The rate and predictors of patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty are influenced by the focus of the question: a standard satisfaction question is required

International consensus-based ranking of definitions for poor response to primary total knee arthroplasty: a Delphi study

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to rank definitions for measuring poor response one year after TKA, after assessing the face validity and feasibility of existing or newly proposed definitions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An international, three-round, online modified Delphi study was conducted with sixty-nine panelists from twenty-three countries. Definitions were derived from a literature review or were newly proposed by an expert group. Panelists rated the face validity and feasibility of definitions, and could propose additional new definitions in round 1. Panelists reconsidered their rating of existing definitions, and rated newly suggested definitions (round 2). Definitions with a median score for face validity < 6.5 were removed from the list, and panelists distributed 100 points among the remaining definitions for ranking (round 3).

RESULTS

Fifty-one panelists completed all three rounds (response rate 74%), and the prioritized list of definitions in round 3 comprised seventeen definitions. The single-item definition of (dis)satisfaction with the outcome of TKA obtained the highest scores for face validity and feasibility (7.5, and 8.5 respectively), and the definition "No improvement in pain OR daily knee functioning compared to pre-operative status" was the highest prioritized. In general, definitions reflecting change from the perception of patients were higher ranked than definitions requiring both preoperative and postoperative assessment of validated questionnaires.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified seventeen potential definitions of poor response to TKA, offering valuable options for integration into quality assessment investigations. Remarkably, all identified definitions were patient-centered and none were clinician-centered. Single-item questions, capturing change from the patient's viewpoint, appear to be the most practicable format to assess response.

Patient Acceptable Symptom State Thresholds for the Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, and 36-Item Short Form Survey Ten Years Following Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) refers to a cutoff value on any patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) scale, beyond which patients consider themselves as having achieved an acceptable outcome. This study aimed to identify PASS thresholds for knee-specific and generic PROMs at 10 years post-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

METHODS

There were 269 patients who underwent UKA for medial osteoarthritis from 2004 to 2007 at a single institution and were surveyed preoperatively and 10 years postoperatively using the Knee Society Function Score (KSFS), Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) Mental Component Score (MCS), and SF-36 Physical Component Score (PCS). Treatment outcomes and expectations were assessed using an anchor question, and PASS attainment was determined using the Youden index on a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Also, a similar study that identified 2-year long-term PROM PASS thresholds for UKA was referenced and compared.

RESULTS

Overall, 91.1% reported acceptable outcomes. The area under the curve for ROCs of KSKS, OKS, and PCS were 0.80, 0.75, and 0.71, respectively. The area under the curve for ROCs of KSFS and MCS were both 0.64. The PASS thresholds were 67.5 for KSFS, 70.5 for KSKS, 39.5 for OKS, 44.6 for PCS, and 43.8 for MCS. Patients who achieved a PASS were at least 3 times more likely to have satisfactory outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study that identified 10-year long-term PROM PASS thresholds for UKA. Accounting for our finding that a decade-long follow-up yielded lower PASS thresholds, time-specific UKA PROM PASS thresholds should be considered.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Patient acceptable symptom state and treatment failure threshold values for work productivity and activity Impairment and EQ-5D-5L in osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) and treatment failure (TF) threshold values for Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) measure and EQ-5D-5L among people with hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA) 3 and 12 months following participation in a digital self-management intervention (Joint Academy®).

METHODS

Among the participants, we computed work and activity impairments scores (both 0-100, with a higher value reflecting higher impairment) and the Swedish hypothetical- (range: - 0.314 to 1) and experience-based (range: 0.243-0.976) EQ-5D-5L index scores (a higher score indicates better health status) at 3- (n = 14,607) and 12-month (n = 2707) follow-ups. Threshold values for PASS and TF were calculated using anchor-based adjusted predictive modeling. We also explored the baseline dependency of threshold values according to pain severity at baseline.

RESULTS

Around 42.0% and 48.3% of the participants rated their current state as acceptable, while 4.2% and 2.8% considered the treatment had failed at 3 and 12 months, respectively. The 3-month PASS/TF thresholds were 16/29 (work impairment), 26/50 (activity impairment), 0.92/0.77 (hypothetical EQ-5D-5L), and 0.87/0.77 (the experience-based EQ-5D-5L). The thresholds at 12 months were generally comparable to those estimated at 3 months. There were baseline dependencies in PASS/TF thresholds with participants with more severe baseline pain considering poorer (more severe) level of WPAI/EQ-5D-5L as satisfactory.

CONCLUSION

PASS and TF threshold values for WPAI and EQ-5D-5L might be useful for meaningful interpretation of these measures among people with OA. The observed baseline dependency of estimated thresholds limits their generalizability and values should be applied with great caution in other settings/populations.

Patients undergoing robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty have a greater improvement in knee-specific pain but not in function

Aims

The aim was to assess whether robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) had greater knee-specific outcomes, improved fulfilment of expectations, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and patient satisfaction when compared with manual TKA (mTKA).

Methods

A randomized controlled trial was undertaken (May 2019 to December 2021), and patients were allocated to either mTKA or rTKA. A total of 100 patients were randomized, 50 to each group, of whom 43 rTKA and 38 mTKA patients were available for review at 12 months following surgery. There were no statistically significant preoperative differences between the groups. The minimal clinically important difference in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score was defined as 7.5 points.

Results

There were no clinically or statistically significant differences between the knee-specific measures (WOMAC, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)) or HRQoL measures (EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) and EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS)) at 12 months between the groups. However, the rTKA group had significantly (p = 0.029) greater improvements in the WOMAC pain component (mean difference 9.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0 to 18.4) over the postoperative period (two, six, and 12 months), which was clinically meaningful. This was not observed for function (p = 0.248) or total (p = 0.147) WOMAC scores. The rTKA group was significantly (p = 0.039) more likely to have expectation of 'Relief of daytime pain in the joint' when compared with the mTKA group. There were no other significant differences in expectations met between the groups. There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction with their knee (p = 0.464), return to work (p = 0.464), activities (p = 0.293), or pain (p = 0.701).

Conclusion

Patients undergoing rTKA had a clinically meaningful greater improvement in their knee pain over the first 12 months, and were more likely to have fulfilment of their expectation of daytime pain relief compared with patients undergoing mTKA. However, rTKA was not associated with a clinically significant greater knee-specific function or HRQoL, according to current definitions.

Robotic Arm-assisted versus Manual (ROAM) total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

Aims

The primary aim was to assess whether robotic total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) had a greater early knee-specific outcome when compared to manual TKA (mTKA). Secondary aims were to assess whether rTKA was associated with improved expectation fulfilment, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and patient satisfaction when compared to mTKA.

Methods

A randomized controlled trial was undertaken, and patients were randomized to either mTKA or rTKA. The primary objective was functional improvement at six months. Overall, 100 patients were randomized, 50 to each group, of whom 46 rTKA and 41 mTKA patients were available for review at six months following surgery. There were no differences between the two groups.

