Cost-effectiveness of Debrichem in managing hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers in the UK

Innovative treatment of diabetic ulcers: combining chemical debridement and xenograft applications: a case study

Lower extremity diabetic ulcers (LEDUs) are a common, high-morbidity complication of diabetes, frequently leading to infections, hospitalisations and emergency department visits. This case study examines the treatment effectiveness of a novel wound care approach in a 57-year-old female patient with a hard-to-heal LEDU (a diabetic foot ulcer of the left lower extremity) complicated by poorly controlled diabetes (glycated haemoglobin A1c: 13%). Initially, standard of care (SoC) practices, including alginate dressings, hypochlorous acid gel and sharp debridement, were ineffective in promoting significant healing. This case was further challenged by its occurrence in the remote setting of Tongatopu within the Kingdom of Tonga, where advanced wound care materials and even SoC products are not consistently available, underscoring the need for innovative and adaptable treatment strategies. A new regimen was subsequently initiated that involved preparing the wound bed through chemical debridement using a topical desiccating agent (TDA) with methanesulfonic acid (DEBRICHEM, DEBx Medical, the Netherlands), which has the ability to denature proteins and reduce microbial biofilms, necrotic tissue and inflammatory proteins in the wound bed. This was followed by the application of ovine forestomach matrix (OFM) grafts containing hyaluronic acid (Symphony, Aroa Biosurgery, New Zealand), which was applied at approximately 12-day intervals. Over the 110 days following the initial application of the TDA, the LEDU showed significant improvement as it progressed along the healing cascade towards closure. This case report provides insights into the potential of combined desiccating chemical debridement and xenograft-based wound care in treating hard-to-heal LEDUs, highlighting an approach that could inform future clinical practices in diabetic wound care.

Topical desiccating agent (DEBRICHEM): an accessible debridement option for removing biofilm in hard-to-heal wounds

It is now assumed that all hard-to-heal wounds contain biofilm. Debridement plays a key role in wound-bed preparation, as it can remove biofilm along with the devitalised tissue, potentially leaving a clean wound bed that is more likely to progress towards healing. The gold standard methods of debridement (surgical and sharp) are the least used, as they require specialist training and are often not readily available at the point of need. Most other methods can be used by generalists but are slower. They all need regular applications. The topical desiccating agent DEBRICHEM is an innovative alternative, as it is fast, effective and can be used in all clinical settings, as well as typically requiring only a single use. This article describes best practice for achieving optimal outcomes with its use.

Cost-effectiveness of ChloraSolv in treating hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers

OBJECTIVE

To estimate whether the topical, amino acid-buffered hypochlorite debriding gel ChloraSolv (RLS Global AB, Sweden) could potentially afford the UK's health services a cost-effective intervention for hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers (VLUs).

METHOD

A Markov model representing the management of hard-to-heal VLUs with ChloraSolv plus standard care (SC) or SC alone was populated with inputs from an indirect comparison of two propensity score-matched cohorts. The model estimated the relative cost-effectiveness of ChloraSolv in terms of the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained at 2021/2022 prices.

RESULTS

Addition of ChloraSolv to an SC protocol was found to increase the probability of healing by 36% (from 0.14 to 0.19) after 12 weeks, and by 79% (from 0.24 to 0.43) after 24 weeks. This led to a marginal increase in health-related quality of life. Treatment with ChloraSolv plus SC instead of SC alone reduced the total cost of wound management by 8% (£189 per VLU) at 12 weeks and by 18% (£796 per VLU) at 24 weeks. Use of ChloraSolv was estimated to improve health outcomes at reduced cost. Sensitivity analysis showed that use of ChloraSolv plus SC remained a cost-effective treatment with plausible variations in costs and effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of the study, the addition of ChloraSolv to an SC protocol potentially affords a cost-effective treatment to the UK's health services for managing hard-to-heal VLUs.

Innovative biochemisurgical treatment for stabilisation of an end-stage chronic wound in a complex vascular compromized patient

INTRODUCTION

Treating advanced peripheral arterial occlusive disease (e.g. PAOD IV) poses a significant challenge, as conventional treatments quite often fall short at this stage. However, a range of interventions can be considered to postpone amputation. This study presents an example of advanced stage of Peripheral Artery Occlusive Disease (PAOD) stage IV, encompassing a history of a high thigh amputation on the left side, coupled with pronounced wound healing disorders.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

Our patient, 55 years old, smoker and ASA Class III is in a left sided above-the knee-amputation situation. He presented to our outpatient clinic with blistering in the stump area, caused by non-proportinate pressure from the prosthesis. With an emerging septic course and advanced peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) at Fontaine class IV, revascularization was unfeasible in the left iliac artery axis and groin arteries. Additionally, a stage PAOD IV presents itself with poorly healing wounds on the right side which our patient still uses to support his transfers in and out bed and his wheelchair. Multiple surgical stump revisions and femur shortenings and diverse wound treatments were performed all were unsatisfying for patient and practitioners. We introduced a novel biochemisurgical treatment in our teaching hospital.

DISCUSSION

Desiccating-agent-A is an innovative dehydrating agent with potent desiccating characteristics upon application to organic substances. Its formulation involves blending 83% methane sulfonic acid with proton acceptors and dimethyl sulfoxide, as outlined in patent application. The case description results in an illustrated follow up period of 16 months and is presented in line with the recommendations of the consensus-based surgical case reporting guideline development.

