Hemorheological Alteration in Patients with Cirrhosis Clinically Diagnosed with Portal Vein System Thrombosis After Splenectomy

Effect of Bile on Hemodynamics and Blood Micro-Rheological Parameters in Experimental Models of Bilhemia

As a rare complication of liver injury and certain interventions, bile can enter the bloodstream depending on the pressure gradient, resulting in bilhemia. Its micro-rheological and hemodynamic effects are still unclear. We aimed to study these parameters in experimental bilhemia models. Under general anesthesia, via laparotomy, bile was obtained by gallbladder puncture from pigs and by choledochal duct cannulation from rats. In vitro, 1 µL and 5 µL of bile were mixed with 500 µL of anticoagulated autologous blood. The systemic effect was also assessed (i.v. bile, 200 µL/bwkg). Hemodynamic and hematological parameters were monitored, and red blood cell (RBC) deformability and aggregation were determined. RBC deformability significantly decreased with the increasing bile concentration in vitro (1 µL: p = 0.033; 5 µL: p < 0.001) in both species. The RBC aggregation index values were concomitantly worsened (1 µL: p < 0.001; 5 µL: p < 0.001). The mean arterial pressure and heart rate decreased by 15.2 ± 6.9% and 4.6 ± 2.1% in rats (in 10.6 ± 2.6 s) and by 32.1 ± 14% and 25.2 ± 11.63% in pigs (in 48.3 ± 18.9 s). Restoration of the values was observed in 45 ± 9.5 s (rats) and 130 ± 20 s (pigs). Bilhemia directly affected the hemodynamic parameters and caused micro-rheological deterioration. The magnitude and dynamics of the changes were different for the two species.

Risk factors of portal vein system thrombosis after splenectomy: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The primary aim of the present study was to explore risk factors for portal vein system thrombosis following splenectomy.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane libraries was conducted to identify original studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Raw data on potential risk factors for portal vein system thrombosis after splenectomy were extracted for meta-analysis. Subsequently, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to verify the stability of the results.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies with 626 thrombosis events from 1807 splenectomy met the inclusion criteria. Larger spleen volume (SMD 0.44, P = 0.000), broader splenic vein diameter (WMD 2.30, P = 0.000), broader portal vein diameter (WMD 2.08, P = 0.000), a lower velocity of portal blood flow (WMD -0.91, P = 0.001), decreased platelet count (WMD -5.14, P = 0.007), decreased white blood cell (WMD -0.40, P = 0.027), decreased haemoglobin (WMD -9.14, P = 0.002), ascites (OR 1.81, P = 0.003) and bleeding history before surgery (OR 1.88, P = 0.002) were identified to be factors that exacerbated the risk of portal vein system thrombosis after splenectomy. Sex, age, preoperative prothrombin time, postoperative platelet count, postoperative D-dimer, operation time and intraoperative blood loss, did not increase the risk of thrombosis.

CONCLUSION

Larger spleen volume, broader splenic vein diameter, broader portal vein diameter, a lower velocity of portal blood flow, ascites, bleeding history before surgery, decreased platelet count, white blood cell and haemoglobin may increase the risk of portal vein system thrombosis.

A Simple Technique of Tunnel Constructing for Occluding Splenic Vessels During Laparoscopic Splenectomy in Patients with Cirrhosis

Purpose: Dissecting and ligating the splenic artery is crucial for bleeding control during laparoscopic splenectomy (LS). However, for patients with portal hypertension from liver cirrhosis, it is difficult for identification and ligation because the splenic vessel is circuitous and dilated. The aim of this study was to describe a simple technique of constructing a tunnel behind the tail of the pancreas for occluding the splenic vessels during LS in patients with portal hypertension. Materials and Methods: The clinical data of 61 patients who underwent LS from April 2016 to January 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. In 27 patients, the tunnel construction (TC) behind the tail of the pancreas approach was performed owning to difficulty in dissecting and ligating the splenic artery (TC group), including 17 patients who received the TC method directly and 10 patients who received the TC method after trying to dissect the splenic artery. The remaining 34 patients underwent traditional ligating of the splenic artery (LA group). The peri- and postoperative outcomes of operative time, blood loss, conversion rate, postoperative oral diet intake, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complication rate of the two groups were analyzed. All the operations were completed by the same group of surgeons. Results: All 61 operations were successfully completed. Compared with patients in the LA group, patients in the TC group had less blood loss (120.37 ± 40.74 mL versus 162.65 ± 87.47 mL; t = -2.317, P = .024). There was no statistical difference of operative time, conversion rate, complication rate, postoperative hospital stays, and follow-up between the two groups. Conclusions: The technique of constructing a tunnel behind the tail of the pancreas for occluding the splenic vessels was effective and safe in those patients whose splenic artery was difficult to dissect and ligate.