Effectiveness of combined modulated ultrasound and electric current stimulation to treat diabetic foot ulcers

Electroactive Electrospun Nanofibrous Scaffolds: Innovative Approaches for Improved Skin Wound Healing

The incidence and burden of skin wounds, especially chronic and complex wounds, have a profound impact on healthcare. Effective wound healing strategies require a multidisciplinary approach, and advances in materials science and bioengineering have paved the way for the development of novel wound healing dressing. In this context, electrospun nanofibers can mimic the architecture of the natural extracellular matrix and provide new opportunities for wound healing. Inspired by the bioelectric phenomena in the human body, electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds with electroactive characteristics are gaining widespread attention and gradually emerging. To this end, this review first summarizes the basic process of wound healing, the causes of chronic wounds, and the current status of clinical treatment, highlighting the urgency and importance of wound dressings. Then, the biological effects of electric fields, the preparation materials, and manufacturing techniques of electroactive electrospun nanofibrous (EEN) scaffolds are discussed. The latest progress of EEN scaffolds in enhancing skin wound healing is systematically reviewed, mainly including treatment and monitoring. Finally, the importance of EEN scaffold strategies to enhance wound healing is emphasized, and the challenges and prospects of EEN scaffolds are summarized.

Intervention effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on grade I-II ulcers in diabetic foot patients: A meta-analysis

This study aims to systematically evaluate the effect of low-level laser therapy on grade I-II diabetic foot ulcers. We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, EBSCO, Cochrane, ClinicalKey, Ovid Medline, Sinomed, CNKI, and WANFANG databases for studies assessing the efficacy of low-level laser therapy for diabetic foot ulcers, with a cutoff date of 15 September 2024. Two researchers independently selected relevant studies and extracted data, utilising RevMan 5.4 software to perform a meta-analysis. A total of 11 studies involving 657 participants with grade I-II diabetic foot ulcers were included. In patients with grade I-II diabetic foot ulcers, low-level laser therapy significantly increased the complete healing rate (RR = 4.97, 95% CI: 2.65-9.32, p < 0.00001), the wound shrinkage area (MD = 7.76, 95% CI: 6.51-9.0, p <0.00001), and the wound bacterial clearance rate (RR = 3.72, 95% CI: 2.16-6.39, p <0.00001) compared to the control group, while also reducing the infection rate (RR = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.01-0.8, p <0.03). Low-level laser therapy is an effective adjuvant therapy that accelerates wound healing in patients with grade I-II diabetic foot ulcers. However, further research is necessary to validate its effects on wound area reduction rate and healing time.

Evaluating the effectiveness of ultrasound-assisted wound debridement in managing diabetic foot ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) present a significant clinical challenge due to their high prevalence and profound impact on morbidity. Ultrasound-assisted wound debridement (UAWD) has emerged as a potential therapeutic modality to improve healing outcomes in DFU management.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of UAWD in treating DFUs on wound closure rates, treatment duration, and quality of life outcomes.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines, systematically searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library with no date restrictions. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy of UAWD in DFU treatment were included. Data were independently extracted by two reviewers, with discrepancies resolved through consensus or third-party consultation. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. χ 2 and I 2 statistics assessed heterogeneity, informing the use of fixed or random-effects models for meta-analysis, supplemented by sensitivity analysis and publication bias assessment through funnel plots and Egger's test.

RESULTS

From 1255 articles, seven RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The studies demonstrated that UAWD significantly reduced DFU healing time (standardized mean difference = -0.78, 95%CI: -0.97 to -0.60, P < 0.001) and increased healing rates (odds ratio = 9.96, 95%CI: 5.99 to 16.56, P < 0.001) compared to standard care. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of these results, and no significant publication bias was detected.

CONCLUSION

UAWD is a promising adjunctive treatment for DFUs, significantly reducing healing times and increasing healing rates. These findings advocate for the integration of UAWD into standard DFU care protocols.

