Radial head fractures

"Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in managing pain and recovery: A clinical case of radial capitellum fracture"

INTRODUCTION

The management of pain and functional recovery following a radial capitellum fracture poses a significant clinical challenge, especially in individuals whose professions, such as physiotherapy, demand optimal joint functionality. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) emerges as a potential non-pharmacological intervention for pain management, necessitating exploration in the context of orthopedic injuries.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 41-year-old male physiotherapist presented with a MASON 2 radial capitellum fracture following a fall, experiencing notable pain (NPRS 6/7) and functional impairment (DASH 45/100, PRTEE 43/100). Conservative management, involving immobilization and potential surgical consideration, was employed, followed by tDCS for pain management. Post-tDCS, significant improvements were observed in pain and functional scores (NPRS to 0, DASH to 14.2, PRTEE to 7), alongside enhancements in range of motion and muscle strength.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

The application of tDCS showcased notable efficacy in pain reduction and functional improvement, highlighting its potential in augmenting pain management strategies post-fracture. However, the variability in responses and lack of standardized application protocols necessitate further research to optimize its clinical utility. The balance between immobilization for fracture healing and mobilization for preventing stiffness and facilitating recovery was pivotal in managing the fracture and ensuring functional improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

This case underscores the potential of tDCS in managing pain and facilitating functional recovery in radial capitellum fractures, warranting further exploration and standardization of its application in clinical practice. The integrated, patient-centric approach, involving interdisciplinary collaboration and personalized care, was crucial in ensuring positive outcomes and provides a framework for managing similar orthopedic cases.

Clinical study of suture anchors in the treatment of radial head fractures

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to analyze and study the clinical effect of suture anchors in the treatment of radial head fractures (RHFs).

METHODS

A total of 11 patients (five male and six female) with RHFs who were treated from March 2016 to June 2021 were included in this study. They were 17-61 (average 38.5) years old. In terms of the Johnston-Mason classification, two cases were type II, seven cases were type III, and two cases were type IV. All patients were treated with open reduction and anchor internal fixation.

RESULTS

All 11 patients were followed up, all incisions healed by first intention, and the duration of follow-up was 14-20 months. The average operation time was 40 ± 15 min. The clinical healing time was 4-6 (average 5) weeks. No patients had any complications, such as traumatic arthritis, malunion, nerve injury, joint stiffness, or incision infection. The clinical effects were evaluated according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score. The scores of all 11 cases were 90-95, all excellent.

CONCLUSION

The application of suture anchor internal fixation in the treatment of RHFs has the advantages of accurate reduction, no need for a secondary operation to remove the fixation materials, less trauma, fewer complications, good fracture healing, and good recovery of elbow extension, flexion, and rotation functions.

Relative Prevalence and Associated Factors of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I in Patients with Radial Head Fractures Treated with Open Reduction and Internal Fixation: A Cross-Sectional Study

Objective

This cross-sectional study aimed to examine the incidence and associated factors of complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS I) in patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for radial head fractures.

Methods

The study enrolled 601 radial head fracture patients treated with ORIF, 523 of which completed the 1-year follow-up. The incidence of CRPS I in those patients was assessed using the Budapest criteria. Patients were then divided into 2 groups: patients with CRPS I (n = 28) and patients without CRPS I (n = 495). The patients' demographic and clinical data before the operation were prospectively collected by our team. Independent t-tests and χ² tests were used as univariate analyses to compare the demographic and clinical data between the two groups. Meanwhile, multivariate regression analysis was conducted to identify the associated risk factors for CRPS I.

Results

The incidence of CRPS I in patients with radial head fractures treated with ORIF was 5.5% during the first year following surgery. Significant differences were observed in age, gender, type of trauma, modified Mason Classification, and depressive personality disorders. The logistic regression analysis revealed that the female gender, modified Mason type III fractures, and depressive patients were significantly more likely to develop CRPS I (p=0.021, 0.023, and 0.025, respectively).

Conclusions

The incidence of CRPS I among radial head fracture patients undergoing ORIF was 5.5%. In addition, early detection of CRPS I and providing adequate intervention will likely result in greater benefits for those patients.