Fibre-reinforced composite (FRC) bridge--a minimally destructive approach

Acrylic tooth splint-An immediate provisionalisation following tooth extraction; a series of case reports

Key Clinical Message

Numerous techniques for provisionally replacing a single tooth at the aesthetic zone while planning for future dental implant placement, while soft and hard tissues heal, are critical in restorative treatment strategy. The available materials, simplicity, cost, and impact on the potential implant location should be considered when evaluating the treatment choices.

Abstract

Replacement of a single anterior tooth in the aesthetic zone while planning for future implant placement is crucial to the restorative treatment plan. Several methods exist for immediate provisionalisation of the extracted tooth while waiting for soft and hard tissue healing. Although there's a myriad of possible provisionalisation methods available, each option has its advantages and disadvantages. The treatment options should weigh various factors such as the available materials, ease of fabrication, costs, and the effect on the future implant site. This article describes three clinical cases demonstrating a simple yet cost-effective technique to temporarily replace an extracted single anterior tooth, enhancing patient satisfaction and increasing compliance before receiving the definitive implant restoration. The pro and cons for each treatment option available as opposed to the technique involved in the three cases used are also described.

Immediate post-operative rehabilitation after decoronation. A systematic review

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Decoronation is currently considered the best treatment option for ankylosed teeth and discrepancies in the alveolar bone, particularly in childhood and adolescence. The loss of a front tooth creates aesthetic, functional, and psychological distress in patients and their parents. The aim of this study was to analyze the types of restorations provided after decoronation, their suitability, durability, and follow up until insertion of the final restoration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature review was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science to identify eligible articles. English language publications until August 9, 2018, were searched independently and cross-checked by two researchers online, in print, and in press.

RESULTS

Of 618 articles screened, 10 included reports on 11 patients with detailed descriptions of 13 provisional restorations. Patients' ages at the time of decoronation were 8-15 years. Seven underwent avulsion and four intrusion. Removable partial denture (nine cases) was the most common restoration. In two cases, the restoration was provisional with a lingual bar with prosthetic crown and in two other cases with an adhesive bridge. Follow up ranged from 3 months to 5 years in nine patients. Two cases were followed until the permanent restoration was placed.

CONCLUSIONS

The importance of long-term provisional restorations was disregarded by most authors. A multidisciplinary approach should take into consideration immediate-, mid-, and long-term rehabilitation of the decoronated tooth.