The suture effect of butterfly suture combined with the looped, broad, and deep buried suture in patients with pigmented naevus receiving surgery excision

This study aims to explore the suture effectiveness of butterfly suture combined the looped, broad, and deep buried suture (butterfly tension-reducing suture) in patients with pigmented naevus. A retrospective analysis of patients with pigmented naevus from January 2021 to December 2022 were performed. Patients were divided into: (1) control group that received routine suture; (2) observation group receiving butterfly tension-reducing suture. The ratio of scar area to the naevus area, the scar width and the incision complication were investigated. Vancouver Scar Scale scores of patients (VSS), Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS) and the Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS) at pre-operation and 6 months after surgery were compared. Logistic regression analysis was used for the risk factor analysis of post-operative scars. The study included 34 in control group and 41 in observation group. Observation group showed a lower incidence of incision complication and smaller scar width. At 6 months after surgery, VSS items showed statistical changes between the control and observation group, including pigmentation, vascularity, pliability, height, and total opinion. Using PSAS, observation group showed lower scores in color, stiffness, thickness, irregularity, pain, itch, and overall opinion as compared to control group. There were significant decreases in OSAS items of the observation group compared to the control group, including vascularity, thickness, pigmentation, pliability, relief, and overall opinion. Suture method and incision complication were the risk factors of post-operative scars. Butterfly tension-reducing suture improves aesthetics and prognosis in pigmented naevus patients by inhibiting extension excessive tension.

Covering skin defects with a xenogeneic collagen matrix in comparison with a skin graft - A multicenter randomized controlled trial

The objective of this study was to analyze, in a randomized controlled multicenter trial, whether a xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM) could be used to cover skin defects. Patients with the need for skin excisions were recruited and randomized to treatment with a skin graft after a period of granulation or to treatment with an XCM. The results were evaluated by two independent observers on the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. On this scale, scars are ranked from 1 to 10 in six different categories. Results range from 6 to 60, with lower scores representing scars closer to normal skin. The results 6 months after reconstruction were used as primary endpoint and compared in a non-inferiority approach. A total of 39 wounds in the head and neck region were analyzed. The mean results were 16.55 (standard deviation 6.8) for XCM and 16.83 (standard deviation 8.21) in the control group. The result of the XCM was not significantly inferior to the result of the skin graft (p = 0.91). Within the limitations of the study, it seems that the use of xenogeneic collagen matrices is a viable alternative to other approaches in small skin defects, and therefore should be taken into account whenever the reduction of patient morbidity to a minimum is the priority. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register under registration identification number DRKS00010930 and can be found under the following URLs: https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00010930. https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=DRKS00010930.

A Comparison of Tissue Adhesive Material and Suture as Wound-Closure Techniques following Carpal Tunnel Decompression: A Single-Center Randomized Control Trial

BACKGROUND

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral neuropathy caused by compression of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel. The presented study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes by comparing two techniques of wound closure following carpal tunnel surgery in subjects randomized to the application of tissue adhesive or sutures.

METHODS

From April 2022 to December 2022, a single-center randomized prospective trial was conducted at the University Hospital of Split in Croatia. The study participants consisted of 100 patients (70 females) aged 61.56 ± 12.03 years, randomly assigned to suture-based wound closure (n = 50) or tissue adhesive-based wound closure (n = 50) with two-component skin adhesive Glubran Tiss 2®. The outcomes were assessed postoperatively during the follow-up period at intervals of 2, 6, and 12 weeks. A scar assessment was performed using the POSAS (Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale) and cosmetic VAS (Visual Analog Scale). The VNRS (Verbal Number Rating Scale) was used to assess pain.

RESULTS

There were significant differences between glue-based wound closure and suture-based wound closure at 2-week and 6-week intervals after the surgery on the POSAS and cosmetic-VAS scales (better aesthetic effect with glue-based wound closure technique where noticed), with less postoperative pain at the same intervals. With the 12-week interval, differences in outcomes were insignificant.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial demonstrated that cyanoacrylate-based adhesion mixtures might be possibly superior in the short term in terms of cosmetic appearance and discomfort compared to conventional skin suturing techniques for the closing of surgical wounds following open CTS decompression, but there was no difference between both procedures in the long term.

