Position of the greater trochanter and functional femoral antetorsion: Which factors matter in the management of femoral antetorsion disorders?

Three-dimensional analysis of functional femoral antetorsion and the position of the greater trochanter in high-grade patellofemoral dysplastic knees

BACKGROUND

The relationship between functional femoral antetorsion, the greater trochanter (GT) position and anatomical antetorsion has been demonstrated in patients with a primary hip pathology. However, the functional antetorsion and GT position have not been analyzed in patellofemoral dysplastic knees. The aim of this study was to develop a three-dimensional (3D) measurement to quantify the functional femoral antetorsion and position of the GT and to analyze these measurements in a cohort of high-grade patellofemoral dysplastic knees.

METHOD

A 3D measurement was developed to analyze functional antetorsion and the axial position of the GT and assessed in 100 cadaveric femora. For validity and repeatability testing, inter- and intra-observer reliability were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). These measurements were then evaluated in a cohort of 19 high-grade patellofemoral dysplastic knees (Dejour type C, D). The relationship between anatomical antetorsion, functional antetorsion and GT position were reported.

RESULTS

Inter- and intra-reader reliability for 3D functional antetorsion and axial position of the GT demonstrated a minimum ICC of 0.96 (P < 0.001). Anatomical and functional antetorsion demonstrated a highly linear relationship (R² = 0.878; P < 0.001) in high-grade patellofemoral dysplastic knees. The mean difference between anatomical and functional antetorsion decreased with increasing anatomical antetorsion (R² = 0.25; P = 0.031, indicating a more anterior position of the GT relative to the femoral neck axis.

CONCLUSION

In high-grade patellofemoral dysplastic knees, the GT is located more anteriorly, relative to the femoral neck axis, with increasing anatomical antetorsion and correction osteotomy may result in an excessively anterior position of the GT.

How frequent is absolute femoral retroversion in symptomatic patients with cam- and pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement?

Aims

The frequency of severe femoral retroversion is unclear in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). This study aimed to investigate mean femoral version (FV), the frequency of absolute femoral retroversion, and the combination of decreased FV and acetabular retroversion (AR) in symptomatic patients with FAI subtypes.

Methods

A retrospective institutional review board-approved observational study was performed with 333 symptomatic patients (384 hips) with hip pain due to FAI evaluated for hip preservation surgery. Overall, 142 patients (165 hips) had cam-type FAI, while 118 patients (137 hips) had mixed-type FAI. The allocation to each subgroup was based on reference values calculated on anteroposterior radiographs. CT/MRI-based measurement of FV (Murphy method) and AV were retrospectively compared among five FAI subgroups. Frequency of decreased FV < 10°, severely decreased FV < 5°, and absolute femoral retroversion (FV < 0°) was analyzed.

Results

A significantly (p < 0.001) lower mean FV was found in patients with cam-type FAI (15° (SD 10°)), and in patients with mixed-type FAI (17° (SD 11°)) compared to severe over-coverage (20° (SD 12°). Frequency of decreased FV < 10° was significantly (p < 0.001) higher in patients with cam-type FAI (28%, 46 hips) and in patients with over-coverage (29%, 11 hips) compared to severe over-coverage (12%, 5 hips). Absolute femoral retroversion (FV < 0°) was found in 13% (5 hips) of patients with over-coverage, 6% (10 hips) of patients with cam-type FAI, and 5% (7 hips) of patients with mixed-type FAI. The frequency of decreased FV< 10° combined with acetabular retroversion (AV < 10°) was 6% (8 hips) in patients with mixed-type FAI and 5% (20 hips) in all FAI patients. Of patients with over-coverage, 11% (4 hips) had decreased FV < 10° combined with acetabular retroversion (AV < 10°).

Conclusion

Patients with cam-type FAI had a considerable proportion (28%) of decreased FV < 10° and 6% had absolute femoral retroversion (FV < 0°), even more for patients with pincer-type FAI due to over-coverage (29% and 13%). This could be important for patients evaluated for open hip preservation surgery or hip arthroscopy, and each patient requires careful personalized evaluation. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):557–565.

