Maintaining Mobility and Balance in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review Examining Potential Impact of Symptomatic Pharmacotherapy

BACKGROUND

Mobility disability (MD) manifests as walking dysfunction and postural instability in more than 90% of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) within 10 years of disease onset. Disease-modifying pharmacotherapies reduce rates of relapses and new lesions and slow disease progression, but ongoing decline in MD can persist or result from secondary, symptomatic pharmacotherapies. This systematic review focuses on symptomatic pharmacotherapies that potentially impact markers of MD in MS.

METHODS

PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and Scopus were searched between January 1990 and December 2024. Eligible studies were included on the basis of the following criteria: (1) randomized, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs); (2) confirmed MS diagnosis; (3) one MD-related outcome; and (4) one symptomatic pharmacotherapy; OR (5) multiple doses of a symptomatic pharmacotherapy. Results were uploaded to Rayyan: Intelligent Systematic Review software and screened by two blinded reviewers for eligibility. Risk of bias was assessed using the PEDRo Scale for quality assessment.

RESULTS

This review included 23 RCTs (all RCTs scored good-to-excellent on PEDRo Scale); 13 RCTs examined fampridine (4-aminopyridine) for its direct effects on MD, and 10 RCTs assessed indirect effects of symptomatic pharmacotherapies, including cannabinoids (n = 9), and baclofen (n = 1) on MD. The MD outcomes included gait (25-foot walk [T25FW], kinetics, and kinematics), community mobility (12-item MS Walking Scale [MSWS-12]), endurance (6-min walk [6MW]), balance (Berg Balance Scale [BBS], Dynamic Gait Index [DGI], Six-Spot Step Test, posturography, and falls), and functional mobility (Timed Up and Go [TUG] and 5 Times Sit-to-Stand [5STS]). Fampridine significantly improved gait (T25FW, MSWS-12), endurance (6MW), and functional mobility (5STS, TUG), with the largest effect on gait speed; changes in balance were inconclusive. Indirect pharmacotherapies, specifically cannabinoids mainly reduced spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale, nine out of nine studies), but rarely improved pain (Numerical Rating Scale, two out of nine studies) or MD outcomes (two out of nine studies). Both direct and indirect pharmacotherapies resulted in adverse effects, notably dizziness (n = 366), urinary tract infection (n = 216), and nausea (n = 150), potentially impacting MD in MS.

CONCLUSIONS

Fampridine may improve gait and functional mobility in MS, but its effect on balance requires further investigation in RCTs. Cannabinoids and baclofen may alleviate spasticity and pain, but seemingly have limited secondary effect on markers of MD, such as gait and postural stability. Clinicians should consider the impact of symptomatic pharmacotherapies on MD in MS, including potential side effects. Future research should explore integrating rehabilitation (e.g., balance training) with symptomatic pharmacotherapies, as this might enhance positive effects or combat deleterious effects on markers of MD.

Should you hold onto the treadmill handrails or not? Cortical evidence at different walking speeds

BACKGROUND

Treadmill-based gait training is part of rehabilitation programs focused on walking abilities. The use of handrails embedded in treadmill systems is debated, and current literature only explores the issue from a behavioral perspective.

METHODS

We examined the cortical correlates of treadmill walking in healthy participants using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. We investigated whether the utilization of treadmill handrails at varying walking speeds could affect cortical activation associated with the task, and we evaluated potential differences in task-based functional connectivity across the various walking conditions.

RESULTS

Significant differences in cortical activation were found between the two walking speeds (3 and 5 km/h) in the unsupported condition; these differences were reduced when using the handrails. Specifically, cortical activation was significantly higher when the participants swung their arms freely while walking at a speed of 5 compared to 3 km/h in several Brodmann's Areas (BA): left BA10, BA3 and BA39, and right BA10, BA9, BA8, BA3, and BA40. No significant differences were found when participants were holding onto the handrails. A significant difference was found in the left BA40 between the two speeds, regardless of whether the participants were holding onto the handrails. Furthermore, at the higher speed and without the use of handrails, a wider pattern of task-based functional connectivity was observed, with significantly stronger connectivity between the left BA10 and BA40.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that speed and handrails use play a role in walking cortical activity patterns, therefore they are key ingredients to take into account when planning a rehabilitation program.

Neurorehabilitation in Multiple Sclerosis-A Review of Present Approaches and Future Considerations

Multiple sclerosis is an increasingly prevalent disease, representing the leading cause of non-traumatic neurological disease in Europe and North America. The most common symptoms include gait deficits, balance and coordination impairments, fatigue, spasticity, dysphagia and an overactive bladder. Neurorehabilitation therapeutic approaches aim to alleviate symptoms and improve the quality of life through promoting positive immunological transformations and neuroplasticity. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the current treatments for the most debilitating symptoms in multiple sclerosis, identify areas for future improvement, and provide a reference guide for practitioners in the field. It analyzes the most cited procedures currently in use for the management of a number of symptoms affecting the majority of patients with multiple sclerosis, from different training routines to cognitive rehabilitation and therapies using physical agents, such as electrostimulation, hydrotherapy, cryotherapy and electromagnetic fields. Furthermore, it investigates the quality of evidence for the aforementioned therapies and the different tests applied in practice to assess their utility. Lastly, the study looks at potential future candidates for the treatment and evaluation of patients with multiple sclerosis and the supposed benefits they could bring in clinical settings.