of mnm5(s2)U, in which the enzyme first converts cmnm5(s2)U to 5-aminomethyl-(2-thio)uridine (nm5(s2)U) and subsequently installs the methyl group to complete the formation of mnm5(s2)U. Although mnm5s2U has been identified in tRNAs of Gram-positive bacteria and plants as well, their genomes do not contain an mnmC ortholog and the gene(s) responsible for this modification is unknown. We discovered that MnmM, previously known as YtqB, is the methyltransferase that converts nm5s2U to mnm5s2U in Bacillus subtilis through comparative genomics, gene complementation experiments, and in vitro assays. Furthermore, we determined X-ray crystal structures of MnmM complexed with anticodon stem loop of tRNAGln. The structures provide the molecular basis underlying the importance of U33-nm5s2U34-U35 as the key determinant for the specificity of MnmM.

What connects splicing of transfer RNA precursor molecules with pontocerebellar hypoplasia?

Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) represent the most abundant class of RNA molecules in the cell and are key players during protein synthesis and cellular homeostasis. Aberrations in the extensive tRNA biogenesis pathways lead to severe neurological disorders in humans. Mutations in the tRNA splicing endonuclease (TSEN) and its associated RNA kinase cleavage factor polyribonucleotide kinase subunit 1 (CLP1) cause pontocerebellar hypoplasia (PCH), a heterogeneous group of neurodegenerative disorders, that manifest as underdevelopment of specific brain regions typically accompanied by microcephaly, profound motor impairments, and child mortality. Recently, we demonstrated that mutations leading to specific PCH subtypes destabilize TSEN in vitro and cause imbalances of immature to mature tRNA ratios in patient-derived cells. However, how tRNA processing defects translate to disease on a systems level has not been understood. Recent findings suggested that other cellular processes may be affected by mutations in TSEN/CLP1 and obscure the molecular mechanisms of PCH emergence. Here, we review PCH disease models linked to the TSEN/CLP1 machinery and discuss future directions to study neuropathogenesis.

tRNA Modifications and Modifying Enzymes in Disease, the Potential Therapeutic Targets

tRNA is one of the most conserved and abundant RNA species, which plays a key role during protein translation. tRNA molecules are post-transcriptionally modified by tRNA modifying enzymes. Since high-throughput sequencing technology has developed rapidly, tRNA modification types have been discovered in many research fields. In tRNA, numerous types of tRNA modifications and modifying enzymes have been implicated in biological functions and human diseases. In our review, we talk about the relevant biological functions of tRNA modifications, including tRNA stability, protein translation, cell cycle, oxidative stress, and immunity. We also explore how tRNA modifications contribute to the progression of human diseases. Based on previous studies, we discuss some emerging techniques for assessing tRNA modifications to aid in discovering different types of tRNA modifications.

Conservation and Diversification of tRNA t6A-Modifying Enzymes across the Three Domains of Life

The universal N⁶-threonylcarbamoyladenosine (t⁶A) modification occurs at position 37 of tRNAs that decipher codons starting with adenosine. Mechanistically, t⁶A stabilizes structural configurations of the anticodon stem loop, promotes anticodon–codon pairing and safeguards the translational fidelity. The biosynthesis of tRNA t⁶A is co-catalyzed by two universally conserved protein families of TsaC/Sua5 (COG0009) and TsaD/Kae1/Qri7 (COG0533). Enzymatically, TsaC/Sua5 protein utilizes the substrates of L-threonine, HCO₃⁻/CO₂ and ATP to synthesize an intermediate L-threonylcarbamoyladenylate, of which the threonylcarbamoyl-moiety is subsequently transferred onto the A37 of substrate tRNAs by the TsaD–TsaB –TsaE complex in bacteria or by the KEOPS complex in archaea and eukaryotic cytoplasm, whereas Qri7/OSGEPL1 protein functions on its own in mitochondria. Depletion of tRNA t⁶A interferes with protein homeostasis and gravely affects the life of unicellular organisms and the fitness of higher eukaryotes. Pathogenic mutations of YRDC, OSGEPL1 and KEOPS are implicated in a number of human mitochondrial and neurological diseases, including autosomal recessive Galloway–Mowat syndrome. The molecular mechanisms underscoring both the biosynthesis and cellular roles of tRNA t⁶A are presently not well elucidated. This review summarizes current mechanistic understandings of the catalysis, regulation and disease implications of tRNA t⁶A-biosynthetic machineries of three kingdoms of life, with a special focus on delineating the structure–function relationship from perspectives of conservation and diversity.

