Effect of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization loaded with cisplatin on normal dogs

Drug-eluting beads bronchial arterial chemoembolization vs. conventional bronchial arterial chemoembolization in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose

To compare the effectiveness and safety of drug-eluting bead bronchial artery chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) with conventional bronchial artery chemoembolization (cBACE) and provide a novel treatment option for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Patients with advanced NSCLC underwent DEB-BACE or cBACE and were screened retrospectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the primary outcome indicators, while technical success rate, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs) were the secondary ones.

Results

A total of 41 patients were enrolled in the study, 12 in the DEB-BACE group and 29 in the cBACE group, according to the treatment regimen. No patient achieved complete response. Eighteen patients achieved partial response (9 in each group), 15 patients achieved stable disease (3 in the DEB-BACE group and 12 in the cBACE group), and eight patients achieved progressive disease (all in the cBACE group) when treated for 2 months. The overall ORR and DCR were 43.9% (18/41) and 80.5% (33/41), respectively. ORR and DCR in the DEB-BACE group were 50.0% (9/12) and 100.0% (12/12), respectively, while ORR and DCR in the cBACE group were 31.0% (9/29) and 72.4% (21/29), respectively. Compared to cBACE, the ORR and DCR of DEB-BACE were significantly improved (p < 0.05). The median PFS was better in the DEB-BACE group than in the cBACE group (6.95 months vs. 3.20 months, respectively, Hazard Ratio [HR] = 0.416; p = 0.005). Furthermore, the median OS was significantly better in the DEB-BACE group than in the cBACE group (28.5 months vs. 22.5 months, respectively, HR = 0.316; p = 0.020).

Conclusion

DEB-BACE has a good safety and therapeutic profile in advanced NSCLC and is superior to cBACE. DEB-BACE can be used as an alternative treatment option for advanced NSCLC, even in elderly patients.

Comparative Oncology: Management of Hepatic Neoplasia in Humans and Dogs

Primary hepatic neoplasia is uncommonly reported in dogs. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent neoplasia identified in dogs and considerable effort has been committed towards identifying definitive and palliative treatment options. HCC is well recognized in humans as a sequelae of liver disease such as hepatitis or cirrhosis, while in dogs a similar link has failed to be fully elucidated. Management of HCC in people may be curative or palliative dependent on staging and transplant eligibility. Despite differences in etiology, there is substantial similarity between treatment options for liver neoplasia in human and veterinary medicine. The below summary provides a comparative discussion regarding hepatic neoplasia in dogs and people with a specific focus on HCC. Diagnosis as well as descriptions of the myriad treatment options will be reviewed.

Evaluation of the use of a novel bioabsorbable polymer drug-eluting microsphere for transarterial embolization of hepatocellular neoplasia in dogs

In dogs with non-resectable hepatic neoplasia, treatment options are limited. The objectives of this study were to describe the use of a novel drug-eluting embolic microsphere containing paclitaxel for use during transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), to compare results of liver-specific owner questionnaires and tumor volume pre- and post-TACE, and to measure systemic paclitaxel concentration post-TACE. Client-owned dogs with non-resectable hepatic neoplasia were prospectively enrolled. All owners completed questionnaires validated for the assessment of subjective outcomes in dogs with cancer before the TACE procedure and approximately 4 weeks after the TACE procedure. A CT scan was performed before TACE and 1 month after TACE; results were compared. Blood samples were obtained at specified time points post-TACE to determine systemic paclitaxel concentrations. Seven dogs (median weight: 8.9 kg; range, 4.3-31 kg) were enrolled. TACE was successfully performed in all dogs, and no intra-procedural complications were encountered. Questionnaire scores improved significantly post-TACE. Among the 6 dogs for which full data were available, median pre-TACE tumor volume was 390 cc (range 152-1,484; interquartile range 231-1,139) and median post-TACE tumor volume was 203 cc (range 98-889; interquartile range 151-369), which was significantly (P = .028) lower. All 6 dogs had a reduction in volume at the post-TACE measurement. Mean percent change in tumor volume was -45.6% (95%CI -58.6 to -32.6%). The mean plasma paclitaxel concentration in canine blood peaked at 4 days post-TACE procedure and was 25.7 ng/mL (range = 3.09-110 ng/mL) Median survival time was 629 days (95%CI 18 to upper limit not reached). The use of a novel paclitaxel-eluting microsphere in this cohort of dogs successfully decreased tumor volume significantly after TACE and improved clinical signs. Future investigation into the use of TACE and other similar therapies is warranted due to the promising outcomes noted in this cohort.