Evaluation of a multiplex flow immunoassay versus conventional assays in detecting autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus

[Methods of autoantibody diagnostics - when immunofluorescence test, when ELISA?]

The detection of circulating autoantibodies against a variety of structural and functional molecules present in ubiquitous or tissue-specific cells is critical to the diagnosis of many autoimmune diseases (systemic - such as systemic rheumatic diseases - and organ-specific diseases). In particular, the determination of autoantibodies is one of the classification and/or diagnostic criteria for some autoimmune diseases and has a relevant predictive value, since many autoantibodies can be detected years before the clinical manifestation of a disease.The identification of these antigen-antibody systems and the simultaneous development of laboratory methods for detecting and measuring autoantibodies are considered one of the milestones in the history of clinical immunology over the last 60 years. Many different immunoassay methods have been developed and used in laboratory practice, from the early conventional (or monoplex) analytical methods that can detect single autoantibodies to the newer multiplex platforms that can quantify dozens of molecules. Various diagnostic immunoassays commonly used in current laboratory practice for the detection of autoantibodies are presented in this review.

Prevalence of autoantibody responses in acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Immunopathology may play a significant role in the pathogenesis of Coronavirus-Induced Disease-19 (COVID-19). Immune-mediated tissue damage could result from development of rapid autoimmune responses, characterized by production of self-reactive autoantibodies. In this study, we tested specimens from acutely ill patients hospitalized with COVID-19 for autoantibodies against nuclear, vasculitis-associated, and phospholipid antigens. Detectable autoantibodies were present in 30% of the patients in our cohort, with the majority of reactive specimens demonstrating antibodies to nuclear antigens. However, antinuclear antibodies were only weakly reactive and directed to single antigens, as is often seen during acute infection. We identified strongly reactive antibodies to nuclear antigens only in patients with a prior history of autoimmune disease. In our cohort, the prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies was low, and we did not detect any vasculitis-associated autoantibodies. We found similar levels of inflammatory markers and total immunoglobulin levels in autoantibody positive versus negative patients, but anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels were increased in autoantibody positive patients. Together, our results suggest that acute COVID-19 is not associated with a high prevalence of clinically significant autoantibody responses of the type usually associated with autoimmune rheumatic disease.

•

Autoantibodies against nuclear antigens are detectable in 25% of patients hospitalized with acute COVID-19.

•

Anti-nuclear antigen antibodies were weakly reactive and most often directed to single antigens.

•

Vasculitis-associated autoantibodies were not detected in specimens from patients with acute COVID-19.

•

Anti-phospholipid antibodies were infrequently detected in patients with acute COVID-19.

Autoantibody-positive healthy individuals with lower lupus risk display a unique immune endotype

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune diseases comprise a spectrum of illnesses and are on the rise worldwide. Although antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) are detected in many autoimmune diseases, up to 20% of healthy women are ANA-positive (ANA+) and most will never develop clinical symptoms. Furthermore, disease transition is higher among ANA+ African Americans compared with ANA+ European Americans.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the immune features that might define and prevent transition to clinical autoimmunity in ANA+ healthy individuals.

METHODS

We comprehensively phenotyped immune profiles of African Americans and European Americans who are ANA-negative (ANA-) healthy, ANA+ healthy, or have SLE using single cell mass cytometry, next-generation RNA-sequencing, multiplex cytokine profiling, and phospho-signaling analyses.

RESULTS

We found that, compared with both ANA- and ANA+ healthy individuals, patients with SLE of both races displayed T-cell expansion and elevated expression of type I and II interferon pathways. We discovered a unique immune signature that suggests a suppressive immune phenotype and reduced CD11C⁺ autoimmunity-associated B cells in healthy ANA+ European Americans that is absent in their SLE or even healthy ANA- counterparts, or among African American cohorts. In contrast, ANA+ healthy African Americans exhibited elevated expression of T-cell activation markers and higher plasma levels of IL-6 than did healthy ANA+ European Americans.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose that this novel immune signature identified in ANA+ healthy European Americans may protect them from T-cell expansion, heightened activation of interferon pathways, and disease transition.

Detection of Anti-Extractable Nuclear Antigens in Patients with Systemic Rheumatic Disease via Fluorescence Enzyme Immunoassay and Its Clinical Utility

PURPOSE

Testing for autoantibodies to extractable nuclear antigens (ENAs) plays an important role in the diagnosis and management of systemic rheumatic disease. Currently, no gold standard tests are available for detecting anti-ENAs. To address this gap, we aimed to identify an assay that exhibits satisfactory diagnostic performance in the detection of five common anti-ENAs by comparing two commonly used assays, an automated fluorescent enzyme immunoassay (FEIA) and a microplate ELISA assay.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sera from 100 patients with systemic rheumatic disease were collected and assayed with FEIA and microplate ELISA to detect anti-ENAs. Statistical analyses were performed to check the agreement rate between the two platforms using kappa coefficients. Analytical sensitivity and specificity for each assay were calculated.

RESULTS

The concordance rates between ELISA and FEIA ranged from 89% for anti-RNP to 97% for anti-Scl-70, and the kappa coefficients of the two assays were in the range of 0.44 to 0.82. Between the two assays, a significant difference in sensitivity and specificity was seen only for anti-Sm and anti-RNP, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this study, FEIA and ELISA showed comparable efficiency for detecting anti-ENAs.