Three and a half years’ experience with outpatient total hip arthroplasty

A Proposed Patient Selection Algorithm for Total Joint Arthroplasty Same-Day Discharge From an Ambulatory Surgery Center

BACKGROUND

Identifying appropriate patients for same-day discharge (SDD) total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is critical for maintaining optimal patient safety and outcomes. This study investigated patient outcomes after SDD TJA at a single ambulatory surgery center (ASC) and proposes a TJA patient-selection algorithm based on findings and existing literature.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 660 patients was performed between July 2019 and October 2021 for all patients who underwent primary TJA in a single ASC. Successful SDD, length of surgery, estimated blood loss (EBL), complications, and readmission events were recorded for each patient. There were 20 total complications in 331 primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) (6.0%) and 15 total complications in 329 primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) (4.6%).

RESULTS

There was one direct admission to the hospital in TKA patients and four direct admissions in THA patients, making the successful SDD rate 99.7% in TKAs, 98.8% in THAs, and 99.2% overall. In the TKA cohort, body mass index was associated with total complications (r = -0.15, P = 0.006); comorbidities with wound complications (P = 0.006); and EBL was with readmissions (r = 0.30, P < 0.001), revision surgery (r = 0.12, P = 0.04), and total complications (r = 0.16, P = 0.03). In the THA cohort, body mass index was weakly associated with wound complications (r = -0.12, P = 0.02), EBL was with emergency department visits (r = 0.18, P = 0.002) and total complications (r = 0.14, P = 0.01). However, there was no direct association between any of the analyzed characteristics and direct admission.

CONCLUSIONS

In our ASC cohort, patients had low rates of perioperative complications and hospital admissions, supporting the safety of SDD TJA using our proposed evidence-based algorithm to guide patient selection for SDD.

Outpatient Versus Inpatient Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Morbidly Obese Patients

BACKGROUND

Morbidly obese patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) face increased postoperative complications, yet studies assessing the safety of this surgery in the outpatient setting for this population are lacking. This study aimed to fill this gap by assessing the safety and benefits of outpatient TJA in morbidly obese patients.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of a commercial claims database. Based on the setting of the procedure, the patients were divided into four groups as follows: inpatient-TKA (total knee arthroplasty), outpatient-TKA, inpatient-THA (total hip arthroplasty), and outpatient-THA. The two TKA groups were matched based on age, sex, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index. The THA groups were matched similarly. The 30- and 90-day medical and surgical complications were compared between these groups. There were 5,500 patients included in each of the outpatient and inpatient TKA groups and 1,550 in each of the outpatient and inpatient THA groups.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing inpatient TKA had higher rates of pulmonary embolism, urinary tract infection, transfusions, intensive care unit admissions, emergency department visits, readmissions at 30 days, surgical site infections, periprosthetic joint infection, prosthetic dislocations, and costs. As for the inpatient THA group, they had higher rates of pulmonary embolism, urinary tract infection, transfusions, intensive care unit admissions, emergency department visits, and costs.

CONCLUSIONS

It is well-established that morbidly obese patients undergoing TJA have higher complication rates than normal-weight patients, and patients should be counseled before arthroplasty. This study highlights the safety and benefits of outpatient TJA in morbidly obese patients. However, one should note that this was done using an insurance database, in which results may differ if it was done in a public and lower socioeconomic setting. Therefore, future prospective studies are needed to confirm the findings before implementing outpatient TJA in morbidly obese patients.

Safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness of outpatient versus inpatient joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The rise in the adoption of outpatient arthroplasty has been attributed to its cost-effectiveness, although safety concerns persist. In this meta-analysis, we compare inpatient and outpatient joint arthroplasty with a primary focus on readmission and complication rates, using exclusively high-quality prospective data. Cost-effectiveness was used as a secondary outcome measure.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library from inception to October 2023. A predefined strategy was used to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis. Twelve studies were deemed eligible for inclusion. These were critically appraised using RoB analysis and MINORS criteria. Overall readmission rate, readmission rate for THA, readmission rate for TKA, complication rate and cost-analysis were selected as outcomes of interest. Forest plots were extracted using RevMan 5.3.5 software.

RESULTS

The twelve studies included 2470 patients, of which 1052 were outpatients and 1418 inpatient subjects undergoing arthroplasty. Forest plot analysis showed no significant difference in safety outcomes (readmission and complication rates). However, there were significantly lower costs in the outpatient group compared to the inpatient group. The results of the analysis were; overall readmission rate (Odds ratio 0.66; P= 0.29; I2=18%), readmission rate in THA (odds ratio 0.62; P=0.10; I2=51%), readmission rate in TKA (odds ratio 0.67; P=0.56; I2=0%), overall complication rate (odds ratio 0.77; P=0.12; I2=38%) and cost analysis (RR -2.88; P<0.00001; I2= 93%).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrates that outpatient total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is a safe option, when compared to inpatient surgery. However, it is clear that further prospective studies and long-term randomized clinical data are necessary for a more comprehensive understanding.

Evolution of the rapid recovery program to outpatient surgery in total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The implementation of enhanced recovery programs has transformed total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery. Outpatient prosthetic surgery is a safe and beneficial technique. Few centers in our country perform outpatient total hip arthroplasty (OTHA). We present the preliminary results of our experience.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This is a prospective observational study conducted in 2023 with a sample of 30 patients proposed for THA following an outpatient surgery protocol by the orthopedic surgery and traumatology service.