Results

There was no difference between rTKA and mTKA groups at six months according to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) functional score (mean difference (MD) 3.8 (95% confidence interval (CI) -5.6 to 13.1); p = 0.425). There was a greater improvement in the WOMAC pain score at two months (MD 9.5 (95% CI 0.6 to 18.3); p = 0.037) in the rTKA group, although by six months no significant difference was observed (MD 6.7 (95% CI -3.6 to 17.1); p = 0.198). The rTKA group were more likely to achieve a minimal important change in their WOMAC pain score when compared to the mTKA group at two months (n = 36 (78.3%) vs n = 24 (58.5%); p = 0.047) and at six months (n = 40 (87.0%) vs n = 29 (68.3%); p = 0.036). There was no difference in satisfaction between the rTKA group (97.8%; n = 45/46) and the mTKA group (87.8%; n = 36/41) at six months (p = 0.096). There were no differences in EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) utility gain (p ≥ 0.389) or fulfilment of patient expectation (p ≥ 0.054) between the groups.

Conclusion

There were no statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences in the change in WOMAC function between mTKA and rTKA at six months. rTKA was associated with a higher likelihood of achieving a clinically important change in knee pain at two and six months, but no differences in knee-specific function, patient satisfaction, health-related quality of life, or expectation fulfilment were observed.

Prognostic models of quality of life after total knee replacement: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review and critically appraise prognostic models for quality of life (QOL) in patients with total knee replacement (TKA).

METHODS

Subjects were TKA recipients recruited from inpatient postoperative settings. Searches were made on June 2022 and updated on April 2023. Databases included PubMed.gov, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science. Two authors performed all review stages independently. Risk of bias assessments on participants, predictors, outcomes and analysis methods followed the Prediction study Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST).

RESULTS

After screening 2204 studies, 9 were eligible for inclusion. Twelve prognostic models were reported, of which 10 models were developed from data without validation and 2 were both developed and validated. The most frequently applied predictor was the pre-TKA QOL score. Discriminatory measures were reported for 9 (75.0%) models with areas under the curve values of 0.66-0.95. All models showed a high risk of bias, mostly due to limitations in statistical methods and outcome assessments.

CONCLUSION

Several prognostic models have been developed for QOL in patients with TKA, but all models show a high risk of bias and are unreliable in clinical practice. Future, prognostic models overcoming the risk of bias identified in this study are needed.

Factors associated with subjective knee joint stiffness in people with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Subjective knee stiffness is a common symptom in patients with knee osteoarthritis treated conservatively. However, the influencing factors or effects of knee joint stiffness are unknown. The aim of this study was to explore the factors associated with subjective knee stiffness in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, and PEDro databases were searched in November 2021. Prospective or retrospective cohort studies were included. The methodological quality of the selected articles was assessed using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network checklist.

RESULTS

Twenty out of 1943 screened articles were included in this systematic review. Eighteen and two studies were rated as having acceptable and low quality, respectively. All the included studies measured subjective knee stiffness using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. The main findings were that worse preoperative subjective knee stiffness was associated with worse pain, subjective knee stiffness, and patient satisfaction at 1 year after total knee arthroplasty. In addition, worse subjective knee stiffness was associated with future degenerative changes in the knee joint, such as joint space narrowing and osteophyte growth progression.

CONCLUSION

Subjective knee stiffness may be associated with the prognosis after total knee arthroplasty and degenerative changes in the knee joint. Early detection and treatment of knee stiffness could lead to a good prognosis after total knee arthroplasty and prevent the progression of degenerative changes in the knee joint.

Dissatisfaction With Total Knee Arthroplasty at 1 Year Post Surgery Can be Predicted Using a Short Questionnaire Early in the Recovery Process

BACKGROUND

Approximately 20% of patients are dissatisfied with their total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Identifying patients likely to be dissatisfied early in the recovery process could help reduce the number of dissatisfied patients. The purpose of this study was to create an easily administered short questionnaire to identify patients likely to be dissatisfied at 1 year post surgery early in the recovery process.

METHODS

The study included 275 patients who underwent primary TKA for osteoarthritis. Individual 3-month postsurgery questionnaire items from the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Knee Society Knee Scoring System were pooled together and used as candidate items to create 3 different short questionnaires. Items included in each questionnaire were selected using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regressions, a backward elimination method, and theory-based approaches. The area under the curve for each short questionnaire was calculated to evaluate predictive performances.

RESULTS

All 3 questionnaires contained a small number of items and appeared to successfully predict 1-year postsurgery dissatisfaction early in the recovery process. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression, backward elimination, and theory-based questionnaires were comprised of 4, 7, and 5 items and had the area under the curve scores of 0.893, 0.902, and 0.890, respectively. A question evaluating rising from sitting and activities of daily living appeared in all of the created questionnaires.

CONCLUSION

A short questionnaire that is easy to administer and interpret can effectively predict TKA patient dissatisfaction at 1 year post surgery early in the recovery process.

Preoperative Anemia Is Associated With Worse Joint-Specific Postoperative Outcomes, but Is Not Associated With Health-Related Quality of Life or Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The primary aim assessed whether preoperative anemia was associated with a worse knee-specific functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The secondary aims assessed the association of preoperative anemia with generic health and patient satisfaction.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was undertaken to compare patients who did and did not have anemia (Hb <13.0 g/dL for men and Hb <11.5 g/dL for women). During a 1-year period, 497 patients underwent a total knee arthroplasty with complete preoperative and postoperative data, including 215 (43.3%) men and 282 (56.7%) women, who had a mean age of 70 years (range 45-93). Patient demographics, comorbidities, preoperative and postoperative (1 year) Oxford Knee Score (OKS), EuroQol 5 dimension (EQ-5D), postoperative Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and patient satisfaction were collected. Regression analyses were used to adjust for confounding factors between the groups.

RESULTS

The 56 (11.3%) patients who had anemia were older (4.6 years, P < .001) and more likely to have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = .004), connective tissue (P = .047), or kidney disease (P = .011) compared to those who did not have anemia. There were no differences in the preoperative OKS (P = .752) or EQ-5D (P = .762) scores between the groups. When adjusting for confounding differences, there was a significantly lower postoperative OKS (-3.0 points, P = .035) and FJS (-11.6 points, P = .011) associated with the anemia group. There were no significant differences in the EQ-5D (P = .118) or patient satisfaction between groups (odds ratio 0.84, P = .976).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative anemia is associated with a lower postoperative joint-specific functional outcome. It is not clear if these differences are clinically meaningful. No difference in patient satisfaction was observed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Similar survival rate but lower functional outcomes following TKA in the elderly people compared to younger patients: analysis of a posterior stabilised implant with minimum 5-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Literature regarding outcomes in patients over 80 years old after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is inconsistent. We aimed to compare implant survivorship and functional outcomes between elderly patients (≥ 80 years) and younger patients (< 80 years) following TKA, using a single modern posterior-stabilized (PS) prosthetic design.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of 80 patients over 80 years old who underwent TKA between January 2015 and December 2016, who were compared with younger patients (60-75 years old) operated during the same period. Patients were matched with a ratio of 1:3 based on logistic regression analysis of gender and body mass index. All patients received the same cemented PS prosthesis with a fixed bearing polyethylene insert, with or without patellar resurfacing. Implant survival and patient-reported outcome measurements were compared between the two groups. At last follow-up, data were available for 41 knees in the elderly group (including 17 patients who died before 5-year follow-up) and 123 knees in the younger group.

