TLC-NOSF dressings as a first-line local treatment of chronic wounds: a systematic review of clinical evidence

OBJECTIVE

Several national and international guidelines recommend lipidocolloid technology with a nano-oligosaccharide factor (TLC-NOSF) dressings (UrgoStart dressing range, Laboratoires Urgo, France) for treating patients with chronic wounds. However, these dressings are still often reported as second-line options, potentially leading to loss of opportunity for patients and additional costs for payers. This review aimed to explore the reported wound healing and patient outcomes as well as the related costs when the dressings were used as first-line treatment in patients with different types of chronic wounds.

METHOD

A systematic review of the literature was conducted. Databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, and Google Scholar) were searched up to 1 February 2024, without any language or time period limitations. Studies were eligible if the evaluated dressings had been used as a first-line treatment for chronic wounds, that is, as an integral part of the standard of care (SoC) at the patient's first presentation and/or in recent wounds. The main evaluation criteria included: wound healing rate; time to reach wound closure; change in patients' quality of life (QoL); and associated costs. The quality of evidence of the included studies was appraised using well-recognised risk-of-bias tools suitable for different study designs. A narrative synthesis describes the findings in three sections depending on the type of comparison. This report followed the principles of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies published between 2017 and 2024 met the eligibility criteria. A comparative analysis between TLC-NOSF dressings and standard dressings, both of which were used as first-line treatment, was reported in nine studies. A comparative analysis between the use of TLC-NOSF dressings as first-line and second-line treatments was reported in eight studies, and five studies reported a systematic use of the TLC-NOSF dressing as first-line treatment without a control group. Overall, the included studies had a relatively low risk of bias for the respective types of evidence. Data of 10,191 patients of both sexes and different age groups with a total of 10,203 wounds (diabetic foot ulcers, leg ulcers, pressure injuries, and other types of chronic wounds) were included in the analysis: 7775 treated with the evaluated dressing and 2428 treated with a comparator dressing. The data suggested that using TLC-NOSF as a first-line treatment for chronic wounds consistently resulted in significantly higher healing rates, shorter healing times, and cost savings compared with standard dressings used under similar conditions. Real-life evidence confirmed the results obtained in clinical trials and economic models, within similar ranges, regardless of the settings involved or of the characteristics of the patients and wounds treated. The wound healing rates ranged around 70-80% by week 20/24 and time-to-heal was reported on average around seven weeks, with slightly longer times reported in wounds with a more severe prognosis. Furthermore, the dressings were shown to improve patient QoL, and were well tolerated and accepted, supporting a wider adoption approach.

CONCLUSION

The results of this review are aligned with the current guidelines recommending the use of TLC-NOSF dressings in the treatment of patients with chronic wounds. They support its wider implementation as a first-line treatment and as an integral part of SoC for these wounds in the daily practice of all centres involved in their management.

Defining wound bed conformability: a new testing methodology to assess the relative swelling rise of foam dressings

OBJECTIVE

Using a dressing that expands and conforms to the wound bed upon exudate absorption is one of the best ways to promote wound healing. While many products claim wound bed conformability, no externally replicated or verified test methodology had been developed to quantify a wound dressing's ability to conform to the wound bed. The Relative Swelling Rise (RSR) test methodology was developed to measure the relative swelling rise of foam dressings upon fluid absorption, and offers a quantifiable and easily replicated method to measure wound bed conformability.

METHOD

The RSR test method was developed, validated and reliability tested by Coloplast A/S, Denmark. External replication was provided by ALS Odense, Denmark (previously DB Lab). Circular fences provide a fixed diameter to apply and contain the fluid and prevent horizontal spreading in the test set-up. The swelling height is quantified relative to the fence's inner diameter, i.e., the ratio alpha (α), and allows evaluation of a material's ability to conform to the wound bed.

RESULTS

Biatain Silicone foam products (n=3, Coloplast A/S, Denmark) were tested, all afforded an average α-ratio from 0.30 to 0.60. The relative standard deviations were between 1-3%, demonstrating the strength of the test. Robustness of the methodology was demonstrated through the internal validation study, the reliability study, and both an internal and external replication study, as well as a systematic literature review and expert review of the construct, content, criterion and generalisability of the method.

CONCLUSION

Having a validated, effective and easily replicable testing method to quantify wound bed conformability of foam dressings is an important step towards achieving better healing outcomes.

