Atezolizumab-induced anaphylactic shock in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing immunotherapy: A case report

Case report: Pembrolizumab as an alternative to atezolizumab following a severe infusion reaction

The emergence of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the field of oncology, providing promising results in various malignancies. However, ICIs can sometimes lead to severe injection reactions, requiring alternative treatment options. In this case report, we introduce a case of a severe infusion reaction induced by atezolizumab. After atezolizumab infusion, the patient experienced symptoms that were suggestive of anaphylactic shock, including chest tightness, low blood pressure, and loss of consciousness, all of which were restored by immediate administration of steroid, antihistamine, and epinephrine. When selecting a new ICI, we were concerned about cross-reactivity with atezolizumab. As such, we conducted a skin test to establish the underlying mechanism of the previous reaction to atezolizumab infusion, the results of which were highly suggestive of Ig-E-mediated hypersensitivity. The skin test for pembrolizumab, another ICI, was negative. Therefore, we replaced atezolizumab with pembrolizumab, and the infusion proceeded safely. To date, the patient has undergone 13 cycles of pembrolizumab, and the disease has remained stable. This case demonstrates that patients who exhibit severe injection reactions to ICIs can continue treatment safely, without cross-reactions, with alternative ICIs. This case will help provide patients who have experienced drug-related hypersensitivity reactions with a choice to use alternative ICIs, thus expanding their options for chemotherapy.

Management of infusion-related reactions in cancer therapy: strategies and challenges

Several anticancer therapies have the potential to cause infusion-related reactions (IRRs) in the form of adverse events that typically occur within minutes to hours after drug infusion. IRRs can range in severity from mild to severe anaphylaxis-like reactions. Careful monitoring at infusion initiation, prompt recognition, and appropriate clinical assessment of the IRR and its severity, followed by immediate management, are required to ensure patient safety and optimal outcomes. Lack of standardization in the prevention, management, and reporting of IRRs across cancer-treating institutions represents not only a quality and safety gap but also a disparity in cancer care. The present article, supported by recently published data, was developed to standardize these procedures across institutions and provide a useful tool for health care providers in clinical practice to recognize early signs and symptoms of an IRR and promptly and appropriately manage the event.

Complications of immunotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are highly effective in cancer treatment. However, the risks associated with the treatment must be carefully balanced against the therapeutic benefits. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are generally unpredictable and may persist over an extended period. In this review, we analyzed common irAEs reported in highly cited original articles and systematic reviews. The prevalent adverse reactions include fatigue, pyrexia, rash, pruritus, diarrhea, decreased appetite, nausea, abdominal pain, constipation, hepatitis, and hypothyroidism. Therefore, it is crucial to conduct evaluations not only of gastrointestinal organs but also of cardiac, neurologic, endocrine (including the frequently affected thyroid), and ophthalmic systems before commencing ICIs. This review further explores commonly reported types of irAEs, specific irAEs associated with each ICI agent, rare yet potentially fatal irAEs, and available treatment options for managing them.

Symptom clusters and their predictors in patients with lung cancer and treated with programmed cell death protein 1 immunotherapy

Objective

The aims of this study were to examine the symptom severity and interference among patients with lung cancer treated with PD-1 immunotherapy, explore whether those symptoms were clustered together, and identify factors associated with symptom clusters.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted. Data were collected by demographic and clinical characteristic questionnaires and the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory Lung Cancer Module. Symptom clusters were identified using exploratory factor analysis, and stepwise linear regression was applied to analyze the factors affecting the symptom clusters.

Results

A total of 148 patients with lung cancer treated with PD-1 immunotherapy participated in this study. The overall symptom burdens of these patients were mainly at a mild level. The patient symptom clusters identified in this study were a general cluster, a treatment-related cluster, a pulmonary cluster, a gastrointestinal cluster, and a neural cluster. The patients’ Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score (β ​= ​−2.758, P ​< ​0.001) and having a history of chemotherapy (β ​= ​4.384, P ​= ​0.001) were significant predictors of the general cluster. Their KPS scores (β ​= ​−1.202, P ​< ​0.001) and having a history of chemotherapy (β ​= ​−1.957, P ​= ​0.001) were significant predictors of the pulmonary cluster. Their monthly income (β ​= ​−0.316, P ​= ​0.030) and KPS scores (β ​= ​−0.357, P ​= ​0.045) were significant predictors of the gastrointestinal cluster. Having a history of chemotherapy (β ​= ​1.868, P ​< ​0.001) was the predictor of the neural cluster.

Conclusions

The symptom burdens of patients with lung cancer and treated with PD-1 immunotherapy were at a mild level and appeared to be clustered. In addition, because the symptoms that comprise a cluster are interrelated, the diagnosis and management of each symptom in a cluster should not be performed in isolation, and each symptom in a cluster should be treated either simultaneously or in an orderly manner.