Reliability of Hand-Held Dynamometer for assessing Isometric Lumbar Muscles Strength in Asymptomatic Healthy Population

Effects of Knee Joint Angle and Contraction Intensity on the Triceps Surae Stiffness

Purpose: Monitoring the contractility of muscles assists the clinician in understanding how muscle functions as part of the kinetic system. This study investigated the effect of knee joint angles under different resistance on the stiffness of the medial gastrocnemius (MG), lateral gastrocnemius (LG), and soleus (SOL) muscles using the shear wave elastography (SWE) technique.

Methods: A total of 22 females were recruited. During isometric plantar flexion, at knee 0-degree (fully extended) and knee 90-degree (flexed 90°), the shear modulus on the MG, LG, and SOL was measured by shear wave elastography at no contraction and two intensities (40% and 80%) of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). Shear modulus is a mechanical parameter to describe stiffness, and stiffness is a proxy for muscle contractility.

Results: There were moderate-to high-positive correlations between the active stiffness of triceps surae muscles and isometric contraction intensity (r: 0.57–0.91, p＜0.001). The active stiffness in MG and LG with extended knees was higher than that with flexed knees (p＜0.001). The active stiffness in SOL with flexed knee was higher than that with extended knee (p＜0.001).

Conclusion: Active stiffness can be considered a quantitative indicator generated by the force output of the triceps surae. Different knee joint angles cause three triceps surae muscles to exhibit non-uniform mechanical properties, which may explain part of the mechanism of soft tissue injury during physical exercise.

Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability of Strength Measurements Using a Pull Hand-Held Dynamometer Fixed to the Examiner's Body and Comparison with Push Dynamometry

Hand held dynamometers (HHDs) are the most used method to measure strength in clinical sitting. There are two methods to realize the assessment: pull and push. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the intra- and inter-rater reliability of a new measurement modality for pull HHD and to compare the inter-rater reliability and agreement of the measurements. Forty healthy subjects were evaluated by two assessors with different body composition and manual strength. Fifteen isometric tests were performed in two sessions with a one-week interval between them. Reliability was examined using the intra-class correlation (ICC) and the standard error of measurement (SEM). Agreement between raters was examined using paired t-tests. Intra- and inter-rater reliability for the tests performed with the pull HHD showed excellent values, with ICCs ranging from 0.991 to 0.998. For tests with values higher than 200 N, push HHD showed greater differences between raters than pull HHD. Pull HHD attached to the examiner’s body is a method with excellent reliability to measure isometric strength and showed better agreement between examiners, especially for those tests that showed high levels of strength. Pull HHD is a new alternative to perform isometric tests with less rater dependence.