A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis: Botulinum Toxin A Effect on Postoperative Facial Scar Prevention

BACKGROUND

Postoperative facial scarring can be a significant psychological burden for patients to carry after surgery, often resulting in prolonged mental health dysfunction. Currently, there is no established method to prevent facial scar formation; however, there are several methods to prevent facial scar hyperplasia and improve scar quality. Botulinum toxin A (BTA) has been widely used due to its properties of muscle paralysis and known success in plastic surgery and cosmetology. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of BTA in preventing postoperative facial scar hyperplasia and improving scar quality.

METHODS

PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, web of science, and Cochrane libraries were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (published before May 2021) wherein BTA was used for the treatment of facial scars. The efficacy and safety of BTA were evaluated by the following scales: the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS), Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS), and Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES); the BTA effect on scar width and complications was also assessed.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs involving 114 cases were included. Through quantitative analysis, the BTA injection group had a higher VAS score, lower VSS score, lower OSAS score, and smaller scar width. However, no significant difference was noted in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrated that BTA can safely improve the appearance of postoperative facial scars by significantly inhibiting scar hyperplasia and improving scar quality.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Early physiotherapy experience with a biodegradable polyurethane dermal substitute: Therapy guidelines for use

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate and develop range of motion (ROM) and mobilisation guidelines in adult patients where a newly developed synthetic dermal substitute was applied in our adult burn centre.

METHOD

A retrospective case note audit was conducted on the first 20 acute burn injured patients who had a synthetic dermal substitute applied. Data collected included days to commencement of ROM, days to clearance for mobilisation, and joint ROM achieved after dermal substitute application (prior to delamination) and after split skin grafting (SSG) for the elbow, knee and shoulder joints. Scar assessments were completed at 12 months after injury using two scar assessment scales.

RESULTS

Clearance to mobilise occurred at mean 10.4 and 4.9 days after dermal substitute and after skin graft application to lower limbs respectively. ROM commenced at a mean of 9.9 (upper limbs) and 12.7 (lower limbs) days after dermal substitute application. Following skin grafting, ROM commenced at a mean of 6.6 and 6.5 days for upper limbs and lower limbs respectively. Prior to dermal substitute delamination mean flexion at the knee (86.3°), elbow (114.0°) and shoulder (143.4°) was achieved. Mean ROM continued to improve after grafting with knee (133.2°), elbow (126.1°) and shoulder (151.0°) flexion approaching normal ROM in most cases. Mean extension of the elbow (-4.6°) was maintained close to normal levels after skin grafting. There were no recorded instances of knee extension contracture. Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale and Matching Assessment of Photographs of Scars scores indicated good cosmetic outcomes with relatively low levels of itch and minimal pain reported at 12 months after injury.

CONCLUSION

A steep learning curve was encountered in providing therapy treatment for patients managed with this relatively new synthetic dermal substitute. Trends indicated that as experience with this new dermal substitute grew, patients progressed toward active therapy earlier. A guideline for therapy treatment has been developed but will continue to be evaluated and adjusted when required.

Measuring aesthetic results after facial skin cancer surgery by means of the FACE-Q

Background

Skin cancer is the most commonly occurring type of cancer. However, the influence of facial skin cancer surgery on patients’ perceived aesthetic appearance is poorly understood. The objective of this study was to provide an insight into how patients perceive the aesthetic outcome of facial skin cancer surgery by means of a specialised patient-reported outcome measure designed for the aesthetic evaluation of the face: the FACE-Q.

Methods

A total of 47 patients with non-melanoma skin cancer who were scheduled for Mohs’s micrographic surgery (MMS) or standard surgical excision (SE) were included. These patients filled out three different FACE-Q questionnaires: satisfaction with facial appearance, social function, and satisfaction with outcome. Follow-up was conducted after baseline at 1 month and 3 months post-surgery.