RESULTS

Functional results were better at final follow-up in the group < 80 years with a significantly higher Knee Society Function Subscore (88.6 ± 16.9 vs 79.4 ± 22.1, p < 0.01), but no significant differences in Knee Subscore and global Knee Society Score (p > 0.05), nor regarding maximum flexion (121° ± 12 and 117° ± 13, p = 0.08). The implant survivorship was 100.0% after a mean 64.4-month follow-up (range 60-78), without revision requiring removal of the implant in any group. The survival rate without any reoperation was 97.6% (95% CI 93.0-100.0) in the elderly group and 95.9% (95% CI 92.5-99.5) in the younger group (p = 0.64).

CONCLUSION

At a minimum of 5-year follow-up, there was no revision surgery and a very low rate of complications requiring reoperations both in the group over 80 years of age and in the younger population, with the use of a PS prosthesis. The functional results were slightly lower for elderly patients and correlate with the lower functional demands of this population. The indication for TKA, especially with a PS implant, may be encouraged in appropriately selected elderly patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III (retrospective cohort study).

Coronal tibiofemoral subluxation in patients with osteoarthritis was corrected after total knee arthroplasty

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of preoperative coronal tibiofemoral subluxation (CTFS) on postoperative mechanical alignment in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for primary knee osteoarthritis (OA) and to investigate whether TKA can correct preoperative CTFS. We hypothesized that TKA would correct CTFS in patients with knee OA. A retrospective analysis of 102 patients with knee OA who underwent TKA was performed. The preoperative and postoperative CTFS and mechanical alignment were measured and compared. At the same time, the baseline values of CTFS and mechanical alignment in "normal" patients were measured and compared with those in the operation group. Eighty patients were eventually enrolled in the study. Mechanical alignment was corrected from 7.3 ± 5.2°, preoperatively, to 1.6 ± 2.3° postoperatively, while the tibiofemoral subluxation was corrected from 5.3 ± 2.6 mm, preoperatively, to 2.3 ± 2.7 mm postoperatively. There was no significant correlation between preoperative CTFS and gender (r = 0.03), BMI (r = -0.09), age (r = 0.05), or preoperative mechanical alignment (r = 0.09). In addition, there was no correlation between the degree of correction of CTFS and the degree of correction of overall mechanical alignment (r = 0.14). The difference between the value for CTFS in the "normal" patients and the preoperative value for arthritis cohorts were statistically significant (P = .004). However, no significant difference was appreciated between the value for CTFS in the "normal" patients and the postoperative value for TKA cohorts (P = .25). Preoperative CTFS does not affect postoperative mechanical alignment. Excellent TKA can correct preoperative CTFS in OA patients to reduce prosthesis wear and improve postoperative patient satisfaction.

Meaningful values of the EQ-5D-3L in patients undergoing primary knee arthroplasty

AIMS

The aim of this study was to report the meaningful values of the EuroQol five-dimension three-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) and EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) in patients undergoing primary knee arthroplasty (KA).

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of patients undergoing primary KA for osteoarthritis in a university teaching hospital (Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh) (1 January 2013 to 31 December 2019). Pre- and postoperative (one-year) data were prospectively collected for 3,181 patients (median age 69.9 years (interquartile range (IQR) 64.2 to 76.1); females, n = 1,745 (54.9%); median BMI 30.1 kg/m² (IQR 26.6 to 34.2)). The reliability of the EQ-5D-3L was measured using Cronbach's alpha. Responsiveness was determined by calculating the anchor-based minimal clinically important difference (MCID), the minimal important change (MIC) (cohort and individual), the patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) predictive of satisfaction, and the minimal detectable change at 90% confidence intervals (MDC-90).

RESULTS

The EQ-5D-3L demonstrated good internal consistency with an overall Cronbach alpha of 0.75 (preoperative) and 0.88 (postoperative), respectively. The MCID for the Index score was 0.085 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.042 to 0.127) and EQ-VAS was 6.41 (95% CI 3.497 to 9.323). The MIC_COHORT was 0.289 for the EQ-5D and 5.27 for the EQ-VAS. However, the MIC_INDIVIDUAL for both the EQ-5D-3L Index (0.105) and EQ-VAS (-1) demonstrated poor-to-acceptable reliability. The MDC-90 was 0.023 for the EQ-5D-3L Index and 1.0 for the EQ-VAS. The PASS for the postoperative EQ-5D-3L Index and EQ-VAS scores predictive of patient satisfaction were 0.708 and 77.0, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The meaningful values of the EQ-5D-3L Index and EQ-VAS scores can be used to measure clinically relevant changes in health-related quality of life in patients undergoing primary KA.Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(9):619-628.

Learning curves of robotic technology in an orthopedic teaching hospital

BACKGROUND

In recent years there has been an increasing implementation of robotic technology in arthroplasty. Due to the unclear data situation the aim of this study was to analyze the learning curve for robotic technology in residency training.

METHODS

After its introduction, the first 351 consecutive robotic knee replacements were prospectively included in the study. Surgical times, preoperative and postoperative radiographs, intraoperatively recorded alignment data and complications were analyzed. Satisfaction, revision, and referral rates were determined in a 90-day follow-up survey. Data from the last 350 navigated total knee arthroplasties were analyzed as a historical control group.

RESULTS

A learning curve of between 3 and 53 procedures was identified, depending on the surgeon, with further reductions in time measured even after 1 year of use. The operative times of the navigated technique were achieved by all surgeons. With respect to precision (alignment outliers) and patient satisfaction rate, no learning curve was evident. Comparison between tutorial and non-tutorial surgery showed a 16-min increase in operating time, but no significant differences in precision, complications, and patient satisfaction rate.

CONCLUSION

The study showed that there was a learning curve in terms of duration of surgery but not in terms of precision, complications, and patient satisfaction. Robotic tutorial surgery requires more time but provides the same outcome compared to experienced surgeons. Thus, the robotic surgical technique appears to be an excellent training tool in knee arthroplasty.

Depression Is Not Independently Associated with a Clinically Worse Functional Improvement but Associated with a Lower Reported Satisfaction Rate after Total Knee Arthroplasty

The aim of this study was to assess whether depression had a clinically significant influence on the functional improvement of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) according to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, and whether it influences patient satisfaction at 1 year. A retrospective cohort of 3,510 primary TKA was identified from an arthroplasty database. Patient demographics, comorbidities, WOMAC, and Short Form-12 (SF-12) scores were collected preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Patient satisfaction (overall, pain relief, return to work, and recreational activity) was assessed at 1 year. There were 444 (12.6%) patients who self-reported depression. Patients with depression were younger (p < 0.001), had a higher body mass index (BMI; p < 0.001), were more likely to be female (p < 0.001), had lung (p < 0.001), neurological (p = 0.018), kidney (p = 0.001), liver (p < 0.001), and gastric (p < 0.001) disease, report associated diabetes (p = 0.001), and back pain (p < 0.001) relative to the subgroup without depression. All preoperative WOMAC functional measures were significantly (p < 0.001) worse in patients with reported depression. When adjusting for these confounding differences, patients with depression had a clinically equal improvement in their WOMAC scores at 1 year compared to those patients without. Depression was not associated with a clinically significant difference in improvement of knee-specific outcome (WOMAC) but was independently associated with a lower rate of patient satisfaction 1 year after TKA. Patients with depression were approximately twice as likely to be dissatisfied at 1 year when compared with those without depression. This is a prognostic retrospective cohort study and reflects level of evidence III.

