1
|
Ramallo‐Fariña Y, Chávarri AT, Robayna AA, Vidal MM, Valcárcel‐Nazco C, Armas Moreno C, Perestelo‐Pérez L, Serrano Muñoz M, Luque González M, García‐Pérez L, García‐Bello MÁ, Serrano‐Aguilar P, Castellano Santana PR, Vera Álamo L. Effectiveness of the T-Control catheter: A study protocol. BJUI Compass 2024; 5:178-188. [PMID: 38371205 PMCID: PMC10869656 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Foley catheters have been subject to limited development in the last few decades. They fulfil their basic function of draining urine from the bladder but cause other associated problems. T-Control is a new silicone Foley catheter with an integrated fluid control valve whose design aims to reduce the risks associated with bladder catheterisation by a multifactorial approach. The general purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the T-Control catheter versus the Foley-type catheter in patients with Acute Urine Retention (AUR). Study design This is a pragmatic, open, multicentre, controlled clinical trial with random allocation to the T-Control catheter or a conventional Foley-type catheter in patients with AUR. Endpoints The magnitude of infections will be analysed as a primary endpoint. While as secondary endpoint, the following will be analysed: rate of symptomatic and asymptomatic infections; days free of infection; quality of life-related to self-perceived health; indication of associated antibiotic treatments; determination of biofilm; number of catheter-related adverse events; use of each type of catheterisation's healthcare resources; level of satisfaction and workload of health professionals and acceptability of the T-Control device as well as the patient experience. Patients and methods Eligible patients are male adults aged ≥50 years, with AUR and with an indication of bladder catheterisation for at least 2 weeks. The estimated sample size is 50 patients. Patient follow-up includes both the time of catheter insertion and its removal or change 2 weeks later, plus 2 weeks after this time when the patient will be called for an in-depth interview.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolanda Ramallo‐Fariña
- Evaluation Unit (SESCS), Canary Island Health ServiceCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC)TenerifeSpain
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS)TenerifeSpain
| | - Ana Toledo Chávarri
- Evaluation Unit (SESCS), Canary Island Health ServiceCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC)TenerifeSpain
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS)TenerifeSpain
| | - Adrián Amador Robayna
- Department of UrologyUniversity Hospital of Nuestra Señora de CandelariaTenerifeSpain
| | | | - Cristina Valcárcel‐Nazco
- Evaluation Unit (SESCS), Canary Island Health ServiceCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC)TenerifeSpain
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS)TenerifeSpain
| | | | - Lilisbeth Perestelo‐Pérez
- Evaluation Unit (SESCS), Canary Island Health ServiceCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC)TenerifeSpain
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS)TenerifeSpain
| | | | | | - Lidia García‐Pérez
- Evaluation Unit (SESCS), Canary Island Health ServiceCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC)TenerifeSpain
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS)TenerifeSpain
| | - Miguel Ángel García‐Bello
- Evaluation Unit (SESCS), Canary Island Health ServiceCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC)TenerifeSpain
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS)TenerifeSpain
- University of La Laguna (ULL)TenerifeSpain
| | - Pedro Serrano‐Aguilar
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS)TenerifeSpain
| | | | - Laura Vera Álamo
- Department of UrologyInsular University Hospital of Gran CanariaGran CanariaSpain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Toledo‐Chavarri A, Bassas‐Parga A, Endrenyi S, Luque M, Bezos‐Daleske C, Reyero V, Serrano‐Aguilar P, Batista‐Miranda JE. Indwelling catheter patient experiences and the potential usability and acceptance of the
T‐Control
® prototype urinary catheter. Int J of Uro Nursing 2023. [DOI: 10.1111/ijun.12362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- A. Toledo‐Chavarri
- Canary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC) Santa Cruz de Tenerife Santa Cruz Spain
| | | | - S. Endrenyi
- Rethink Medical Las Palmas de Gran Canaria Las Palmas Spain
| | - M. Luque
- Rethink Medical Las Palmas de Gran Canaria Las Palmas Spain
- Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ULPGC) Las Palmas Spain
| | | | - V. Reyero
- Institute for Patient Experience—IEXP Madrid Spain
| | - P. Serrano‐Aguilar
- Canary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC) Santa Cruz de Tenerife Santa Cruz Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
McNaughton J, Fairley-Murdoch M. Catheter valves: are they useful in supporting patients in a trial without catheter? Br J Community Nurs 2022; 27:294-300. [PMID: 35671208 DOI: 10.12968/bjcn.2022.27.6.294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
A trial without catheter (TWOC) is a common urological procedure undertaken to remove an indwelling urinary catheter when no longer clinically indicated. An appropriately trained practitioner should undertake a TWOC in a controlled environment to ensure that a further urinary retention does not occur. Indwelling urinary catheters are commonly used with a free drainage system such as a leg bag, which continually empties the bladder. This article examines the potential benefits of using a catheter valve as an alternative to free drainage, prior to undertaking a TWOC, to optimise clinical outcomes and patient experience. This article will guide nurses to increase their knowledge of catheter valves to promote person-centred informed decision-making.