Modification mapping by nanopore sequencing

Next generation sequencing (NGS) has provided biologists with an unprecedented view into biological processes and their regulation over the past 2 decades, fueling a wave of development of high throughput methods based on short read DNA and RNA sequencing. For nucleic acid modifications, NGS has been coupled with immunoprecipitation, chemical treatment, enzymatic treatment, and/or the use of reverse transcriptase enzymes with fortuitous activities to enrich for and to identify covalent modifications of RNA and DNA. However, the majority of nucleic acid modifications lack commercial monoclonal antibodies, and mapping techniques that rely on chemical or enzymatic treatments to manipulate modification signatures add additional technical complexities to library preparation. Moreover, such approaches tend to be specific to a single class of RNA or DNA modification, and generate only indirect readouts of modification status. Third generation sequencing technologies such as the commercially available “long read” platforms from Pacific Biosciences and Oxford Nanopore Technologies are an attractive alternative for high throughput detection of nucleic acid modifications. While the former can indirectly sense modified nucleotides through changes in the kinetics of reverse transcription reactions, nanopore sequencing can in principle directly detect any nucleic acid modification that produces a signal distortion as the nucleic acid passes through a nanopore sensor embedded within a charged membrane. To date, more than a dozen endogenous DNA and RNA modifications have been interrogated by nanopore sequencing, as well as a number of synthetic nucleic acid modifications used in metabolic labeling, structure probing, and other emerging applications. This review is intended to introduce the reader to nanopore sequencing and key principles underlying its use in direct detection of nucleic acid modifications in unamplified DNA or RNA samples, and outline current approaches for detecting and quantifying nucleic acid modifications by nanopore sequencing. As this technology matures, we anticipate advances in both sequencing chemistry and analysis methods will lead to rapid improvements in the identification and quantification of these epigenetic marks.

Sequential action of a tRNA base editor in conversion of cytidine to pseudouridine

Post-transcriptional RNA editing modulates gene expression in a condition-dependent fashion. We recently discovered C-to-Ψ editing in Vibrio cholerae tRNA. Here, we characterize the biogenesis, regulation, and functions of this previously undescribed RNA editing process. We show that an enzyme, TrcP, mediates the editing of C-to-U followed by the conversion of U to Ψ, consecutively. AlphaFold-2 predicts that TrcP consists of two globular domains (cytidine deaminase and pseudouridylase) and a long helical domain. The latter domain tethers tRNA substrates during both the C-to-U editing and pseudouridylation, likely enabling a substrate channeling mechanism for efficient catalysis all the way to the terminal product. C-to-Ψ editing both requires and suppresses other modifications, creating an interdependent network of modifications in the tRNA anticodon loop that facilitates coupling of tRNA modification states to iron availability. Our findings provide mechanistic insights into an RNA editing process that likely promotes environmental adaptation.

tRNA methylation resolves codon usage bias at the limit of cell viability

Codon usage of each genome is closely correlated with the abundance of tRNA isoacceptors. How codon usage bias is resolved by tRNA post-transcriptional modifications is largely unknown. Here we demonstrate that the N¹-methylation of guanosine at position 37 (m¹G37) on the 3′-side of the anticodon, while not directly responsible for reading of codons, is a neutralizer that resolves differential decoding of proline codons. A genome-wide suppressor screen of a non-viable Escherichia coli strain, lacking m¹G37, identifies proS suppressor mutations, indicating a coupling of methylation with tRNA prolyl-aminoacylation that sets the limit of cell viability. Using these suppressors, where prolyl-aminoacylation is decoupled from tRNA methylation, we show that m¹G37 neutralizes differential translation of proline codons by the major isoacceptor. Lack of m¹G37 inactivates this neutralization and exposes the need for a minor isoacceptor for cell viability. This work has medical implications for bacterial species that exclusively use the major isoacceptor for survival.

Masuda et al. show that loss of m¹G37 from the 3′ side of the tRNA anticodon renders a modified wobble nucleotide of the anticodon insufficient to decode a set of rare codons, providing a functional underpinning for the “modification circuit” between position 37 and the wobble position of the tRNA anticodon.

Dihydrouridine in the Transcriptome: New Life for This Ancient RNA Chemical Modification

Until recently, post-transcriptional modifications of RNA were largely restricted to noncoding RNA species. However, this belief seems to have quickly dissipated with the growing number of new modifications found in mRNA that were originally thought to be primarily tRNA-specific, such as dihydrouridine. Recently, transcriptomic profiling, metabolic labeling, and proteomics have identified unexpected dihydrouridylation of mRNAs, greatly expanding the catalog of novel mRNA modifications. These data also implicated dihydrouridylation in meiotic chromosome segregation, protein translation rates, and cell proliferation. Dihydrouridylation of tRNAs and mRNAs are introduced by flavin-dependent dihydrouridine synthases. In this review, we will briefly outline the current knowledge on the distribution of dihydrouridines in the transcriptome, their chemical labeling, and highlight structural and mechanistic aspects regarding the dihydrouridine synthases enzyme family. A special emphasis on important research directions to be addressed will also be discussed. This new entry of dihydrouridine into mRNA modifications has definitely added a new layer of information that controls protein synthesis.