Results

No significant differences were detected between baseline and follow-up regarding social function and satisfaction with facial appearance. However, after 3 months, patients were significantly more satisfied with the result of surgery when compared with the 1-month post-surgery follow-up.

Conclusions

The perceived aesthetic appreciation of patients does not seem to be significantly influenced by facial skin cancer SE or MMS surgery in this 3-month follow-up study.

Level of evidence: Not ratable.

[Advantages of minimally invasive approach for carotid endarterectomy]

OBJECTIVE

To identify the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches for carotid endarterectomy (conventional, longitudinal and transverse incision).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

There were 58 patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on surgical approach. Group 1 (n=37) - minimal skin incision (less than 5 cm). There were subgroup 1A (transverse minimal skin incision along the natural skin wrinkle, n=17) and subgroup 1B (longitudinal minimal skin incision, n=20). Group 2 (n=21) - conventional longitudinal incision. Surgical outcomes were analyzed after 1 month and 1 year. End-points were mortality, stroke, TIA, cranial nerve neuropathy. Cosmetic effect was evaluated using POSAS scale (Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, Draaijers, 2004).

RESULTS

Mortality, stroke and TIA were absent after 1 month. Cranial nerve neuropathy was not observed in subgroup 1A and diagnosed in 2 (10%) patients of subgroup 1B and 6 (28.5%) patients of group 2. Cosmetic effect: subgroup 1A - 48.4±9.5 scores, subgroup 1B - 52.4±9.2, group 2 - 63.1±11.1 (p<0.05). The outcomes after 12 months: mortality was absent in subgroups 1A and 1B, 2 patients died in group 2 from AMI. Stroke was absent in subgroups 1A and 1B, group 2 - 1 patient. Cranial nerve neuropathy was absent in 1A and 1B subgroups and diagnosed in 4 (21%) patients of group 2. Cosmetic effect: subgroup 1A - 37.2 scores, subgroup 1B - 40.0 scores, group 2 - 55.1 scores. Physical component of QOL: subgroup 1A - 51.63±6.31 scores, subgroup 1B - 46.01±7.53 scores, group 2 - 38.85±5.33 scores. Psychological component of QOL: subgroup 1A - 49.64±6.72 scores, subgroup 1B - 45.68±5.63 scores, group 2 - 48.6±7.36 scores (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Transverse minimal skin incision for carotid endarterectomy is a safe alternative to classic longitudinal incision and reduces the risk of postoperative complications with significant cosmetic effect.

Tendoscopic versus open release for de Quervain's disease: earlier recovery with 7.21 year follow-up

Purpose

To compare the time return to work and long-term results of tendoscopic versus open technique for de Quervain’s disease.

Methods

From 2005 to 2013, either tendoscopic or open decompression was performed on 56 consecutive patients (56 wrists) with symptomatic de Quervain’s disease despite a minimum of 3 months non-operative treatment. Of the 50 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 41 patients were followed-up for a mean of 7.21 years postoperatively. Among these 41 wrists, 20 underwent tendoscopic release (group A), and 21 underwent open release (group B). The clinical evaluations were performed preoperatively, 1 month postoperatively and at last follow-up visit, using visual analog scale (VAS); the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Outcome score; and the Finkelstein’s test. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) was used as an esthetic evaluation tool of the scar at last follow-up.

Results

No significant baseline differences were found between two groups. The average time return to work in group A was less than in group B (P < 0.05), The mean VAS and DASH scores improved significantly in both groups at 1 month and last follow-up visit (P < 0.001). At 1 month, the scores in group A were significantly better than in group B (P < 0.05 and P < 0.001, respectively). There was no difference between groups at last follow-up. In addition, the improvement of the mean DASH score was significantly greater in group A than in group B (34.74 ± 10.99 in group A and 23.58 ± 12.01 in group B, P < 0.01) at 1 month. For POSAS scale, both the OSAS and PSAS scores were significantly better in group A. One patient in group A had cephalic vein injury and 3 patients in group B was involved with radial sensory nerve injury. All patients showed negative on Finkelstein’s test at last follow-up.

