The sequential use of clonidine and naltrexone in the treatment of opiate addicts

Opioid Maintenance Therapy: A Review of Methadone, Buprenorphine, and Naltrexone Treatments for Opioid Use Disorder

The rates of opioid use and opioid related deaths are escalating in the United States. Despite this, evidence-based treatments for Opioid Use Disorder are underutilized. There are three medications FDA approved for treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: Methadone, Buprenorphine, and Naltrexone. This article reviews the history, criteria, and mechanisms associated with Opioid Use Disorder. Pertinent pharmacology considerations, treatment strategies, efficacy, safety, and challenges of Methadone, Buprenorphine, and Naltrexone are outlined. Lastly, a practical decision making algorithm is discussed to address pertinent psychiatric and medical comorbidities when prescribing pharmacology for Opioid Use Disorder.

Neurological correlates of brain reward circuitry linked to opioid use disorder (OUD): Do homo sapiens acquire or have a reward deficiency syndrome?

The extant literature confirms that an array of polymorphic genes related to- neurotransmitters and second messengers govern the net release of dopamine in the Nucleus Accumbens (NAc) in the mesolimbic region of the brain. They are linked predominantly to motivation, anti-stress, incentive salience (wanting), and wellbeing. Notably, in 2000 the Nobel Prize was awarded to Carlsson, Greengard, and Kandel for their work on the molecular and cellular function of dopaminergic activity at neurons. This historical psychopharmacological work involved neurotransmission of serotonin, endorphins, glutamate, and dopamine, and the seminal work of Blum, Gold, Volkow, Nestler, and others related to neurotransmitter function and related behaviors. Currently, Americans are facing their second and worst opioid epidemic, prescribed opioids, and easy access drive this epidemic of overdoses, and opioid use disorders (OUDs). Presently the clinical consensus is to treat OUD, as if it were an opioid deficiency syndrome, with long-term to life-long opioid substitution therapy. Opioid agonist administration is seen as necessary to replace missing opioids, treat OUD, and prevent overdoses, like insulin is used to treat diabetes. Treatment of OUD and addiction, in general, is similar to the endocrinopathy conceptualization in that it views opioid agonist MATs as an essential core to therapy. Is this approach logical? Other than as harm reduction, is using opioids to treat OUD therapeutic or harmful in the long term? This historical Trieste provides a molecular framework to understand the current underpinnings of endorphinergic/dopaminergic mechanisms related to opioid deficiency syndrome and generalized reward processing depletion. WC 249.

Medication-assisted therapies for opioid use disorders in patients with chronic pain

Opioids have been used to treat pain and invoke pleasure for centuries. Modern scientific advancements have led to more potent, synthetic opioids. While certainly more effective in treating pain, they can also be much more addictive. Over the years the scientific community has developed a clearer understanding of the role opioid receptors play in causing and treating opioid use disorders (OUD) and we now know that OUD can develop in individuals taking opioids for "legitimate" pain. Current guidelines suggest that all prescribers (especially those prescribing opioids) be capable treating OUD. Pharmacological advances have led to a wide array of safe and effective treatment options to address OUDs. This paper will discuss the history of opioid development, what is known about the transition from analgesic uses to addiction and modern evidenced based treatment strategies to address OUDs.

Medication-Assisted Treatment for Opioid-Use Disorder

The United States is in the midst of a national opioid epidemic. Physicians are encouraged both to prevent and treat opioid-use disorders (OUDs). Although there are 3 Food and Drug Administration-approved medications to treat OUD (methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone) and there is ample evidence of their efficacy, they are not used as often as they should. We provide a brief review of the 3 primary medications used in the treatment of OUD. Using data from available medical literature, we synthesize existing knowledge and provide a framework for how to determine the optimal approach for outpatient management of OUD with medication-assisted treatments.

Pharmacologic treatments for opioid dependence: detoxification and maintenance options

While opioid dependence has more treatment agents available than other abused drugs, none are curative. They can, however, markedly diminish withdrawal symptoms and craving, and block opioid effects due to lapses.

The most effective withdrawal method is substituting and tapering methadone or buprenorphine, α-2 Adrenergic agents can ameliorate untreated symptoms or substitute for agonists if not available. Shortening withdrawal by precipitating it with narcotic antagonists has been studied, but the methods are plagued by safety issues or persisting symptoms. Neither the withdrawal agents nor the methods are associated with better long-term outcome, which appears mostly related to post-detoxification treatment.