CONCLUSION

The goal of achieving a secondary healing trend is to establish stability within the wound area or achieve complete healing. This endeavor becomes particularly intricate when severe blood circulation compromise exists. Nonetheless, progress in wound treatment measures has made it feasible to achieve this aim by fostering the formation of dry and clean necrotic tissue. This dry and clean wound is now manageable in a patient's home situation, allowing for effective care and a better chance at preventing further severe complications.

Cost-effectiveness of two reduced pressure compression systems in treating newly diagnosed venous leg ulcers

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of using two different reduced pressure compression systems in treating newly diagnosed venous leg ulcers (VLUs) in clinical practice, from the perspective of the UK's National Health Service (NHS).

METHODS

This was a modelling study based on a retrospective cohort analysis of the case records of patients with a newly diagnosed VLU, randomly extracted from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database, who were initially treated with a two-layer cohesive compression bandage (TLCCB Lite; Coban 2 Lite, 3M, US) or a two-layer compression system (TLCS Reduced; Ktwo Reduced, Urgo, France). No significant differences were detected between the groups. Nevertheless, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed to enable differences in patients' outcomes between the groups to be adjusted for any heterogeneity in baseline covariates. Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of the alternative compression systems were estimated over 12 months after starting treatment.

RESULTS

Time from wound onset to starting compression was a mean of two months. The probability of healing at 12 months was 0.59 in the TLCCB Lite group and 0.53 in the TLCS Reduced group. Patients in the TLCCB Lite group experienced a marginally better health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of 0.02 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per patient compared to those in the TLCS Reduced group. The 12-month NHS wound management cost was £3883 per patient treated with TLCCB Lite and £4235 per patient treated with TLCS Reduced. When the analysis was repeated without ANCOVA, the findings from the base case analysis remained unchanged (i.e., use of TLCCB Lite improved outcomes at lower cost).

CONCLUSION

Within the study's limitations, treating newly diagnosed VLUs with TLCCB Lite instead of TLCS Reduced potentially affords a cost-effective use of NHS-funded resources in clinical practice, since it is expected to result in an increased healing rate, better HRQoL and a lower NHS wound management cost.

Relative cost-effectiveness of three compression bandages in treating newly diagnosed venous leg ulcers in the UK

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of using a two-layer cohesive compression bandage (TLCCB; Coban 2, 3M, US) compared with a two-layer compression system (TLCS; KTwo, Urgo, France) and a cohesive inelastic bandage system (CIBR; Actico, L&R, Germany) in treating newly diagnosed venous leg ulcers (VLUs) in clinical practice, from the perspective of the UK's National Health Service (NHS).

METHOD

This was a modelling study based on a retrospective cohort analysis of the case records of patients with a newly diagnosed VLU randomly extracted from the The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database who were treated with TLCCB, TLCS or CIBR. No significant differences were detected between the groups. Nevertheless, analysis of covariance was performed to enable differences in patients' outcomes between the groups to be adjusted for any heterogeneity in baseline covariates. Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of the alternative compression systems were estimated over 12 months after starting treatment.

RESULTS

There were 250 patients in each group. Time from wound onset to starting compression was a mean of two months. The healing distribution of the TLCCB-treated patients was significantly different from that of the other two cohorts (p=0.003); the probability of healing at 12 months was 0.62, 0.51 and 0.49 in the TLCCB, TLCS and CIBR groups, respectively. Patients treated with TLCCB experienced better health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over 12 months (0.86 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per patient), compared with those treated with TLCS and CIBR (0.83 and 0.82 QALYs per patient, respectively). The 12-month NHS wound management cost was £3693, £4451 and £4399 per patient in the TLCCB, TLCS and CIBR groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Within the model's limitations, treating newly diagnosed VLUs with TLCCB instead of the other two compression systems appears to afford a more cost-effective use of NHS-funded resources in clinical practice, since it is expected to result in increased healing, better HRQoL and a lower wound management cost for the NHS.

Cohort study assessing the impact of COVID-19 on venous leg ulcer management and associated clinical outcomes in clinical practice in the UK

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on venous leg ulcer (VLU) management by the UK's health services and associated outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort analysis of the electronic records of patients from The Health Improvement Network database.

SETTING

Clinical practice in primary and secondary care.

PARTICIPANTS

A cohort of 1946 patients of whom 1263, 1153 and 733 had a VLU in 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical outcomes and wound-related healthcare resource use.

RESULTS

VLU healing rate in 2020 and 2021 decreased by 16% and 42%, respectively, compared with 2019 and time to heal increased by >85%. An estimated 3% of patients in 2020 and 2021 had a COVID-19 infection. Also, 1% of patients in both years had VLU-related sepsis, 0.1%-0.2% developed gangrene and 0.3% and 0.6% underwent an amputation on part of the foot or lower limb in 2020 and 2021 (of whom 57% had diabetes), respectively. The number of community-based face-to-face clinician visits decreased by >50% in both years and >35% fewer patients were referred to a hospital specialist. In 2020 and 2021, up to 20% of patients were prescribed dressings without compression compared with 5% in 2019. The total number of wound care products prescribed in 2020 and 2021 was >50% less than that prescribed in 2019, possibly due to the decreased frequency of dressing change from a mean of once every 11 days in 2019 to once every 21 days in 2020 and 2021.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significant trend towards decreasing care during 2020 and 2021, which was outside the boundaries considered to be good care. This led to poorer outcomes including lower VLU healing rates and increased risk of amputation. Hence, the COVID-19 pandemic appears to have had a deleterious impact on the health of patients with a VLU.