Pretreatment with Oxycodone Simultaneously Reduces Etomidate-Induced Myoclonus and Rocuronium-Induced Withdrawal Movements During Rapid-Sequence Induction

The need to monitor emerging issues in etomidate usage: the misuse or abuse potential

Since 2011, the misuse or abuse of etomidate has gradually increased when propofol was designated a controlled drug under the Narcotics Control Act in Korea. Accordingly, the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety announced that etomidate would be under the 'Regulation on the designation of drugs that may cause concerns of misuse or abuse' rule in June 2020, which is less stringent than the Narcotics Control Act. Therefore, this review investigates potential misuse or abuse cases of etomidate to consider strengthening its management. A literature search was conducted to compare etomidate with other sedatives in their efficacy and side effects, as well as identify the adverse health outcomes, abuse cases, and analytical methods of etomidate. Etomidate has an equal or higher sedative efficacy and lower risk of adverse cardiopulmonary events than propofol. However, major adverse effects of etomidate include adrenocortical suppression and unproven associated deaths, as well as myoclonus requiring pre-treatment. Although the issue of abuse and misuse of etomidate is emerging in recent years, there are few academic reports on these issues and analytical methods in the forensic field. In order to effectively manage the misuse or abuse of etomidate, it is necessary to continuously monitor related cases with great interest and to be more intensively studied on its abuse potential.

Beyond the surface: analyzing etomidate and propofol as anesthetic agents in electroconvulsive therapy-A systematic review and meta-analysis of seizure duration outcomes

Background

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a widely used treatment for severe psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, depression, and mania. The procedure involves applying brief electrical stimulation to induce a seizure, and anesthesia is used to ensure sedation and muscle relaxation. Finding the right anesthetic agent with minimal side effects, especially on seizure duration, is crucial for optimal outcomes because seizure duration is an important factor in the effectiveness of ECT, but the anesthetic agents used can affect it.

Objective

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to pool the results of all relevant studies comparing the two induction agents, etomidate and propofol, for motor and electroencephalogram (EEG) seizure duration outcomes.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases to identify the relevant articles. The primary outcome measures were motor and EEG seizure durations. Statistical power was ensured by performing heterogeneity, publication bias, sensitivity analysis, and subgroup analysis. Standard mean difference and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for continuous outcomes, and a random-effects model was used.

Results

A total of 16 studies were included in this meta-analysis, comprising 7 randomized control trials (RCTs), 7 crossover trials, and 2 cohorts. The overall motor seizure duration was statistically significantly longer with etomidate than with propofol. The overall result for EEG seizure duration was also longer with the use of etomidate over propofol and was statistically significant. In addition, subgrouping was performed based on the study design for both outcomes, which showed insignificant results in the cohort's subgroup for both outcomes, while the RCTs and crossover subgroups supported the overall results. Heterogeneity was assessed through subgrouping and sensitivity analysis.

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis found that etomidate is superior to propofol in terms of motor and EEG seizure duration in ECT, implying potentially better efficacy. Hence, etomidate should be considered the preferred induction agent in ECT, but larger studies are needed to further validate our findings.

Median Effective Dose of Remifentanil for the Prevention of Pain Caused by the Injection of Rocuronium: An Age-Stratified Study

INTRODUCTION

Rocuronium intravenous pain is common in induction of general anesthesia. The aim of our study was to determine the median effective dose (ED₅₀) of prophylactic intravenous remifentanil for the prevention of rocuronium injection pain and to explore the effect of age on the ED₅₀.

METHODS

Eighty-nine adult patients undergoing elective general anesthesia, ASA I or II, regardless of gender or weight, were stratified according to age: group R1 18-44 years, group R2 45-59 years, and group R3 60-80 years. The initial dose of prophylactic remifentanil before rocuronium injection was set at 1 μg/kg lean body weight (LBW). The remifentanil doses were adjusted according to the degree of injection pain using the Dixon sequential method, with a ratio of 1.1 between adjacent doses. Injection pain was graded, and the occurrence of injection pain and adverse reactions were recorded. The ED₅₀ and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of remifentanil were calculated using the Dixon-Massey formula. Patients were asked whether they recalled feeling any injection pain in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU).

RESULTS

The ED₅₀ (95% CIs) of prophylactic remifentanil for the prevention of rocuronium injection pain were 1.266 μg/kg (1.186-1.351 μg/kg), 1.188 μg/kg (1.065-1.324 μg/kg), and 1.070 μg/kg (1.014-1.129 μg/kg) LBW in group R1, group R2, and group R3, respectively. No adverse reactions to remifentanil occurred in any group. In PACU, 84.6, 86.7, and 85.7% of patients who experienced injection pain had memories of the pain in group R1, group R2, and group R3, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic intravenous remifentanil can prevent rocuronium injection pain, and its ED₅₀ decreases with age, with 1.266 μg/kg (18-44 years), 1.188 μg/kg (45-59 years), and 1.070 μg/kg LBW (60-80 years), respectively.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05217238 (registration date 18 Dec 2021).

