Svantesson M, Sjökvist P, Thorsén H. End-of-life decisions in Swedish ICUs. How do physicians from the admitting department reason?
Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2003;
19:241-51. [PMID:
12915113 DOI:
10.1016/s0964-3397(03)00055-7]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To study how physicians from the admitting department reason during the decision-making process to forego life-sustaining treatment of patients in intensive care units (ICUs).
DESIGN
Qualitative interview that applies a phenomenological approach.
SETTING
Two ICUs at one secondary and one tertiary referral hospital in Sweden.
PARTICIPANTS
Seventeen admitting-department physicians who have participated in decisions to forego life-sustaining treatment.
RESULTS
The decision-making process as it appeared from the physicians' experiences was complex, and different approaches to the process were observed. A pattern of five phases in the process emerged in the interviews. The physicians described the process principally as a medical one, with few ethical reflections. Decision-making was mostly done in collaboration with other physicians. Patients, family and nurses did not seem to play a significant role in the process.
CONCLUSION
This study describes how physicians reasoned when confronted with real patient situations in which decisions to forego life-sustaining treatment were mainly based on medical--not ethical--considerations.
Collapse