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that tendoscopic technique for de Quervain’s disease could provide earlier symptom relief and earlier recovery with fewer complications and more desirable scar, as well as equivalent successful long-term outcome, when compared with traditional open release technique.

Clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of botulinum toxin type A injection for reducing scars in patients with forehead laceration: A double-blinded, randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) is known to prevent fibroblast proliferation and expression of transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1). It also induces temporary muscle paralysis and decreases tension vectors. Fibroblasts induce scar contracture and hypertrophy by producing collagen fibers in wound healing processes. The aim of this study is to identify the effect of BoNTA on the scar formation.

METHODS

Forty-five patients with forehead laceration were enrolled in this study and randomized into 2 groups with or without injection of BoNTA. When the patients presented to the clinic to remove the stitches, BoNTA was injected to the BoNTA group with 24 patients and saline was injected to the control group with 21 patients. The BoNTA was injected on dermal layer with 5 IU/cm. After that, follow-up was done in 1, 3, and 6 months. The scars were analyzed with the patient and observer scar assessment scale, Stony Brook scar evaluation scales (SBSESs), and visual analog scale (VAS) and analyzed with independent T-test, along with clinical photographs, cutometer, and biopsies.

RESULTS

In all scar scales, the scores changed into favorable direction in both groups and the changes were larger in BoNTA group compared with the control group. On SBSES and VAS, better improvements on BoNTA group showed statistical significance. Skin biopsy showed less collagen deposition on dermal layer in BoNTA group.

CONCLUSION

Improvement of aesthetic, functional, and emotional aspect of the scar formation in the groups treated with BoNTA was illustrated. The application of BoNTA may be expanded to prevent hypertrophic scar after trauma, burns, or operations.

Translation and cultural adaptation of an Arabic version of the patient scar assessment scale for thyroidectomy patients

Objectives:

To translate and validate an Arabic version of the patient scar assessment scale (PSAS). The cosmetic appearance of a thyroidectomy scar can critically influence a patient’s self-esteem. Moreover, scar evaluation tools are necessary for an evidence-based approach to scar management.

Methods:

This quantitative, observational, cross-sectional study was conducted by administering an Arabic-translated version of the PSAS. The translation process included a forward translation into Arabic by 3 fluently bilingual otolaryngologists, a back-translation into English, and a comparison with the original items. The questionnaires were distributed to patients who underwent thyroidectomies. We included patients who underwent surgery at least 2 months previously.

Results:

A total of 50 patients were included in this research. The internal consistency was 0.89, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.88-0.90. The score distributions showed high correlations for all items. The Arabic-translated PSAS showed good test-retest reliability, and the Pearson correlation coefficient between the test and retest administrations was 0.84 (p<0.001). With a possible range of 6-60 points, the standard error of the mean was 5.14, and the minimal detectable change was 14.2.

Conclusion:

This Arabic version of the PSAS was reliable for use in Arabic-speaking communities. It will allow for comparisons between the results of investigations conducted in different countries, which aids in the exchange of information within the international scientific community.

Effectiveness and Safety of an Overnight Patch Containing Allium cepa Extract and Allantoin for Post-Dermatologic Surgery Scars

Background

An occlusive overnight intensive patch medical device (OIP) containing onion extract and allantoin has been developed for preventing and treating dermatologic scars and keloids. Here, we examined the efficacy and safety of the OIP for post-dermatologic surgery scars.

Methods

This was an intra-individual randomized, observer-blind, controlled study in adults with post-dermatologic surgery scars. Two scars per subject were randomized to no treatment or overnight treatment with the OIP for 12–24 weeks. Scar quality was assessed using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and a Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale.

Results

A total of 125 subjects were included. The decrease in observer-assessed POSAS from baseline was significantly greater for treated than untreated scars at week 6 (p < 0.001) and 24 (p = 0.001). The decrease in patient-assessed POSAS was significantly greater for the treated scar than the untreated scar at week 12 (p = 0.017) and 24 (p = 0.014). Subject- and investigator-evaluated Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores were higher for the treated than the untreated scar at all visits. All subjects considered the global comfort of the OIP to be good or very good, and no safety concerns were identified.

