Cost Comparison between Laparoscopic and Open Appendectomies in Children

Self-Locking Polymeric Clips Are Safe for the Closure of Appendiceal Stump in Laparoscopic Appendectomy

Background: Closure of the appendix stump is critical to avoid serious postoperative complications. There are a number of options, but the best one has not been identified yet. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of appendiceal stump closure using self-locking polymeric clips and endoloops. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the prospectively maintained database of patients with acute appendicitis was performed. Patient demographic details and surgical characteristics, including the duration of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and also the cost of the appendix stump closure, were recorded. Patients were divided into two groups according to the appendix stump closure method: the clips group if it was closed with self-locking polymeric clips and the loops group if Vicryl or PDS loops were used. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's chi-squared test, Wilcoxon rank sum (Mann-Whitney U) test, and Fisher's exact test in R statistical software package version 4.2.1. Results: 515 patients were included in the study from June 2016 to April 2021. There were no significant differences in terms of demographics (p-value in comparison of groups' sex > 0.99, age p-value 0.16), postoperative complications (p-value > 0.99), histological findings (p-value 0.27), or length of hospital stays (p-value 0.18) between the two patient groups (clips group, N = 454 and loops group, N = 61). The price of operation while using different appendiceal stump closures is significantly different. In a laparoscopic appendectomy, one stump closure with self-locking clips costs 7.69 €, with Vicryl loops-91.35 €, with PDS loops-96.51 €, and with a stapler-514.50 €. Conclusions: Self-locking polymeric clips can be used for the safe and effective closure of an appendiceal stump. There were no significant differences in the postoperative time (30 days) or complication rates among patients in both (clips and loops) groups. Thus, this might be a technique to reduce expenses while maintaining good postoperative results after laparoscopic appendectomy.

Single-center comparison of outcomes between laparoscopic appendectomy and transumbilical laparoscopic assisted appendectomy

PURPOSE

Appendectomy is the most common pediatric emergency surgery performed to date. This study compared outcomes between laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and transumbilical laparoscopic assisted appendectomy (TULAA) for 1154 uncomplicated patients across 5 years at a single institution. Primary outcomes include length of stay (LOS), post-operative complications, pain score, and operating room (OR) time.

METHODS

Demographic and clinical data was collected for 1154 eligible patients treated for uncomplicated appendicitis between August 2014-October 2019, with 830 patients in the LA group, and 324 in the TULAA group. Mixed effects modeling procedure using logistic and linear regression examined the effect of surgery type on the four primary outcomes after adjustment for potential clustering effect of surgeon and confounding factors.

RESULTS

Of 1154 patients, 62.7% were male, and mean (SD) age was 10.9 (3.6) years. Median [IQR] LOS was 28.0 h [22.0, 36.0], mean (SD) OR time was 29.0 (10.0) minutes, and median [IQR] pain at maximum level was 5.5 (2.7). The complication rate overall was <5.0% and did not differ between TULAA and LA groups (p > 0.05). OR time was reduced by an average of 5.2 min in the TULAA group (p < 0.001), pain did not differ between groups overall (p > 0.05), and patients were more likely to be discharged within 24 h in patients who underwent TULAA (OR = 5.3 [1.6, 17.4], p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

Retrospective analysis of 1154 pediatric appendectomies, found no difference in complications between single- and three-incision laparoscopic procedures (TULAA vs. LA). Findings suggest TULAA is a safe procedure for acute appendicitis in pediatrics.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Same-Day Discharge after Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Simple Appendicitis in Pediatric Patients—Is It Possible?

