Comparisons of the Computed Tomographic Scan and Panoramic Radiography Before Mandibular Third Molar Extraction Surgery

Investigation of the relationship between the mandibular third molar teeth and the inferior alveolar nerve using posteroanterior radiographs: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

The most severe complication that can occur after mandibular third molar (MM3) surgery is inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) damage. It is crucial to have a comprehensive radiographic evaluation to reduce the possibility of nerve damage. The objective of this study is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiographs (PR) and posteroanterior (PA) radiographs in identifying the association between impacted MM3 roots and IAN.

METHODS

This study included individuals who had PR, PA radiographs, and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and who had at least one impacted MM3. A total of 141 impacted MM3s were evaluated on CBCT images, and the findings were considered gold standard. The relationship between impacted MM3 roots and IAN was also evaluated on PR and PA radiographies. The data was analyzed using the McNemar and Chi-squared tests. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy of PR and PA radiographies were determined.

RESULTS

Considering CBCT the gold standard, the relationship between MM3 roots and IAN was found to be statistically significant between PR and CBCT (p = 0.00). However, there was no statistically significant relationship between PA radiography and CBCT (0.227). The study revealed that the most prevalent limitation of the PR in assessing the relationship between MM3 roots and IAN was the identification of false-positive relationship.

CONCLUSIONS

PA radiography may be a good alternative in developing countries to find out if there is a contact between MM3 roots and IAN because it is easier to get to, cheaper, and uses less radiation.

Artificial Intelligence Model to Detect Real Contact Relationship between Mandibular Third Molars and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Based on Panoramic Radiographs

This study aimed to develop a novel detection model for automatically assessing the real contact relationship between mandibular third molars (MM3s) and the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) based on panoramic radiographs processed with deep learning networks, minimizing pseudo-contact interference and reducing the frequency of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) use. A deep-learning network approach based on YOLOv4, named as MM3-IANnet, was applied to oral panoramic radiographs for the first time. The relationship between MM3s and the IAN in CBCT was considered the real contact relationship. Accuracy metrics were calculated to evaluate and compare the performance of the MM3-IANnet, dentists and a cooperative approach with dentists and the MM3-IANnet. Our results showed that in comparison with detection by dentists (AP = 76.45%) or the MM3-IANnet (AP = 83.02%), the cooperative dentist-MM3-IANnet approach yielded the highest average precision (AP = 88.06%). In conclusion, the MM3-IANnet detection model is an encouraging artificial intelligence approach that might assist dentists in detecting the real contact relationship between MM3s and IANs based on panoramic radiographs.

Assessment of the reliability of radiographic signs on panoramic radiographs to determine the relationship between mandibular third molars and the inferior alveolar canal

OBJECTIVE

To assess the reliability of radiographic signs of the relationship between impacted mandibular third molars (IMTMs) and the inferior alveolar canal (IAC), and the vertical relationship between IMTM and IAC on panoramic radiographs (PRs) as risk indicators for IAC exposure during extraction.

STUDY DESIGN

Seven radiographic signs regarding the appearance of roots and the IAC were assessed as present or absent on PRs. The vertical relationship between IMTM and the IAC was divided into 3 levels. The correlation between radiographic data and IAC exposure during extraction was analyzed by using χ² statistics and logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 198 IMTMs were examined. In 46 cases (23.2%), the IAC was exposed during extraction. Four radiographic signs-darkening of the root, narrowing of the root, narrowing of the IAC, and diversion of the IAC-were associated with IAC exposure (P < .05). Concurrence of 2 or more of 7 radiographic signs increased the risk of IAC exposure (P < .001). The vertical relationship between IMTM and the IAC was found to be a risk indicator for IAC exposure (P < .001). No significant correlation was found between IAC exposure and inferior alveolar nerve damage (P = .148).

CONCLUSIONS

Panoramic radiography is useful for assessing the risk of IAC exposure during IMTM extraction.

Can narrowing of the mandibular canal on pre-operative panoramic radiography predict close anatomical contact of the mandibular canal with the mandibular third molar? A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Inferior alveolar nerve injury is a common complication following mandibular third molar extraction. Accurate pre-operative assessment of the anatomical relationship between the mandibular third molar and the mandibular canal could help to avoid this injury. We performed a eta-analysis to investigate whether panoramic radiography could be used to assess the relationship between these two structures.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, SpringerLink, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched independently by two researchers from January 2008 to May 2018.

RESULTS

Seven articles were identified. Statistical analyses were performed using Revman 5.3 and Meta-disc 1.4 software tools. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.19 (95%CI:0.16-0.22) and 0.90 (95%CI:0.88-0.92), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 2.34 (95%CI:1.42-3.87) and 0.86 (95%CI:0.78-0.96), respectively. The area under the curve was 0.86 (95%CI:0.78-0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

According to the sign of narrowing of the mandibular canal, panoramic radiology used to assess the relationship between the mandibular third molar and the mandibular canal yielded high specificity, but low sensitivity. The absence of narrowing of the mandibular canal indicated that there was no close contact between these two structures. However, the presence of narrowing of the mandibular canal could not be used to accurately evaluate the relationship between these two structures, although it might indicate a high probability of close anatomical contact between these two structures. Further tests should be performed for providing adequate pre-operative risk assessment while planning for the surgery to reduce the risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury, as well as to enable an open discussion with the patient to decrease the risk of medical disputes.