1
|
Wagner AD, Njuguna IN, Neary J, Lawley KA, Louden DKN, Tiwari R, Jiang W, Kalu N, Burke RM, Mangale D, Obermeyer C, Escudero JN, Bulterys MA, Waters C, Mollo B, Han H, Barr-DiChiara M, Baggaley R, Jamil MS, Shah P, Wong VJ, Drake AL, Johnson CC. Demand creation for HIV testing services: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2023; 20:e1004169. [PMID: 36943831 PMCID: PMC10030044 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND HIV testing services (HTS) are the first steps in reaching the UNAIDS 95-95-95 goals to achieve and maintain low HIV incidence. Evaluating the effectiveness of different demand creation interventions to increase uptake of efficient and effective HTS is useful to prioritize limited programmatic resources. This review was undertaken to inform World Health Organization (WHO) 2019 HIV testing guidelines and assessed the research question, "Which demand creation strategies are effective for enhancing uptake of HTS?" focused on populations globally. METHODS AND FINDINGS The following electronic databases were searched through September 28, 2021: PubMed, PsycInfo, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL Complete, Web of Science Core Collection, EMBASE, and Global Health Database; we searched IAS and AIDS conferences. We systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared any demand creation intervention (incentives, mobilization, counseling, tailoring, and digital interventions) to either a control or other demand creation intervention and reported HTS uptake. We pooled trials to evaluate categories of demand creation interventions using random-effects models for meta-analysis and assessed study quality with Cochrane's risk of bias 1 tool. This study was funded by the WHO and registered in Prospero with ID CRD42022296947. We screened 10,583 records and 507 conference abstracts, reviewed 952 full texts, and included 124 RCTs for data extraction. The majority of studies were from the African (N = 53) and Americas (N = 54) regions. We found that mobilization (relative risk [RR]: 2.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.30, 3.09], p < 0.05; risk difference [RD]: 0.29, 95% CI [0.16, 0.43], p < 0.05, N = 4 RCTs), couple-oriented counseling (RR: 1.98, 95% CI [1.02, 3.86], p < 0.05; RD: 0.12, 95% CI [0.03, 0.21], p < 0.05, N = 4 RCTs), peer-led interventions (RR: 1.57, 95% CI [1.15, 2.15], p < 0.05; RD: 0.18, 95% CI [0.06, 0.31], p < 0.05, N = 10 RCTs), motivation-oriented counseling (RR: 1.53, 95% CI [1.07, 2.20], p < 0.05; RD: 0.17, 95% CI [0.00, 0.34], p < 0.05, N = 4 RCTs), short message service (SMS) (RR: 1.53, 95% CI [1.09, 2.16], p < 0.05; RD: 0.11, 95% CI [0.03, 0.19], p < 0.05, N = 5 RCTs), and conditional fixed value incentives (RR: 1.52, 95% CI [1.21, 1.91], p < 0.05; RD: 0.15, 95% CI [0.07, 0.22], p < 0.05, N = 11 RCTs) all significantly and importantly (≥50% relative increase) increased HTS uptake and had medium risk of bias. Lottery-based incentives and audio-based interventions less importantly (25% to 49% increase) but not significantly increased HTS uptake (medium risk of bias). Personal invitation letters and personalized message content significantly but not importantly (<25% increase) increased HTS uptake (medium risk of bias). Reduced duration counseling had comparable performance to standard duration counseling (low risk of bias) and video-based interventions were comparable or better than in-person counseling (medium risk of bias). Heterogeneity of effect among pooled studies was high. This study was limited in that we restricted to randomized trials, which may be systematically less readily available for key populations; additionally, we compare only pooled estimates for interventions with multiple studies rather than single study estimates, and there was evidence of publication bias for several interventions. CONCLUSIONS Mobilization, couple- and motivation-oriented counseling, peer-led interventions, conditional fixed value incentives, and SMS are high-impact demand creation interventions and should be prioritized for programmatic consideration. Reduced duration counseling and video-based interventions are an efficient and effective alternative to address staffing shortages. Investment in demand creation activities should prioritize those with undiagnosed HIV or ongoing HIV exposure. Selection of demand creation interventions must consider risks and benefits, context-specific factors, feasibility and sustainability, country ownership, and universal health coverage across disease areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anjuli D. Wagner
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Irene N. Njuguna
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Research & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Jillian Neary
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Kendall A. Lawley
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Diana K. N. Louden
- University Libraries, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Ruchi Tiwari
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Wenwen Jiang
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Ngozi Kalu
- Department of Infectious Diseases Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rachael M. Burke
- Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Dorothy Mangale
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Chris Obermeyer
- The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jaclyn N. Escudero
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Michelle A. Bulterys
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Chloe Waters
- Statistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research and Prevention, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Bastien Mollo
- Infectious and Tropical Diseases Department, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Hannah Han
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | | | - Rachel Baggaley
- Global HIV, Hepatitis and STI Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Muhammad S. Jamil
- Global HIV, Hepatitis and STI Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Purvi Shah
- Global HIV, Hepatitis and STI Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
- UNAIDS, Asia Pacific, Regional Support Team, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Vincent J. Wong
- USAID, Division of HIV Prevention, Care and Treatment, Office of HIV/AIDS, Washington DC, United States of America
| | - Alison L. Drake
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Cheryl C. Johnson
- Global HIV, Hepatitis and STI Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Skinner J, Hempstone H, Raney L, Galavotti C, Light B, Weinberger M, Van Lith L. Elevating Social and Behavior Change as an Essential Component of Family Planning Programs. Stud Fam Plann 2021; 52:383-393. [PMID: 34268743 PMCID: PMC8457161 DOI: 10.1111/sifp.12169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The global family planning community has made significant progress towards enabling 120 million more women and girls to use contraceptives by 2020, though we enter the decade ahead with a long road yet to travel. While investment in strong health systems and supply chains is still needed, the supply‐driven approach dominant in family planning fails to address the individual, relational, and social barriers faced by women and couples in achieving their reproductive intentions and desired family size. Overcoming these barriers will require a better understanding of behavioral drivers and the social environment in which family planning decisions are made, and an increased investment in the proven, yet underutilized, approach of social and behavior change (SBC). We make the case that a more intentional focus on the science of human behavior in family planning can help advance the achievement of global, regional, and national goals while also calling for strategic and sustained investment that reflects the critical importance and proven impact of SBC approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Skinner
- Joanna Skinner and Lynn Van Lith are at the Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, 21202, USA
| | - Hope Hempstone
- Hope Hempstone is at the United States Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Laura Raney
- Laura Raney is at the FP2030, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Christine Galavotti
- Christine Galavotti is at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Benedict Light
- Benedict Light is at the United Nations Population Fund, New York, USA
| | | | - Lynn Van Lith
- Joanna Skinner and Lynn Van Lith are at the Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, 21202, USA
| |
Collapse
|