Conclusions

This study confirmed that the OIP safely promotes scar healing after minor dermatologic surgery.

Level of Evidence II

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Cosmetic effects of skin-crease camouflage incision versus longitudinal incision following carotid endarterectomy

Introduction

Despite the increasing use of carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS), carotid endarterectomy (CEA) nonetheless remains a more medically beneficial method of treatment for carotid artery stenosis. Therefore, one possibility for progress within this procedure may be to use minimally invasive carotid surgery, especially when the scar is in plain sight: the use of the natural wrinkles (skin crease) as a camouflage of the skin incision provides significant cosmetic improvements.

Aim

To compare the cosmetic effects of classic and trans-wrinkle CEA. To assess the distance between the carotid artery bifurcation (CAB) and the skin-crease incision whilst attempting CEA.

Material and methods

It was a randomized prospective study with two groups: patients undergoing classic surgery (control group; n = 100) and skin-crease trans-wrinkle camouflaged CEA (study group; n = 100). Follow-up was at 2 months and 1 year.

Results

The medical results of the treatment were similar in both groups. The cumulative count of strokes and myocardial infarctions was 0.5% within 30 days, and after one year 3.5% (and 5.5% including cases of death). The superiority of the transverse crease being hidden compared to the conventional longitudinal technique was proven in the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) score, respectively 11.4 ±1.0 vs. 14.1 ±3.4 (p = 0.0001) after 2 months and 13.5 ±2.8 vs. 14.1 ±3.4 (p = 0.039) after a year.

Conclusions

Trans-wrinkle incision gives better cosmetic results, can be safely performed in most cases, and offers a comfortable approach during CEA.

The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale to Evaluate the Cosmetic Outcomes of the Robotic Single-Site Hysterectomy in Endometrial Cancer

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the cosmetic outcome of robotic single-site hysterectomy (RSSH) in early-stage endometrial cancer.

Methods

We prospectively collected patient demographics, operative times, complications, pathologic results, and length of stay on all patients who underwent RSSH for early-stage endometrial cancer. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) was used for the evaluation of the cosmetic outcome.

Results

Forty-five patients were included in our study from January 2012 to October 2015. The median age of patients was 63 years (range, 35–84 years), and the median body mass index was 26.5 kg/m2 (range, 18–39 kg/m2). No laparoscopic/laparotomic conversion was registered. The median docking time, console time, and total operative time were 7 minutes (range, 4–14 minutes), 46 minutes (range, 20–100 minutes), and 90 minutes (range, 45–150 minutes), respectively. The median blood loss was 50 mL (range, 10–150 mL). Nine patients underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy, and the median number of pelvic lymph nodes was 13 (range, 10–32). The median time to discharge was 3 days (range, 2–6 days). No intraoperative complications occurred, whereas we did observe 1 early postoperative complication. The oncological outcome was directly comparable to the literature. Patients reported low pain scores and high satisfaction in terms of postoperative scarring. The POSAS scores confirmed excellent cosmetic outcome of RSSH.

Conclusion

Robotic single-site hysterectomy provided an efficient option for gynecologic oncologic surgery. The POSAS revealed high objective and patient-evaluated outcome, and patients were highly satisfied with the overall outcome of the appearance of their scars.

A new treatment for reliable functional and esthetic outcome after local facial flap reconstruction: a transparent polycarbonate facial mask with silicone sheeting

BACKGROUND

Facial flap surgery predominantly leads to good functional results. However, in some cases, it can cause unsatisfactory esthetic results. They include persistent erythema, pincushioning, and development of hypertrophic scars. Conservative, reliable treatment for facial flaps is lacking. Pressure and silicone therapy have proven to result in significant improvement in scar erythema, pliability, and thickness in postburn hypertrophic scars. By combining these therapies in a facial mask, the esthetic outcome of facial flaps could be improved. In this retrospective study, the efficacy of a unique transparent face mask containing silicone sheets on the esthetic outcome of postsurgical facial flaps is assessed.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients were assigned to facial pressure mask therapy after they underwent facial flap surgery between July 2012 and September 2015. Patients were treated for a mean duration of 46 weeks. The effects of pressure mask therapy were examined by means of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS).

