The Perth Surgical Wound Dehiscence Risk Assessment Tool (PSWDRAT): development and prospective validation in the clinical setting

Exploring the definition of surgical wound dehiscence in literature: a Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Surgical wound dehiscence (SWD) is interpreted differently amongst healthcare professionals due to a lack of uniformity in definitions in literature. Inconsistent defining impedes accurate diagnosis, appropriate care, intercollegiate consultation, and benchmarking. Despite the introduction of a consensus-driven definition by the World Union of Wound Healing Societies (WUWHS) in 2018, its application in literature and clinical practice remains unclear.

A OBJECTIVES

This scoping review aims to systematically explore the literature to identify existing SWD definitions, provide an overview, identify knowledge gaps, and extract articles that reference the WUWHS definition.

METHODS

This review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and Joanna Briggs Institute Methodology for Scoping Reviews. A systematic literature search was performed through MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar. Eligibility screening and data extraction were independently performed by two researchers.

RESULTS

This study included 34 articles: 28 systematic reviews, two randomized clinical trials, three retrospective studies, and one book chapter. SWD was defined in different ways, such as "breakdown/disruption of the surgical wound" (n = 17), "separation/splitting apart of the wound edges" (n = 13), "gaping/re-opened wound" (n = 7), mechanical failure (n = 2), or infection (n = 1). Other studies defined SWD in relation to its depth (skin layers involved) or length over the incision, both complete and partial (n = 9). One study referenced the WUWHS definition.

CONCLUSION

Existing literature demonstrates a substantial variety in defining SWD, and little adoption of the WUWHS definition following its introduction in 2018. Uniform use of the definition should be considered as this will improve the quality of care.

Ipsilateral dual cannulation is associated with wound complications following veno-arterial ECMO decannulation

BACKGROUND

Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) is a well-established treatment for severe cardio-pulmonary failure. The use of large bore cannulas in the femoral vessels for an extended period has been associated with significant wound complications. There is a lack of data analyzing risk factors that can mitigate such complications. The primary purpose of this study was to identify modifiable risk factors associated with femoral wound complications after VA ECMO decannulation.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of wound complications in patients following VA ECMO decannulation from 2014-2021 at a single academic institution were analyzed. Wound complications were defined as wound infection, dehiscence, or those wounds that were deliberately opened to promote healing by secondary intention.

RESULTS

Sixty patients underwent decannulation of VA ECMO with operative repair of the femoral artery. Fifteen patients were identified to have wound complications, eight (53%) of these had infection. Fourteen (93%) patients had wound dehiscence or had their wound purposely opened at bedside. Univariate analysis revealed no association of access-related complication with higher Body Mass Index (BMI, 28.3 vs. 32.7 kg/m2, P=0.110) but here was a trend in having more wound complications in individuals with COVID-19 infection (6.7% vs. 26.7%, P=0.058). Patients that had dual cannulation with the arterial and venous cannulas in the same groin had significantly more wound complications compared to single cannulation arterial and venous cannulas in separate groins (57.8% vs. 93.3%; P=0.012). Multivariate analysis revealed same side cannulation (OR 18.05, 95% CI 1.44-226.18, P=0.025) and COVID-19 infection (OR 18.18, 95% CI 1.50-220.66, P=0.023) were independent predictors of wound complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Wound complications after VA ECMO decannulation is associated with COVID-19 infection and having venous and arterial cannulas in the same groin. We recommend that the arterial and venous cannulation be placed in different groins in patients that require VA ECMO.

Incidence of wound dehiscence in patients undergoing laparoscopy or laparotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Surgical wound dehiscence (SWD) is a serious complication-with a 40% estimated mortality rate-that occurs after surgical intervention. Since the implementation of advanced recovery protocols, the current global incidence of SWD is unknown. This systematic review and meta-analysis estimated the worldwide incidence of SWD and explored its associated factors in general surgical patients. Eligible full-text cross-sectional, cohort and observational studies in English, between 1 January 2010 to 23 April 2021, were retrieved from MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. Data extraction and quality appraisal were undertaken independently by three reviewers. Random effects meta-analytic models were used in the presence of substantial inconsistency. Subgroup, meta-regression and sensitivity analyses were used to explore inconsistency. Publication bias was assessed using Hunter's plots and Egger's regression test. Of 2862 publications retrieved, 27 studies were included in the final analyses. Pooled data from 741,118 patients across 24 studies were meta-analysed. The 30-day cumulative incidence of SWD was 1% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1-1%). SWD incidence was highest in hepatobiliary surgery, at 3% (95% CI: 0-8%). Multivariable meta-regression showed SWD was significantly associated with duration of operation and reoperation (F=7.93 (2-10); p=0.009), explaining 58.2% of the variance. Most studies were retrospective, predated the agreed global definition for SWD and measured as a secondary outcome; thus, our results likely underestimate the scope of the problem. Wider uptake of the global definition will inform the SWD surveillance and improve the accuracy of reporting.

Clinical prediction models and risk tools for early detection of patients at risk of surgical site infection and surgical wound dehiscence: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

Despite advances in surgical techniques, intraoperative practice and a plethora of advanced wound therapies, surgical wound complications (SWCs), such as surgical site infection (SSI) and surgical wound dehiscence (SWD), continue to pose a considerable burden to the patient and healthcare setting. Predicting those patients at risk of a SWC may give patients and healthcare providers the opportunity to implement a tailored prevention plan or potentially ameliorate known risk factors to improve patient postoperative outcomes.

