Differential effects of nucleotide analogs on scanning-dependent initiation and elongation of mammalian mRNA translation in vitro

Translational activity of 80S monosomes varies dramatically across different tissues

Translational regulation at the stage of initiation can impact the number of ribosomes translating each mRNA molecule. However, the translational activity of single 80S ribosomes (monosomes) on mRNA is less well understood, even though these 80S monosomes represent the dominant ribosomal complexes in vivo. Here, we used cryo-EM to determine the translational activity of 80S monosomes across different tissues in Drosophila melanogaster. We discovered that while head and embryo 80S monosomes are highly translationally active, testis and ovary 80S monosomes are translationally inactive. RNA-Seq analysis of head monosome- and polysome-translated mRNAs, revealed that head 80S monosomes preferentially translate mRNAs with TOP motifs, short 5'-UTRs, short ORFs and are enriched for the presence of uORFs. Overall, these findings highlight that regulation of translation initiation and protein synthesis is mostly performed by monosomes in head and embryo, while polysomes are the main source of protein production in testis and ovary.

[Dengue treatments and vaccines]

Dengue fever is a viral disease transmitted by mosquitoes of the Aedes genus, whose incidence and range have been steadily increasing in recent decades. Causing hemorrhagic fever in severe cases, it affects the inter-tropical regions of the world and threatens to spread to new geographical areas. Its complex pathophysiology and the existence of four genetically distant serotypes make vaccine development a challenge. Currently, there is no specific treatment against dengue fever and only a few vaccines are marketed or in development, with some limitations on their use. It is therefore necessary to develop new vaccines and identify new molecules with antiviral properties to reduce the economic and public health burden of this disease in endemic areas.

Conserved 5-methyluridine tRNA modification modulates ribosome translocation

While the centrality of posttranscriptional modifications to RNA biology has long been acknowledged, the function of the vast majority of modified sites remains to be discovered. Illustrative of this, there is not yet a discrete biological role assigned for one of the most highly conserved modifications, 5-methyluridine at position 54 in tRNAs (m5U54). Here, we uncover contributions of m5U54 to both tRNA maturation and protein synthesis. Our mass spectrometry analyses demonstrate that cells lacking the enzyme that installs m5U in the T-loop (TrmA in Escherichia coli, Trm2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae) exhibit altered tRNA modification patterns. Furthermore, m5U54-deficient tRNAs are desensitized to small molecules that prevent translocation in vitro. This finding is consistent with our observations that relative to wild-type cells, trm2Δ cell growth and transcriptome-wide gene expression are less perturbed by translocation inhibitors. Together our data suggest a model in which m5U54 acts as an important modulator of tRNA maturation and translocation of the ribosome during protein synthesis.

Conserved 5-methyluridine tRNA modification modulates ribosome translocation

While the centrality of post-transcriptional modifications to RNA biology has long been acknowledged, the function of the vast majority of modified sites remains to be discovered. Illustrative of this, there is not yet a discrete biological role assigned for one the most highly conserved modifications, 5-methyluridine at position 54 in tRNAs (m 5 U54). Here, we uncover contributions of m 5 U54 to both tRNA maturation and protein synthesis. Our mass spectrometry analyses demonstrate that cells lacking the enzyme that installs m 5 U in the T-loop (TrmA in E. coli , Trm2 in S. cerevisiae ) exhibit altered tRNA modifications patterns. Furthermore, m 5 U54 deficient tRNAs are desensitized to small molecules that prevent translocation in vitro. This finding is consistent with our observations that, relative to wild-type cells, trm2 Δ cell growth and transcriptome-wide gene expression are less perturbed by translocation inhibitors. Together our data suggest a model in which m 5 U54 acts as an important modulator of tRNA maturation and translocation of the ribosome during protein synthesis.

Tricks and threats of RNA viruses - towards understanding the fate of viral RNA

Human innate cellular defence pathways have evolved to sense and eliminate pathogens, of which, viruses are considered one of the most dangerous. Their relatively simple structure makes the identification of viral invasion a difficult task for cells. In the course of evolution, viral nucleic acids have become one of the strongest and most reliable early identifiers of infection. When considering RNA virus recognition, RNA sensing is the central mechanism in human innate immunity, and effectiveness of this sensing is crucial for triggering an appropriate antiviral response. Although human cells are armed with a variety of highly specialized receptors designed to respond only to pathogenic viral RNA, RNA viruses have developed an array of mechanisms to avoid being recognized by human interferon-mediated cellular defence systems. The repertoire of viral evasion strategies is extremely wide, ranging from masking pathogenic RNA through end modification, to utilizing sophisticated techniques to deceive host cellular RNA degrading enzymes, and hijacking the most basic metabolic pathways in host cells. In this review, we aim to dissect human RNA sensing mechanisms crucial for antiviral immune defences, as well as the strategies adopted by RNA viruses to avoid detection and degradation by host cells. We believe that understanding the fate of viral RNA upon infection, and detailing the molecular mechanisms behind virus-host interactions, may be helpful for developing more effective antiviral strategies; which are urgently needed to prevent the far-reaching consequences of widespread, highly pathogenic viral infections.

