Transcervical Carotid Artery Stenting Without Flow Reversal: A Report of Two Cases

Transcervical approach for carotid artery stenting without flow reversal: A case report

Current treatment options for high-risk patients with severe carotid artery stenosis include transcarotid artery revascularization, transfemoral carotid artery stenting, and carotid endarterectomy. Transfemoral carotid artery stenting is associated with high perioperative stroke risk, and recent studies and trials have identified transcarotid artery revascularization as a new technique able to minimize the stroke risk associated with high-risk procedures. Moreover, the transcervical approach allows easy access to the carotid artery in cases with an anatomically tortuous aortic arch. Therefore, determining the optimal approach to achieve arterial access during carotid stenting is important for successful procedures and positive outcomes. We report a clinical case of ischemic stroke due to severe stenosis of the left internal carotid artery indicated for stent deployment. After transfemoral carotid artery stenting failure, the patient's symptoms progressed from minor stroke to hemiplegia and Broca's aphasia. The transcervical approach was used to perform transcarotid artery revascularization after several days. The procedure was both safe and prevented recurrent stroke occurrence. Although transfemoral access is the classic approach used for carotid stenting, the transcervical approach can be used as an alternative and safe choice in cases with complex vascular anatomy, such as the one described here.

Transcervical Versus Transfemoral Approach in Carotid Stenting Real World Experience in a Community Hospital

INTRODUCTION

Peri-procedural embolic events are the Achilles' heel of carotid stenting. To overcome this complication, transcervical access to the carotid artery was introduced. In this study we describe our "our life" experience with the transcervical approach in a community hospital.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All carotid stent procedures between January 2010 and December 2020 were included in this retrospective analysis. The transcervical approach was compared to the transfemoral approach. In both procedures open-cell, closed-cell design and hybrid stents were used. In-hospital stroke was the primary outcome measure.

RESULTS

A total of 340 procedures were performed, in 184 patients the transfemoral approach was used and in 156 patients the transcervical approach was used. In 12 patients (3.5%) an in-hospital stroke was diagnosed, 4 in the transfemoral group (2.2%) and 8 in the transcervical group (5.1%) (P = 0.14). In the multivariate analyses a symptomatic lesion was associated with in-hospital stroke. Neither type of access nor cell design was associated with increased risk of in-hospital stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to previous studies, we could not confirm the advantages of the transcervical approach. However, conclusions should be carefully drawn, since this study is retrospective and was performed with multiple surgeon and different kind of stents.

Transcervical approach for carotid artery stenting with transitory reversal flow: Case report

Introduction

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been indicated as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy in high risk patients. Sometimes, an aortic arch can be anatomically unfavourable for CAS. Herein we report our experience in a case of CAS with transcervical approach.

Presentation of case

A 77-year-old male was referred to our hospital for severe subtotal occlusion of the left internal carotid artery. He had a past medical history of radiation to the head and neck for laryngeal cancer. Previous CT-angiography had shown a type III aortic with bovine arch. CAS via transcervical approach was performed with transitory reversal flow during the placement of RX Spider Filter 6 Fr (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN). After release of 7 × 30 mm RX Xact carotid stent (Abbott Vascular, Chicago, IL) and ballooning with a 5.5 × 30 mm Rx Submarine balloon catheter (Medtronic Minneapolis, MN), angiography check showed a good result.

Discussion

The transcervical approach is an innovative technique where usually a shunt is created, either between the common carotid artery and the internal jugular vein or between the common carotid artery and the common femoral vein. This flow reversal reduces the risk of periprocedural embolic events. In our experience a short proximal clamping with transitory reversal flow, reduces the invasiveness of procedure with good outcomes.

Conclusion

Transcervical carotid access with transitory reversal flow is a valid alternative in complicated patient with anatomy unfit for CAS.

•

Carotid stenting can be an alternative to endarterectomy in high risk patients.

•

Aortic arch can be anatomically unfavourable for Carotid artery stenting.

•

Transcervical approach is a technique suited to patients unfit for stenting.

•

Transcervical access with transitory reversal flow is useful in complicated patient.

Combined Angioplasty Technique of the Carotid Territory and Supra-Aortic Trunk by Double Access (Cervical and Limbs) for Tandem Lesions

BACKGROUND

The carotid stent angioplasty (CAS) has been the main option for patients with high cardiovascular risk and carotid stenosis. The common femoral artery is still the most used access site; however, the aortic arch manipulation is a critical moment for cerebral embolization. Carotid transcervical access should be considered as a good alternative access route for CAS. Tandem lesions combining supra-aortic trunks and ipsilateral carotid bulb critical stenosis pose a great challenge for the vascular surgeon.

METHODS

This is a retrospective descriptive study based on medical records of our institution. We report 2 cases of complex cerebral vascular insufficiency and discuss therapeutic options and strategies to protect the cerebrovascular territory avoiding microembolization, as well as demonstrate an alternative and safe total endovascular approach for those cases.

RESULTS

We describe the approach of 2 complex cerebral vascular insufficiency cases: case 1, a 63-year-old male with previous ischemic stroke, right internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion, left ICA stenosis >70%, and critical stenosis of the origin of common carotid artery (CCA); case 2, a 68-year-old female with previous ischemic stroke, left ICA occlusion, brachiocephalic trunk critical stenosis, hypoplastic right vertebral artery, and aortobi-iliac chronic occlusion. In both cases reported here a challenging solution was chosen, little described in the literature, with cerebral filter protection as the first step. In addition, a literature review was performed to discuss the different approach options for tandem injuries of the supra-aortic trunk and carotid bulb.

CONCLUSIONS

Our initial experience with total endovascular treatment of complex tandem lesions of the carotid territory and supra-aortic trunks show that transcervical access, coupled with distal protection filter device on the first step, is a safe and effective technique for preventing neurological events.