Transfer RNA processing - from a structural and disease perspective

Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) are highly structured non-coding RNAs which play key roles in translation and cellular homeostasis. tRNAs are initially transcribed as precursor molecules and mature by tightly controlled, multistep processes that involve the removal of flanking and intervening sequences, over 100 base modifications, addition of non-templated nucleotides and aminoacylation. These molecular events are intertwined with the nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of tRNAs to make them available at translating ribosomes. Defects in tRNA processing are linked to the development of neurodegenerative disorders. Here, we summarize structural aspects of tRNA processing steps with a special emphasis on intron-containing tRNA splicing involving tRNA splicing endonuclease and ligase. Their role in neurological pathologies will be discussed. Identification of novel RNA substrates of the tRNA splicing machinery has uncovered functions unrelated to tRNA processing. Future structural and biochemical studies will unravel their mechanistic underpinnings and deepen our understanding of neurological diseases.

Native RNA or cDNA Sequencing for Transcriptomic Analysis: A Case Study on Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Direct sequencing of single molecules through nanopores allows for accurate quantification and full-length characterization of native RNA or complementary DNA (cDNA) without amplification. Both nanopore-based native RNA and cDNA approaches involve complex transcriptome procedures at a lower cost. However, there are several differences between the two approaches. In this study, we perform matched native RNA sequencing and cDNA sequencing to enable relevant comparisons and evaluation. Using Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a eukaryotic model organism widely used in industrial biotechnology, two different growing conditions are considered for comparison, including the poly-A messenger RNA isolated from yeast cells grown in minimum media under respirofermentative conditions supplemented with glucose (glucose growth conditions) and from cells that had shifted to ethanol as a carbon source (ethanol growth conditions). Library preparation for direct RNA sequencing is shorter than that for direct cDNA sequencing. The sequence characteristics of the two methods were different, such as sequence yields, quality score of reads, read length distribution, and mapped on reference ability of reads. However, differential gene expression analyses derived from the two approaches are comparable. The unique feature of direct RNA sequencing is RNA modification; we found that the RNA modification at the 5' end of a transcript was underestimated due to the 3' bias behavior of the direct RNA sequencing. Our comprehensive evaluation from this work could help researchers make informed choices when selecting an appropriate long-read sequencing method for understanding gene functions, pathways, and detailed functional characterization.

Required Elements in tRNA for Methylation by the Eukaryotic tRNA (Guanine-N2-) Methyltransferase (Trm11-Trm112 Complex)

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Trm11 and Trm112 complex (Trm11-Trm112) methylates the 2-amino group of guanosine at position 10 in tRNA and forms N²-methylguanosine. To determine the elements required in tRNA for methylation by Trm11-Trm112, we prepared 60 tRNA transcript variants and tested them for methylation by Trm11-Trm112. The results show that the precursor tRNA is not a substrate for Trm11-Trm112. Furthermore, the CCA terminus is essential for methylation by Trm11-Trm112, and Trm11-Trm112 also only methylates tRNAs with a regular-size variable region. In addition, the G10-C25 base pair is required for methylation by Trm11-Trm112. The data also demonstrated that Trm11-Trm112 recognizes the anticodon-loop and that U38 in tRNA^Ala acts negatively in terms of methylation. Likewise, the U32-A38 base pair in tRNA^Cys negatively affects methylation. The only exception in our in vitro study was tRNA^Val_AAC1. Our experiments showed that the tRNA^Val_AAC1 transcript was slowly methylated by Trm11-Trm112. However, position 10 in this tRNA was reported to be unmodified G. We purified tRNA^Val_AAC1 from wild-type and trm11 gene deletion strains and confirmed that a portion of tRNA^Val_AAC1 is methylated by Trm11-Trm112 in S. cerevisiae. Thus, our study explains the m²G10 modification pattern of all S. cerevisiae class I tRNAs and elucidates the Trm11-Trm112 binding sites.

