Chaperones and intimate physical examinations: what do male and female patients want?

The Financial Considerations of Employing a Dedicated Chaperone in Clinical Practice

Introduction: Medical associations and medicolegal bodies are urging for increased chaperone use by physicians during intimate physical examinations in clinical practice (such as breast or pelvic examinations). However, widespread chaperone use is limited by factors such as staff availability and financial considerations. Presently, there is a scarcity of information available regarding the cost of hiring a dedicated chaperone. This study investigates the cost of hiring a chaperone and its financial implications for a physician's clinical practice. Materials and Methods: Using data from the Government of Canada website, the range of salary rates for clinic staff who can act as a chaperone in Canada was analyzed. The cost of hiring a chaperone was estimated to be in the range between the cost of hiring a minimum-wage worker and a nurse (the highest-paid hired medical office staff). Obstetrics and Gynecology as well as Plastic Surgery urban community practices were consulted regarding the costs of operating a clinic. Results: The approximate annual income for a minimum-wage worker in Canada is $29,250 CAD. Registered nurses earn on average $72,783.75 CAD per year. The cost of operating a private clinic practice with one staff member in Canada is on average $102,500 CAD per year. Thus, hiring an additional full-time chaperone could increase clinic expenses by approximately 49% per year, bringing the clinic cost to approximately $153,517 CAD per year. For part-time employment, the annual cost of hiring a chaperone is approximately $10,203 CAD for each day/week of employment. Conclusion: In terms of financial considerations, hiring a chaperone can increase clinic expenses by approximately one-and-a-half times. The findings of this study provide an important reference for physicians and may assist with the decision to employ chaperones in clinical practice.

Dangers in the dark: Calling for a safer practice of transvaginal ultrasonography

Background

The intimate examination is an important component of the assessment of a patient presenting with obstetric or gynaecological concerns. Ultrasound practitioners, like any other medical practitioner, are in a unique and privileged position. During the examination, the sonographers engage in a very close and personal interaction with an individual whom they have likely never met. They are also most likely unfamiliar with their social situation, cultural background, previous experiences with the healthcare profession and more importantly, any history of sexual trauma. It is an extremely sensitive area of practice which places a great deal of responsibility on the clinician to ensure that they not only protect their patient from psychological distress, but also themselves, from the threat of litigation arising from such distress.

Aims

This paper highlights the current governance requirements for sonographers and makes suggestions to support them in safeguarding their patients and themselves from allegations of unprofessional conduct, until such a regulatory body exists.

Materials and Methods

A wide-ranging review of the literature exploring the perceptions of female patients regarding intimate sonographic examination was performed using standard search engines. Additionally, grey literature was searched for policy statements and government regulatory documents for guidance on the topic.

Results

Although much research has been undertaken in this field across diverse cultures and knowledge in this area is ever increasing; however, the guidelines for sonographers appear to be site specific and variable. At present, there is no overarching governance for sonographers, as there is with practitioners registered with the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency.

Discussion

While there are practice standards for the purposes of Medicare set out by the Diagnostic Imaging Accreditation Scheme, there is no regulatory professional standard that sonographers are held accountable to. This is problematic and has the potential for inadvertent boundary transgression by the practitioner, as there is also no existing framework for management of such incidents in an equitable manner.

Conclusion

The intimate examination is generally well tolerated; however, there is a subset of the population who are vulnerable to psychological distress arising from the examination. The sonographer must be astute to signs of distress and act in accordance with the intimate examination guidelines set out by AHPRA, for the dual purpose of protecting their patients against harm and also themselves from the threat of litigation.

Intimate patient examinations: The awareness, acceptance and practice preference of transvaginal ultrasound scan among women in a South-southern State of Nigeria

Background

Transvaginal ultrasound scan (TVS) is a relatively new routine intimate examination in Nigeria carried out only in fertility clinics, specialist radio-diagnostic centres and a few public hospitals. It is a procedure, which many patients find intrusive and may result in anxiety. The gender of the practitioner and the presence of a third person in the room may influence patient's acceptance to undergo the procedure. Centres offering this service do not routinely ask for the patient's opinion, which negates the patient-centred care principle. The aim of this study is to assess women's awareness, acceptance and practice preference of TVS to get their opinion about the preferred gender of sonologist and presence of a third person during the procedure in comparison to other intimate examinations.

Materials and Methods

It is a questionnaire-based prospective survey involving women referred for various indications to the radiology department of a Navy Hospital in south-southern Nigeria for 1 month.

Results

We recruited 204 women. Although only 20.6% knew about TVS, 98.5% accepted to undergo TVS. Forty-six percent were indifferent about the gender of the sonologist, while 45% and 9% preferred a female and a male, respectively. About 50.3% wanted a third person in the room during the TVS and majority preferred their husbands (44.7%) to a chaperone (35.8%).

Conclusion

The awareness of TVS is low, but it enjoys wide acceptance. Patient's preference for practitioner's gender and chaperone use are variable similar to findings from other intimate examinations, so consent should be sought before the procedure.