A prospective study on the efficacy of sequential treatment of technology Lipido-Colloid Impregnated with Silver and Technology Lipido-Colloid Nano-Oligosaccharide Factor in the management of venous leg ulcers

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are associated with significant morbidity and poor quality of life (QOL). Compression therapy and wound dressing are the mainstay treatment options. Technology Lipido-Colloid Impregnated with Silver (TLC-Ag) reduces bacterial load and Technology Lipido-Colloid Nano-Oligosaccharide Factor (TLC-NOSF) reduces elevated matrix metalloproteinases and improve wound healing. However, evidence is scarce on the role of sequential therapy. This study aims to evaluate if sequential treatment with TLC-Ag and TLC-NOSF improves VLU wound healing and QOL.

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study from May 2020 to October 2021 on patients with VLUs who received sequential therapy, consisting of 2 weeks of TLC-Ag followed by two-layer compression bandage (2LB) with TLC-NOSF until complete wound healing. Participants were followed-up with weekly dressing changes. Our primary outcomes were wound area reduction (WAR) and Pressure Ulcer Scale of Healing (PUSH) score. Our secondary outcomes were QOL measures.

RESULTS

There were 28 patients with 57.1% males (n = 16) with a mean age of 65.3 years. Mean duration of VLU was 13.9 ± 11.7 weeks before the initiation of sequential therapy. Mean baseline wound area was 8.44 cm2. Median time to wound healing was 10 weeks. 57.1% of patients achieved complete wound closure at 3 months. There was significant WAR after 1 month (mean area 8.44-5.81 cm2, 31.2% decrease) and after 3 months (mean area 8.44-2.53 cm2, 70.0% decrease). Mean monthly WAR was 28.9%. PUSH score also decreased at 1 month (16.5% decrease, p < 0.001) and 3 months (63.3% decrease, p < 0.001) marks following the sequential therapy. EuroQol Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) improved following sequential therapy (baseline: 69.0 ± 15.0, week 13: 80.2 ± 13.2, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Sequential therapy with TLC-Ag followed by TLC-NOSF and 2LB is feasible, with good wound healing and improvement in QOL of patients with VLUs.

Clinical evaluation of UrgoStart Plus dressings in real-life conditions: results of a prospective multicentre study on 961 patients

AIMS

This study aimed to evaluate the performances of lipid colloid technology with nano-oligosaccharide factor (TLC-NOSF) dressings with polyabsorbent fibres in an unselected population of patients under real-life conditions.

METHODS

A large, prospective, multicentre, observational study with three polyabsorbent TLC-NOSF dressings (UrgoStart Plus Pad, UrgoStart Plus and UrgoStart Plus Border, Laboratoires Urgo, France) was conducted in Germany between January 2019 and June 2020. Main outcomes included wound healing rate, clinical assessment of wound healing progression, local tolerance and acceptance of dressings, and changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of the patients, assessed with the validated Wound-QoL questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 961 patients with wounds of various aetiologies (leg ulcers (LU), diabetic foot ulcers (DFU), pressure ulcers (PU) and other types of wounds) were treated with the evaluated dressings in 105 centres for a mean duration of 62 days (standard deviation 37 days). By the last visit, a wound closure or an improvement in wound healing was reported in 92.0% of the treated wounds. The highest wound closure rates were achieved when the dressings were used as first-line treatment: 71.3% in DFUs, 52.9% in LUs, 53.6% in PUs and 61.8% in the other wounds. Improvement of the wound healing process was also associated with an 87.5% relative reduction of sloughy tissue, a decrease of the level of exudate in 68.9% of the wounds, and an improvement in the periwound skin condition in 66.4% of the patients at the final visit. The dressings were 'very well' or 'well' tolerated and 'very well' or 'well' accepted by the large majority of patients. The HRQoL questionnaires were completed both at initial and final visits by 337 patients, representative of the total cohort. Despite the relatively short duration of the wounds, the HRQoL of the patients was already impaired at baseline, with 81.6% of the patients being severely affected in at least one aspect of their HRQoL. By the final visit, significant improvements in each dimension of the patients' HRQoL were reported (p<0.001), along with a reduction of the proportion of patients in need of intervention and in the number of actions needed per patient in relation to their HRQoL.

CONCLUSIONS

These results are consistent with previous clinical evidence on TLC-NOSF dressings. They confirm the good healing properties and safety profile of these dressings, and that a significant improvement in patient HRQoL is achieved in non-selected patients treated in real-life practice. These data support the use of such dressings as a first-line intervention and until wound healing in the management of chronic wounds, in association with appropriate standard of care.

