Wound bed preparation: a case series using polyhexanide and betaine solution and gel-a UK perspective

Analysis of Biogenic Amines and Small Molecule Metabolites in Human Diabetic Wound Ulcer Exudate

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) pose a significant challenge in wound care due to their chronic nature and impaired healing processes. This study examines the biogenic amines and small molecule metabolites present in DFU wound exudates to identify their potential roles in wound healing. Under an IRB-approved protocol, wound fluid samples were collected from 25 diabetic patients and analyzed using ultrahigh-pressure liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry. The analysis identified 721 metabolites, with 402 confirmed through stringent criteria. Key metabolites significantly contributing to the wound exudates include betaine, lactic acid, carnitine, choline, creatine, and metformin (a widely used first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes). These molecules are known to influence wound healing processes, such as collagen synthesis, angiogenesis, inflammation modulation, and energy metabolism. Notably, the presence of drugs such as metformin and beclomethasone in the exudates suggests significant pharmacodynamic interactions that could influence wound healing. Specifically, we discovered that the combined use of insulin and metformin administered systemically significantly increased the concentration of metformin in the wound exudates (from 0.3% ± 0.0 to 3.1% ± 3.4; p = 0.00 49). This study highlights the complexity of DFU exudate composition and underscores the potential for targeted metabolic profiling to develop personalized wound care strategies.

The Use of Polyhexanide and Betaine Combined Preparation in Adult Burn Care in Sri Lanka

Biofilm formation over burn wounds has led to persistent wound infection, poor wound healing, and resistance to antimicrobial therapy. This process ultimately leads to prolonged hospital stays and increased cost of burn wound care, especially in developing countries. Hence, large-area biofilm-targeted therapy should be a mainstay in burn wound care. Polyhexanide is a polymer used as a disinfectant, and betaine is a surfactant. We report a patient managed with a combined preparation of the above two substances. A 44-year-old patient sustained a 22% superficial partial-thickness and mid-dermal burns on the back and right arm after a high-voltage electrocution injury. The patient was treated with dressings containing the above preparation and closely monitored for the healing stages of the burn wound. Complete wound epithelialization with healthy granulation tissue was achieved within 15 days. No surface wound swab culture became positive during the treatment. The patient did not develop any fever spikes, and the white blood cell count was maintained at less than 12,000 mm-3 with a C-reactive protein level below 50 mg/L. No surgical intervention was needed for further management of the wound. Polyhexanide and betaine combined preparation may be used effectively on the superficial partial-thickness and mid-dermal burns to prevent wound infection and improve granulation and epithelialization. However, high-quality comparative evidence is needed for the confirmation.

Quality of life case series review: wound bed preparation from a UK perspective

Previous studies have reported that polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) and betaine solution and gels remove biofilm, improve wound healing and reduce infection rates. Quality of life (QoL) outcomes are not commonly reported on when it comes to wound care. This review aims to summarise QoL data from a cohort of case studies previously published on chronic lower limb ulcers using PHMB products (Prontosan® Solution, Prontosan® Wound Gel X and Prontosan® Debridement Pad). Here, we report on and review a total of 38 case studies describing 56 wounds. From these 38 case studies, 36 reported that all the wounds involved had either healed or improved by the end of their respective study period. QoL themes explore malodour, slough, and exudate, pain, mobility, hair growth, antibiotic intake, return to work, social life and mood. This case series demonstrates that treatment with Prontosan® products improves many QoL outcomes for patients with non-healing wounds.

Assessment between antiseptic and normal saline for negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell time in diabetic foot infections

Negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell time (NPWTi-d) is increasingly used for a diverse range of wounds. Meanwhile, the topical wound irrigation solution consisting of polyhexamethylene biguanide and betaine (PHMB-B) has shown efficacy in managing wound infections. However, the effectiveness of this solution as a topical instillation solution for NPWTi-d in patients with diabetic foot infections (DFIs) has not been thoroughly studied. The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the impact of using PHMB-B as the instillation solution during NPWTi-d on reducing bioburden and improving clinical outcomes in patients with DFIs. Between January 2017 and December 2022, a series of patients with DFIs received treatment with NPWTi-d, using either PHMB-B or normal saline as the instillation solution. Data collected retrospectively included demographic information, baseline wound characteristics, and treatment outcomes. The study included 61 patients in the PHMB-B group and 73 patients in the normal saline group, all diagnosed with DFIs. In comparison to patients treated with normal saline, patients with PHMB-B exhibited no significant differences in terms of wound bed preparation time (P = 0.5034), length of hospital stay (P = 0.6783), NPWTi-d application times (P = 0.1458), duration of systematic antimicrobial administration (P = 0.3567), or overall cost of hospitalization (P = 0.6713). The findings of the study suggest that the use of either PHMB-B or normal saline as an instillation solution in NPWTi-d for DFIs shows promise and effectiveness, yet no clinical distinction was observed between the two solutions.

Antiseptic versus non-antiseptic solutions for preventing infection in acute traumatic wounds: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of antiseptic solutions to that of non-antiseptic solutions in reducing wound infection rate, reducing bacterial load and improving wound healing.

METHOD

We searched PubMed MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ProQuest Medical Database and medRxiv for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antiseptic solutions with non-antiseptic solutions in simple, uncomplicated acute traumatic wounds. Qualitative data synthesis was employed. Risk of bias was assessed and GRADE assessment was used to evaluate quality of evidence.

RESULTS

In this systematic review, four studies with a total of 875 participants were included, of which two studies showed a significant reduction of wound infection rate using povidone-iodine (p=0.001 and p=0.03). The use of non-antiseptic solutions significantly increased bacterial load on acute traumatic wounds (p=0.0001). The quality of evidence was very low. No studies reported on wound healing outcome.

CONCLUSION

No robust conclusions can be implemented in clinical practice. Future studies are needed to compare the use of antiseptic and non-antiseptic solutions in acute traumatic wounds.

Use of Adjunct Antiseptic Agents in Periprosthetic Joint Infections

Periprosthetic joint infection is a leading cause for failure of contemporary total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty projected to nearly double in the next decade and reach an economic burden of $1.85 billion in the United Sates by 2030. Although multiple treatments for periprosthetic joint infection have been described, a thorough débridement and joint lavage to decrease bacterial bioburden and to remove biofilm remains a critical component of treatment. Various adjunct antiseptic agents such as chlorhexidine, povidone-iodine, hydrogen peroxide, acetic acid, and chlorine compounds are currently in off-label use in this capacity. Each antiseptic agent, however, has a distinct mechanism of action and targets different organisms, and some combinations of agents may lead to tissue toxicity. In this review, currently available adjunct antiseptic washes will be described in detail based on their mechanism of action and the evidence for their use will be reviewed. Furthermore, this review puts forward an evidence-based treatment algorithm based on the specific causative organism.