Subtrochanteric osteotomy in the management of femoral maltorsion results in anteroposterior malcorrection of the greater trochanter: computed simulations of 3D surface models of 100 cadavers

AIM

The purpose of this study was to investigate the greater trochanter's (GT) behaviour in simulated subtrochanteric osteotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Measurement of functional and anatomical femoral torsion, and position of the GT and lesser trochanter was performed using 3-dimensional (3D) surface models of 100 cadaveric femora. Femoral torsion between 2° and 22° was defined as normal, femora with <2° and >22° of femoral torsion were assigned to the low- and high-torsion group. Subtrochanteric osteotomy was simulated to normalise torsional deformities to 12°.

RESULTS

With subtrochanteric osteotomy, functional torsion was simultaneously corrected while adjusting anatomical torsion (R² = 0.866, p < 0.001). Compared to the normal-torsion group, an anteroposterior (AP) overcorrection of ±0.5 centimetres (range 0.02-1.1 cm) of the GT resulted in the high- and low-torsion group, respectively (p < 0.001): Mean AP GT distance to a standardised coronal plane was 2.1 ± 0.3 cm (range 12-30 cm) in the normal-torsion group compared to 1.61 ± 0.1 cm (range 1.4-1.71 cm) and 2.6 ± 0.6 cm (range 1.8-3.6 cm) for the corrected high and low-torsion groups, respectively. The extent of the GT shift in AP direction correlated strongly with the extent to which anatomical femoral torsion was corrected (R² = 0.946; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Subtrochanteric osteotomy for femoral maltorsion reliably adjusts anatomical and functional torsion, but also results in a ±1 cm AP shift of the GT per 10° of torsional correction. However, this effect of the procedure is most likely not clinically relevant in relation to hip abductor performance.

External snapping hip syndrome is associated with an increased femoral offset

Background

External snapping hip syndrome (ESH) is postulated to be one of the causes of greater trochanteric pain syndrome, which also includes greater trochanteric bursitis and tendinopathy or tears of the hip abductor mechanism. However, it was not yet described what kind of bony morphology can cause the snapping and whether symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals have different imaging features.

Purpose

It was the purpose of this study to look for predisposing morphological factors for ESH and to differentiate between painful and asymptomatic snapping.

Methods

A consecutive cohort with ESH and available magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between 2014 and 2019 was identified. The control group consisted of patients that underwent corrective osteotomies around the knee for mechanical axis correction and never complained of hip symptoms nor had undergone previous hip procedures. The following parameters were blindly assessed for determination of risk factors for ESH: CCD (corpus collum diaphysis) angle; femoral and global offset; femoral antetorsion; functional femoral antetorsion; translation of the greater trochanter (GT); posterior tilt of the GT; pelvic width/anterior pelvic length; intertrochanteric width. Hip and pelvic offset indexes were calculated as ratios of femoral/global offset and intertrochanteric/pelvic width, respectively. For the comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic snapping, the following soft-tissue signs were investigated: presence of trochanteric bursitis or gluteal tendinopathy; presence of surface bony irregularities on trochanter major and ITB (Iliotibial band) thickness.

Results

A total of 31 hips with ESH were identified. The control group (n = 29) consisted of patients matched on both age (± 1) and gender. Multiple regression analysis determined an increased hip offset index to be independent predictor of ESH (r =  + 0.283, p = 0.025), most likely due to the higher femoral offset in the ESH group (p = 0.031). Pearson correlation analysis could not identify any significant secondary factors. No differences were found between painful and asymptomatic snapping on MRI.

Conclusions

A high hip offset index was found as an independent predictor for external snapping hip in our cohort, mainly due to increased femoral offset. No imaging soft-tissue related differences could be outlined between symptomatic and asymptomatic external snapping.

Level of evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors  www.springer.com/00590.

