Quality of life of patients with hard-to-heal leg ulcers: a review of nursing documentation

Management and outcomes among patients with hard-to-heal ulcers in Sweden: a national mapping of data from medical records, focusing on diagnoses, ulcer healing, ulcer treatment time, pain and prescription of analgesics and antibiotics

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether patients with hard-to-heal ulcers in Sweden were treated according to an aetiological diagnosis and to explore ulcer healing, treatment time, ulcer-related pain and the prescription of analgesics and antibiotics.

DESIGN

A national mapping of data from the patients' medical records, between April 2021 and March 2023.

SETTING

Data from medical records for patients with hard-to-heal ulcers from a randomised clustered sample of two units per level of care and region.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with hard-to-heal ulcers treated in primary, community and specialist care, public or private, within units covering all 21 regions in Sweden.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Descriptive analysis of data from the patients' medical records.

RESULTS

A total of 2470 patients from 168 units were included, of which 39% were treated in primary care, 24% in community care and 37% in specialist care. A total of 49% of patients were treated without an aetiological diagnosis. Healing occurred in 37% of patients and ulcer-related pain was experienced by 1224 patients (50%). Antibiotics were given to 56% of the patients. Amputation occurred in 5% and 11% were deceased.

CONCLUSION

Only 51% of patients with hard-to-heal ulcers had a documented aetiological ulcer diagnosis, which means that approximately 20 000 patients in Sweden might receive suboptimal treatment. Future research needs to explore why so many patients are undiagnosed and how to improve diagnosis, which could lead to faster healing and shorter treatment times.

A qualitative study of patients' experiences of living with hard-to-heal leg ulcers

BACKGROUND

Patients with hard-to-heal leg ulcers are often older and have underlying conditions that contribute to making wound healing more difficult. Hard-to-heal leg ulcers are often treated in primary care and form a large part of the district nurse's work.

AIM

To describe patients' experiences of living with hard-to-heal leg ulcers.

METHODS

This qualitative study undertook 18 interviews with patients in primary care with hard-to-heal leg ulcers.

FINDINGS

A total of three categories were identified: 'Living with changes in everyday life', 'Being dependent on care', and 'Experiencing and dealing with suffering'. The patients described limitations in physical activity and changes in social interaction. Suffering was described in different ways and also resulted in coping strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Living with hard-to-heal leg ulcers affects the patient's everyday life physically and mentally. Knowledge about the complexity of patients' experiences can contribute to better care and increased quality of life in a difficult situation.

[Not Available]

Hard-to-heal wounds are a problem for both patients and caregivers. The biofi lm is one of the local factors of delayed healing. Wound hygiene carried out in 4 steps (cleansing, debridement, refashion - care of the edges, and dressing) constitutes the basis of proactive and curative anti-biofi lm strategies.

Evaluating the impact of using a wound-specific oral nutritional supplement to support wound healing in a rehabilitation setting

Chronic wounds adversely affect patient quality of life, increase the risk of mortality, and impose high costs on healthcare systems. Since protein-energy malnutrition or specific nutrient deficiencies can delay wound healing, nutritionally focused care is a key strategy to help prevent or treat the occurrence of non-healing wounds. The objective of our study of inpatients in a rehabilitation hospital was to quantify the effect of daily wound-specific oral nutritional supplementation (WS-ONS) on healing chronic wounds. Using electronic medical records, we conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with chronic wounds. We identified records for (a) a treatment group who received standard wound care + usual hospital diet + daily WS-ONS for ≥14 days, and (b) a control group who received standard wound care + a usual hospital diet. We collected data for demographics, nutritional status, and wound-relevant health characteristics. We examined weekly measurements of wound number and sizes (surface area for superficial wounds or volume for non-superficial wounds). There were 341 patients identified, 114 with 322 wounds in the treatment group and 227 patients with 420 wounds in the control group. We found that rehabilitation inpatients who were given nutritional support had larger wounds and lower functional independence on admission. At discharge, wound area reduction (percent) was nearly two-fold better in patients who were given daily WS-ONS + usual hospital diet compared to those who consumed usual diet only (61.1% vs 34.5%). Overall, weekly wound improvement (lowered wound area or wound volume) was more likely in the WS-ONS group than in the Control group, particularly from the start of care to week 2. Inpatients with largest wounds and lowest functional independence on admission were most likely to be given WS-ONS, an indication that caregivers recognised the need for supplementation. Week-to-week improvement in wound size was more likely in patients who received WS-ONS than in those who did not. Specifically, wound areas and wound volumes were significantly lower at discharge among patients who were given specialised nutritional support. More research in this field is needed to improve care and reduce healthcare costs.