Recent advances in graft-versus-host disease

Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Sickle Cell Disease and Transfusion-Dependent Beta-Thalassemia Treated With Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Literature Review

Background

The purpose of this study is to synthesize evidence on disease-specific outcomes in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) or transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia (TDT) following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT).

Methods

A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted in MEDLINE and Embase to identify publications up to May 2023, including patients with SCD or TDT treated with allo-HSCT. Occurrence of vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs) including acute pain, acute chest syndrome, priapism, and splenic sequestration in SCD, and red blood cell transfusion (RBCT) requirements in TDT were the main outcomes of interest. Transplant-related outcomes such as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and graft failure/rejection were summarized in the studies that reported main outcomes. Proportion of patients experiencing VOCs or RBCTs, GVHD, and graft failure/rejection after allo-HSCT were aggregated and descriptively reported with range across studies.

Results

Thirty-one SCD studies met inclusion criteria. Twenty-nine studies assessed for VOC and pain crisis events after allo-HSCT; 11 studies reported ≥1 VOCs after allo-HSCT in 6.9% of the 2,760 patients. Graft failure was reported in 14.4% (0.9%-18.8%, 14 studies) of patients, graft rejection in 5.5% (1.6%-100.0%, 12 studies) of patients, acute GVHD in 22.4% (1.6%-50.0%, 19 studies) of patients, and chronic GVHD in 20.4% (3.3%-57.1%, 14 studies) of patients. Seventy-eight TDT studies met inclusion criteria. Fifty-six studies reported that 8.8% of the 3,107 patients required RBCTs after allo-HSCT. Graft failure was reported in 5.4% (1.1%-80.0%, 21 studies) of patients, graft rejection in 7.5% (0.5%-42.9%, 50 studies) of patients, acute GVHD in 28.4% (5.2%-100.0%, 57 studies) and chronic GVHD in 15.2% (1.3%-50.0%, 51 studies) of TDT patients.

Conclusion

Based on this SLR, after allo-HSCT, a portion of patients with SCD continue to experience VOCs and a portion of patients with TDT continue to require RBCTs, in addition to experiencing GVHD and graft failure or rejection.

Comparison of ATG-thymoglobulin with atg-fresenius in patients with hematological malignancies who undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a propensity score-matched analysis

We retrospectively compared the outcomes of 166 patients with hematological malignancies who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) using ATG-Thymoglobulin (ATG-T) at 10 mg/kg or ATG-Fresenius (ATG-F) at 20 mg/kg. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was applied, with 44 patients assigned to each group. The ATG-T group showed a trend toward a higher incidence of bacterial infections (72.7% vs. 65.9%, P = 0.064). Additionally, the ATG-T group had a significantly higher incidence of other viral infections, including BK virus and herpes zoster virus (40.9% vs. 15.9%, P = 0.003), compared to the ATG-F group. Furthermore, the ATG-F group experienced a lower incidence of high fever (4.5% vs. 50.0%, P < 0.001) and reduced ATG treatment costs [¥ 45100 (28700-82000) vs. ¥ 56250 (38000-85000), P < 0.001] compared to ATG-T. The incidences of acute GVHD, grade III-IV aGVHD, grades of aGVHD, chronic GVHD, 3-year overall survival (OS), transplantation-related mortality (TRM), non-relapse mortality (NRM), disease-free survival (DFS), and GVHD-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS) were similar between the ATG-T and ATG-F groups. In conclusion, our study suggests that ATG-F is superior to ATG-T in terms of viral infections, fever rate, and treatment cost.

Future biomarkers for acute graft-versus-host disease: potential roles of nucleic acids, metabolites, and immune cell markers

INTRODUCTION

Acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) is a potentially lethal complication after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Biomarkers are used to estimate the risk of aGVHD and evaluate response to treatment. The most widely used biomarkers are systemic levels of various protein mediators involved in immunoregulation or reflecting tissue damage. However, systemic levels of other molecular markers such as nucleic acids or metabolites, levels of immunocompetent cells or endothelial cell markers may also be useful biomarkers in aGVHD.

AREAS COVERED

This review is based on selected articles from the PubMed database. We review and discuss the scientific basis for further studies to evaluate nucleic acids, metabolites, circulating immunocompetent cell subsets or endothelial markers as biomarkers in aGVHD.

EXPERT OPINION

A wide range of interacting and communicating cells are involved in the complex pathogenesis of aGVHD. Both nucleic acids and metabolites function as soluble mediators involved in communication between various subsets of immunocompetent cells and between immunocompetent cells and other neighboring cells. Clinical and experimental studies suggest that both neutrophils, monocytes, and endothelial cells are involved in the early stages of aGVHD pathogenesis. In our opinion, the possible clinical use of these molecular and cellular biomarkers warrants further investigation.

