Periodontally Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics versus Conventional Extraction - Based Orthodontics in Dental Decrowding : A Randomized Controlled Trial

The efficacy and accuracy of 3D-guided orthodontic piezocision: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

No randomized controlled trial (RCT) has studied the accuracy of surgical guides used in terms of orthodontic treatment acceleration. Therefore the aim of this trial was to assess computer-guided piezocision-based orthodontic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients with severely crowded upper anterior teeth were enrolled and randomly allocated to either the experimental group (ExpG) or the control one. Subjects of the ExpG received three-dimensional (3D) guided piezoelectric corticotomies on the buccal alveolar bone of the anterior region. Five piezocision cuts were properly performed between each anterior teeth and the adjacent in virtual models. Surgical guides were designed and 3D-printed with preplanned slots that guide gingival and then piezoelectric incisions. The patients underwent Cone-Beam Computed Tomography CBCT before and immediately after surgery. Thus, Predesigned piezocisions were compared to the actual ones in attempt to measure three dimensional deviations of the applied peizocisions.

RESULTS

Ninety-six severe maxillary dental crowding were assigned for eligibility, 40 of them met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-two participants were randomly allocated to the trial`s groups. No patient was lost to follow-up neither from the control nor the experimental group. Overall alignment time (OAT) was reduced by 53% in the experimental group compared to the control group. The mean of the 3D deviation of the surgical guide was 0.23 mm (standard deviation 0.19 mm).

CONCLUSION

The values of the surgical guide deviation was nearly null, which confirms that this innovative technique is clinically applicable. Furthermore, this technique was impressively effective in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered at The ISRCTN registry (ID: ISRCTN65498676 Registration date: 07/04/2021).

The transparency of reporting 'harms' encountered with the surgically assisted acceleration of orthodontic tooth movement in the published randomized controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological study

BACKGROUND

Surgical-assisted accelerated orthodontics (SAAO) has become very popular recently. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the extent to which researchers adhere to Item 19 (harms) of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) in the published studies in the field of SAAO. In addition, the study evaluated the possible association between harm reporting and the human development index (HDI) of the recruited research sample country, CiteScore-based quartile (CSBQ) of the publishing journal, invasiveness of the surgical intervention (ISI), and the type of orthodontic tooth movement (TOTM). Moreover, it aimed to summarize the different possible harms and complications that maybe encountered in the course of SAAO.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electronic searching of six databases was conducted for SAAO-related English RCTs published between January 2000 and April 2022. For the RCTs that did not report harms, information was sought by contacting the corresponding authors. Descriptive statistics of the evaluated variables were performed. The association between 'harm reporting' and the HDI of the research team, the BDRQ of the publication journal, the ISI, and the TOTM were investigated. Binary logistic regression was used, and the odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CIs) of the evaluated variables were obtained. Moreover, the risk of bias of the included RCTs was assessed using the RoB2 tool.

RESULTS

Among the 91 included RCTs, 54 RCTs (59.3%) did not adhere to reporting harm associated with the SAAO. The non-adherence was significantly associated with the ISI (OR 0.16; CI 0.03-0.73; p < 0.018) for invasive methods compared with minimally invasive ones). There was a significant positive correlation between harm reporting and both the CSBQ of the publishing journal and the HDI of the recruited research sample country (p = 0.001, p = 0.003, respectively). On the contrary, a non-significant association was found between harm reporting and the type of OTM (p = 0.695). The incidence of harms associated with SAAO was approximately 17.5%.

LIMITATIONS

Assessment was restricted to English RCTs related to SAAO.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

The adherence to reporting harms in the field of SAAO was deficient. Efforts should be made by authors, peer reviewers, and editors to improve compliance with the CONSORT guidelines regarding harms reporting. Additionally, there is a wide spectrum of harms that could be associated with SAAO that the practitioner should pay attention to and alert the patient to the possibility of their occurrence.

Evaluation of corticision-based acceleration of lower anterior teeth alignment in terms of root resorption and dehiscence formation using cone-beam computed tomography in young adult patients: A randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

No randomized controlled trial (RCT) has compared flapless corticision with the conventional treatment in the non-extraction treatment of crowded lower anterior teeth (LAT) in terms of external apical root resorption (EARR) and dehiscence formation (DF). The aim of this RCT was to investigate these two complications during levelling and alignment of the LAT using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging.

METHODS

Patients with mild to moderate crowding of the LAT were included. Subjects were randomly allocated to either the corticision-assisted orthodontic treatment group (CORT) or the traditional orthodontic treatment group (TRAD). In the CORT, three vertical incisions were performed after brackets' placement. CBCT images were taken before starting treatment and after treatment completion to assess the EARR and the DF. Two-sample t-test and Chi-Square tests were used to detect significant differences.

RESULTS

In general, 312 roots of the lower anterior teeth (156 in each group) were examined. Fifty-two patients (14 males and 38 females, mean age 21.38) were recruited. (CORT; n=26, 6 males, 20 females, mean age 21.30); (TRAD; n=26, 8 males, 18 females, mean age 21.46). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups regarding the overall mean value of EARR following alignment (P=0.436). The greatest recorded resorption values were 0.81 and 1.02 in the CORT and TRAD groups, respectively. At the end of levelling and alignment, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the distribution of DF (P=0.780).

CONCLUSION

Corticision as an acceleration technique did not produce any significant side effects on the roots of lower anterior teeth and did not cause additional alveolar bone defects (dehiscence formation) compared to the conventional non-accelerated method of alignment.