Multiple domains of the integral KREPA3 protein are critical for the structure and precise functions of RNA editing catalytic complexes in Trypanosoma brucei

RESC14 and RESC8 cooperate to mediate RESC function and dynamics during trypanosome RNA editing

Mitochondrial transcripts in Trypanosoma brucei require extensive uridine insertion/deletion RNA editing to generate translatable open reading frames. The RNA editing substrate binding complex (RESC) serves as the scaffold that coordinates the protein-protein and protein-RNA interactions during editing. RESC broadly contains two modules termed the guide RNA binding complex (GRBC) and the RNA editing mediator complex (REMC), as well as organizer proteins. How the protein and RNA components of RESC dynamically interact to facilitate editing is not well understood. Here, we examine the roles of organizer proteins, RESC8 and RESC14, in facilitating RESC dynamics. High-throughput sequencing of editing intermediates reveals an overlapping RESC8 and RESC14 function during editing progression across multiple transcripts. Blue native PAGE analysis demonstrates that RESC14 is essential for incorporation of RESC8 into a large RNA-containing complex, while RESC8 is important in recruiting a smaller ribonucleoprotein complex (RNP) to this large complex. Proximity labeling shows that RESC14 is important for stable RESC protein-protein interactions, as well as RESC-RECC associations. Together, our data support a model in which RESC14 is necessary for assembly of editing competent RESC through recruitment of an RNP containing RESC8, GRBC and gRNA to REMC and mRNA.

Deep mutational scanning of the RNase III-like domain in Trypanosoma brucei RNA editing protein KREPB4

Kinetoplastid pathogens including Trypanosoma brucei, T. cruzi, and Leishmania species, are early diverged, eukaryotic, unicellular parasites. Functional understanding of many proteins from these pathogens has been hampered by limited sequence homology to proteins from other model organisms. Here we describe the development of a high-throughput deep mutational scanning approach in T. brucei that facilitates rapid and unbiased assessment of the impacts of many possible amino acid substitutions within a protein on cell fitness, as measured by relative cell growth. The approach leverages several molecular technologies: cells with conditional expression of a wild-type gene of interest and constitutive expression of a library of mutant variants, degron-controlled stabilization of I-SceI meganuclease to mediate highly efficient transfection of a mutant allele library, and a high-throughput sequencing readout for cell growth upon conditional knockdown of wild-type gene expression and exclusive expression of mutant variants. Using this method, we queried the effects of amino acid substitutions in the apparently non-catalytic RNase III-like domain of KREPB4 (B4), which is an essential component of the RNA Editing Catalytic Complexes (RECCs) that carry out mitochondrial RNA editing in T. brucei. We measured the impacts of thousands of B4 variants on bloodstream form cell growth and validated the most deleterious variants containing single amino acid substitutions. Crucially, there was no correlation between phenotypes and amino acid conservation, demonstrating the greater power of this method over traditional sequence homology searching to identify functional residues. The bloodstream form cell growth phenotypes were combined with structural modeling, RECC protein proximity data, and analysis of selected substitutions in procyclic form T. brucei. These analyses revealed that the B4 RNaseIII-like domain is essential for maintenance of RECC integrity and RECC protein abundances and is also involved in changes in RECCs that occur between bloodstream and procyclic form life cycle stages.

RNA editing catalytic complexes edit multiple mRNA sites non-processively in Trypanosoma brucei

RNA editing generates mature mitochondrial mRNAs in T. brucei by extensive uridine insertion and deletion at numerous editing sites (ESs) as specified by guide RNAs (gRNAs). The editing is performed by three RNA Editing Catalytic Complexes (RECCs) which each have a different endonuclease in addition to 12 proteins in common resulting in RECC1 that is specific for deletion ESs and RECC2 and RECC3 that are specific for insertion ESs. Thus, different RECCs are required for editing of mRNA sequence regions where single gRNAs specify a combination of insertion and deletion ESs. We investigated how the three different RECCs might edit combinations of insertion and deletion ESs that are specified by single gRNAs by testing whether their endonuclease compositions are stable or dynamic during editing. We analyzed in vivo BirA* proximity labeling and found that the endonucleases remain associated with their set of common RECC proteins during editing when expressed at normal physiological levels. We also found that overexpression of endonuclease components resulted in minor effects on RECCs but did not affect growth. Thus, the protein stoichiometries that exist within each RECC can be altered by perturbations of RECC expression levels. These results indicate that editing of consecutive insertion and deletion ESs occurs by successive engagement and disengagement of RECCs, i.e., is non-processive, which is likely the case for consecutive pairs of insertion or deletion ESs. This clarifies the nature of the complex patterns of partially edited mRNAs that occur in vivo.