Do oxidized zirconium heads decrease tribocorrosion in total hip arthroplasty? A study of retrieved components

A convolutional neural network for high throughput screening of femoral stem taper corrosion

Corrosion at the modular head-neck taper interface of total and hemiarthroplasty hip implants (trunnionosis) is a cause of implant failure and clinical concern. The Goldberg corrosion scoring method is considered the gold standard for observing trunnionosis, but it is labor-intensive to perform. This limits the quantity of implants retrieval studies typically analyze. Machine learning, particularly convolutional neural networks, have been used in various medical imaging applications and corrosion detection applications to help reduce repetitive and tedious image identification tasks. 725 retrieved modular femoral stem arthroplasty devices had their trunnion imaged in four positions and scored by an observer. A convolutional neural network was designed and trained from scratch using the images. There were four classes, each representing one of the established Goldberg corrosion classes. The composition of the classes were as follows: class 1 (n = 1228), class 2 (n = 1225), class 3 (n = 335), and class 4 (n = 102). The convolutional neural network utilized a single convolutional layer and RGB coloring. The convolutional neural network was able to distinguish no and mild corrosion (classes 1 and 2) from moderate and severe corrosion (classes 3 and 4) with an accuracy of 98.32%, a class 1 and 2 sensitivity of 0.9881, a class 3 and 4 sensitivity of 0.9556 and an area under the curve of 0.9740. This convolutional neural network may be used as a screening tool to identify retrieved modular hip arthroplasty device trunnions for further study and the presence of moderate and severe corrosion with high reliability, reducing the burden on skilled observers.

What Patient and Implant Factors Affect Trunnionosis Severity? An Implant Retrieval Analysis of 664 Femoral Stems

BACKGROUND

Corrosion at the modular head-neck taper interface of total and hemiarthroplasty hip implants (trunnionosis) is a cause of implant failure and thus a clinical concern. Patient and device factors contributing to the occurrence of trunnionosis have been investigated in prior implant retrieval studies but generally with limited sample sizes and a narrow range of models. The purpose of the present investigation was to determine which patient and device factors were associated with corrosion damage on the femoral stem taper across a large collection of different implant models retrieved following revision hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

A retrieval study of 664 hip arthroplasty modular stem components was performed. Patient and device information was collected. Trunnions were imaged under digital microscopy and scored for corrosion damage using a scaling system. Damage was related to patient and device factors using regression analyses.

RESULTS

Greater duration of implantation (P = .005) and larger head size (P < .001) were associated with an elevated corrosion class. Older age at index surgery (P = .035), stainless steel stem material (P = .022), indication for revision as bone or periprosthetic fracture (P = .017), and infection (P = .018) and certain larger taper geometries were associated with a decreased corrosion class.

CONCLUSION

Factors identified as contributing to a higher or lower risk of more severe corrosion are consistent with most prior smaller retrieval studies. Surgeons should be aware of these risk factors when selecting implants for their patients and when diagnosing trunnionosis in symptomatic hip arthroplasty patients.

Oxidized zirconium versus cobalt-chrome femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty: a multicentre prospective randomized controlled trial with ten years' follow-up

AIMS

This study reports the ten-year wear rates, incidence of osteolysis, clinical outcomes, and complications of a multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing oxidized zirconium (OxZr) versus cobalt-chrome (CoCr) femoral heads with ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) liners in total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

Patients undergoing primary THA were recruited from four institutions and prospectively allocated to the following treatment groups: Group A, CoCr femoral head with XLPE liner; Group B, OxZr femoral head with XLPE liner; and Group C, OxZr femoral head with UHMWPE liner. All study patients and assessors recording outcomes were blinded to the treatment groups. The outcomes of 262 study patients were analyzed at ten years' follow-up.

RESULTS

Patients in Group C were associated with increased mean liner wear rates compared to patients in Group A (0.133 mm/yr (SD 0.21) vs 0.031 mm/yr (SD 0.07), respectively; p < 0.001) and Group B (0.133 mm/yr (SD 0.21) vs 0.022 mm/yr (SD 0.05), respectively; p < 0.001) at ten years' follow-up. Patients in Group C were also associated with increased risk of osteolysis and aseptic loosening requiring revision surgery, compared with patients in Group A (7/133 vs 0/133, respectively; p = 0.007) and Group B (7/133 vs 0/135, respectively; p = 0.007). There was a non-statistically significant trend towards increased mean liner wear rates in Group A compared with Group B (0.031 mm/yr (SD 0.07) vs 0.022 mm/yr (SD 0.05), respectively; p = 0.128). All three groups were statistically comparable preoperatively and at ten years' follow-up when measuring normalized Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (p = 0.410), 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (p = 0.465 mental, p = 0.713 physical), and pain scale scores (p = 0.451).