A versatile tRNA modification-sensitive northern blot method with enhanced performance

The 22 mitochondrial and ∼45 cytosolic tRNAs in human cells contain several dozen different post-transcriptional modified nucleotides such that each carries a unique constellation that complements its function. Many tRNA modifications are linked to altered gene expression, and deficiencies due to mutations in tRNA modification enzymes (TMEs) are responsible for numerous diseases. Easily accessible methods to detect tRNA hypomodifications can facilitate progress in advancing such molecular studies. Our laboratory developed a northern blot method that can quantify relative levels of base modifications on multiple specific tRNAs ∼10 yr ago, which has been used to characterize four different TME deficiencies and is likely further extendable. The assay method depends on differential annealing efficiency of a DNA-oligo probe to the modified versus unmodified tRNA. The signal of this probe is then normalized by a second probe elsewhere on the same tRNA. This positive hybridization in the absence of modification (PHAM) assay has proven useful for i⁶A37, t⁶A37, m³C32, and m^2,2G26 in multiple laboratories. Yet, over the years we have observed idiosyncratic inconsistency and variability in the assay. Here we document these for some tRNAs and probes and illustrate principles and practices for improved reliability and uniformity in performance. We provide an overview of the method and illustrate benefits of the improved conditions. This is followed by data that demonstrate quantitative validation of PHAM using a TME deletion control, and that nearby modifications can falsely alter the calculated apparent modification efficiency. Finally, we include a calculator tool for matching probe and hybridization conditions.

RNA modifications stabilize the tertiary structure of tRNAfMet by locally increasing conformational dynamics

A plethora of modified nucleotides extends the chemical and conformational space for natural occurring RNAs. tRNAs constitute the class of RNAs with the highest modification rate. The extensive modification modulates their overall stability, the fidelity and efficiency of translation. However, the impact of nucleotide modifications on the local structural dynamics is not well characterized. Here we show that the incorporation of the modified nucleotides in tRNAfMet from Escherichia coli leads to an increase in the local conformational dynamics, ultimately resulting in the stabilization of the overall tertiary structure. Through analysis of the local dynamics by NMR spectroscopic methods we find that, although the overall thermal stability of the tRNA is higher for the modified molecule, the conformational fluctuations on the local level are increased in comparison to an unmodified tRNA. In consequence, the melting of individual base pairs in the unmodified tRNA is determined by high entropic penalties compared to the modified. Further, we find that the modifications lead to a stabilization of long-range interactions harmonizing the stability of the tRNA's secondary and tertiary structure. Our results demonstrate that the increase in chemical space through introduction of modifications enables the population of otherwise inaccessible conformational substates.

The RNA methyltransferase METTL8 installs m3C32 in mitochondrial tRNAsThr/Ser(UCN) to optimise tRNA structure and mitochondrial translation

Modified nucleotides in tRNAs are important determinants of folding, structure and function. Here we identify METTL8 as a mitochondrial matrix protein and active RNA methyltransferase responsible for installing m3C32 in the human mitochondrial (mt-)tRNAThr and mt-tRNASer(UCN). METTL8 crosslinks to the anticodon stem loop (ASL) of many mt-tRNAs in cells, raising the question of how methylation target specificity is achieved. Dissection of mt-tRNA recognition elements revealed U34G35 and t6A37/(ms2)i6A37, present concomitantly only in the ASLs of the two substrate mt-tRNAs, as key determinants for METTL8-mediated methylation of C32. Several lines of evidence demonstrate the influence of U34, G35, and the m3C32 and t6A37/(ms2)i6A37 modifications in mt-tRNAThr/Ser(UCN) on the structure of these mt-tRNAs. Although mt-tRNAThr/Ser(UCN) lacking METTL8-mediated m3C32 are efficiently aminoacylated and associate with mitochondrial ribosomes, mitochondrial translation is mildly impaired by lack of METTL8. Together these results define the cellular targets of METTL8 and shed new light on the role of m3C32 within mt-tRNAs.

RNA nucleotide methylation: 2021 update

Among RNA modifications, transfer of methylgroups from the typical cofactor S-adenosyl-l-methionine by methyltransferases (MTases) to RNA is by far the most common reaction. Since our last review about a decade ago, the field has witnessed the re-emergence of mRNA methylation as an important mechanism in gene regulation. Attention has then spread to many other RNA species; all being included into the newly coined concept of the "epitranscriptome." The focus moved from prokaryotes and single cell eukaryotes as model organisms to higher eukaryotes, in particular to mammals. The perception of the field has dramatically changed over the past decade. A previous lack of phenotypes in knockouts in single cell organisms has been replaced by the apparition of MTases in numerous disease models and clinical investigations. Major driving forces of the field include methylation mapping techniques, as well as the characterization of the various MTases, termed "writers." The latter term has spilled over from DNA modification in the neighboring epigenetics field, along with the designations "readers," applied to mediators of biological effects upon specific binding to a methylated RNA. Furthermore "eraser" enzymes effect the newly discovered oxidative removal of methylgroups. A sense of reversibility and dynamics has replaced the older perception of RNA modification as a concrete-cast, irreversible part of RNA maturation. A related concept concerns incompletely methylated residues, which, through permutation of each site, lead to inhomogeneous populations of numerous modivariants. This review recapitulates the major developments of the past decade outlined above, and attempts a prediction of upcoming trends. This article is categorized under: RNA Processing > RNA Editing and Modification.