Total Knee Arthroplasty Assessments Should Include Strength and Performance-Based Functional Tests to Complement Range-of-Motion and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

Range of motion (ROM) and pain often define successful recovery after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but these routine clinical outcomes correlate poorly or not at all to functional capacity after TKA. The purpose of this Perspective is to underscore the importance of muscle strength and performance-based functional tests in addition to knee ROM and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures to evaluate outcomes after TKA. Specifically: (1) muscle strength is the rate-limiting step for recovery of function after TKA; (2) progressive rehabilitation targeting early quadriceps muscle strengthening improves outcomes and does not compromise ROM after TKA; (3) ROM and PROs fail to fully capture functional limitations after TKA; and (4) performance-based functional tests are critical to evaluate function objectively after TKA. This Perspective also addresses studies that question the need for or benefit of physical therapy after TKA because their conclusions focus only on ROM and PRO measures. Future research is needed to determine the optimal timing, delivery, intensity, and content of physical therapy.

Over-constrained kinematic of the medial compartment leads to lower clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To investigate if postoperative clinical outcomes correlate with specific kinematic patterns after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery. The hypothesis was that the group of patients with higher clinical outcomes would have shown postoperative medial pivot kinematics, while the group of patients with lower clinical outcomes would have not.

METHODS

52 patients undergoing TKA surgery were prospectively evaluated at least a year of follow-up (13.5 ± 6.8 months) through clinical and functional Knee Society Score (KSS), and kinematically through dynamic radiostereometric analysis (RSA) during a sit-to-stand motor task. Patients received posterior-stabilized TKA design. Based on the result of the KSS, patients were divided into two groups: "KSS > 70 group", patients with a good-to-excellent score (93.1 ± 6.8 points, n = 44); "KSS < 70 group", patients with a fair-to-poor score (53.3 ± 18.3 points, n = 8). The anteroposterior (AP) low point (lowest femorotibial contact points) translation of medial and lateral femoral compartments was compared through Student's t test (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

Low point AP translation of the medial compartment was significantly lower (p < 0.05) than the lateral one in both the KSS > 70 (6.1 mm ± 4.4 mm vs 10.7 mm ± 4.6 mm) and the KSS < 70 groups (2.7 mm ± 3.5 mm vs 11.0 mm ± 5.6 mm). Furthermore, the AP translation of the lateral femoral compartment was not significantly different (p > 0.05) between the two groups, while the AP translation of the medial femoral compartment was significantly higher for the KSS > 70 group (p = 0.0442).

CONCLUSION

In the group of patients with a postoperative KSS < 70, the medial compartment translation was almost one-fourth of the lateral one. Surgeons should be aware that an over-constrained kinematic of the medial compartment might lead to lower clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Patient Satisfaction Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Contributing Factors

The reported dissatisfaction rate after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) ranges between 15% and 25%. The purpose of this article is to perform a narrative review of the literature with the aim of answering the following question: What are the main factors contributing to patient dissatisfaction after TKA? A review of the literature was performed on patient satisfaction after TKA. The search engines used were MedLine (PubMed) and the Cochrane Library. The keywords used were "TKA" and "satisfaction". The main reported preoperative factors positively contributing to patient satisfaction were the following: fulfilment of preoperative expectations, preoperative complete joint space collapse, increasing patellar and lateral compartment osteophyte size, and TKA communication checklist. The principal preoperative factors negatively contributing to patient satisfaction included female sex, comorbidities, and Hispanic race. The chief perioperative factor positively contributing to patient satisfaction was cosmetic closure, whereas the fundamental perioperative factors negatively contributing to patient satisfaction included joint laxity, anterior tibial component slope, and greater femoral component valgus angle. The principal postoperative factors positively contributing to patient satisfaction were the following: ameliorated walking distance, improved range of motion, and improvements in pain. The most important postoperative factors negatively contributing to patient satisfaction included poor postoperative knee stability and soft-tissue balance, functional limitation, surgical complication and reoperation, staff or quality of care issues, and increased stiffness.

Is Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Arthroplasty Predictable Using Patient Characteristics and Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes?

BACKGROUND

Dissatisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a difficult problem. Patient characteristics and preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are potential predictors of satisfaction one year after TKA. Being able to predict the outcome preoperatively might reduce the number of less satisfied patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study on prospectively collected data of 1239 primary TKA patients (ASA I-II, BMI <35) was performed. Primary outcome was degree of patient satisfaction one year after TKA (Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) 0-10). Secondary outcomes were degree of patient satisfaction six months and two years after TKA and being dissatisfied (NRS 0-6) or satisfied (NRS 7-10) at all three time points. Multivariate linear and binary logistic regression analyses were executed with patient characteristics and preoperative PROs as potential predictors.

RESULTS

One year after TKA, median NRS satisfaction score was 9.0 (8.0-10.0) and 1117 (90.2%) patients were satisfied. BMI, degree of medial cartilage damage, previous knee surgery, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form score, EQ VAS score, and anxiety were identified as predictors of the degree of patient satisfaction (P = .000, R² = 0.027). Models on secondary outcomes reported R² of 1.7%-7.1% (P < .05). All models showed bad agreement between observed and predicted values for lower NRS satisfaction scores and being dissatisfied.

CONCLUSION

The degree of patient satisfaction and the chance of being dissatisfied or satisfied six months, one, and two years after TKA are predictable by patient characteristics and preoperative PROs but not at a reliability level that is clinically useful.

Is there a Threshold Preoperative WOMAC Score That Predicts Patient Satisfaction after Total Knee Arthroplasty?

The aim of this study was to identify threshold preoperative Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores that were predictive of patient dissatisfaction 1 year after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A retrospective cohort of 3,324 patients undergoing a primary TKA was identified from an established arthroplasty database. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and the WOMAC score were collected preoperatively. Patient satisfaction was assessed at 1 year using four questions that focused on: overall outcome, activity, work, and pain. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify threshold values predictive of dissatisfaction. The overall satisfaction rate at 1 year was 89.7% (n = 2982). Patients who were satisfied had a significantly greater preoperative pain (3.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-5.6, p < 0.001) and functional (4.5, 95% CI 2.6-6.5, p < 0.001) component and total (4.2, 95% CI 2.3-6.0, p < 0.001) WOMAC scores compared with those who were dissatisfied. ROC curve analysis demonstrated the preoperative pain (p = 0.001) and functional (p < 0.001) components and total (p < 0.001) WOMAC scores were significant predictors of satisfaction. Patients scoring < 36 for the pain and function components and < 35 for the total WOMAC score were more likely to be dissatisfied with their overall outcome, but the area under the curves (AUCs) for these predictive threshold values were 0.56, 0.54, and 0.60, respectively, indicating poor prognostic value. A similar finding was observed for satisfaction with pain relief and ability to work and recreational activities; however, in addition the stiffness component was also a significant (p < 0.001) predictor with a threshold value of < 43. Again, these thresholds were of poor prognostic value with an AUC of less than 0.57 for all these satisfaction questions. Threshold values in the preoperative component and total WOMAC scores were not reliable prognostic indicators of overall patient satisfaction or for satisfaction with pain relief, ability to do work, or recreational activities after TKA.