RESULTS

All POSAS components showed a reduction between start and end of therapy, while itchiness, pigmentation, pliability, thickness, and relief of the flap improved significantly (P < 0.05). Mean total and patient score showed significant reduction between start and end of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that a facial pressure mask layered with silicone results in noticeable flap improvement with a long-lasting result. Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.

Aesthetic principles access thyroidectomy produces the best cosmetic outcomes as assessed using the patient and observer scar assessment scale

Background

Thyroid carcinoma (TC) is more likely to occur in young women. The aim of this study was to compare the aesthetic effect of different thyroidectomies.

Methods

One hundred twenty female patients who underwent thyroidectomy were evenly distributed into three groups: conventional access (CA), aesthetic principles access (APA) and minimally invasive access (MIA). The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) was used as the assessment tool for the linear scar.

Results

The patients in the MIA group showed significantly less intraoperative blood loss, less drainage, a shorter scar length and a shorter duration of drainage than those in the CA group and the APA group. However, the operation time of 129.0 min in the MIA group was significantly longer than the 79.6 min in the CA group and the 77.0 min in the APA group. The best aesthetic score, as assessed by the Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS), was obtained in the APA group. The Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS) scores were significantly lower in the APA group and CA group than in the MIA group. Significantly lower objective scar ratings were found in the APA group than in the other two groups.

Conclusion

These results show that APA produced the best surgical outcomes in TC patients, indicating that conventional thyroidectomy can produce an ideal aesthetic result using the principles of aesthetic surgery. Thyroid surgery need not be performed through excessively short incisions for the sake of patient satisfaction with the scar’s appearance.

Trial registration

This clinical trial was retrospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov PRS on August 1st,2017 (NCT03239769).

A new treatment of hypertrophic and keloid scars with combined triamcinolone and verapamil: a retrospective study

Background

Since the management of keloid and hypertrophic scars still remains a difficult clinical problem, there is need for adequate, effective therapy. In this study, we explored for the first time the efficacy and the potential synergetic effect of combined triamcinolone and verapamil for the treatment of hypertrophic and keloid scars. The objective was to assess the efficacy of combined intralesional triamcinolone and verapamil therapy for hypertrophic and keloid scars.

Methods

Fifty-eight patients with hypertrophic scars (n = 31) and keloid scars (n = 27) were included. A specific injection therapy scheme was applied. Five follow-up moments were chosen, with a maximum follow-up of nearly 2 years. The effects of combination therapy on scar pliability, thickness, relief, vascularization, surface area, pain, and pruritus were examined by means of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS).

Results

Our results reveal a fast and abiding improvement of both keloid and hypertrophic scars after treatment with the combination therapy. All POSAS components showed a reduction in scar score, while scar relief, pain, itchiness, and surface area improved significantly (P < 0.05) in keloids. Significant improvement in hypertrophic scars was found in scar pigmentation, vascularization, pliability, thickness, pain, and surface area. Overall POSAS scores revealed statistically significant decreases between baseline and 3–4 months, 4–6 months, and >12 months after start of therapy in both keloids and hypertrophic scars.

Conclusions

This study reveals that combined therapy of triamcinolone and verapamil results in overall significant scar improvement with a long-term stable result.

Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Combination of medical needling and non-cultured autologous skin cell transplantation (ReNovaCell) for repigmentation of hypopigmented burn scars