Safety and efficacy of etomidate in combination with oxycodone in painless gastroscopic procedures in the elderly: A prospective randomized controlled trial study

OBJECTIVE

Etomidate is often combined in rapid succession during induction of anesthesia. However, the effect of pretreatment with oxycodone on recovery of cognitive function and adverse effects has rarely been studied. We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare etomidate alone with etomidate combined with oxycodone in elderly patients undergoing painless gastroscopy.

METHODS

Hundred elderly patients undergoing painless gastroscopy were divided into a control and an observation group, with 50 cases in each group. The age, gender, height, weight, body mass index and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (I/II) of patients in both groups were recorded. The recovery of cognitive function was compared in both groups using the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination. Adverse events, including somatic motor reactions, hypotension, bradycardia, myocardial tremor, nausea and vomiting, and injection pain, were also recorded in both groups. Moreover, heart rate, peripheral capillary oxygen saturation, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure were evaluated in the 2 groups at different time points.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were enrolled in this study. The demographic characteristics in the 2 groups were not significantly different (P > .05). Regarding the recovery of cognitive functions, more subjects in the observation group passed the memory, arithmetic and orientation test than in the control group (P < .05). Fewer adverse events such as dynamic body reactions, cardiac tremor, nausea and vomiting, and injection pain occurred in the observation group than in the control group (P < .05). During anesthesia and after awakening, the results of peripheral capillary oxygen saturation, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were better in the observation group than in the control group (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Etomidate in combination with oxycodone for painless gastroscopic operation in the elderly is a safe and effective anesthetic strategy.

Advances in the clinical application of oxycodone in the perioperative period

To review the research progress of pure opioid receptor agonist oxycodone. The research progress of oxycodone in terms of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, adverse reactions, clinical application, combined medication and new progress in clinical application was summarized by referring to the literature. Oxycodone is a semi-synthetic thebaine derivative of opioid alkaloids, and is a pure opioid μ and κ receptor agonist. The main action sites are the central nervous system and visceral smooth muscle. Due to its advantages of low adverse reactions, good analgesic effects, and a wide range of safe doses, the drug has been widely used in the control of acute and chronic postoperative pain, as well as malignant and non-malignant pain. Since the end of the 20^th century, researchers have begun to formulate antipyretic analgesics, opioid receptor agonists, opioid receptor antagonists, dopamine receptor antagonists and other drugs with oxycodone in different proportions to enhance the analgesic effect. At the same time, it can reduce the dosage of oxycodone and reduce its adverse reactions, so as to achieve the purpose of limiting opioid abuse. With the continuous research on the efficacy and safety of oxycodone in the perioperative period at home and abroad, oxycodone has become the only dual-opioid potent analgesic that can be used in clinical work.

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Various Drug Interventions to Prevent Etomidate-Induced Myoclonus: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

Background

Myoclonic movement is a very common but undesirable phenomenon during the induction of general anesthesia using etomidate. Such movement may cause unnecessary problems. Currently, there is an increasing number of drugs for preventing etomidate-induced myoclonus (EM). However, direct comparisons of various drugs are lacking, and this interferes with clinical decision-making. Our network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to compare the efficacy of different drugs for the prevention of moderate-to-severe general myoclonus.

Methods

Using several biomedical databases, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English from inception to August 22, 2021 were searched. Among the various interventions, we selected nine types of intervention drugs (dexmedetomidine, etomidate, lidocaine, NMDA receptor antagonist, κ opioid receptor agonist, μ opioid receptor agonist, muscle relaxant, gabapentin, and midazolam) for comparison, according to the number of studies. Bayesian NMA was performed using STATA16 and R softwares. The relative risk of EM was assessed using risk ratios (RRs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

A total of 31 RCTs (3209 patients) were included. NMA results showed that, compared with a placebo, etomidate (RR 4.0, 95%CI 2.1–7.8), κ opioid receptor agonist (RR 2.9, 95%CI 1.9–4.6), μ opioid receptor agonist (RR 3.1, 95%CI 2.3–4.3), NMDA receptor antagonist (RR 1.7, 95%CI 1.0–2.8), dexmedetomidine (RR 2.4, 95%CI 1.5–3.9), lidocaine (RR 2.1, 95%CI 1.2–3.9), and midazolam (RR 2.2, 95%CI 1.5–3.2) can significantly reduce the risk of EM. In contrast, the effects of muscle relaxants (RR 2.1, 95%CI 0.81–5.3) and gabapentin (RR 2.8, 95%CI 0.92–9.3) were inconclusive. Further subgroup analyses showed that preoperative low-dose etomidate, μ-opioid receptor agonist, and κ-opioid receptor agonist were significantly better than other interventions in the prevention of moderate to severe EM.

Conclusion

Preoperative use of small doses of etomidate or opioids may be the most effective way to avoid EM, especially moderate and severe EM, which makes anesthesia induction safer, more stable, and aligns better with the requirements of comfortable medicine.

Systematic Review Registration

[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], [CRD4202127706].