Collapse
|
4
|
Tae BS, Oh JJ, Jeong BC, Ku JH. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections in patients who have undergone radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A prospective randomized clinical study of two silicone catheters (clinical benefit of antibiotic silicone material). Investig Clin Urol 2022; 63:334-340. [PMID: 35437959 PMCID: PMC9091833 DOI: 10.4111/icu.20210436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Revised: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Materials and Methods Results Conclusions
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bum Sik Tae
- Department of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
| | - Jong Jin Oh
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Byong Chang Jeong
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ja Hyeon Ku
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gad MH, AbdelAziz HH. Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections in the Adult Patient Group: A Qualitative Systematic Review on the Adopted Preventative and Interventional Protocols From the Literature. Cureus 2021; 13:e16284. [PMID: 34422457 PMCID: PMC8366179 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.16284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CA-UTIs) are among the most common nosocomial infections acquired by patients in health care settings. A significant risk factor for CA-UTIs is the duration of catheterization. To summarize the current strategies and interventions in reducing urinary tract infections associated with urinary catheters, use and the need for re-catheterization on the rate of CA-UTIs, we performed a systematic review. A rapid evidence analysis was carried out in the Medline (via Ovid) and the Cochrane Library for the periods of January 2005 till April 2021. The main inclusion criterion required to be included in this review was symptomatic CA-UTI in adults as a primary or secondary outcome in all the included studies. Only randomized trials and systematic reviews were included, reviewed, evaluated, and abstracted data from the 1145 articles that met the inclusion criteria. A total of 1145 articles were identified, of which 59 studies that met the inclusion criteria were selected. Studies of relevance to CA-UTIs were based on: duration of catheterization, indication for catheterization, catheter types, UTI prophylaxis, educational proposals and approaches, and mixed policies and interventions. The duration of catheterization is the contributing risk factor for CA-UTI incidence; longer-term catheterization should only be undertaken where needed indications. The indications for catheterization should be based on individual base to base cases. The evidence for systemic prophylaxis instead of when clinically indicated is still equivocal. However, antibiotic-impregnated catheters reduce the risk of symptomatic CA-UTIs and bacteriuria and are more cost-effective than other impregnated catheter types. Antibiotic resistance, potential side effects and increased healthcare costs are potential disadvantages of implementing antibiotic prophylaxis. Multiple interventions and measures such as reducing the number of catheters in place, removing catheters at their earliest, clinically appropriate time, reducing the number of unnecessary catheters inserted, decrease antibiotic administration unless clinically needed, raising more awareness and provide training of nursing personnel on the latest guidelines, can effectively lower the incidence of CA-UTIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed H Gad
- Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn NHS Foundation Trust, King's Lynn, GBR
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kranz J, Schmidt S, Wagenlehner F, Schneidewind L. Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections in Adult Patients. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2020; 117:83-88. [PMID: 32102727 PMCID: PMC7075456 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Revised: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urinary tract infections are among the more common types of nosocomial infection in Germany and are associated with catheters in more than 60% of cases. With increasing rates of antibiotic resistance worldwide, it is essential to distinguish catheter-associated asymptomatic bacteriuria from catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CA-UTI). METHODS This review is based on publications from January 2000 to March 2019 that were retrieved by a selective search in Medline. Randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews in which the occurrence of CA-UTI in adult patients was a primary or secondary endpoint were included in the analysis. Two authors of this review, working independently, selected the publications and extracted the data. RESULTS 508 studies were identified and 69 publications were selected for analysis by the prospectively defined criteria. The studies that were included dealt with the following topics: need for catheterization, duration of catheterization, type of catheter, infection prophylaxis, education programs, and multiple interventions. The duration of catheterization is a determinative risk factor for CA-UTI. The indications for catheterization should be carefully considered in each case, and the catheter should be left in place for the shortest possible time. The available data on antibiotic prophylaxis do not permit any definitive conclusion, but they do show a small benefit from antibiotic-impregnated catheters and from systemic antibiotic prophylaxis. CONCLUSION Various measures, including careful consideration of the indication for catheterization, leaving catheters in place for the shortest possible time, and the training of nursing personnel, can effectively lower the incidence of CA-UTI. The eous in some respects, and thus no recommendations can be given on certain questions relevant to CA-UTI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Kranz