The epitranscriptome beyond m6A

Following its transcription, RNA can be modified by >170 chemically distinct types of modifications - the epitranscriptome. In recent years, there have been substantial efforts to uncover and characterize the modifications present on mRNA, motivated by the potential of such modifications to regulate mRNA fate and by discoveries and advances in our understanding of N ⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A). Here, we review our knowledge regarding the detection, distribution, abundance, biogenesis, functions and possible mechanisms of action of six of these modifications - pseudouridine (Ψ), 5-methylcytidine (m⁵C), N ¹-methyladenosine (m¹A), N ⁴-acetylcytidine (ac⁴C), ribose methylations (N_m) and N ⁷-methylguanosine (m⁷G). We discuss the technical and analytical aspects that have led to inconsistent conclusions and controversies regarding the abundance and distribution of some of these modifications. We further highlight shared commonalities and important ways in which these modifications differ with respect to m⁶A, based on which we speculate on their origin and their ability to acquire functions over evolutionary timescales.

Epitranscriptomic marks: Emerging modulators of RNA virus gene expression

Epitranscriptomics, the study of posttranscriptional chemical moieties placed on RNA, has blossomed in recent years. This is due in part to the emergence of high‐throughput detection methods as well as the burst of discoveries showing biological function of select chemical marks. RNA modifications have been shown to affect RNA structure, localization, and functions such as alternative splicing, stabilizing transcripts, nuclear export, cap‐dependent and cap‐independent translation, microRNA biogenesis and binding, RNA degradation, and immune regulation. As such, the deposition of chemical marks on RNA has the unique capability to spatially and temporally regulate gene expression. The goal of this article is to present the exciting convergence of the epitranscriptomic and virology fields, specifically the deposition and biological impact of N7‐methylguanosine, ribose 2′‐O‐methylation, pseudouridine, inosine, N6‐methyladenosine, and 5‐methylcytosine epitranscriptomic marks on gene expression of RNA viruses.

This article is categorized under:

RNA in Disease and Development > RNA in Disease

RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > Protein–RNA Interactions: Functional Implications

Global analysis of RNA metabolism using bio-orthogonal labeling coupled with next-generation RNA sequencing

Many open questions in RNA biology relate to the kinetics of gene expression and the impact of RNA binding regulatory factors on processing or decay rates of particular transcripts. Steady state measurements of RNA abundance obtained from RNA-seq approaches are not able to separate the effects of transcription from those of RNA decay in the overall abundance of any given transcript, instead only giving information on the (presumed steady-state) abundances of transcripts. Through the combination of metabolic labeling and high-throughput sequencing, several groups have been able to measure both transcription rates and decay rates of the entire transcriptome of an organism in a single experiment. This review focuses on the methodology used to specifically measure RNA decay at a global level. By comparing and contrasting approaches and describing the experimental protocols in a modular manner, we intend to provide both experienced and new researchers to the field the ability to combine aspects of various protocols to fit the unique needs of biological questions not addressed by current methods.

The molecular choreography of protein synthesis: translational control, regulation, and pathways

Translation of proteins by the ribosome regulates gene expression, with recent results underscoring the importance of translational control. Misregulation of translation underlies many diseases, including cancer and many genetic diseases. Decades of biochemical and structural studies have delineated many of the mechanistic details in prokaryotic translation, and sketched the outlines of eukaryotic translation. However, translation may not proceed linearly through a single mechanistic pathway, but likely involves multiple pathways and branchpoints. The stochastic nature of biological processes would allow different pathways to occur during translation that are biased by the interaction of the ribosome with other translation factors, with many of the steps kinetically controlled. These multiple pathways and branchpoints are potential regulatory nexus, allowing gene expression to be tuned at the translational level. As research focus shifts toward eukaryotic translation, certain themes will be echoed from studies on prokaryotic translation. This review provides a general overview of the dynamic data related to prokaryotic and eukaryotic translation, in particular recent findings with single-molecule methods, complemented by biochemical, kinetic, and structural findings. We will underscore the importance of viewing the process through the viewpoints of regulation, translational control, and heterogeneous pathways.

Pseudouridine: still mysterious, but never a fake (uridine)!

Pseudouridine (Ψ) is the most abundant of >150 nucleoside modifications in RNA. Although Ψ was discovered as the first modified nucleoside more than half a century ago, neither the enzymatic mechanism of its formation, nor the function of this modification are fully elucidated. We present the consistent picture of Ψ synthases, their substrates and their substrate positions in model organisms of all domains of life as it has emerged to date and point out the challenges that remain concerning higher eukaryotes and the elucidation of the enzymatic mechanism.