An Overview of Recent Clinical Trials for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Therapies

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a major complication of diabetes, leading to high mortality, reduced quality of life, neuropathy, ischemia, infection, and amputation risks. The prevalence of these ulcers is only on the rise as more people suffer from type 2 diabetes and obesity. The current wound management involves wound dressings, offloading, debridement, and infection control, but more must be done to keep up with the rising prevalence of DFUs and the strain they put on patients and the healthcare system. To find recent therapeutic advances in DFU treatment, we searched PubMed for novel therapeutics from the past 5 years. We found a diversity of promising interventions, including advanced wound dressings and topicals, physical energy-based therapies, regenerative scaffolds, and growth factor- and cell-based therapies. Recent therapies hold significant promise in healing more DFUs faster and more effectively. Providers should consider employing safe, novel therapeutics when standard dressings are not effective.

Short-term effect of dressing with Dermaheal ointment in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer: A double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Diabetic foot ulcers, a major cause of amputations in diabetics, could benefit from natural products as adjuncts to standard care, given the costs and adverse effects of typical therapies. This study aims to evaluate the short-term effects of dressing with Dermaheal ointment in the treatment of DFUs through a double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial.

METHODS

This double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial included 50 patients with Wagner's ulcer grade I or II, randomly assigned to Dermaheal and placebo groups (received standard treatment and placebo ointment). The ulcer site was dressed daily for four consecutive weeks with either Dermaheal or placebo ointment. Ulcer healing score (using DFU healing checklist), ulcer size with transparent ruler and largest dimension of ulcer, and pain severity using numerical pain rating score (were recorded at five-time points, including baseline, and on weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4). Also, ulcer healing status was investigated at the trial ended in November 2021.

RESULTS

Both groups showed significant improvement in ulcer healing over 4 weeks (p time < 0.001), with more remarkable progress in the Dermaheal group (p group = 0.03). At the trial end, complete ulcer healing was also significantly higher in the Dermaheal group compared to the placebo group (56% vs. 12%, p = 0.002). Both groups exhibited a decrease in ulcer size (p time < 0.001). Considering the baseline ulcer size as a covariate, substantial changes in mean ulcer size were noted in the initial (p = 0.01), second (p = 0.001), third (p = 0.002), and fourth (p = 0.002) weeks of the intervention, showing a preference for the Dermaheal group. However, no significant between-group difference was observed in pain severity levels.

CONCLUSION

Dressing with Dermaheal as a topical treatment shows promise in improving healing and reducing the size of diabetic foot ulcers. Further research is needed to confirm these findings' long-term efficacy.

Effect of ultrasound-supported wound debridement in subjects with diabetic foot ulcers: A meta-analysis

A meta-analysis study to assess the effect of ultrasound-supported wound debridement (USSD) in subjects with diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). A comprehensive literature examination till January 2023 was implemented and 1873 linked studies were appraised. The picked studies contained 577 subjects with DFUs in the studies' baseline, 282 of them were using USSD, 204 were using standard care, and 91 were using a placebo. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to calculate the consequence of USSD in subjects with DFUs by the dichotomous styles and a fixed or random effect model. The USSD applied to DFU caused a significantly higher wound healing rate compared with the standard care (OR, 3.08; 95% CI, 1.94-4.88, P < .001) with no heterogeneity (I2  = 0%) and the placebo (OR, 7.61; 95% CI, 3.11-18.63, P = .02) with no heterogeneity (I2  = 0%). The USSD applied to DFUs caused a significantly higher wound healing rate compared with the standard care and the placebo. Though precautions should be taken when commerce with the consequences as all of the picked studies for this meta-analysis was with low sample sizes.

The Potential of Electrical Stimulation and Smart Textiles for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus

Diabetes mellitus is one of the most frequent diseases in the general population. Electrical stimulation is a treatment modality based on the transmission of electrical pulses into the body that has been widely used for improving wound healing and for managing acute and chronic pain. Here, we discuss recent advancements in electroceuticals and haptic/smart devices for quality of life and present in which patients and how electrical stimulation may prove to be useful for the treatment of diabetes-related complications.