Importance of Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluation of the Treatment Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis Patients with Acute Attacks

Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery in discriminating between enhancing and nonenhancing lesions in multiple sclerosis

PURPOSE

This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and T2 fluid-attenuation inversion recovery (T2 FLAIR) in discriminating between new white matter (WM) enhancing lesions (ELs) and non-enhancing lesions (NELs) in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.

METHODS

Thirty MS patients with a new solitary WM lesion on brain MRI were analyzed. A region-of-interest was drawn on all lesions and the contralateral normal-appearing WM (NAWM) on T2 FLAIR and ADC maps. Normalized ratios of T2 FLAIR and ADC were calculated by dividing lesion value by the contralateral NAWM. Histogram analysis was performed on the T2 FLAIR, ADC values, and their normalized ratios. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare histogram parameters and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis determined the area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

T2 FLAIR histogram parameters were not significantly different between ELs and NELs. Several EL ADC histogram parameters, including maximum and mean, were significantly higher than NELs (p = 0.006 to p = 0.031). There was a trend toward significantly higher maximum ADC in ELs after adjusting for multiple comparisons (p = 0.054). The standard deviation of T2 FLAIR (AUC 0.70), maximum ADC (AUC 0.79), and normalized maximum ADC ratio (AUC 0.75) were among histogram parameters with the highest diagnostic performance. A maximum ADC cutoff of 1274 × 10^-6 mm²/s provided a 0.86 sensitivity and 0.75 specificity.

CONCLUSION

In patients with contraindications to gadolinium or concerns with gadolinium brain deposition, consideration may be given to ADC and T2 FLAIR as potential noncontrast methods for the evaluation of active MS lesions.

The quest for high spatial resolution diffusion-weighted imaging of the human brain in vivo

Diffusion-weighted imaging, a contrast unique to MRI, is used for assessment of tissue microstructure in vivo. However, this exquisite sensitivity to finer scales far above imaging resolution comes at the cost of vulnerability to errors caused by sources of motion other than diffusion motion. Addressing the issue of motion has traditionally limited diffusion-weighted imaging to a few acquisition techniques and, as a consequence, to poorer spatial resolution than other MRI applications. Advances in MRI imaging methodology have allowed diffusion-weighted MRI to push to ever higher spatial resolution. In this review we focus on the pulse sequences and associated techniques under development that have pushed the limits of image quality and spatial resolution in diffusion-weighted MRI.

The Use of Noncontrast Quantitative MRI to Detect Gadolinium-Enhancing Multiple Sclerosis Brain Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Concerns have arisen about the long-term health effects of repeat gadolinium injections in patients with multiple sclerosis and the incomplete characterization of MS lesion pathophysiology that results from relying on enhancement characteristics alone.

PURPOSE

Our aim was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis analyzing whether noncontrast MR imaging biomarkers can distinguish enhancing and nonenhancing brain MS lesions.

DATA SOURCES

Our sources were Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and the Cochrane data base from inception to August 2016.

STUDY SELECTION

We included 37 journal articles on 985 patients with MS who had MR imaging in which T1-weighted postcontrast sequences were compared with noncontrast sequences obtained during the same MR imaging examination by using ROI analysis of individual MS lesions.

DATA ANALYSIS

We performed random-effects meta-analyses comparing the standard mean difference of each MR imaging metric taken from enhancing-versus-nonenhancing lesions.

DATA SYNTHESIS

DTI-based fractional anisotropy values are significantly different between enhancing and nonenhancing lesions (P = .02), with enhancing lesions showing decreased fractional anisotropy compared with nonenhancing lesions. Of the other most frequently studied MR imaging biomarkers (mean diffusivity, magnetization transfer ratio, or ADC), none were significantly different (P values of 0.30, 0.47, and 0.19. respectively) between enhancing and nonenhancing lesions. Of the limited studies providing diagnostic accuracy measures, gradient-echo-based quantitative susceptibility mapping had the best performance in discriminating enhancing and nonenhancing MS lesions.

LIMITATIONS

MR imaging techniques and patient characteristics were variable across studies. Most studies did not provide diagnostic accuracy measures. All imaging metrics were not studied in all 37 studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Noncontrast MR imaging techniques, such as DTI-based FA, can assess MS lesion acuity without gadolinium.