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, St. Antonius Hospital Eschweiler, Academic Teaching Hospital of RWTH Aachen, Eschweiler, Germany; UroEvidence, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Martin Luther University, Halle (Saale), Germany; Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Andrology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Germany; Department of Urology, University Medicine Rostock, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Nazarko
- Consultant Nurse, London Northwest HealthCare Hospital NHS Trust and BJHCA Board Member
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Homan HD, Dmochowski R, Cochran JS, Karsh L, Sherman ND, Yalla S. Safety and efficacy of a patient-controlled bladder management system for treating urinary retention in men. Neurourol Urodyn 2015; 35:630-5. [PMID: 25856157 DOI: 10.1002/nau.22770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2014] [Accepted: 03/02/2015] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The CymActive™ Bladder Management System (BMS) is a self-retaining, intraurethral catheter with a patient-controlled magnetic valve that allows cyclical bladder filling and emptying, without external appliances. We determined the safety and efficacy of the BMS in men with urinary retention who required catheterization for more than 7 days. METHODS Men requiring continuous drainage, bladder capacity less than 300 ml, history of prostatic or urethral surgery, or urethral length outside of defined limits, were excluded. Data were collected from patient diaries and weekly visits during catheterization for up to 30 days. The primary composite endpoint assessed four outcomes: placement, post-void residual volume (PVR) of 75 ml or less, adverse device-related events requiring early removal, and removal. RESULTS Nine of 23 patients met all four criteria: eight of 18 non-neurogenic (7/11 prior Foley users and 1/7 without Foley experience) and one of five neurogenic spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. Secondary outcomes in non-neurogenic patients included: 17/18 successful insertions; of these, 16/17 average PVR of 75 ml; successful valve openings and closings ≥ 95% of more than 1,400 voids; and minimal leakage. Four of five SCI patients discontinued within 7 days. Cystourethroscopy after removal revealed no marked inflammation or mucosal changes. CONCLUSIONS This pilot study demonstrated the BMS is potentially useful, convenient, and safe for appropriate patients. A follow-up study will better define the characteristics of patients who benefit from this device and examine whether the use of antimuscarinic agents improves outcomes. Neurourol. Urodynam. 35:630-635, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Roger Dmochowski
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | | | - Neil D Sherman
- Premier Urology Group-Urological Surgery Associates, Edison, New Jersey
| | - Subbarao Yalla
- Department of Urology, Harvard Medical School, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Catheterisation is commonly used to manage long-term bladder drainage. If intermittent catheterisation is not possible an indwelling urethral or suprapubic catheter will be used. There are a choice of drainage systems for use with indwelling urinary catheters including bed bags, link systems and catheter valves. Catheter valves are not suitable for everybody and patient assessment is vital: only patients with the cognitive ability and manual dexterity to operate a valve should be offered this option for bladder drainage. Catheter valves offer a number of advantages over drainage bags including improved privacy and dignity, prevention of bladder-neck trauma, reduced catheter encrustation and maintenance of normal detrusor muscle function. A number of catheter valves are available, including the EZ-Flow valve, and patient choice is important when selecting an appropriate product.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue Woodward
- Department of Postgraduate Research, Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Theofanidis D, Fountouki A. Bladder catheterization in Greek nursing education: An audit of the skills taught. Nurse Educ Today 2011; 31:157-162. [PMID: 20580468 DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2010.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2009] [Revised: 05/20/2010] [Accepted: 05/21/2010] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The auditing of nurse teaching is in its infancy in Greece. One area urgently in need of audit is the teaching of male catheterization. AIMS To assess the current educational model regarding male bladder catheterization at a sole tertiary education nursing establishment in a major Greek city and to improve nurse undergraduate training by implementing appropriate recommendations for change to the current educational module and support these changes in the long term. METHODS A systematic search of international databases for guidelines or best practice regarding bladder catheterization was conducted. Audit measures included direct observation of the teaching process and compilation of a checklist. RESULTS The shortcomings are discussed under the following headings: patient pre-preparation, choice and quality of materials used, appropriate aseptic techniques, catheter withdrawal, connecting and handling the drainage bag, diminishing risk of Catheter Associated Urinary Track Infections (CAUTIs), no problem solving trouble-shooting training, textbook and educational resources, lack of national guidelines, setting of the educational experience. CONCLUSIONS The main problem with the teaching process exposed by the audit is entrenched use of an outmoded textbook with little effort to enrich teaching with current evidence base practices.
Collapse
|
11
|
Affiliation(s)
- Glynis Collis Pellatt
- Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of Bedfordshire; AVEC, Stoke Mandeville Hospital
| | - Tracey Geddis
- Outpatients Department, National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
|