Position 34 of tRNA is a discriminative element for m5C38 modification by human DNMT2

Dnmt2, a member of the DNA methyltransferase superfamily, catalyzes the formation of 5-methylcytosine at position 38 in the anticodon loop of tRNAs. Dnmt2 regulates many cellular biological processes, especially the production of tRNA-derived fragments and intergenerational transmission of paternal metabolic disorders to offspring. Moreover, Dnmt2 is closely related to human cancers. The tRNA substrates of mammalian Dnmt2s are mainly detected using bisulfite sequencing; however, we lack supporting biochemical data concerning their substrate specificity or recognition mechanism. Here, we deciphered the tRNA substrates of human DNMT2 (hDNMT2) as tRNAAsp(GUC), tRNAGly(GCC) and tRNAVal(AAC). Intriguingly, for tRNAAsp(GUC) and tRNAGly(GCC), G34 is the discriminator element; whereas for tRNAVal(AAC), the inosine modification at position 34 (I34), which is formed by the ADAT2/3 complex, is the prerequisite for hDNMT2 recognition. We showed that the C32U33(G/I)34N35 (C/U)36A37C38 motif in the anticodon loop, U11:A24 in the D stem, and the correct size of the variable loop are required for Dnmt2 recognition of substrate tRNAs. Furthermore, mammalian Dnmt2s possess a conserved tRNA recognition mechanism.

tRNA modifications and their potential roles in pancreatic cancer

Since the breakthrough discovery of N6-methyladenosine (m⁶A), the field of RNA epitranscriptomics has attracted increasing interest in the biological sciences. Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) are extensively modified, and various modifications play a crucial role in the formation and stability of tRNA, which is universally required for accurate and efficient functioning of tRNA. Abnormal tRNA modification can lead to tRNA degradation or specific cleavage of tRNA into fragmented derivatives, thus affecting the translation process and frequently accompanying a variety of human diseases. Increasing evidence suggests that tRNA modification pathways are also misregulated in human cancers. In this review, we summarize tRNA modifications and their biological functions, describe the type and frequency of tRNA modification alterations in cancer, and highlight variations in tRNA-modifying enzymes and the multiple functions that they regulate in different types of cancers. Furthermore, the current implications and the potential role of tRNA modifications in the progression of pancreatic cancer are discussed. Collectively, this review describes recent advances in tRNA modification in cancers and its potential significance in pancreatic cancer. Further study of the mechanism of tRNA modifications in pancreatic cancer may provide possibilities for therapies targeting enzymes responsible for regulating tRNA modifications in pancreatic cancer.

Balancing of mitochondrial translation through METTL8-mediated m3C modification of mitochondrial tRNAs

Mitochondria contain a specific translation machinery for the synthesis of mitochondria-encoded respiratory chain components. Mitochondrial tRNAs (mt-tRNAs) are also generated from the mitochondrial DNA and, similar to their cytoplasmic counterparts, are post-transcriptionally modified. Here, we find that the RNA methyltransferase METTL8 is a mitochondrial protein that facilitates 3-methyl-cytidine (m³C) methylation at position C₃₂ of the mt-tRNA^Ser(UCN) and mt-tRNA^Thr. METTL8 knockout cells show a reduction in respiratory chain activity, whereas overexpression increases activity. In pancreatic cancer, METTL8 levels are high, which correlates with lower patient survival and an enhanced respiratory chain activity. Mitochondrial ribosome profiling uncovered mitoribosome stalling on mt-tRNA^Ser(UCN)- and mt-tRNA^Thr-dependent codons. Further analysis of the respiratory chain complexes using mass spectrometry revealed reduced incorporation of the mitochondrially encoded proteins ND6 and ND1 into complex I. The well-balanced translation of mt-tRNA^Ser(UCN)- and mt-tRNA^Thr-dependent codons through METTL8-mediated m³C₃₂ methylation might, therefore, facilitate the optimal composition and function of the mitochondrial respiratory chain.

