The appropriate use of gloves to reduce allergies and infection

Aseptic technique: evidence-based approach for patient safety

The fact that there is a relationship between the standards of aseptic technique performance and the rise in hospital infection rates has been suggested by the Department of Heath's (DoH's, 2004) 'Winning Ways' document. This literature review considers how the aseptic technique is performed in the UK, and examines the nature of ritualistic and evidence-based practice underpinning this skill-based procedure. The findings have identified an emerging glove culture and continuing poor hand-hygiene practices. The alternative 'clean technique' is also adopted widely in clinical practice which confuses the aseptic theory-practice gap. While it is hard to pinpoint an actual time or event that causes infection, it is unlikely nurses will ever become involved in litigation as a result of a poorly performed aseptic technique. However, the review concludes that nurses should not become too complacent. It briefly considers how performance of the aseptic technique can be improved, through creative educational strategy, applied risk assessment and clinical audits of nurses' practices.

Nurses' inappropriate use of gloves in caring for patients

Asepsis still remains an important part of infection control and sterile gloves are still required in acute wound care and surgical procedures. Some tissue viability practitioners have for many years used unsterile gloves for chronic wound care and this provides a cost-effective method of protection for both the patient and the nurse. However, there are still those nurses who are bound in nursing rituals and find it difficult to discard a practice that has been shown to be costly and unnecessary. At the same time, there is a worrying practice of wearing gloves for all procedures without changing between each patient contact and this can be a dangerous method of introducing cross-infection and increasing the potential for latex allergies. Therefore, the use of gloves must be carefully thought through and the rationale for their use should be based on researched evidence. This article reviews the available evidence.