The role of interleukin-2 in graft-versus-host disease pathogenesis, prevention and therapy

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a significant complication following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), posing substantial risks to patient survival. In the late follow-up phase of transplanted patients, GVHD is also a major cause of morbidity and disability, mostly due to low response to first-line steroids and the lack of effective standard therapies in the second line. This review provides a description of GVHD pathogenesis, with a focus on the central role of Interleukin-2 (IL-2). IL-2 is one of the critical mediators in the complex pathogenesis of GVHD, contributing to the intricate balance between regulatory T cells (Tregs) and effector T cells (Teffs). Due to this pivotal role, several studies investigate the potential of IL-2 as a therapeutic option for GVHD management. We discuss the outcomes of low-dose IL-2 therapies and their impact on Treg proliferation and steroid dependency reduction. Additionally, the effects of combining IL-2 with other treatments, such as extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) and Treg-enriched lymphocyte infusions, are highlighted. Novel approaches, including modified IL-2 complexes and IL-2 receptor blockade, are explored for their potential in selectively enhancing Treg function and limiting Teff activation. The evolving understanding of IL-2's pivotal role in immune regulation presents promising prospects for applying treatment and prevention strategies for GVHD.

Interventions to reduce the risk of side-effects of cancer treatments in childhood

INTRODUCTION

Childhood cancers as a group affect around 1 in 500 children but each individual diagnosis is a rare disease. While research largely focuses on improving cure rates, the management of side effects of treatment are high priority for clinicians, families and children and young people.

AREAS COVERED

The prevention and efficient management of infectious complications, oral mucositis, nausea and vomiting and graft-vs-host disease illustrated with examples of implementation research, translation of engineering to care, advances in statistical methodologies, and traditional bench-to-patient development. The reviews draw from existing systematic reviews and well conducted clinical practice guidelines.

EXPERT OPINION

The four areas are driven from patient and family priorities. Some of the problems outlined are ready for proven interventions, others require us to develop new technologies. Advancement needs us to make the best use of new methods of applied health research and clinical trial methodologies. Some of the greatest challenges may be those we're not fully aware of, as new therapies move from their use in adult oncological practice into children. This will need us to continue our collaborative, multi-professional, multi-disciplinary and eclectic approach.

Multidisciplinary Management of Morbidities Associated with Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) represents a common long-term complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). It imposes a significant morbidity burden and is the leading cause of non-relapse mortality among long-term HSCT survivors. cGVHD can manifest in nearly any organ, severely affecting the quality of life of a transplant survivor. While the mainstay of treatment has remained systemic immunosuppression with glucocorticoids, progress has been made within the last few years with approvals of three oral agents to treat steroid-refractory cGVHD: ibrutinib, ruxolitinib, and belumosudil. Iatrogenesis contributes a significant portion of the morbidity experienced by patients with cGVHD, primarily from glucocorticoids. This review highlights the myriad impacts of cGVHD, including and beyond the traditional organ systems captured by the National Institutes of Health Consensus Criteria, including iatrogenic complications of long-term immunosuppression. It presents the implications of cGVHD and its treatment on cardiovascular and metabolic health, bone density, endocrine function, sexual health, and ocular and pulmonary disease and outlines a framework around the comprehensive multidisciplinary approach for its evaluation and management.

Decision-making conflicts regarding hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with hematological neoplasms: A descriptive qualitative study

PURPOSE

To explore and understand the conflict in decision-making of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with hematological neoplasms.

METHODS

A descriptive qualitative study of 16 patients with hematologic neoplasms in the hematology department was conducted between February 2022 and May 2022. Purposive sampling was used to select participants. Face-to-face in-depth personal interviews were performed. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded. This descriptive qualitative study adhered to the COREQ checklist.

RESULTS

All patients indicated difficulties in making decisions regarding hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Five themes were identified: (1) weighing the pros and cons of HSCT, (2) financial burden versus desire for rebirth, (3) treatment urgency versus being unprepared, (4) saving oneself versus damaging loved ones, and (5) family companionship versus emotional isolation. These themes reflect the contradictions, entanglements, and realistic conflicts in decision-making regarding hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with hematological neoplasms.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified multiple conflicts of decision-making in patients with hematologic neoplasms regarding decisions on hematopoietic stem cell transplantations. Healthcare workers should provide patients with disease knowledge, doctor-patient and intra-family communication, and access to financial support in order to resolve their conflicts and ultimately help them make the decision that is most optimum for them.

Fecal microbiota transplantation in autoimmune diseases - An extensive paper on a pathogenetic therapy

The role of infections in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases has long been recognized and reported. In addition to infectious agents, the internal composition of the "friendly" living bacteria, (microbiome) and its correlation to immune balance and dysregulation have drawn the attention of researchers for decades. Nevertheless, only recently, scientific papers regarding the potential role of transferring microbiome from healthy donor subjects to patients with autoimmune diseases has been proposed. Fecal microbiota transplantation or FMT, carries the logic of transferring microorganisms responsible for immune balance from healthy donors to individuals with immune dysregulation or more accurately for our paper, autoimmune diseases. Viewing the microbiome as a pathogenetic player allows us to consider FMT as a pathogenetic-based treatment. Promising results alongside improved outcomes have been demonstrated in patients with different autoimmune diseases following FMT. Therefore, in our current extensive review, we aimed to highlight the implication of FMT in various autoimmune diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease, autoimmune thyroid and liver diseases, systemic lupus erythematosus, and type 1 diabetes mellitus, among others. Presenting all the aspects of FMT in more than 12 autoimmune diseases in one paper, to the best of our knowledge, is the first time presented in medical literature. Viewing FMT as such could contribute to better understanding and newer application of the model in the therapy of autoimmune diseases, indeed.