Modifications of the human tRNA anticodon loop and their associations with genetic diseases

Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) harbor the most diverse posttranscriptional modifications. Among such modifications, those in the anticodon loop, either on nucleosides or base groups, compose over half of the identified posttranscriptional modifications. The derivatives of modified nucleotides and the crosstalk of different chemical modifications further add to the structural and functional complexity of tRNAs. These modifications play critical roles in maintaining anticodon loop conformation, wobble base pairing, efficient aminoacylation, and translation speed and fidelity as well as mediating various responses to different stress conditions. Posttranscriptional modifications of tRNA are catalyzed mainly by enzymes and/or cofactors encoded by nuclear genes, whose mutations are firmly connected with diverse human diseases involving genetic nervous system disorders and/or the onset of multisystem failure. In this review, we summarize recent studies about the mechanisms of tRNA modifications occurring at tRNA anticodon loops. In addition, the pathogenesis of related disease-causing mutations at these genes is briefly described.

New substrates and determinants for tRNA recognition of RNA methyltransferase DNMT2/TRDMT1

Methylation is a common post-transcriptional modification of tRNAs, particularly in the anticodon loop region. The cytosine 38 (C38) in tRNAs, such as tRNAAsp-GUC, tRNAGly-GCC, tRNAVal-AAC, and tRNAGlu-CUC, can be methylated by human DNMT2/TRDMT1 and some homologs found in bacteria, plants, and animals. However, the substrate properties and recognition mechanism of DNMT2/TRDMT1 remain to be explored. Here, taking into consideration common features of the four known substrate tRNAs, we investigated methylation activities of DNMT2/TRDMT1 on the tRNAGly-GCC truncation and point mutants, and conformational changes of mutants. The results demonstrated that human DNMT2/TRDMT1 preferred substrate tRNAGly-GCC in vitro. L-shaped conformation of classical tRNA could be favourable for DNMT2/TRDMT1 activity. The complete sequence and structure of tRNA were dispensable for DNMT2/TRDMT1 activity, whereas T-arm was indispensable to this activity. G19, U20, and A21 in D-loop were identified as the important bases for DNMT2/TRDMT1 activity, while G53, C56, A58, and C61 in T-loop were found as the critical bases. The conserved CUXXCAC sequence in the anticodon loop was confirmed to be the most critical determinant, and it could stabilize C38-flipping to promote C38 methylation. Based on these tRNA properties, new substrates, tRNAVal-CAC and tRNAGln-CUG, were discovered in vitro. Moreover, a single nucleotide substitute, U32C, could convert non-substrate tRNAAla-AGC into a substrate for DNMT2/TRDMT1. Altogether, our findings imply that DNMT2/TRDMT1 relies on a delicate network involving both the primary sequence and tertiary structure of tRNA for substrate recognition.

The structural and functional workings of KEOPS

KEOPS (Kinase, Endopeptidase and Other Proteins of Small size) is a five-subunit protein complex that is highly conserved in eukaryotes and archaea and is essential for the fitness of cells and for animal development. In humans, mutations in KEOPS genes underlie Galloway-Mowat syndrome, which manifests in severe microcephaly and renal dysfunction that lead to childhood death. The Kae1 subunit of KEOPS catalyzes the universal and essential tRNA modification N6-threonylcarbamoyl adenosine (t6A), while the auxiliary subunits Cgi121, the kinase/ATPase Bud32, Pcc1 and Gon7 play a supporting role. Kae1 orthologs are also present in bacteria and mitochondria but function in distinct complexes with proteins that are not related in structure or function to the auxiliary subunits of KEOPS. Over the past 15 years since its discovery, extensive study in the KEOPS field has provided many answers towards understanding the roles that KEOPS plays in cells and in human disease and how KEOPS carries out these functions. In this review, we provide an overview into recent advances in the study of KEOPS and illuminate exciting future directions.

The occurrence order and cross-talk of different tRNA modifications

Chemical modifications expand the composition of RNA molecules from four standard nucleosides to over 160 modified nucleosides, which greatly increase the complexity and utility of RNAs. Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) are the most heavily modified cellular RNA molecules and contain the largest variety of modifications. Modification of tRNAs is pivotal for protein synthesis and also precisely regulates the noncanonical functions of tRNAs. Defects in tRNA modifications lead to numerous human diseases. Up to now, more than 100 types of modifications have been found in tRNAs. Intriguingly, some modifications occur widely on all tRNAs, while others only occur on a subgroup of tRNAs or even only a specific tRNA. The modification frequency of each tRNA is approximately 7% to 25%, with 5-20 modification sites present on each tRNA. The occurrence and modulation of tRNA modifications are specifically noticeable as plenty of interplays among different sites and modifications have been discovered. In particular, tRNA modifications are responsive to environmental changes, indicating their dynamic and highly organized nature. In this review, we summarized the known occurrence order, cross-talk, and cooperativity of tRNA modifications.