Predictors of two-year patient satisfaction following elective knee surgery

BACKGROUND

Patient satisfaction metrics are increasingly being utilized as tools to evaluate the quality of healthcare and affect reimbursements. The objectives of this study were to (1) identify factors associated with two-year patient satisfaction after elective knee surgery, (2) compare the Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (SSQ-8) and a numeric satisfaction scale (NSS), and (3) determine if two-year patient satisfaction can be predicted based on preoperative factors.

METHODS

A total of 365 patients undergoing elective knee surgery at a single center were administered questionnaires to assess demographics, medical history, and various patient-reported outcomes preoperatively and at two years postoperatively. Patient satisfaction was measured at two years postoperatively with SSQ-8 and NSS. Bivariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed to identify significant associations and independent predictors of satisfaction.

RESULTS

SSQ-8 and NSS scores were significantly correlated (r_s = 0.68, P < 0.0001). Lower SSQ-8 and NSS scores were associated with black race, higher BMI, more comorbidities, unemployment, smoking, higher ASA score, and greater Met Expectations (P < 0.05). Better scores on patient-based outcome measures and better improvement from baseline were significantly correlated with higher satisfaction on both SSQ-8 and NSS. Multivariable analysis identified greater Met Expectations and higher two-year Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference scores as independent predictors of greater SSQ-8 scores (adjusted r² = .52). Greater Met Expectations and better two-year PROMIS Social Satisfaction scores were independent predictors of NSS score (adjusted r² = .41). In contrast, when only preoperative variables were considered, the multivariable regression model accounted for only 14% of the variance in SSQ-8 and 6% of the variance in NSS.

CONCLUSION

While there are multiple preoperative factors that are associated with two-year patient satisfaction after knee surgery, those factors contribute relatively little to satisfaction. Meeting expectations and better patient-based outcomes at two years are more important.

Can Met Expectations Moderate the Relationship Between Pain/Function and Satisfaction in Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Approximately 20% of patients are dissatisfied with their total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at 1-year post-surgery. Met expectations have been found by some to significantly predict satisfaction. The role of met expectations in determining patient satisfaction has not been exhaustively explored. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate if met expectations moderate the relationship between pain and function variables and satisfaction.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary TKA for osteoarthritis were included in the study (n = 304). Patient-reported outcomes at pre-surgery and 1-year post-surgery were collected. The Knee Society Score (KSS) satisfaction subscale was used as the dependent variable. Candidate independent variables included the following: demographics, KSS, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire, and University of California Los Angeles activity score. Separate linear regression models were created to test interactions for KSS met expectations with pain and KSS met expectations with function.

RESULTS

Significant predictors of satisfaction were KSS symptoms (pain), KOOS activities of daily living (function), KSS met expectations, KOOS pre-surgery activities of daily living, body mass index, and SF-12 general health. A significant interaction between met expectations and pain was found (P = .043) and the met expectations and function interaction approached significance (P = .086). For both interactions, as met expectations increased, pain and function predicted satisfaction less strongly.

CONCLUSION

Met expectations were found to moderate the relationship between pain and satisfaction. There may be more value in improving pain for patients with low met expectations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

A new prediction model for patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty and the roles of different scoring systems: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Although total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an efficacious treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis, ~20% of patients are dissatisfied with the results. We determined which factors contribute to patient satisfaction and compared the various scoring systems before and after surgery.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 545 patients were enrolled and evaluated preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Patient demographics, as well as scores for the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Short Form (SF)-12, and 1989 Knee Society Clinical Rating System (1989 KSS), were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively. The possible predictors were introduced into a prediction model. Scores for overall satisfaction and the 2011 Knee Society Score (2011 KSS) were also assessed after TKA to identify the accuracy and agreement of the systems.

RESULTS

There were 134 male patients and 411 female patients, with an overall prevalence of satisfaction of 83.7% 1 year after surgery. A history of surgery (p < 0.001) and the 1989 KSS and SF-12 were of the utmost importance in the prediction model, whereas the WOMAC score had a vital role postoperatively (change in WOMAC pain score, p < 0.001; change in WOMAC physical function score, p < 0.001; postoperative WOMAC pain score, p = 0.004). C-index of model was 0.898 > 0.70 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86-0.94). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed a p value of 0.586, and the AUC of external cohort was 0.953 (sensitivity=0.87, specificity=0.97). The agreement between the assessment of overall satisfaction and the 2011 KSS satisfaction assessment was general (Kappa=0.437 > 0.4, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A history of surgery, the preoperative 1989 KSS, and the preoperative SF-12 influenced patient satisfaction after primary TKA. We recommend the WOMAC (particularly the pain subscale score) to reflect overall patient satisfaction postoperatively.

Meaningful values in the Forgotten Joint Score after total knee arthroplasty

AIMS

The aim of this study was to identify the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), minimal important change (MIC), minimal detectable change (MDC), and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) threshold in the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) according to patient satisfaction six months following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

During a one-year period 484 patients underwent a primary TKA and completed preoperative and six-month FJS and OKS. At six months patients were asked, "How satisfied are you with your operated knee?" Their response was recorded as: very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied. The difference between patients recording neutral (n = 44) and satisfied (n = 153) was used to define the MCID. MIC for a cohort was defined as the change in the FJS for those patients declaring their outcome as satisfied, whereas receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the MIC for an individual and the PASS threshold. Distribution-based methodology was used to calculate the MDC.

RESULTS

Using satisfaction as the anchor question, the MCID for the FJS was 16.6 (95% confidence interval (CIs) 8.9 to 24.3; p < 0.001) and when adjusting for confounding this decreased to 13.7 points (95% CI 4.8 to 22.5; p < 0.001). The MIC for the FJS for a cohort of patients was 17.7 points and for an individual patient was 10 points. The MDC90 for the FGS was 12 points; where 90% of patients scoring more than this will have experienced a real change that is beyond measurement error. The PASS was defined as 22 points or more in the postoperative FJS.

CONCLUSION

The estimates for MCID and MIC can be used to assess whether there is clinical difference between two groups and whether a cohort/patient has had a meaningful change in their FJS, respectively. The MDC90 of 12 points suggests a value lower than this may fall within measurement error. A postoperative FJS of 22 or more was predictive of achieving PASS. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(5):846-854.

A clinical prediction rule for predicting a delay in quality of life recovery at 1 month after total knee arthroplasty: A decision tree model

BACKGROUND

There is no clinical prediction rule for predicting the prognosis of quality of life after total knee arthroplasty and for assessing its accuracy. The study aimed to develop and assess a clinical prediction rule to predict decline in quality of life at 1 month after total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

This study included 116 patients with total knee arthroplasty in Japan. Potential predictors such as sociodemographic factors, medical information, and motor functions were measured. Quality of life was measured using the Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure at 1 day before surgery and 1 month after total knee arthroplasty. The classification and regression tree methodology was used for developing a clinical prediction rule.

RESULTS

The Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure score pre-total knee arthroplasty (≦34.0 or >34.0) was the best single discriminator. Among those with the Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure score pre-total knee arthroplasty ≦34.0, the next best predictor was knee flexor muscle strength on the affected side (≦0.45 or >0.45 N m/kg). Among those with knee flexor muscle strength on the affected side >0.45, the next predictor was knee flexion range of motion on the affected side (≦132.5°or >132.5°). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of the model was 0.805 (95% confidence interval, 0.701-0.909).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, 4 variables were selected as the significant predictor. However, the results of knee flexor muscle strength and knee flexion range of motion were paradoxical. This result suggests that it should be careful to perform surgery to the patients with good preoperative knee function. The clinical prediction rule was developed for predicting quality of life decline 1 month after total knee arthroplasty, and the accuracy was moderate. This clinical prediction rule can be used for screening of patients with total knee arthroplasty.