Excluding those with short-term habits, the best outcome occurs with long-term maintenance on methadone or buprenorphine accompanied by appropriate psychosocial interventions. Those with strong external motivation may do well on the antagonist naltrexone. Currently, optimum duration of maintenance on either is unclear. Better agents are needed to impact the brain changes related to addiction.

Naltrexone augments the effects of nicotine replacement therapy in female smokers

BACKGROUND

There is increased recognition that gender differences may influence outcomes and may modify vulnerability to tobacco addiction, severity of course and response to different treatments. We hypothesized that naltrexone, which has been used to successfully treat opioid and alcohol dependence, when combined with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and psychosocial therapy (PT) may enhance smoking cessation rates in women.

METHODS

Forty-four adult female smokers meeting DSM-IV criteria for nicotine dependence with expired carbon monoxide content of > or = 15 ppm were randomly assigned in a double blind placebo controlled clinical trial of naltrexone 50 mg + NRT patch + psychosocial therapy (N + NRT + PT)(N = 12) or placebo + NRT patch + psychosocial therapy (P + N + PT)(N=12) for 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Twelve weeks of treatment was completed by 54.5%. Smoking cessation among females who completed the 12 weeks for N + NRT + PT was 91.7% (11/12) and for P + NRT + PT was 50% (6/12).

CONCLUSION

Naltrexone combined with NRT and psychosocial therapy appears to have a positive cessation effect on women and may be a new treatment option for recidivist female smokers.

Compliance to naltrexone treatment after ultra-rapid opiate detoxification: an open label naturalistic study

Studies have found that naltrexone, a long-acting opiate antagonist, owing to poor patient compliance, is of limited value in preventing relapse. The current study investigates compliance with a 9-month course of naltrexone (25-50 mg daily) given with counseling after ultra-rapid opiate detoxification which uses clonidine and naltrexone under general anesthesia. Eighty-three of 113 randomly selected patients (out of 640), who were detoxified more than 1 year prior (average 1.5 years), responded to phone interviews. Phone questionnaire asked about patients' compliance with naltrexone, counseling and drug use since detoxification. Similar interviews were also conducted with patients' significant other. Non-relapse patients (n = 47, 57%) took naltrexone an average of 2 months longer than did relapse patients (n = 36, 43%). About half of the non-relapse patients completed at least 5 months of naltrexone, 30% completed at least 7 months and about 20% completed 9 months. Fifty-five percent of the relapse patients stopped using naltrexone by the end of the 3rd month, and by the end of 7th month 10% continued to take it. After the first 2 months the decline in naltrexone compliance was about the same for relapse and non-relapse patients. These results are more encouraging about the use of naltrexone for relapse prevention than previous studies. This method of using naltrexone should be further tested in prospective random assignment controlled studies.

Pharmacological adjuncts in the treatment of opioid and cocaine addicts

Addiction consists of a complex neuropharmacologic behavioral cycle. The positive reinforcement of the drug and the negative reinforcement of withdrawal serve to drive the behavior of obtaining and ingesting the drug. The pharmacological adjuncts that are available today work by interfering with one or another part of the cycle. The alpha 2-adrenergic agonists, such as clonidine and guanabenz, act to block noradrenergic activity in the locus coeruleus and therefore block the negative reinforcement of opioid withdrawal. Naltrexone, on the other hand, works by preventing the positive reinforcement of administered opioids by preventing them from binding to the opioid receptor. In the case of cocaine addiction, most of the adjuncts currently in use focus on decreasing the severity of the immediate withdrawal symptoms. These agents potentiate dopaminergic transmission and in so doing tend to counter the dopamine depletion effect of prolonged cocaine use. Bromocriptine is the best known and probably the most effective member of this class. It may be that neuroleptics or naltrexone will prove to decrease reinforcement of cocaine use. However, the hazards of long-term neuroleptic use make it unlikely that they will be widely used for this purpose. Desipramine and perhaps other antidepressants may have a special role in treating cocaine addiction: They may prove to have some long-term prophylactic value and prevent relapse in recovering addicts. This ability may stem from the antidepressant action or it may involve a more specific action on dopaminergic transmission. These pharmacological agents may be very effective for certain purposes, such as relieving withdrawal symptoms. However, since they only act on one part of the addiction cycle, they can never be considered complete treatment by themselves. Of course, the use of all of these agents requires the voluntary cooperation of the patient. Therefore, the basis of the treatment of addictive illness continues to be the peer group and other types of interpersonal interactions. However, these pharmacological adjuncts may serve to make treatment easier, shorter and less expensive, and they may improve overall success rates. Consequently, they are of great value in the present and they can serve as models for the development of more effective agents in the future.