Wound dressings: curbing inflammation in chronic wound healing

Chronic wounds represent an economic burden to healthcare systems worldwide and a societal burden to patients, deeply impacting their quality of life. The incidence of recalcitrant wounds has been steadily increasing since the population more susceptible, the elderly and diabetic, are rapidly growing. Chronic wounds are characterised by a delayed wound healing process that takes longer to heal under standard of care than acute (i.e. healthy) wounds. Two of the most common problems associated with chronic wounds are inflammation and infection, with the latter usually exacerbating the former. With this in mind, researchers and wound care companies have developed and marketed a wide variety of wound dressings presenting different compositions but all aimed at promoting healing. This makes it harder for physicians to choose the correct therapy, especially given a lack of public quantitative data to support the manufacturers’ claims. This review aims at giving a brief introduction to the clinical need for chronic wound dressings, focusing on inflammation and evaluating how bio-derived and synthetic dressings may control excess inflammation and promote healing.

Benefits of sucrose octasulfate (TLC-NOSF) dressings in the treatment of chronic wounds: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Management of chronic wounds remains one of the major challenges for health professionals and patients. An evidence-based decision is important to ensure that patients are receiving the best treatment proven to reduce healing time and improve outcomes, including economic benefits and patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Due to recent restrictions because of the COVID-19 pandemic, including closure of wound care centres within hospitals and a drop in patient volume, chronic wound management needs simple-to-use dressings which are still effective and evidence-based solutions. This systematic review was conducted to identify the clinical evidence available on a sucrose octasulfate dressing (TLC-NOSF, UrgoStart dressing range, Laboratoires Urgo, France) to explore its efficacy in the management of chronic wounds, particularly lower limb ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers and pressure ulcers.

METHOD

A literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar was conducted based on the PICO model (patient/population, intervention, comparison and outcomes) to retrieve publications of different levels of evidence in order to evaluate outcomes of the use of TLC-NOSF dressings.

RESULTS

A total of 21 publications of different levels, ranging from double-blind randomised control trials to case reports, involving over 12,000 patients, were identified through PubMed, with a further eight publications through Google Scholar and two publications through Cochrane Library. A total of seven results were omitted due to the lack of relevance or repetition.

CONCLUSION

All the evidence provided suggest that these dressings provide clinicians with an evidence-based option for the management of chronic wounds; that the TLC-NOSF dressings are beneficial in promoting the healing process, reducing healing times, enhancing patients' HRQoL, and in allowing a more cost-effective procedure.

Cost-effectiveness of TLC-NOSF dressings versus neutral dressings for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in France

This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of Technology Lipido-Colloid with Nano Oligo Saccharide Factor (TLC-NOSF) wound dressings versus neutral dressings in the management of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) from a French collective perspective. We used a Markov microsimulation cohort model to simulate the DFU monthly progression over the lifetime horizon. Our study employed a mixed method design with model inputs including data from interventional and observational studies, French databases and expert opinion. The demographic characteristics of the simulated population and clinical efficacy were based on the EXPLORER double-blind randomized controlled trial. Health-related quality of life, costs, and resource use inputs were taken from the literature relevant to the French context. The main outcomes included life-years without DFU (LYsw/DFU), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), amputations, and lifetime costs. To assess the robustness of the results, sensitivity and subgroup analyses based on the wound duration at treatment initiation were performed. Treatment with the TLC-NOSF dressing led to total cost savings per patient of EUR 35,489, associated with gains of 0.50 LYw/DFU and 0.16 QALY. TLC-NOSF dressings were established as the dominant strategy in the base case and all sensitivity analyses. Furthermore, the model revealed that, for every 100 patients treated with TLC-NOSF dressings, two amputations could be avoided. According to the subgroup analysis results, the sooner the TLC-NOSF treatment was initiated, the better were the outcomes, with the highest benefits for ulcers with a duration of two months or less (+0.65 LYw/DFU, +0.23 QALY, and cost savings of EUR 55,710). The results from the French perspective are consistent with the ones from the German and British perspectives. TLC-NOSF dressings are cost-saving compared to neutral dressings, leading to an increase in patients' health benefits and a decrease in the associated treatment costs. These results can thus be used to guide healthcare decisionmakers. The potential savings could represent EUR 3,345 per treated patient per year and even reach EUR 4,771 when TLC-NOSF dressings are used as first line treatment. The EXPLORER trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01717183.

