Financing long-term care with limited resources: combining the resources of the public and private sectors

Partnership insurance: an innovation to meet long-term care financing needs in an era of federal minimalism

In the case of long-term care financing, federal minimalism is not new news. Long-term care has long played a weak "third fiddle" to national health reform concerns about the uninsured and catastrophic expenditures on prescription drugs. The states have been left to struggle with the issue of long-term financing as part of their responsibilities in funding and administering the means-tested Medicaid program. Recently, the environment has become even more challenging. Much of what is on the national agenda for health and welfare reform has been delegated to the states. This "devolution" of responsibilities has created many competing priorities for both the attention and resources of states. This context of evolving federal minimalism calls for creative solutions that balance competing points of view. In this article, we provide some background and insights from one such effort: a collaboration between state governments and private insurers to put into operation an insurance-based approach to long-term care financing that uses Medicaid as an incentive to encourage potential purchasers.

Long-term care insurance and Medicaid

Depending on length-of-stay, somewhere between 29 percent and 38 percent of long-term care insurance purchasers who use nursing homes would qualify for Medicaid payments if they did not own a policy. This is equivalent to between 13 percent and 17 percent of all policyholders. Owning such a policy would, however, reduce spend-down rates among policyholders by 39 percent. Thus, in the presence of long-term care insurance, only 8 to 10 percent of all policyholders would receive Medicaid. Medicaid would spend between $6,492 and $14,179 (in 1990 dollars) on nursing home entrants with long-term care insurance policies--$14,437 to $29,698 if entrants did not have insurance. The ultimate impact on Medicaid expenditures is reduced, however, because many policyholders voluntarily let their policies lapse before entering nursing homes. If policies paid reduced benefits for voluntary lapses, then Medicaid could reap more significant fiscal savings.