Pain Neuroscience Education Delivered by a Student Physical Therapist for a Patient with Persistent Musculoskeletal Pain

Clinician approaches to spinal manipulation for persistent spinal pain after lumbar surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data

BACKGROUND

This review aimed to identify variables influencing clinicians' application of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) for persistent spine pain after lumbar surgery (PSPS-2). We hypothesized markers of reduced clinical/surgical complexity would be associated with greater odds of applying SMT to the lumbar region, use of manual-thrust lumbar SMT, and SMT within 1-year post-surgery as primary outcomes; and chiropractors would have increased odds of using lumbar manual-thrust-SMT compared to other practitioners.

METHODS

Per our published protocol, observational studies describing adults receiving SMT for PSPS-2 were included. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, OVID, PEDro, and Index to Chiropractic Literature were searched from inception to January 6, 2022. Individual patient data (IPD) were requested from contact authors when needed for selection criteria. Data extraction and a customized risk-of-bias rubric were completed in duplicate. Odds ratios (ORs) for primary outcomes were calculated using binary logistic regressions, with covariates including age, sex, symptom distribution, provider, motion segments, spinal implant, and surgery-to-SMT interval.

RESULTS

71 articles were included describing 103 patients (mean age 52 ± 15, 55% male). The most common surgeries were laminectomy (40%), fusion (34%), and discectomy (29%). Lumbar SMT was used in 85% of patients; and of these patients was non-manual-thrust in 59%, manual-thrust in 33%, and unclear in 8%. Clinicians were most often chiropractors (68%). SMT was used > 1-year post-surgery in 66% of cases. While no primary outcomes reached significance, non-reduced motion segments approached significance for predicting use of lumbar-manual-thrust SMT (OR 9.07 [0.97-84.64], P = 0.053). Chiropractors were significantly more likely to use lumbar-manual-thrust SMT (OR 32.26 [3.17-327.98], P = 0.003). A sensitivity analysis omitting high risk-of-bias cases (missing ≥ 25% IPD) revealed similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians using SMT for PSPS-2 most often apply non-manual-thrust SMT to the lumbar spine, while chiropractors are more likely to use lumbar-manual-thrust SMT relative to other providers. As non-manual-thrust SMT may be gentler, the proclivity towards this technique suggests providers are cautious when applying SMT after lumbar surgery. Unmeasured variables such as patient or clinician preferences, or limited sample size may have influenced our findings. Large observational studies and/or international surveys are needed for an improved understanding of SMT use for PSPS-2. Systematic review registration PROSPERO (CRD42021250039).

Interprofessional Active Learning for Chronic Pain: Transforming Student Learning From Recall to Application

Chronic pain (CP) affects over 50 million Americans daily and represents a unique challenge for healthcare professionals due to its complexity. Across all health professions, only a small percentage of the curriculum is devoted to treating patients with CP. Unfortunately, much of the content is delivered passively via lecture without giving students an opportunity to practice the communication skills to effectively treat patients in the clinic. An interprofessional team of health educators identified 5 essential messages that students frequently struggle to convey to patients with CP. Those messages were based on interprofessional and profession-specific competencies to treat patients with CP from the International Association for the Study of Pain. The 5 messages highlighted the importance of (1) therapeutic alliance, (2) consistent interdisciplinary language, (3) patient prognosis, (4) evidence for pain medicine, surgery, and imaging, and (5) early referral to the interprofessional team. For each message, the team summarized relevant research supporting the importance of each individual message that could serve as a foundation for didactic content. The team then developed active learning educational activities that educators could use to have students practice the skills tied to each message. Each learning activity was designed to be delivered in an interprofessional manner.

Efficacy and complications of different surgical modalities of treating osteoporotic spinal compression fracture in the elderly

PURPOSE

To explore the efficacy and complications of different surgical modalities in the treatment of osteoporotic spinal compression fractures (OSCFs) in the elderly.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 98 elderly patients with OSCFs who received surgical treatment in the Changsha Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from March 2018 to July 2020. Based on different surgical treatments, the patients were divided into a percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) group (n=51) and a percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) group (n=47). The intraoperative blood loss, operation time, the amount of bone cement per vertebral body, length of hospitalization, and fracture healing time were recorded and compared between the two groups. The original anterior wall height and middle height of the compressed fractured vertebra were then evaluated and compared at 3 time points, namely before operation, 2 days after operation, and 6 months after operation. Pain, spinal function improvement and Cobb's angle were evaluated and compared between the two cohorts of patients before operation and 3 months after operation. Adverse reactions and bone cement permeability were recorded and compared between the two groups. Patients' quality of life quality was evaluated using the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) before treatment and 12 months after treatment. Treatment satisfaction was evaluated.

RESULTS

Intraoperative blood loss, the average use of bone cement per vertebral body and length of hospitalization were similar between the groups (P>0.05). However, the PKP group had significantly longer operation time and fracture healing time than the PVP group (P<0.05). Vertebral 3D volume, as well as anterior wall and middle vertebra heights increased significantly at 6 months after surgery in both groups (all P<0.05). In addition, anterior wall and middle vertebra heights increased more in the PVP group than in the PKP group. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswesrty Disability Index (ODI) scores, as well as Cobb's angle decreased in both groups at 3 months after treatment (all P<0.05). The Cobb's angle and VAS score of the PVP group showed more significant reductions (all P<0.05). The PKP group had a higher incidence of adverse reactions and bone cement leakage rate than the PVP group (all P<0.05). However, no distinct difference was determined between the two groups in terms of patients' quality of life at 12 months after surgery. Treatment satisfaction was significantly higher in the PVP group than the PKP group.

CONCLUSION

For the treatment of senile OSCFs, both PVP and PKP have the advantages of little trauma and quick recovery. PVP has an edge over PKP with significantly shorter operation time, lower possibility of bone cement venous leakage and adjacent cone fracture, and higher surgical safety.