(1) Background: One-day surgery has been widely adopted for many elective laparoscopic procedures in pediatric patients. Recently, the same protocol has been investigated for some emergency procedures, such as laparoscopic appendectomy. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of discharge from hospital within 24 h in pediatric patients who received laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis. (2) Methods: From 1 March 2021 to 1 May 2022, a total of 180 pediatric patients who were discharged from hospital within 24 h after laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis were included in this prospective single-center study. The primary outcome of this study was the safety of discharge from hospital within 24 h after laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis, as well as the parental satisfaction with this protocol. Secondary outcomes included the rate of readmission or unplanned return to the operating room, the complication rate and a cost-effectiveness analysis. For each patient, demographic data, preoperative evaluation (physical examination, laboratory data, imaging), duration of surgery, intraoperative and postoperative complications, length of hospital stay and pain levels, as well as parental satisfaction with this protocol, were recorded. (3) Results: The median age was 11 years (interquartile range (IQR) 10, 14). The majority of the patients (63.8%) were males. The median length of hospital stay after surgery was 15 h (IQR 12, 19). The highest level of satisfaction, at discharge, was recorded in most of the respondents (n = 155, 86.1%), while the remaining 25 (13.9%) expressed moderate levels of satisfaction. The median pain levels according to a visual analogue scale for all postoperative days were low (range 0–4). In four patients (2.2%), unplanned readmission before the seventh postoperative day because of postoperative intraabdominal abscess was recorded. All patients with abscess formation were treated conservatively. The majority of the parents (n = 175; 97.2%) expressed the highest level of satisfaction during the outpatient follow-up examination on the seventh postoperative day. (4) Conclusions: Same-day discharge after laparoscopic appendectomy for simple appendicitis in pediatric patients was safe and feasible. Parental satisfaction with this protocol was very high. With the right protocol and parent education, pediatric patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy because of non-complicated acute appendicitis may be successfully treated in this way.

A new approach to laparoscopic appendectomy in children-clipless/sutureless Harmonic scalpel laparoscopic appendectomy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate Harmonic scalpel performance in laparoscopic appendectomy for sealing the base of the appendix in children.

METHODS

During the study period, a total of 312 patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy were included in prospective bicenter clinical trial. The patients were divided in two study groups in regard to technique used for appendiceal base closure. In the first group (n = 197) the appendiceal base was secured using a polymeric clip while in the second group (n = 115) the Harmonic scalpel was used for sealing the base in a stepwise manner, without placing any clip or suture. Outcomes of treatment, including complication rates, duration of surgery and length of hospital stay were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 312 patients with a median age of 11 years (IQR 8, 15) were included in study. Of these, 191 were males (61.2%). Both groups were symmetric in regard to baseline characteristics of the patients. A total of 10 (5.1%) postoperative complications (postoperative abscess n = 7 and ileus n = 3) were recorded in the polymeric clip group while none of the patients from the clipless group had postoperative complications (P = 0.015). In the group who received a polymeric clip appendectomy, fever lasting 0-72 h and > 72 h was recorded in 16 (8.1%) and 12 (6.1%) children, respectively, while in the clipless group, it was observed in 2 (1.7%) and 5 (4.3%) children, respectively (P = 0.048). Significantly shorter surgical times were found in the clipless group compared to the polymeric clip group (21 min (IQR 18, 25) vs. 30 min (IQR 22, 40), P < 0.0001). Also, length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the clipless group of the patients (2 days (IQR 2, 3) vs. 3 days (IQR 2, 4), P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Clipless harmonic scalpel laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe and effective method in children for treatment of acute appendicitis with lesser number of complications and shorter duration of surgery compared to laparoscopic appendectomy in which the appendiceal base is secured with clip.

Evaluating quantity and quality of literature focusing on health economics and pharmacoeconomics in Gulf Cooperation Council countries

BACKGROUND

The importance of pharmacoeconomics and health economics has been augmented. It has the potential to provide evidence to aid in optimal decision-making in the funding of cost-effective medicines and services in Gulf Cooperation Council countries (G.C.C).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the quality and quantity of health economic researches published until the end of 2017 in G.C.C. and to identify the factors that affect the quality of studies.

METHOD

Studies were included according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quantity was recorded, and the quality was assessed using the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument.

RESULTS

Forty-nine studies were included. The mean (SD) quality score of all studies was 57.83 (25.05), and a high number of reviewed studies (47%) were evaluated as either poor or extremely poor quality. The factors that affect the quality of studies with statistical significance were, the type and method of economic evaluation, the economic outcome was the objective of the research, author`s background, the perspective of the study, health intervention and source of funding.

CONCLUSION

The use of economic evaluation studies in G.C.C was limited. Different factors that affect the quality of articles such as performing a full economic evaluation and choosing societal perspective were identified. Strategies to improve the quality of future studies were recommended.