The influence of expectation modification in knee arthroplasty on satisfaction of patients: a randomized controlled trial

AIMS

Meeting preoperative expectations is known to be of major influence on postoperative satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Improved management of expectation, resulting in more realistic expectations can potentially lead to higher postoperative satisfaction. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of an additional preoperative education module, addressing realistic expectations for long-term functional recovery, on postoperative satisfaction and expectation fulfilment.

METHODS

In total, 204 primary TKA patients with osteoarthritis were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial (RCT). Patients were allocated to either usual preoperative education (control group) or usual education plus an additional module on realistic expectations (intervention group). Primary outcome was being very satisfied (numerical rating scale for satisfaction ≥ 8) with the treatment result at 12 months' follow-up. Other outcomes were change in preoperative expectations and postoperative expectation fulfilment.

RESULTS

A total of 187 patients (91.7%) were available for analysis at follow-up. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 58.5% (55/94) of patients were very satisfied with the treatment result in the control group, and 69.9% (65/93) of patients in the intervention group (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90 to 3.29). A per-protocol analysis for patients who attended the education session (92.0%, n = 172) showed that 56.9% (49/86) of patients were very satisfied in the control group and 74.4% (61/86) in the intervention group (AOR 2.44, 95% CI 1.21 to 4.91). After preoperative education, the expectation scores in the intervention group were significantly lower (mean difference -6.9 (95% CI -10.2 to -3.6)) and did not alter in the control group (mean difference 0.5 (95% CI -2.9 to 3.9)). Overall, fulfilment of expectations at 12 months was significantly higher in the intervention group (mean difference 11.4% (95% CI 2.3 to 20.5)).

CONCLUSION

Improved preoperative patient education can modify patient expectations, resulting in higher postoperative fulfilment of expectation and higher satisfaction in the group that attended the preoperative education. This is the first RCT to confirm the potential of improved expectation management on satisfaction after TKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):619-626.

The role of perioperative intravenous low-dose dexamethasone in rapid recovery after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the overall safety and effectiveness of perioperative intravenous dexamethasone to facilitate postoperative rehabilitation in patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed using the Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to 2020. Methodological quality of the trials was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, and the relevant data were extracted using a predefined data extraction form.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs with 1100 knees were included. Our study showed a significant reduction in pain using a postoperative pain visual analog scale (VAS) at 24 hours and 48 hours, total opioid consumption at 24 hours and 48 hours, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), active range of motion (ROM) limitation, and passive ROM limitation at 72 hours in dexamethasone-treated groups compared with controls.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous low-dose dexamethasone is potentially useful in the perioperative setting for reducing postsurgical immediate ROM limitations, pain, opioid consumption, and PONV. There are no data that directly attribute an increase in postoperative complications to intravenous dexamethasone. More high-quality studies are necessary to draw these conclusions.

Patient satisfaction and perception of success after total knee arthroplasty are more strongly associated with patient factors and complications than surgical or anaesthetic factors

PURPOSE

A proportion of TKA recipients following TKA are dissatisfied with their outcome. Our hypothesis is that patient satisfaction with TKA and perception of success of surgery are associated with patient comorbidities and overall health status, surgical and anaesthetic techniques as well as processes of post-operative care after TKA. The aims were to (i) measure the incidence of patient unfavourable outcomes-defined as dissatisfaction with the surgery or lack of joint-specific global improvement-1 year after TKA, and to explore the differences between these two outcomes of interest; (ii) assess the relationship between the development of these unfavourable outcomes and patient-reported knee function and overall quality of life; (iii) explore the associations between pre- and peri-operative variables and the development of these unfavourable outcomes 1 year after TKA.

METHODS

This study includes analysis of data from a prospective cohort of 1017 TKA recipients. Pre-operative patient variables, surgical and acute-care data were collected. The Oxford knee score and the global perception of improvement were used to assess satisfaction and success 365 days post-surgery.

RESULTS

From 1017 patients (56% female), mean age 68 years and BMI 32, 68 pts (7%) were dissatisfied with the outcome of surgery, 141 pts (14%) believed surgery was unsuccessful 1 year after TKA. A negative outcome was noted in 151 (15%) patients for either satisfaction or success, and 58 (6%) of patients reported neither good satisfaction nor success after surgery. Dissatisfied patients reported worse mean OKS (26.4 [SD 8.03] vs 42.3 [SD 5.21], p < 0.001) and mean EQ VAS (64.9 [SD 19.49] vs 81.8 [SD 14.38], p < 0.001) than satisfied patients. Patients who reported unsuccessful surgery also showed significantly lower mean OKS (30.9 [SD 9.29] vs 42.9 [SD 4.39], p < 0.001) and mean EQ VAS (68.2 [SD 18.61] vs 82.7 [SD 13.77], p < 0.001). Univariate analysis of predictors of unfavourable outcome post-TKA showed that financial status, obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), ASA class > 2 and not resurfacing the patella were factors associated with the development of dissatisfaction with TKA and with patient perceived unsuccessful results of TKA. Multivariable logistic regression of patient satisfaction and success of TKA showed that compensation cases (OR 26.91, p < 0.001 for dissatisfaction and OR 11.49, p = 0.001 for unsuccessful TKA), obstructive sleep apnoea (OR 2.18, p = 0.04 for dissatisfaction and OR 1.82, p = 0.04 for unsuccessful TKA), ASA grade > 2 (OR 1.83, p = 0.04 for dissatisfaction and OR 1.57, p = 0.03 for unsuccessful TKA)and the development of a complication after TKA (OR 3.4, p < 0.001 for dissatisfaction and OR 2.39, p < 0.001 for unsuccessful TKA) were associated with the development of a negative outcome in both groups. Patella preservation (OR 1.96, p = 0.03) was associated with dissatisfaction, whereas the use of cruciate retaining femoral prosthesis was associated with less successful results of TKA (OR 1.78, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

An unfavourable outcome occurs in approximately 7-15% of patients following TKA. The incidence varies with how an unfavourable result is defined and many factors are associated with this outcome though prosthetic design or patella resurfacing do not appear to be important.

What Influences Patient Satisfaction after TKA? A Qualitative Investigation

BACKGROUND

Patient satisfaction is a common measure of the success of an orthopaedic intervention. However, there is poor understanding of what satisfaction means to patients or what influences it.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Using qualitative study methodology in patients undergoing TKA, we asked: (1) What does it mean to be satisfied after TKA? (2) What factors influence satisfaction levels after TKA?