METHOD

A scoping review of the literature for studies which reported predictive power and internal/external validity of risk tools for clinical use in predicting patients at risk of SWCs after surgery was conducted. An electronic search of three databases and two registries was carried out with date restrictions. The search terms included 'prediction surgical site infection' and 'prediction surgical wound dehiscence'.

RESULTS

A total of 73 records were identified from the database search, of which six studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these, the majority of validated risk tools were predominantly within the cardiothoracic domain, and targeted morbidity and mortality outcomes. There were four risk tools specifically targeting SWCs following surgery.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this review have highlighted an absence of well-developed risk tools specifically for SSI and/or SWD in most surgical populations. This review suggests that further research is required for the development and clinical implementation of rigorously validated and fit-for-purpose risk tools for predicting patients at risk of SWCs following surgery. The ability to predict such patients enables the implementation of preventive strategies, such as the use of prophylactic antibiotics, delayed timing of surgery, or advanced wound therapies following a procedure.

Fascial dehiscence: predictable complication? Development and validation of a risk model: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Fascial dehiscence is still an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the postoperative period of abdominal surgery. Different authors have sought to identify risk factors for this entity. Two risk scores have been developed, but they include postoperative variables, which hinder preventive decision-making during the early surgical period. Our aim is to identify preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for fascial dehiscence and to develop and validate a risk prediction score that allows taking preventive behaviors.

METHODS

All adult patients, with no prior history of abdominal surgery, who underwent midline laparotomy by a general surgery division between January 2009 and December 2019 were included. Recognized preoperative risk factors for fascial dehiscence were evaluated in a univariate analysis and subsequently entered in a multivariate stepwise logistic regression model. A prognostic risk model was developed and posteriorly validated by bootstrapping. This study was conducted following the STROBE statement.

RESULTS

A total of 594 patients were included. Fascial dehiscence was detected in 41 patients (6.9%). On multivariate analysis, eight factors were identified: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), immunosuppression, smoking, prostatic hyperplasia, anticoagulation use, sepsis, and overweight. The resulting score ranges from 1 to 8. Scores above 3 are predictive of 18% risk of dehiscence with a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 80% (ROC 0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

We present a new preoperative prognostic score to identify patients with a high risk of fascial dehiscence. It can be a guide for decision-making that allows taking intraoperative preventive measures. External validation is still required.

Incidence and risk factors for surgical wound complications in women with body mass index >30 kg/m2 following cesarean delivery: a secondary analysis

BACKGROUND

OBJECTIVE

STUDY DESIGN

RESULTS

CONCLUSION

Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy in the prevention of surgical wound complications in the cesarean section at-risk population: a parallel group randomised multicentre trial-the CYGNUS protocol

INTRODUCTION

Caesarean delivery is steadily becoming one of the more common surgical procedures in Australia with over 100 000 caesarean sections performed each year. Over the last 10 years in Australia, the caesarean section rate has increased from 28% in 2003 to 33% in 2013. On the international stage, the Australian caesarean delivery rates are higher than the average for the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Australia ranked as 8 out of 33 and is second to the USA. Postoperative surgical site infections (SSIs) and wound complications are the most common and costly event following a caesarean section. Globally, complication rates following a caesarean delivery vary from 4.9% to 9.8%. Complications such as infection and wound breakdown affect the postpartum mother's health and well-being, and contribute to healthcare costs for clinical management that often spans the acute, community and primary healthcare settings. Published level one studies using advanced wound dressings in the identified 'at-risk' population prior to surgery for prophylactic intervention are yet to be forthcoming.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A parallel group randomised control trial of 448 patients will be conducted across two metropolitan hospitals in Perth, Western Australia, which provide obstetric and midwifery services. We will recruit pregnant women in the last trimester, prior to their admission into the healthcare facility for delivery of their child. We will use a computer-generated block sequence to randomise the 448 participants to either the interventional (negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) dressing, n=224) or comparator arm (non-NPWT dressing, n=224). The primary outcome measure is the occurrence of surgical wound dehiscence (SSWD) or SSI. The Centres for Disease Control reporting definition of either superficial or deep infection at 30 days will be used as the outcome measure definition. SWD will be classified as per the World Union of Wound Healing Societies grading system (grade I-IV). We will assess recruitment rate, and adherence to intervention and follow-up. We will assess the potential effectiveness of NPWT in the prevention of postpartum surgical wound complications at three time points during the study; postoperative days 5, 14 and 30, after which the participant will be closed out of the trial. We will use statistical methods to determine efficacy, and risk stratification will be conducted to determine the SWD risk profile of the participant. Follow-up at day 30 will assess superficial and deep infection, and wound dehiscence (grade I-IV) and the core outcome data set for wound complications. This study will collect health-related quality of life (European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 5-Level Scale), mortality and late complications such as further surgery with a cost analysis conducted. The primary analysis will be by intention-to-treat. This clinical trial protocol follows the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) and the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval was obtained through St John of God Health Care (HREC1409), Western Australia Department of Health King Edward Memorial Hospital (HREC3111). Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences. We used the SPIRIT checklist when writing our study protocol.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618002006224p).