Use of a TLC-Ag dressing on 2270 patients with wounds at risk or with signs of local infection: an observational study

OBJECTIVE

A description of wounds treated with a poly-absorbent silver dressing (with technology lipido-colloid with silver ions, TLC-Ag), and evaluation of the short-term clinical impact of the dressing on the wound healing process, under real-life conditions.

METHOD

A large, prospective, multicentre, observational study of patients in 81 centres in Germany, presenting with an exuding wound at risk or with clinical signs of local infection for whom the evaluated TLC-Ag dressing (UrgoClean Ag, Laboratoires Urgo, France) has been prescribed. Main outcomes included: reduction in number of wound infections diagnosed and clinical signs of local infection, wound healing rate, clinical assessment of wound healing progression, relative wound area reduction (RWAR), local tolerability, handling and acceptance of the dressing.

RESULTS

A total of 2270 patients with acute and chronic wounds of various aetiologies were treated with the evaluated dressing for a mean duration of 22±13 days. All clinical signs of local infection and the diagnosed wound infections were substantially reduced at two weeks after the treatment initiation. All wound infection parameters continued to reduce until the last visit. In the meantime, clinical improvement in wound healing was reported in 98.9% of acute wounds, with a wound closure rate of 68.5%. In chronic wounds, a median RWAR of 57.4% was achieved, with an improvement in healing process documented by clinicians in 90.6% of cases, stabilisation in 6.1% and worsening in 3.2%. Similar results were reported, regardless of exudate level and proportion of sloughy and granulation tissues in the wound bed at baseline. The dressing was well tolerated and well accepted by both patients and health professionals.

CONCLUSION

These results, documented in a large cohort of patients treated in current practice, support and complete the clinical evidence on the healing properties and safety profile of the TLC-Ag dressing in the management of wounds at risk or with clinical signs of local infection, regardless of wound and patient characteristics. Declaration of interest: This study was supported by a grant from Laboratoires Urgo. UM, EB, LT and SB are employees of Laboratoires Urgo. JD, KCM and MD provided advisory and speaking services to pharmaceutical and other healthcare organisations including, but not limited to, Laboratoires Urgo. Data management and statistical analyses were conducted independently by INPADS GmbH, Germany.

Association of autologous punch grafting, TLC-NOSF dressing and multitype compression therapy to rapidly achieve wound closure in hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers

OBJECTIVE

To document the efficacy of a combined therapeutic strategy in achieving rapid wound healing in patients with long-standing ulcers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Outpatients with hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers were included in an interventional, prospective, single-arm, mono-centre study and treated with autologous punch grafting, TLC-NOSF dressing and multi-type compression therapy. The primary outcome was the percentage of healed wounds by week 12. Secondary outcomes included time-to-reach wound closure, wound area reduction, treatment acceptability and safety.

RESULTS

From November 2018 to October 2019, 42 patients with 51 ulcers were included (23 males, 70.6±40.8 years old, with multiple comorbidities). Despite poor wound healing prognosis at baseline (47% of recurrent ulcers, with a mean duration of 15 months and a mean area of 12.6cm²), wound healing was achieved in 47 ulcers (92%) after a mean period of treatment of 25±13 days. A relative wound area reduction>75% was also reached in three additional ulcers by the last evaluation visit. No adverse event related to the procedure was reported throughout the study period. The associated treatment were very well tolerated and accepted by the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The evaluated procedure induced fast re-epithelisation of the treated ulcers. Based on our experience, this simple and successful reparative strategy may be considered as an interesting option in the treatment of venous leg ulcers of poor prognosis.

Uso de apósitos con TLC-NOSF en el manejo de la úlcera de pie diabético, basado en la revisión de la evidencia y la práctica clínica

Management of diabetic foot ulcers with a TLC-NOSF dressing, based on evidence and clinical practice The incidence of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) has increased in the past decade, both in Chile and worldwide, as a result of the progressive growth in diabetes prevalence. Because DFU are associated with a high risk of infection and amputation, it is crucial to choose effective and evidence-based treatments. A dressing combining technology lipidocolloid with nano-oligo saccharide factor (TLC-NOSF) has demonstrated its effectiveness in managing DFU. This article reviews the evidence around TLC-NOSF and its implementation in clinical practice.

