Symptoms and classification of uterine adenomyosis, including the place of hysteroscopy in diagnosis

Where histology used the presence of glands and/or stroma in the myometrium as pathognomonic for adenomyosis, imaging uses the appearance of the myometrium, the presence of striations, related to the presence of endometrial tissue within the myometrium, the presence of intramyometrial cystic structures and the size and asymmetry of the uterus to identify adenomyosis. Preliminary reports show a good correlation between the features detected by imaging and the histological findings. Symptoms associated with adenomyosis are abnormal uterine bleeding, pelvic pain (dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, dyspareunia), and impaired reproduction. However a high incidence of existing comorbidity like fibroids and endometriosis makes it difficult to attribute a specific pathognomonic symptom to adenomyosis. Heterogeneity in the reported pregnancy rates after assisted reproduction is due to the use of different ovarian stimulation protocols and absence of a correct description of the adenomyotic pathology. Current efforts to classify the disease contributed a lot in elucidated the potential characteristics that a classification system should be relied on. The need for a comprehensive, user friendly, and clear categorization of adenomyosis including the pattern, location, histological variants, and the myometrial zone seems to be an urgent need. With the uterus as a possible unifying link between adenomyosis and endometriosis, exploration of the uterus should not only be restricted to the hysteroscopic exploration of the uterine cavity but in a fusion with ultrasound.

MED12 mutations and fumarate hydratase inactivation in uterine adenomyomas

STUDY QUESTION

Do the uterine leiomyoma driver events – mediator complex subunit 12 (MED12) mutations, high mobility group AT-hook (HMGA2) overexpression, and fumarate hydratase (FH) inactivation – also contribute to the development of uterine adenomyomas?

SUMMARY ANSWER

MED12 mutations and FH deficiency occur in a subset of uterine adenomyomas, but at lower frequencies than in leiomyomas.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Uterine adenomyomas are benign tumours with clinical features very similar to uterine leiomyomas. Mutations affecting MED12, HMGA2 and FH account for up to 80–90% of leiomyomas, but their contribution to adenomyomas is not known.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded adenomyoma samples from 21 patients operated on during 2012–2014 were collected at the pathology department’s archives and analysed for uterine leiomyoma driver events.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Adenomyoma diagnoses were verified by a specialized pathologist and representative areas were marked on haematoxylin-eosin slides. DNA was extracted from the tissue samples and sequenced to detect mutations in MED12. Expression levels of HMGA2 and 2SC, a robust indirect method to detect FH inactivation, were analysed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The coding region of FH was sequenced in one adenomyoma sample showing strong 2SC staining as well as in the same patient’s normal tissue sample. All patients’ medical histories were collected and reviewed.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

MED12 mutation c.131G > A, p.G44D, the most common mutation in uterine leiomyomas, was identified in two samples (2/21; 9.5%). One adenomyoma displayed strong 2SC positivity and subsequent sequencing revealed a frameshift FH mutation c.911delC, p.P304fs in the tumour. The mutation was also present in the patient’s normal tissue sample, indicating that she has a hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer (HLRCC) syndrome. HMGA2 protein expression was normal in all adenomyomas.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Restricted sample size limits the determination of exact mutation frequencies of the studied aberrations in adenomyomas.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Uterine leiomyoma driver mutations do contribute to the development of some adenomyomas. We also report an adenomyoma in the context of hereditary HLRCC syndrome. Despite clinical similarities, the pathogenic mechanisms of adenomyomas and leiomyomas are likely different. Large-scale genomic analyses are warranted to elucidate the complete molecular background of adenomyomas.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

This study was supported by The Academy of Finland, the Sigrid Jusélius Foundation, and the Cancer Society of Finland. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Adenomyosis: a life-cycle approach

The life-cycle approach to endometriosis highlighted unexpected features of the condition; the same approach was therefore applied to gain insight into the clinical features of adenomyosis and to draw a comparison with endometriosis. This is possible today thanks to new imaging techniques enabling non-invasive diagnosis of adenomyosis. The specificity and sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasound remain uncertain. Unlike endometriosis, little information is available on the presence of classic adenomyosis in adolescents, except for rare cystic forms that may not represent the true disease. Adenomyosis is most likely to affect adult women, although most reported incidences are still based on post-hysterectomy studies, and are affected by diligence in histopathologic diagnosis and the adopted cut-off point. The traditionally accepted associations of adult adenomyosis, such as multiparity, a link to infertility and its effect on pregnancy are uncertain. Active adenomyosis has been found in pre- and peri-menopausal women and in postmenopausal women receiving tamoxifen. In conclusion, major diagnostic limitations and the systematic bias of hysterectomy make it difficult to draw firm conclusions from existing evidence. In addition, no information is available on the natural history of adenomyosis and no study has systematically evaluated its existence in adolescents.