Mutually exclusive substrate selection strategy by human m3C RNA transferases METTL2A and METTL6

tRNAs harbor the most diverse posttranscriptional modifications. The 3-methylcytidine (m3C) is widely distributed at position C32 (m3C32) of eukaryotic tRNAThr and tRNASer species. m3C32 is decorated by the single methyltransferase Trm140 in budding yeasts; however, two (Trm140 and Trm141 in fission yeasts) or three enzymes (METTL2A, METTL2B and METTL6 in mammals) are involved in its biogenesis. The rationale for the existence of multiple m3C32 methyltransferases and their substrate discrimination mechanism is hitherto unknown. Here, we revealed that both METTL2A and METTL2B are expressed in vivo. We purified human METTL2A, METTL2B, and METTL6 to high homogeneity. We successfully reconstituted m3C32 modification activity for tRNAThr by METT2A and for tRNASer(GCU) by METTL6, assisted by seryl-tRNA synthetase (SerRS) in vitro. Compared with METTL2A, METTL2B exhibited dramatically lower activity in vitro. Both G35 and t6A at position 37 (t6A37) are necessary but insufficient prerequisites for tRNAThr m3C32 formation, while the anticodon loop and the long variable arm, but not t6A37, are key determinants for tRNASer(GCU) m3C32 biogenesis, likely being recognized synergistically by METTL6 and SerRS, respectively. Finally, we proposed a mutually exclusive substrate selection model to ensure correct discrimination among multiple tRNAs by multiple m3C32 methyltransferases.

Partially modified tRNAs for the study of tRNA maturation and function

Transfer RNA (tRNA) is the most highly and diversely modified class of RNA in all domains of life. However, we still have only a limited understanding of the concerted action of the many enzymes that modify tRNA during tRNA maturation and the synergistic functions of tRNA modifications for protein synthesis. Here, we describe the preparation of in vitro transcribed tRNAs with a partial set of defined modifications and the use of partially modified tRNAs in biochemical assays. By comparing the affinity and activity of tRNA modification enzymes for partially modified and unmodified tRNAs, we gain insight into the preferred pathways of tRNA maturation. Additionally, partially modified tRNAs will be highly useful to investigate the importance of tRNA modifications for tRNA function during translation including the interaction with aminoacyl-tRNA synthases, translation factors and the ribosome. Thereby, the methods described here lay the foundation for understanding the mechanistic function of tRNA modifications.

RNA modifications as a common denominator between tRNA and mRNA

Recent studies underscore RNA modifications as a novel mechanism to coordinate expression and function of different genes. While modifications on the sugar or base moieties of tRNA are well known, their roles in mRNA regulation are only starting to emerge. Interestingly, some modifications are present in both tRNA and mRNA, and here we discuss the functional significance of these common features. We describe key modifications that are present in both RNA types, elaborate on proteins that interact with them, and indicate recent works that identify roles in communicating tRNA processes and mRNA regulation. We propose that as tools are developed, the shortlist of features that are common between types of RNA will greatly expand and proteins that interact with them will be identified. In conclusion, the presence of the same modification in both RNA types provides an intersect between tRNA processes and mRNA regulation and implies a novel mechanism for connecting diverse cellular processes.

The expanding world of tRNA modifications and their disease relevance

Transfer RNA (tRNA) is an adapter molecule that links a specific codon in mRNA with its corresponding amino acid during protein synthesis. tRNAs are enzymatically modified post-transcriptionally. A wide variety of tRNA modifications are found in the tRNA anticodon, which are crucial for precise codon recognition and reading frame maintenance, thereby ensuring accurate and efficient protein synthesis. In addition, tRNA-body regions are also frequently modified and thus stabilized in the cell. Over the past two decades, 16 novel tRNA modifications were discovered in various organisms, and the chemical space of tRNA modification continues to expand. Recent studies have revealed that tRNA modifications can be dynamically altered in response to levels of cellular metabolites and environmental stresses. Importantly, we now understand that deficiencies in tRNA modification can have pathological consequences, which are termed 'RNA modopathies'. Dysregulation of tRNA modification is involved in mitochondrial diseases, neurological disorders and cancer.

Instrumental analysis of RNA modifications

Organisms from all domains of life invest a substantial amount of energy for the introduction of RNA modifications into nearly all transcripts studied to date. Instrumental analysis of RNA can focus on the modified residues and reveal the function of these epitranscriptomic marks. Here, we will review recent advances and breakthroughs achieved by NMR spectroscopy, sequencing, and mass spectrometry of the epitranscriptome.