CONCLUSION

The use of UHMWPE was associated with progressively increased annual liner wear rates after THA compared to XLPE. At ten years' follow-up, the group receiving UHMWPE demonstrated an increased incidence of osteolysis and aseptic loosening requiring revision surgery compared to XLPE. Femoral heads composed of OxZr were associated with trend towards reduced wear rates compared to CoCr, but this did not reach statistical significance and did not translate to any differences in osteolysis, functional outcomes, or revision surgery between the two femoral head components. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(7):833-843.

Oxidized Zirconium Components Maintain a Smooth Articular Surface Except Following Hip Dislocation

BACKGROUND

Oxidized zirconium (OxZr) offers theoretical advantages in total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA, respectively) relative to other biomaterials by combining the tribological benefits of ceramics with the fracture toughness of metals. Yet, some studies have found that OxZr does not improve outcomes or wear rates relative to traditional bearing materials such as cobalt-chromium (CoCr). Separately, effacement of the thin ceramic surface layer has been reported for OxZr components, though the prevalence and sequelae are unclear.

METHODS

To elucidate the in vivo behavior of OxZr implants, the articular surfaces of 94 retrieved THA and TKA femoral components (43 OxZr TKA, 21 OxZr THA, 30 CoCr THA) were analyzed using optical microscopy, non-contact profilometry, and scanning electron microscopy.

RESULTS

We found that OxZr components maintain a smooth articular surface except following hip dislocation. Three of four OxZr femoral heads revised following dislocation exhibited severe damage to the articular surface, including macroscopic regions of ceramic-layer effacement and exposure of the underlying metal substrate; these components were 23-32 times rougher than pristine OxZr controls. When revised for dislocation, OxZr femoral heads were substantially rougher than CoCr femoral heads (median S_a = 0.431 v. 0.020 μm, P = .03). In contrast, CoCr femoral heads exhibited low overall roughness values regardless of whether they dislocated (median S_a = 0.020 v. 0.008 μm, P = .09, CoCr dislocators v. non-dislocators).

CONCLUSIONS

Effacement of the ceramic surface layer and substantial articular surface roughening is not atypical following dislocation of OxZr femoral heads, making OxZr much less tolerant than CoCr to hip dislocation.

[Tribology in hip arthroplasty : Benefits of different materials]

When it comes to total hip replacements, choosing the suitable material combination is of clinical relevance. The present review article examines the technical differences in wear and corrosion of the relevant material combinations of ceramics, metals, ceramized metals and various types of polyethylene. The material characteristics, which were often tested under standardized conditions in the laboratory, are compared with clinical results on the basis of evidence-graded clinical studies and on the basis of register studies. This article thus represents an up-to-date snapshot of the expectations and actual clinical outcomes of the present choice of material combinations. It shows that some tendencies from the field of materials research, e.g. with regard to cross-linked polyethylene, coincide with observations from practical clinical experience, while for other materials, a proven technical superiority has not yet been confirmed as an evident advantage in clinical practice.

Taper corrosion: a complication of total hip arthroplasty

The focus on taper corrosion in modular hip arthroplasty increased around 2007 as a result of clinical problems with large-head metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings on standard stems. Corrosion problems with bi-modular primary hip stems focused attention on this issue even more.

Factors increasing the risk of taper corrosion were identified in laboratory and retrieval studies: stiffness of the stem neck, taper diameter and design, head diameter, offset, assembly force, head and stem material and loading.

The high variability of the occurrence of corrosion in the clinical application highlights its multi-factorial nature, identifying the implantation procedure and patient-related factors as important additional factors for taper corrosion.

Discontinuing the use of MoM has reduced the revisions due to metal-related pathologies dramatically from 49.7% (MoM > 32 mm), over 9.2% (MoM ⩽ 32 mm) to 0.8% (excluding all MoM).

Further reduction can be achieved by omitting less stiff Ti-alloys and large metal heads (36 mm and above) against polyethylene (PE).

Standardized taper assembly of smaller and ceramic heads will reduce the clinical occurrence of taper corrosion even further. If 36 mm heads are clinically indicated, only ceramic heads should be used.

Taper-related problems will not comprise a major clinical problem anymore if the mentioned factors are respected.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:776-784. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200013