Impact of wound duration on diabetic foot ulcer healing: evaluation of a new sucrose octasulfate wound dressing

OBJECTIVE

A common and frequent complication of diabetes is diabetic foot ulcers (DFU), which can have high treatment costs and severe adverse events. This study aims to evaluate the effects of wound duration on wound healing and the impact on costs, including treatment with a new sucrose octasulfate dressing compared with a control dressing.

METHOD

Based on the Explorer study (a two-armed randomised double-blind clinical trial), a cost-effectiveness analysis compared four different patient groups distinguished by their wound duration and additionally two DFU treatment options: a sucrose octasulfate dressing and a neutral dressing (as control). Clinical outcomes and total direct costs of wound dressings were evaluated over 20 weeks from the perspective of the Social Health Insurance in Germany. Simulation of long-term outcomes and costs were demonstrated by a five cycle Markov model.

RESULTS

The results show total wound healing rates between 71% and 14.8%, and direct treatment costs for DFU in the range of €2482-3278 (sucrose octasulfate dressing) and €2768-3194 (control dressing). Patients with a wound duration of ≤2 months revealed the highest wound healing rates for both the sucrose octasulfate dressing and control dressing (71% and 41%, respectively) and had the lowest direct treatment costs of €2482 and €2768, respectively. The 100-week Markov model amplified the results. Patients with ≤2 months' wound duration achieved wound healing rates of 98% and 88%, respectively and costs of €3450 and €6054, respectively (CE=€3520, €6864). Sensitivity analysis revealed that the dressing changes per week were the most significant uncertainty factor.

CONCLUSION

Based on the findings of this study, early treatment of DFU with a sucrose octasulfate dressing is recommended from a health economic view due to lower treatment costs, greater cost-effectiveness and higher wound healing rates.

[Sucrose octasulfate-evidence in the treatment of chronic wounds]

Patients with chronic wounds should receive wound treatment in addition to causative therapy. In this context, the lack of adequate evidence for wound healing products has been repeatedly discussed. Using the example of TLC-sucrose octasulfate (TLC: technology lipido-colloid), the present review shows that there is significant data with good evidence and comparability in this area. One therapeutic approach to promote wound healing is the inhibition of matrix-metalloproteinases, for example by sucrose octasulfate. For wound products containing TLC-sucrose octasulfate, several sequential clinical studies have been conducted in recent years. The WHAT study was an open randomized controlled trial (RCT) with 117 patients with venous leg ulcers (VLU). The CHALLENGE study was a double-blind RCT with 187 patients with VLU. The SPID study was a pilot study with 33 patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). The two prospective, multicenter clinical pilot studies NEREIDES and CASSIOPEE examined a total of 88 patients with VLU in different phases of healing. In the REALITY study, a pooled data analysis was performed on eight observational studies with 10,220 patients with chronic wounds of different genesis. In the double-blind, two-armed EXPLORER RCT, 240 patients with neuro-ischemic DFU were followed from first presentation until complete healing. In all studies, a significant promotion of wound healing could be shown by the use of wound healing products with TLC-sucrose octasulfate.

Clinical evaluation of polyabsorbent TLC-NOSF dressings on chronic wounds: a prospective, observational, multicentre study of 1140 patients

Objective:

The superior wound healing properties and cost-effectiveness of TLC-NOSF dressings in the local treatment of chronic wounds have already been demonstrated by several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) at a high quality level. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of new TLC-NOSF dressings with polyabsorbent fibres in an unselected population of patients under real-life conditions.

Method:

A large, prospective, multicentre, observational study with two polyabsorbent TLC-NOSF dressings (UrgoStart Plus Pad and UrgoStart Plus Border, Laboratoires Urgo, France) was conducted in Germany between July 2017 and December 2018. Main outcomes included wound healing rate, clinical assessment of wound healing progression, local tolerability and acceptance of dressings.

Results:

A total of 1140 patients with chronic wounds of various aetiologies (leg ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, pressure ulcers, etc.) were treated with the investigated dressings in 130 centres, for a mean duration of 56±34 days. By the final visit, 48.5% of wounds had healed and 44.8% had improved. Similar results were reported regardless of wound aetiology or regardless of proportions of sloughy and granulation tissue at the start of treatment. According to the subgroup analysis by wound duration, the sooner the TLC-NOSF treatment was initiated, the better the clinical outcomes for all types of wounds. The dressings were very well tolerated and accepted by the patients.