Prevalence of combined abnormalities of tibial and femoral torsion in patients with symptomatic hip dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement

AIMS

The prevalence of combined abnormalities of femoral torsion (FT) and tibial torsion (TT) is unknown in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and hip dysplasia. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of combined abnormalities of FT and TT, and which subgroups are associated with combined abnormalities of FT and TT.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated symptomatic patients with FAI or hip dysplasia with CT scans performed between September 2011 and September 2016. A total of 261 hips (174 patients) had a measurement of FT and TT. Their mean age was 31 years (SD 9), and 63% were female (165 hips). Patients were compared to an asymptomatic control group (48 hips, 27 patients) who had CT scans including femur and tibia available for analysis, which had been acquired for nonorthopaedic reasons. Comparisons were conducted using analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction.

RESULTS

In the overall study group, abnormal FT was present in 62% (163 hips). Abnormal TT was present in 42% (109 hips). Normal FT combined with normal TT was present in 21% (55 hips). The most frequent abnormal combination was increased FT combined with normal TT of 32% (84 hips). In the hip dysplasia group, 21% (11 hips) had increased FT combined with increased TT. The prevalence of abnormal FT varied significantly among the subgroups (p < 0.001). We found a significantly higher mean FT for hip dysplasia (31°; SD 15)° and valgus hips (42° (SD 12°)) compared with the control group (22° (SD 8°)). We found a significantly higher mean TT for hips with cam-type-FAI (34° (SD 6°)) and hip dysplasia (35° (SD 9°)) compared with the control group (28° (SD 8°)) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with FAI had a high prevalence of combined abnormalities of FT and TT. For hip dysplasia, we found a significantly higher mean FT and TT, while 21% of patients (11 hips) had combined increased TT and increased FT (combined torsional malalignment). This is important when planning hip preserving surgery such as periacetabular osteomy and femoral derotation osteotomy. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(12):1636-1645.

Femoral anteversion: significance and measurement

Femoral neck anteversion (FNA) is the angle between the femoral neck and femoral shaft, indicating the degree of torsion of the femur. Differences in FNA affect the biomechanics of the hip, through alterations in factors such as moment arm lengths and joint loading. Altered gait associated with differences in FNA may also contribute to the development of a wide range of skeletal disorders including osteoarthritis. FNA varies by up to 30° within apparently healthy adults. FNA increases substantially during gestation and thereafter decreases steadily until maturity. There is some evidence of a further decrease at a much lower rate during adulthood into old age, but the mechanisms behind it have never been studied. Development of FNA appears to be strongly influenced by mechanical forces experienced during everyday movements. This is evidenced by large differences in FNA in groups where movement is impaired, such as children born breech or individuals with neuromuscular conditions such as cerebral palsy. Several methods can be used to assess FNA, which may yield different values by up to 20° in the same participant. While MRI and CT are used clinically, limitations such as their cost, scanning time and exposure to ionising radiation limit their applicability in longitudinal and population studies, particularly in children. More broadly, applicable measures such as ultrasound and functional tests exist, but they are limited by poor reliability and validity. These issues highlight the need for a valid and reliable universally accepted method. Treatment for clinically problematic FNA is usually de-rotational osteotomy; passive, non-operative methods do not have any effect. Despite observational evidence for the effects of physical activity on FNA development, the efficacy of targeted physical activity remains unexplored. The aim of this review is to describe the biomechanical and clinical consequences of FNA, factors influencing FNA and the strengths and weaknesses of different methods used to assess FNA.

The Impingement-free, Prosthesis-specific, and Anatomy-adjusted Combined Target Zone for Component Positioning in THA Depends on Design and Implantation Parameters of both Components

BACKGROUND

Lewinnek's recommendation for orienting the cup in THA is criticized because it involves a static assessment of the safe zone and because it does not consider stem geometry. A revised concept of the safe zone should consider those factors, but to our knowledge, this has not been assessed.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) To determine the shape, size, and location of target zones for combined cup and stem orientation for a straight stem/hemispheric cup THA to maximize the impingement-free ROM and (2) To determine whether and how these implant positions change as stem anteversion, neck-shaft angle, prosthetic head size and target range of movements are varied.