Burn scars remain a serious physical and psychological problem for the affected people. Clinical studies as well as basic scientific research have shown that medical needling can significantly increase the quality of burn scars with comparatively low risk and stress for the patient with regards to skin elasticity, moisture, erythema and transepidermal water loss. However, medical needling has no influence on repigmentation of large hypopigmented scars. The goal of this study is to evaluate whether two established methods - needling (for improvement of scar quality) and non-cultured autologous skin cell suspension (for repigmentation) - can be successfully combined. Twenty subjects with mean age of 33 years (6-60 years) with scars from deep second and third degree burns have been treated. The average treated surface area was 94cm² (15-250cm²) and was focused on prominent areas such as the face, neck, chest and arm. Percutaneous collagen induction or "medical needling" was performed using a roller covered with 3mm long needles. The roller is vertically, horizontally and diagonally rolled over the scar, inducing microtrauma. Then, non-cultured autologous skin cell suspension (NCASCS) was produced and applied using the ReNovaCell Autologous Cell Harvesting Device (Avita Medical), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The patients were followed 12 months postoperatively. Pigmentation changes were measured objectively, as well as with patient and observer ratings. Patient satisfaction/preference was also obtained. Taken together, the pigmentation ratings and objective measures indicate individual improvement in 17 of the study participants. The melanin increases seen 12 months after NCASCS treatment are statistically significant. Medical needling in combination with NCASCS shows promise for repigmentation of burn cars.

Conservative vs Surgical Interventions for Umbilical Pilonidal Sinus: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Umbilical pilonidal sinus (UPS) is one of the most neglected disorders, and there is still no clear consensus regarding optimal treatment of the disease. We therefore present our data from a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing conservative vs surgical treatment of UPS.

STUDY DESIGN

The study was conducted in Turkey between January 2012 and November 2015. All eligible patients with the diagnosis of UPS (n = 84) were randomized for either conservative treatment (CT, n = 42) or surgical treatment (ST, n = 42). All patients were followed up for at least 2 years; then, the results of both groups were compared. The primary outcomes were initial healing, recurrence, and the cure rate of the disease after each treatment modality.

RESULTS

Mean (± SD) age of the patients was 20.83 ± 5.73 years old, and the majority were men (94%). Nearly 60% of the patients had a deep navel, and 55% had intense hair status. The main symptoms were drainage and wetness, pain, itching, and malodor. Overall, in 10 (27.8%) patients, relapse of the disease was observed in the CT group; it was observed in only 1 patient in the ST group (p = 0.002). Initial healing time was significantly shorter in the ST group (p = 0.001). Of the 81 patients who completed the 2-year follow-up, a cure could be obtained in only 28 of 41 patients in the CT group; it was achieved in all 40 patients in the ST group (68.3% vs 100%, respectively; p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided evidence that surgical treatment is superior to conservative surgery regarding the primary and secondary outcomes of UPS at least 2 years after surgery.

Short and long-term cosmesis of cervical thyroidectomy scars

Introduction Multiple surgical approaches to the thyroid gland have been described via cervical or extracervical routes. Improved cosmesis, patient satisfaction, reduced pain (procedure dependent) and early discharge have all been reported for minimally invasive approaches with similar safety profiles and long-term outcomes to conventional surgery. This review summarises the current evidence base for improved cosmesis with minimally invasive cervical approaches to the thyroid gland compared with conventional surgery. Methods A systematic review was undertaken. The MEDLINE(®), Embase™ and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant articles. Results A total of 57 papers thyroid papers were identified. Of those, 20 reported some form of cosmetic outcome assessment. There were 6 randomised controlled trials with 412 patients (evidence level 2B), 7 cohort studies with 3,073 patients (level 3B) and 7 non-comparative case series with 1,575 patients (level 4). There was significant heterogeneity between studies in terms of wound closure technique, timing of scar assessment and scar assessment scales (validated and non-validated). Most studies performed early scar assessments, some using non-validated scar assessment tools. Conclusions Assessment of cosmesis is complex and requires rigorous methodology. Evidence from healing/remodelling studies suggests scar maturation is a long-term process. This calls into question the value of early scar assessment. Current evidence does not support minimally invasive surgical approaches to the thyroid gland if improved long-term cosmesis is the goal.

Patient and observer scar assessment scores favour the late appearance of a transverse cervical incision over a vertical incision in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy for stroke risk reduction

BACKGROUND

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a very common operation, but there is no agreement on the appropriate orientation of the surgical incision.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who had undergone CEA between Jul. 1, 2010, and Dec. 31, 2013. We contacted patients identified in the review to solicit participation in a clinical follow-up examination, during which the esthetic outcome of the scar was evaluated using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS).