Conclusion:

These results are consistent with those from RCTs conducted on TLC-NOSF dressings. They complete the evidence on the good healing properties and safety profile of these dressings, especially in non-selected patients treated in current practice, and regardless of the characteristics of wounds and patients. They support the use of the dressings as a first-line intervention and until wound healing in the management of chronic wounds, in association with appropriate standard of care.

Cost-effectiveness of TLC-sucrose octasulfate versus control dressings in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers

Objective:

Diabetes is one of the most widespread diseases in Germany. Common complications are diabetic foot ulcers (DFU), which are associated with a cost-intensive treatment and serious adverse events, such as infections, amputations. This cost-effectiveness analysis compares two treatment options for patients with DFU: a TLC-NOSF dressing versus a neutral dressing, assessed through a European double-blind randomised controlled trial (RCT), Explorer.

Methods:

The evaluation of the clinical outcomes was associated to direct costs (costs for dressings, nursing time, hospitalisation etc.) of both dressings, from the perspective of the statutory health insurance in Germany. Due to the long mean healing time of a DFU, the observation period was extended from 20 to 100 weeks in a Markov model.

Results:

After 20 weeks, and with complete closure as a primary endpoint, the model revealed direct treatment costs for DFU of €2,864.21 when treated with a TLC-NOSF dressing compared with €2,958.69 with the neutral control dressing (cost-effectiveness: €6,017.25 versus €9,928.49). In the Markov model (100 weeks) the costs for the TLC-NOSF dressing were €5,882.87 compared with €8,449.39 with the neutral dressing (cost-effectiveness: €6,277.58 versus €10,375.56). The robustness of results was underlined by several sensitivity analyses for varying assumptions. The frequency of weekly dressing changes had the most significant influence in terms of parameter uncertainty.

Conclusion:

Overall, the treatment of DFU with a TLC-NOSF dressing is supported from a health economic perspective, because both the treatment costs and the cost-effectiveness were superior compared with the neutral wound dressing.

Implementation of NICE technology guidance on venous leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers: a conference report

Implementation of evidence-based care is central to achieving good results. In the UK, this involves implementing guidance from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Here, Tracy Cowan, JWC consultant editor, reports on a conference that outlined recently published NICE guidance on UrgoStart for treating leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers, and described how to incorporate this into everyday practice to drive significant cost savings and improve patient outcomes.

Optimal wound closure of diabetic foot ulcers with early initiation of TLC-NOSF treatment: post-hoc analysis of Explorer

Objective:

In March 2018, the Explorer study, an international, double-blind, randomised controlled trial (RCT), established that adding a TLC-NOSF (UrgoStart Contact, Laboratoires Urgo, France) dressing to good local standard of care (SoC) significantly and substantially increases wound closure and reduces the healing time of neuroischaemic diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). Besides the TLC-NOSF treatment, the wound duration was the only other covariate that had an influence on the wound closure rate in the regression model used in the original study. The purpose of this work was to further document the impact of wound duration on the healing outcomes of the DFUs included in the Explorer study and to discuss complementary pragmatic observations on the TLC-NOSF effect.

Method:

In this post-hoc analysis of the Explorer data, the wound closure rates by week 20 are reported for the global cohort (n=240, Intention-to-treat population) and for the treated (n=126) and control groups (n=114) according to DFU duration and location.

Results:

For the combined group, wound closure rates decreased with the increase of wound duration at baseline (from 57% in wounds ≤2 months to 19% in wounds >11 months). Whatever the wound duration subgroups analysed, higher closure rates were reported in the TLC-NOSF group than in the control group. However, the maximal difference between the two treatments was reported in wounds with a duration of ≤2 months (71% versus 41%, 30 percentage points difference, Relative Risk 1.7, 95% Confidence Interval 1.1 to 2.8). Regarding wound location subgroup analyses, the outcomes were always in favour of the TLC-NOSF treatment, with closure rates ranging between 43% and 61% within the TLC-NOSF group, and between 25% and 40% within the control group.

Conclusion:

This clinical evidence supports that treating DFUs with TLC-NOSF dressing and good SoC results in higher wound closure rates than with a neutral dressing and the same good standard of care, whatever the duration and the location of the treated wounds. However, the earlier the TLC-NOSF dressing is initiated in DFU treatment, the greater the benefits.