Predictors for Postoperative Loss of Lumbar Lordosis After Long Fusions Arthrodesis in Patients with Adult Scoliosis

Paraspinal Muscle Degeneration as an Independent Risk for Loss of Local Alignment in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis Patients After Corrective Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effect of paraspinal muscle degeneration on the maintenance of local and global alignment among degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) patients after corrective surgery.

METHODS

98 DLS patients with a mean follow-up period of 38.3 months after corrective surgery were included. The T1 pelvic angle (TPA), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence were measured preoperatively, immediate postoperatively and at last follow-up. All patients were divided into LL maintenance group (n = 21) and LL loss group (n = 77). For patients with well-aligned correction (immediate postoperative TPA ≤ 20°, n = 73), they were divided into TPA maintenance group (last follow-up TPA ≤ 20°) and TPA loss group (last follow-up TPA > 20°). The relative gross cross-sectional area (rGCSA) and fat infiltration (FI) of multifidus (MF) and erector spinae (ES), and the relative functional CSA (rFCSA) of psoas major (PS) were measured at L3, L4 and L5 on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

MF rGCSA were significantly smaller in LL loss group than in LL maintenance group. Both MF rGCSA and PS rFCSA were significantly smaller and MF FI was significantly higher in TPA loss group than in TPA maintenance group. Binary logistic regression revealed that the MF rGCSA was an independent factor of LL loss; Large immediate postoperative TPA was an independent risk factor of TPA loss, but not the parameters of paraspinal muscles.

CONCLUSION

The effect of paraspinal muscles in lower lumbar segments might be mainly focused on the maintenance of local alignment rather than the global alignment.

Risk Factors Associated With Failure to Reach Minimal Clinically Important Difference After Correction Surgery in Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors affecting health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after surgery in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) by minimum clinically important difference (MCID).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

MCID has been introduced in the adult spinal deformity to quantify the absolute minimum change that can be considered a success. There are limited data available to identify factors affecting reaching MCID after DLS surgery.

METHODS

This study reviewed a cohort of 123 DLS patients after correction surgery and with a minimum 2-year follow-up (FU). Inclusion criteria included age ≥40 and minimum five vertebrae fused and the availability of Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 scores and radiographic data at baseline (BL) and FU. Using a multivariate analysis, two groups were compared to identify possible risk factors: those who reached MCID in the all four SRS domains (N = 65) at the last FU and those who missed MCID (N = 58).

RESULTS

At baseline, patients differed significantly from matched normative data in all SRS-22 domains. The baseline HRQOL was comparable in reached MCID and missed MCID group patients (P > 0.05). The HRQOL scores at FU were significantly higher than those at baseline. Of 123 included patients, 77.2% (N = 95), 72.4% (N = 89), 76.4% (N = 94), and 89.4% (N = 110) reached MCID in SRS pain, activity, appearance, and mental domain, respectively. Pelvic incidence (PI) >55°, lumbar lordosis (LL) loss >4.65°, coronal imbalance at FU, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) at FU >80 mm, and presence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and distal junctional problem (DJP) had negative effects on the recovery process.

CONCLUSION

Factors affecting reaching MCID after surgery for DLS were higher PI, LL loss, coronal imbalance, severe sagittal imbalance, and the occurrence of PJK and DJP.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Effect of lordosis on adjacent levels after lumbar interbody fusion, before and after removal of the spinal fixator: a finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

Literature indicates that adjacent-segment diseases after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw fixation accelerate degenerative changes at unfused adjacent segments due to the increased motion and intervertebral stress. Sagittal alignment of the spine is an important consideration as achieving proper lordosis could improve the outcome of spinal fusion and avoid the risk of adjacent segment diseases. Therefore, restoration of adequate lumbar lordosis is considered as a major factor in the long-term success of lumbar fusion. This study hypothesized that the removal of internal fixation devices in segments that have already fused together could reduce stress at the disc at adjacent segments, particularly in patients with inadequate lordosis. The purpose of this study was to analyze the biomechanical characteristics of a single fusion model (posterior lumbar interbody fusion with internal fixation) with different lordosis angles before and after removal of the internal fixation device.

METHODS

Five finite element models were constructed for analysis; 1) Intact lumbar spine without any implants (INT), 2) Lumbar spine implanted with a spinal fixator and lordotic intervertebral cage at L4-L5 (FUS-f-5c), 3) Lumbar spine after removal of the spinal fixator (FUS-5c), 4) Lumbar spine implanted with a spinal fixator and non-lordotic intervertebral cage at L4-L5 (FUS-f-0c), and 5) Lumbar spine after removal of the spinal fixator from the FUS-f-0c model (FUS-0c).

RESULTS

The ROM of adjacent segments in the FUS-f-0c model was found to be greater than in the FUS-f-5c model. After removing the fixator, the adjacent segments in the FUS-5c and FUS-0c models had a ROM that was similar to the intact spine under all loading conditions. Removing the fixator also reduced the contact forces on adjacent facet joints and reduced the peak stresses on the discs at adjacent levels. The greatest increase in stress on the discs was found in the FUS-f-0c model (at both L2/L3 and L3/L4), with intervertebral stress at L3/L4 increasing by 83% when placed in flexion.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated how removing the spinal fixation construct after bone fusion could reduce intradiscal pressure and facet contact forces at adjacent segments, while retaining a suitable level of lumbar lordosis.

Factors Associated with Caregiver Burden in Primary Caregivers of Patients with Adolescent Scoliosis: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study

Background

Primary caregivers for patients with scoliosis suffer from considerable distress and burden. However, a few studies have examined the factors related to burden of caregivers of patients with adolescent scoliosis, particularly in China. Therefore, the present study aimed to identify patient and caregiver characteristics associated with caregiver burden.

Material/Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in a sample comprising 87 pairs of patients with adolescent scoliosis and their primary caregivers from July 2014 to October 2016 in Xi’an, China. Patients and their primary caregivers were administered a sociodemographic questionnaire. The caregiver burden, social support, and self-efficacy were assessed using the Chinese version of the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS), and General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE). A multivariate analysis was used to evaluate the factors associated with caregiver burden.

Results

Most primary caregivers observed in this study were female (65.5%), with mothers of the patients accounting for 58.6% of all the caregivers. The ZBI score of primary caregivers was 36.83±13.30, and most caregivers (88.5%) had moderate or severe burden. The factors associated with caregiver burden were Cobb angle of patients, SSRS scores, GSE scores, and monthly household income per capita of the caregiver (R²=0.556; P<0.001). The identified significant factors explained nearly 56% of the variance in the caregiver burden.

Conclusions

The data indicated that most primary caregivers for patients with scoliosis had a considerable caregiver burden, and intervention of social support and self-efficacy might be helpful in reducing caregiver burden.