METHODS

People in a hospital registry who had completed 12-month follow-up questionnaires and were not more than 18 months post-TKA at the time of sampling were eligible (n = 121). To recruit a sample that provided insight into a range of TKA experiences, we divided eligible candidates on the registry into quadrants based on their responder status and satisfaction level. A responder was an individual who experienced a clinically meaningful change in pain and/or function on the WOMAC according to the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) responder criteria. Individuals were considered satisfied unless they indicated somewhat dissatisfied or very dissatisfied for one or more of the four items on the Self-Administered Patient Satisfaction Scale. From the resulting quadrants: responder satisfied, nonresponder satisfied, nonresponder dissatisfied, responder dissatisfied, we identified men and women with a range of ages and invited them to participate (n = 85). The final sample (n = 40), consisted of 10 responder satisfied, nine nonresponder satisfied, eight nonresponder dissatisfied, and 13 responder dissatisfied; 71% were women, with a mean age of 71 ± 7 years and a mean time since TKA surgery of 17 ± 2 months (range 13 to 25 months). Interview transcripts were analyzed by looking for factors in the participants' narrative that appeared to underscore their level of satisfaction and attaching inductive (data-derived, rather than a priori derived) codes to relevant sections of text. Coded data from participants who reported high and low levels of satisfaction were compared/contrasted and emerging patterns were mapped into a conceptual model. Recruitment continued until no new information was uncovered in data analysis of subsequent interviews, signalling to the researchers that further interviews would not change the key themes identified and data collection could cease.

RESULTS

In those with high satisfaction levels, satisfaction was conceptualized as an improvement in pain and function. In those with low satisfaction levels, rather than an improvement, satisfaction was conceptualized as completely resolving all symptoms and functional limitations. In addition, we identified three pathways through which participants reached different levels of low and high satisfaction: (1) The full-glass pathway, characterized by no or minimal ongoing symptoms and functional deficits, which consistently led to high levels of satisfaction; (2) the glass-half-full pathway, characterized by ongoing symptoms and functional limitations, which led to high satisfaction; and (3) the glass-half-empty pathway, also characterized by ongoing symptoms and functional limitations, which led to low satisfaction levels. The latter two pathways were mediated by three core mechanisms (recalibration, reframing valued activities, and reconceptualization) influenced either positively or negatively by (1) a persons' thoughts and feelings such as optimism, self-efficacy, pain catastrophizing, external locus of control; and (2) social and contextual factors such as fulfilment of social roles, therapeutic alliance, lack of family/social support.

CONCLUSIONS

This qualitative study suggests that for preoperative patients in whom unrealistically high hopes for complete symptom resolution and restoration of functional capacity persists, it may be appropriate to direct them away from TKA due to the risk of low satisfaction. For postoperative patients troubled by ongoing symptoms or functional limitations, clinicians may improve levels of satisfaction by targeting the three core mechanisms (recalibration, reframing valued activities, and reconceptualization) through addressing modifiable negative thoughts and feelings in interventions such as psychology or psychotherapy; and negative social and contextual factors by promoting a strong therapeutic alliance and engagement in community activities. Given that these factors may be identifiable preoperatively, future research is needed to explore if and how addressing them preoperatively may improve satisfaction post-TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Sex does not clinically influence the functional outcome of total knee arthroplasty but females have a lower rate of satisfaction with pain relief

Background

The aims were to assess whether sex had a clinically significant independent influence on the outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) according to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, Short Form (SF-) 12 scores and patient satisfaction at 1 year.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of 3510 primary TKA were identified. Patient demographics, comorbidities, WOMAC and SF-12 scores were collected preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Patient satisfaction were assessed at 1 year.

Results

There were 1584 males and 1926 females. The preoperative WOMAC and SF-12 scores were significantly (p < 0.001) worse in females but were not greater than the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). When adjustments had been made for confounding differences, females showed a significantly greater improvement in their function (1.5 points, p = 0.03) and total (1.5 points, p = 0.03) WOMAC scores compared to males, but these were not greater than the MCID. When adjustments had been made for confounding differences, females were less likely to be satisfied with their pain relief (p = 0.03) relative to males.

Conclusion

Sex does not clinically influence the knee specific outcome (WOMAC) or overall generic (SF-12) health 1 year after TKA. However, satisfaction with pain relief after TKA was significantly less likely in female patients.

Level of evidence II

Prognostic retrospective cohort study.

Patients' experiences of discontentment one year after total knee arthroplasty- a qualitative study

Background

Total knee arthroplasty is a common procedure with generally good results. However, there are still patients who are dissatisfied without known explanation. Satisfaction and dissatisfaction have previously been captured by quantitative designs, but there is a lack of qualitative studies regarding these patients’ experiences. Qualitative knowledge might be useful in creating strategies to decrease the dissatisfaction rate.

Methods

Of the 348 patients who responded to a letter asking if they were satisfied or dissatisfied with their surgery, 61 (18%) reported discontent. After excluding patients with documented complications and those who declined to participate, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 44 patients. The interviews were analyzed according to qualitative content analysis. The purpose was to describe patients’ experiences of discontentment 1 year after total knee arthroplasty.

Results

The patients experienced unfulfilled expectations and needs regarding unresolved and new problems, limited independence, and lacking of relational supports. They were bothered by pain and stiffness, and worried that changes were complications as a result of surgery. They described inability to perform daily activities and valued activities. They also felt a lack of relational supports, and a lack of respect and continuity, support from health care, and information adapted to their needs.

Conclusion

Patient expectation seems to be the major contributing factor in patient discontentment after knee replacement surgery. This qualitative study sheds light on the on the meaning of unfulfilled expectations, in contrast to previous quantitative studies. The elements of unfulfilled expectations need to be dealt with both on the individual staff level and on the organizational level. For instance, increased continuity of healthcare staff and facilities may help to improve patient satisfaction after surgery.

Contralateral knee pain reduces the rate of patient satisfaction but does not clinically impair the change in WOMAC score after total knee arthroplasty

Aims

The primary aim of this study was to assess whether pain in the contralateral knee had a clinically significant influence on the outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) according to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score. Secondary aims were to: describe the prevalence of contralateral knee pain; identify if it clinically improves after TKA; and assess whether contralateral knee pain independently influences patient satisfaction with their TKA.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of 3,178 primary TKA patients were identified from an arthroplasty database. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, and WOMAC scores were collected preoperatively and one year postoperatively for the index knee. In addition, WOMAC pain scores were also collected for the contralateral knee. Overall patient satisfaction was assessed at one year. Preoperative contralateral knee pain was defined according to the WOMAC score: minimal (> 78 points), mild (59 to 78), moderate (44 to 58), and severe (< 44). Multivariate regression analysis was used to adjust for confounding.

Results

According to severity there were 1,425 patients (44.8%) with minimal, 710 (22.3%) with mild, 518 (16.3%) with moderate, and 525 (16.5%) with severe pain in the contralateral knee. Patients in the severe group had a greater clinically significant improvement in their functional WOMAC score (9.8 points; p < 0.001). Only patients in the moderate (22.9 points) and severe (37.8 points) groups had a clinically significant improvement in their contralateral knee pain (p < 0.001), but they were significantly less likely to be satisfied with their TKA (moderate: odds ratio (OR) 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4 to 0.92, p = 0.022; severe: OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.82, p = 0.002).

Conclusion

Contralateral knee pain did not impair improvement in the WOMAC score after TKA, and patients with the most severe contralateral knee pain had a clinically significantly greater improvement in their functional outcome. More than half the patients presenting for TKA had mild-to-severe contralateral knee pain, most of whom had a clinically meaningful improvement but were significantly less likely to be satisfied with their TKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J. 2020;102-B(1):125–131

Dual-pivot bearings improve ambulation and promote increased activity levels in Total knee arthroplasty: A match-controlled retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Modern understanding of native knee kinematics reveals more complex pattern of lateral-pivot in early flexion activities, and medial-pivot in deeper flexion (i.e. dual-pivot). The purpose of this study was to compare patient outcomes with a contemporary dual-pivot TKA, designed to replicate anterior-cruciate substitution and stability, with a traditional TKA.