METHODS

A three-dimensional computer-assisted design model, in which design geometry was expressed in terms of parameters, of a straight stem/hemispheric cup hip prosthesis was designed, its design parameters modified systematically, and each prosthesis model was implanted virtually at predefined component orientations. Functional component orientation referencing to body planes was used: cups were abducted from 20° to 70°, and anteverted from -10° to 40°. Stems were rotated from -10° to 40° anteversion, neck-shaft angles varied from 115° to 143°, and head sizes varied from 28 to 40 mm. Hip movements up to the point of prosthetic impingement were tested, including simple flexion/extension, internal/external rotation, ab/adduction, combinations of these, and activities of daily living that were known to trigger dislocation. For each combination of parameters, the impingement-free combined target zone was determined. Maximizing the size of the combined target zone was the optimization criterion.

RESULTS

The combined target zones for impingement-free cup orientation had polygonal boundaries. Their size and position in the diagram changed with stem anteversion, neck-shaft angle, head size, and target ROM. The largest target zones were at neck-shaft angles from 125° to 127°, at stem anteversions from 10° to 20°, and at radiographic cup anteversions between 17° and 25°. Cup anteversion and stem anteversion were inverse-linearly correlated supporting the combined-anteversion concept. The range of impingement-free cup inclinations depended on head size, stem anteversion, and neck-shaft angle. For a 127°-neck-shaft angle, the lowest cup inclinations that fell within the target zone were 42° for the 28-mm and 35° for the 40-mm head. Cup anteversion and combined version depended on neck-shaft angle. For head size 32-mm cup, anteversion was 6° for a 115° neck-shaft angle and 25° for a 135°-neck-shaft angle, and combined version was 15° and 34° respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The shape, size, and location of the combined target zones were dependent on design and implantation parameters of both components. Changing the prosthesis design or changing implantation parameters also changed the combined target zone. A maximized combined target zone was found. It is mandatory to consider both components to determine the accurate impingement-free prosthetic ROM in THA.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study accurately defines the hypothetical impingement-free, design-specific component orientation in THA. Transforming it into clinical precision may be the case for navigation and/or robotics, but this is speculative, and as of now, unproven.

Prevalence and diagnostic accuracy of in-toeing and out-toeing of the foot for patients with abnormal femoral torsion and femoroacetabular impingement: implications for hip arthroscopy and femoral derotation osteotomy

AIMS

Abnormal femoral torsion (FT) is increasingly recognized as an additional cause for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). It is unknown if in-toeing of the foot is a specific diagnostic sign for increased FT in patients with symptomatic FAI. The aims of this study were to determine: 1) the prevalence and diagnostic accuracy of in-toeing to detect increased FT; 2) if foot progression angle (FPA) and tibial torsion (TT) are different among patients with abnormal FT; and 3) if FPA correlates with FT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective, institutional review board (IRB)-approved, controlled study of 85 symptomatic patients (148 hips) with FAI or hip dysplasia was performed in the gait laboratory. All patients had a measurement of FT (pelvic CT scan), TT (CT scan), and FPA (optical motion capture system). We allocated all patients to three groups with decreased FT (< 10°, 37 hips), increased FT (> 25°, 61 hips), and normal FT (10° to 25°, 50 hips). Cluster analysis was performed.

RESULTS

We found a specificity of 99%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 93%, and sensitivity of 23% for in-toeing (FPA < 0°) to detect increased FT > 25°. Most of the hips with normal or decreased FT had no in-toeing (false-positive rate of 1%). Patients with increased FT had significantly (p < 0.001) more in-toeing than patients with decreased FT. The majority of the patients (77%) with increased FT walk with a normal foot position. The correlation between FPA and FT was significant (r = 0.404, p < 0.001). Five cluster groups were identified.

CONCLUSION

In-toeing has a high specificity and high PPV to detect increased FT, but increased FT can be missed because of the low sensitivity and high false-negative rate. These results can be used for diagnosis of abnormal FT in patients with FAI or hip dysplasia undergoing hip arthroscopy or femoral derotation osteotomy. However, most of the patients with increased FT walk with a normal foot position. This can lead to underestimation or misdiagnosis of abnormal FT. We recommend measuring FT with CT/MRI scans in all patients with FAI. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1218-1229.