Clinical Management of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Conjunctiva

Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Conjunctiva in a Patient With Previous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lower Lip

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the conjunctiva is a rare malignancy that is part of the spectrum of ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN). Numerous non-modifiable and modifiable risk factors, such as male sex, age, cigarette smoking, and immunosuppression, have been identified. Any lesion of the conjunctiva requires a differential diagnosis between benign and malignant diseases, and all suspicious lesions should be biopsied. We present a case of SCC of the conjunctiva in a former smoker with multiple risk factors, including a previous SCC of the lower lip. Metastatic tumors rarely occur in the conjunctiva, but due to our patient's medical history, the exclusion of metastasis from the previous primary tumor was performed through whole-body imaging restaging.  The patient underwent a no-touch wide resection, followed by adjuvant topical chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). After finishing treatment, the patient continues to attend regular ophthalmology and oncology appointments. Increasing population awareness of modifiable risk factors for OSSN is essential. Misdiagnosis can lead to a loss of time in treatment and progression of the disease.

Exploring the Risk Factors of Conjunctival Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Establishing a Prognostic Model: Retrospective Study

Objective

Exploring the risk factors of conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) and establishing a prognostic model.

Methods

Information on patients with CSCC was extracted from the SEER database, conducting a retrospective study. 650 patients with CSCC were finally included in the model. Descriptive analysis was performed by Chi-square test and T-test. The risk factors of CSCC were explored by COX multivariate analysis, and the corresponding prognostic model was established as a result.

Results

The all-cause mortality rate of CSCC was 38.3%, and the risk factors were age (HR = 1.077), sex (HR = 0.691), grade (HR = 7.857), laterality (HR = 1.403), N (HR = 7.195), M (HR = 0.217), and surgery (HR = 1.618), all P < 0.05. The new model had C index and area under curve ROC (AUC) value greater than 0.7. Calibration curve, Net Reclassification Index (NRI), Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI), and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) indicate the new model has better predictive performance than the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC-TNM).

Conclusions

Compared with the clinical guidance of AJCC (TNM) for patients with CSCC, the established model exhibits good performance and can provide guidance for clinical decision-making.

Supportive treatment to chemotherapy with MMC, in patients with ocular surface squamous neoplasia or conjunctival melanocytic tumor

PURPOSE

Since there is a lack of clear information regarding the benefit to combine supportive therapies (such as artificial tears) to mitomycin C (MMC) in the treatment of ocular surface neoplasia, the primary purpose of the study was to evaluate hyaluronic acid eye drops and hyaluronic acid-conjugated lactobionic acid (LACTOyal FREE) eye drops as supportive therapy.

METHODS

Retrospective evaluation of patients with ocular surface squamous neoplasia or conjunctival melanocytic tumor treated with MMC, who had used also artificial tears as supportive treatment. A 6-month follow-up with evaluation of subjective and objective tests for ocular surface integrity was conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients were analyzed, most of them with squamous disease (71.4%). The break-up time (BUT), Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and Schirmer test values showed a significant difference at any time point with overall population. No statistical difference was found among subgroups (Lactoyal vs No Lactoyal).

CONCLUSION

The use of an ancillary therapy based on hyaluronic acid allows to improve both subjective and objective ocular parameters, reducing MMC induced adverse effects. Meantime, hyaluronic acid-conjugated lactobionic acid eye drops highlighted the same advantages with a more positive trend in OSDI results.

Modified procedure of anterior orbital exenteration enables eye socket reconstruction: A retrospective cohort study

The conventional procedure of anterior orbital exenteration is unfavorable for eye socket reconstruction, whereas a modified procedure enables socket reconstruction and prosthesis fitting. Our study aims to compare the cosmetic outcomes between these 2 surgical techniques.We retrospectively recruited patients treated with modified or conventional exenteration during January 2015 to May 2021 in our hospital. The conventional approach was performed along with dermis-fat graft transplantation. The modified approach was conducted followed by eye socket reconstruction and eyelid blepharoplasty. The clinical data were collected and analyzed, including demographics, tumor characteristics, postoperative complications, tumor-related events, and cosmetic outcomes.Forty-nine patients were consecutively recruited in this study, including 22 cases of modified exenteration and 27 cases of conventional exenteration. Forty-four subjects (89.8%) were diagnosed with ocular surface malignancies (conjunctival melanoma and squamous cell carcinoma) and 5 subjects (10.2%) were diagnosed with extraocular stage of uveal melanoma. After follow-up for 31.8 ± 17.1 months, the 1-, 2-, 5-year overall survival rate was calculated as 100%, 79.2%, and 59.2% in the Modified group, and 94.2%, 73.8%, and 51.5% in the Conventional group. Comparison of the survival curves showed no significant differences. In the Modified group, all patients received orbital implant placement and eye socket reconstruction. The implant motility was satisfactory in 12 cases (54.5%) with movements in 3 to 4 directions. The eyelid function was acceptable in 17 cases (77.3%) with no entropion, ectropion or lower lid laxity. Ocular prosthesis was delivered in 17 cases (77.3%) with successful fitting in 11 cases (64.7%). The self-rated cosmetic score was statistically (t test, P < .0001) higher in the Modified group (6.7 ± 0.9) than the Conventional group (2.2 ± 0.4).The modified approach to anterior orbital exenteration enables eye socket reconstruction and cosmetic rehabilitation while still preserves the curable chance for the treatment of advanced periocular/intraocular malignancies.