METHODS

One hundred and eighty-three dual-pivot TKAs were matched with 183 traditional non-conforming TKAs. All TKAs were cemented and performed with identical perioperative protocols. Patients were matched on age, sex, BMI, and ASA score. Patient-reported outcome measures were prospectively obtained and compared at minimum one-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Study cohorts were identical with 72% female, average age of 68 years, and BMI of 33 kg/m². There were no differences in prevalence of fibromyalgia, depression, preoperative narcotic use, or femoral component alignment (p ≥ 0.105). Dual-pivot TKA patients had a greater prevalence of lumbar spine disease (p = 0.012) and more reported their knee never feels normal preoperatively (p = 0.012). Dual-pivot TKA patients reported less walking pain at latest follow-up (p = 0.022). Trends for greater level of participation in very active activities or impact sports (p = 0.067) and more reporting their knee feels normal (p = 0.091) were observed in dual-pivot TKAs.

CONCLUSION

Patients with dual-pivot knees reported less walking pain despite greater lumbar spine disease, supporting the potential benefit of lateral-pivot motion in early flexion activities. However, the groups were similar in overall satisfaction suggesting the nuances and potential ceiling-effect of patient satisfaction warrants further study.

Asynchronous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: Predictors of the Functional Outcome and Patient Satisfaction for the Second Knee Replacement

BACKGROUND

The primary aim of this study is to identify independent preoperative predictors of outcome and patient satisfaction for the second total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 454 patients undergoing an asynchronous (6 weeks or more apart) bilateral primary TKA were identified from an arthroplasty database. Patient demographics, comorbidities, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Short Form-12 scores were collected preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Overall patient satisfaction was assessed at 1 year.

RESULTS

The 1 year WOMAC pain score (P = .01), and improvement in WOMAC pain (P < .001) and functional (P = .002) scores were significantly lower for the second TKA. Worse preoperative WOMAC pain, function, and stiffness scores were demonstrated to be independent predictors of improvement in the WOMAC pain, function, and stiffness scores, respectively, for both the first and second TKA. The overall rate of satisfaction with the first TKA was 94.0% and 94.7% for the second TKA (P = .67). The rate of satisfaction for the second TKA was 77.8% for patients that were dissatisfied with their first TKA, which was an independent predictor of dissatisfaction (P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Improvement in pain and function is less with the second TKA, but the satisfaction rate remains similar. There are common independent predictors for change in the WOMAC score for the first and second TKA; however, the predictors of satisfaction were different with no common factors. Patients that were dissatisfied with their first TKA were more likely to be dissatisfied with their second TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

Prognostic retrospective cohort study.

Prospective, observational study to evaluate the relation between patient-reported outcomes and component rotation in total knee replacement: protocol for the CRACK study

INTRODUCTION

Total knee replacement (TKR) for osteoarthritis results in a satisfactory outcome in the majority of patients, although up to one in five patients may be dissatisfied with the outcome. Persistent pain is a main contributor to patient dissatisfaction, and femoral and tibial component malrotation have been identified as a potential cause for both persistent pain and patellofemoral problems. Based on the assumption that component malrotation is the causative factor for persistent pain, early revision for patients with symptomatic malrotated components has been advocated in the literature. However, convincing evidence that component malrotation indeed results in less than optimal outcomes is lacking. This study aims to assess the relation between knee prosthesis component rotation and patient-reported outcomes in a large group of patients and to determine the range of femoral, tibial and combined rotation that results in the best clinical outcomes.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In this single-centre, prospective observational cohort study, a total of 500 patients will undergo TKR. All patients will have a 3D-CT assessment of femoral and tibial component rotation within 8 weeks after surgery. Outcome measures will include the Oxford Knee Score, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, EQ-5D, visual analogue scale for pain, the American Knee Society Score and the knee joint range of motion. We will assess the relation between femoral, tibial and combined component rotation and patient-reported outcome measures at 8 weeks and 1 year of follow-up, and we will determine the range of femoral, tibial and combined rotation that results in the best clinical outcomes.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval for this study has been granted by the Isala Hospital ethics committee. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NL7635.

Which patients are satisfied with their overall outcome but dissatisfied with their return to recreational activities after total knee arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

The primary aim of this study was to assess whether patients dissatisfied with both recreational activities and overall outcome were different to those dissatisfied with recreational activities but satisfied with their overall outcome one year after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort consisting of 3324 primary TKA were identified from an established arthroplasty database. Patient demographics, comorbidities, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Short Form (SF) 12 scores were collected pre-operatively and one year post-operatively. Overall patient satisfaction and satisfaction with recreational activities were assessed at one year.

RESULTS

The rate of patient satisfaction with recreational activities (n = 2672, 80.4%) was significantly (odds ratio (OR) 0.47, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.41 to 0.54, p < 0.001) lower than satisfaction with the overall outcome (n = 2982, 89.7%). When adjusting for confounding variables older age (OR 1.03, p = 0.008), increasing BMI (OR 1.05, p = 0.01) and absence of hypertension (OR 0.66, p = 0.02) were independent predictors of being dissatisfied with recreational activities in isolation. The one-year components and total WOMAC scores were significant (p < 0.001) predictors of satisfaction with recreational activities and were reliable with an area under the curve of ≥0.82 CONCLUSION: Patients of older age, higher BMI and without hypertension are more likely to be dissatisfied with recreational activities despite being satisfied with their overall outcome.

How do orthopaedic surgeons inform their patients before knee arthroplasty surgery? A cross-sectional study

Background

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a successful and common procedure. However, 6–28% of patients are dissatisfied postoperatively. The provision of preoperative patient information, inquiring about patients’ expectations, and taking a psychiatric history are essential parts of both preoperative evaluation and postoperative outcome. The aim of this study was to investigate how orthopaedic knee surgeons in Sweden inform their patients before surgery.

Methods

A questionnaire was distributed to all knee surgeons performing TKA in Sweden. Responses were received from 60 of the 65 orthopaedic departments performing TKA in Sweden (92%), covering 219 of the approximately 311 knee surgeons at the 65 departments (70%). The answers were analysed with descriptive statistics. A content analysis of the surgeons’ opinions was also performed using a thematic method.

Results

In terms of information provision, 58% of the surgeons always gave written information while 92% informed orally. Only 44% always asked about the patient’s expectations, and only 42% always informed patients about the 20% dissatisfaction rate after TKA. Additionally, 24% never operated on mild indication of arthrosis, 20% always took a psychiatric history, and half never or seldom consulted a psychiatrist. However, all the knee surgeons believed in a psychiatric impact on TKA outcome. Qualitative analysis revealed five common causes of patient dissatisfaction, which in descending frequency were: patients’ expectations, choice of patients to operate on, surgical factors, combinations of factors, and insufficient information provision to patients.

Conclusions

Knee surgeons in Sweden have considerable awareness of the importance of preoperative patient information, the impact of patient expectations, and psychiatric illness. However, they need to improve their preoperative routines when it comes to providing written information, asking about the patient’s expectations, and psychiatric assessment.