RESULTS

During the study period 237 CEAs were performed. Nine patients refused the use of their personal health information in this study. There were no significant differences in the neurologic outcomes of patients based on the incision orientation (perioperative stroke and death 1.4% with transverse incision v. 0% with a vertical incision, p = 0.44). Fifty-two patients presented for follow-up examination. Thirty-three had a transverse incision and 19 had a vertical incision. Results of the POSAS significantly favoured the transverse incision (p = 0.03). Vertical incisions were more often associated with persistent, mild marginal mandibular nerve dysfunction (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Carotid endarterectomy performed through a transverse skin incision compared with a vertically oriented skin incision is associated with improved esthetic outcome, as measured by the POSAS, without an observed statistically significant difference in the risk of perioperative stroke or death between the 2 techniques.

Linear scar reduction using silicone gel sheets in individuals with normal healing

OBJECTIVE

To examine the application of silicone gel sheets on linear scars due to surgical procedures.

METHOD

Ten individuals, with scars less than I year old, participated in the study. The Participant and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) was used to evaluate scars on seven characteristics rated by visual analogue scales 0fAS). Participants applied silicone gel sheets to half of their scar for 6 months, and every 2 weeks POSAS data forms were completed. Linear mixed-effects analysis of variances (ANOVA)were used to determine if significant differences occurred between groups (treated and untreated scarsides) across the 6 months of data collection. To see if differences were found from the initial evaluation to final visit, Mann-Whitney U tests analysed between-group changes (treated and untreated scar sides), while Wilcoxon signed ranks tests compared within-group changes (evaluation of each scar side over time).

RESULTS

No significant differences in VAS ratings were observed when the two scar sides were compared, with the exception of overall opinion of the scar, as rated by an observer. For each group,significant changes from baseline to study end were observed for colour, stiffness and irregularities, as rated by the participant. Significant improvements for the treated versus untreated group were observed for pliability and pigmentation, as rated by the observer scale.

CONCLUSION

There was no evidence for improved healing when using silicone gel sheets. The results do not support using silicone gel sheets on linear scars for individuals with no history of abnormal scarring.

Use of botulinum toxin type A to improve treatment of facial wounds: a prospective randomised study

BACKGROUND

The tension vectors acting on the wound edges are transmitted to immature collagen fibres synthesised during the normal healing phase. This accounts for scar widening as well as hypertrophic and hyperpigmented scars. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether early injections of botulinum toxin type A (BTA), which induces temporary muscular paralysis, decreases tension vectors on wound edges and enhances scarring of facial wounds.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty patients with facial wounds were enrolled in this study and randomised into two groups with or without injection of BTA within 72 h postoperatively. BTA was injected into the facial muscles directly or indirectly involved in scar widening. Scars were assessed at a 1-year follow-up visit by patients using the Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS) scale, by an independent evaluator using the Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS) and the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), and by a board of six experienced medical specialists using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with standardised photographs.

RESULTS

At the 1-year visit, 24 patients were reviewed and six patients were lost to follow-up. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups for the PSAS, OSAS and VSS scores. However, the median VAS rated by the six evaluators was 8.25 for the botulinum toxin-treated group compared with 6.35 for the control group. This result was statistically different, demonstrating improved scarring with BTA.

CONCLUSIONS

Thanks to chemoimmobilisation, injections of BTA appear to improve cosmesis of facial wounds. Accordingly, they would be beneficial for use in young patients for wounds without tissue loss, lying perpendicular to the reduced tension lines of the skin of the face.

Managing the relationship between quality and cost-effective burn care

In the modern era of fiscal prudence, managing the relationship between quality health care and cost reduction is a complex and challenging task for policy makers and health care providers. Health economics is an applied field that aids in assessing the feasibility of incorporating new interventions in a certain field. Applying these tools when allocating funds for burn care is even more complicated due to the lack of clinical data regarding the cost effectiveness of different aspects in burn care. Herein we review the existing literature and summarize different approaches for achieving cost effective health care in general and in burn care specifically. Special considerations to funds allocation in burn care are also discussed.