Revisiting tRNA chaperones: New players in an ancient game

tRNAs undergo an extensive maturation process including post-transcriptional modifications that influence secondary and tertiary interactions. Precursor and mature tRNAs lacking key modifications are often recognized as aberrant and subsequently targeted for decay, illustrating the importance of modifications in promoting structural integrity. tRNAs also rely on tRNA chaperones to promote the folding of misfolded substrates into functional conformations. The best characterized tRNA chaperone is the La protein, which interacts with nascent RNA polymerase III transcripts to promote folding and offers protection from exonucleases. More recently, certain tRNA modification enzymes have also been demonstrated to possess tRNA folding activity distinct from their catalytic activity, suggesting that they may act as tRNA chaperones. In this review, we will discuss pioneering studies relating post-transcriptional modification to tRNA stability and decay pathways, present recent advances into the mechanism by which the RNA chaperone La assists pre-tRNA maturation, and summarize emerging research directions aimed at characterizing modification enzymes as tRNA chaperones. Together, these findings shed light on the importance of tRNA folding and how tRNA chaperones, in particular, increase the fraction of nascent pre-tRNAs that adopt a folded, functional conformation.

Post-Transcriptional Modifications of Conserved Nucleotides in the T-Loop of tRNA: A Tale of Functional Convergent Evolution

The high conservation of nucleotides of the T-loop, including their chemical identity, are hallmarks of tRNAs from organisms belonging to the three Domains of Life. These structural characteristics allow the T-loop to adopt a peculiar intraloop conformation able to interact specifically with other conserved residues of the D-loop, which ultimately folds the mature tRNA in a unique functional canonical L-shaped architecture. Paradoxically, despite the high conservation of modified nucleotides in the T-loop, enzymes catalyzing their formation depend mostly on the considered organism, attesting for an independent but convergent evolution of the post-transcriptional modification processes. The driving force behind this is the preservation of a native conformation of the tRNA elbow that underlies the various interactions of tRNA molecules with different cellular components.

Regulation of translation by one-carbon metabolism in bacteria and eukaryotic organelles

Protein synthesis is an energetically costly cellular activity. It is therefore important that the process of mRNA translation remains in excellent synchrony with cellular metabolism and its energy reserves. Unregulated translation could lead to the production of incomplete, mistranslated, or misfolded proteins, squandering the energy needed for cellular sustenance and causing cytotoxicity. One-carbon metabolism (OCM), an integral part of cellular intermediary metabolism, produces a number of one-carbon unit intermediates (formyl, methylene, methenyl, methyl). These OCM intermediates are required for the production of amino acids such as methionine and other biomolecules such as purines, thymidylate, and redox regulators. In this review, we discuss how OCM impacts the translation apparatus (composed of ribosome, tRNA, mRNA, and translation factors) and regulates crucial steps in protein synthesis. More specifically, we address how the OCM metabolites regulate the fidelity and rate of translation initiation in bacteria and eukaryotic organelles such as mitochondria. Modulation of the fidelity of translation initiation by OCM opens new avenues to understand alternative translation mechanisms involved in stress tolerance and drug resistance.

A substrate binding model for the KEOPS tRNA modifying complex

The KEOPS complex, which is conserved across archaea and eukaryotes, is composed of four core subunits; Pcc1, Kae1, Bud32 and Cgi121. KEOPS is crucial for the fitness of all organisms examined. In humans, pathogenic mutations in KEOPS genes lead to Galloway-Mowat syndrome, an autosomal-recessive disease causing childhood lethality. Kae1 catalyzes the universal and essential tRNA modification N⁶-threonylcarbamoyl adenosine, but the precise roles of all other KEOPS subunits remain an enigma. Here we show using structure-guided studies that Cgi121 recruits tRNA to KEOPS by binding to its 3' CCA tail. A composite model of KEOPS bound to tRNA reveals that all KEOPS subunits form an extended tRNA-binding surface that we have validated in vitro and in vivo to mediate the interaction with the tRNA substrate and its modification. These findings provide a framework for understanding the inner workings of KEOPS and delineate why all KEOPS subunits are essential.

S-adenosylmethionine tRNA modification: unexpected/unsuspected implications of former/new players

S-adenosylmethionine supplies methyl groups to many acceptors, including lipids, proteins, RNA, DNA, and a wide range of small molecules. It acts as the precursor in the biosynthesis of metal ion chelating compounds, such as nicotianamine and phytosiderophores, of the polyamines spermidine and spermine and of some plant hormones. Finally, it is the source of catalytic 5′-deoxyadenosyl radicals.

Radical S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) enzymes (RS) represent one of the most abundant groups (more than 100,000) of enzymes, exerting a plethora of biological functions, some of which are still unknown.

In this work, we will focus on two RS: CDK5RAP1 and CDKAL1, both of which are involved in tRNA modifications that result in important tRNA folding and stability and in maintaining high translational fidelity. Based on this crucial role, their impairment can be important in the development of different human diseases.