RESULTS

In 2023, we performed 132 THAs in our center. Thirty patients, 27 men and 3 women with an average age of 55.7 years were included for an outpatient surgery circuit. Three patients did not meet the inclusion criteria identified by the Anesthesiology Department. Of the 27 patients included in the program, 25 were discharged on the same day. Two patients were admitted: one due to an intraoperative fracture and the other due to poor pain control and dizziness. No secondary complications related to the program were observed after discharge. All patients except one would recommend the outpatient protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

OTHA programs should evolve from rapid recovery programs. Their implementation depends on an experienced multidisciplinary team. In this study, inclusion criteria were defined, achieving high satisfaction without increased complications. Outpatient surgery is a good option, and the implementation of this circuit is a safe, effective, and a satisfactory practice for selected patients.

Perioperative systemic corticosteroids in primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

Main reasons for prolonged hospital stay after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pain. Having a positive effect on both PONV and pain, perioperative administration of corticosteroids might improve rehabilitation and reduce length of hospital stay (LOS) after TKA. Aim of this review is to determine the effect of different corticosteroid dosages on PONV, pain, and LOS in TKA. A systematic search for articles comparing dosage effects of corticosteroids regarding PONV, pain, and LOS after primary unilateral TKA was conducted using EMBASE, PubMed publisher, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Google scholar, and Web-of-Science for articles published from inception to March 17, 2022. 16 studies were included involving 2352 TKA procedures. Most studies showed reduced pain scores in corticosteroid groups and some described better pain reduction in high-dose groups. All studies showed reduced PONV in the corticosteroid groups. LOS was similar in most studies comparing placebo and perioperative corticosteroids. Only one study reported increased infection rates and intramuscular venous thrombosis in the corticosteroid group. Concluding, current literature on corticosteroids use in TKA is highly variable in type, dosage, and timing of administering medication. Overall, corticosteroids mostly reduce pain and PONV with limited effects on LOS after TKA. Only minimal statistically significant and clinically relevant benefits were found in perioperative high-dose corticosteroids compared to low-dose. Given the short follow-up in most studies, it is not possible to evaluate safety of high-dose corticosteroids.

Implementation of outpatient hip and knee arthroplasty in a multicenter public healthcare setting

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Length of hospital stay after hip and knee arthroplasty is about 1 day in Denmark with few patients discharged on the day of surgery. Hence, a protocol for multicenter implementation of discharge on day of surgery has been instituted. We aimed to describe the implementation of outpatient hip and knee arthroplasty in a multicenter public healthcare setting.

METHODS

We performed a prospective multicenter study from 7 public hospitals across Denmark. Patients were screened using well-defined in- and exclusion criteria and were discharged on day of surgery when fulfilling functional discharge criteria. The study period was from September 2022 to February 2023 with variable start of implementation. Data from the same centers in a 6-month period before the COVID pandemic from July 2019 to December 2019 was used for baseline control.

RESULTS

Of 2,756 primary hip and knee arthroplasties, 37% (95% confidence interval [CI] 35-39) were eligible (range 21-50% in centers) and 52% (range 24-62%) of these were discharged on day of surgery. 21% (CI 20-23) of all patients (eligible and non-eligible) were discharged on day of surgery with a range of 10-31% within centers. This was an additional 15% (CI 13-17, P < 0.001) compared with patients discharged in the control period (6% in 2019).

CONCLUSION

We found it possible to perform outpatient hip and knee replacement in 21% of patients in a public healthcare setting, probably to be increased with further center experience.

Perioperative Differences Between Outpatient and Inpatient Pathways Following Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

Background

Optimization of clinical pathways and logistics led to the introduction of outpatient joint arthroplasty of the hip and knee. Nevertheless, little is known about what these current protocols look like and how they differ from "standard" inpatient protocols. This study aimed to find preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative differences between outpatient and inpatient pathways.

Methods

A questionnaire (ranging between 23 and 37 items) was developed and administered by email to orthopedic surgeons who were a member of the Dutch Hip Society and Dutch Knee Society. Survey response rate was 38% (N = 117).

Results

No significant differences were found in preoperative pathway characteristics. The administration regime for tranexamic acid significantly differed between outpatient and inpatient pathways (P < .001 and P = .002 for hip and knee arthroplasty, respectively), with outpatient pathways using a combined (eg, oral and intravenous) administration regime more frequently. The perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis regime also significantly differed between outpatient and inpatient pathways (P < .001 and P = .014, respectively), with outpatient pathways more frequently incorporating fewer antibiotic doses. Same-day postoperative mobilization significantly less often occurred if surgery took place later that day in inpatient hip arthroplasty pathways (24%; P = .034). Postoperative hemoglobin-check occurred significantly more often on indication in outpatient than in inpatient hip and knee arthroplasty pathways (∼75% vs ∼25%; P = .001).

Conclusions

Few intraoperative and postoperative differences in outpatient and inpatient pathways were found and probably mainly relied on logistical grounds. Nonetheless, findings suggested that outpatient pathways tended to be more up-to-date and innovative than inpatient pathways.

Day-case hip and knee arthroplasty: stages of care and the development of an institutional pathway

Day-case, or outpatient, arthroplasty is growing and has been adopted in healthcare systems because of its cost-effectiveness. A number of studies that reported on day-case total hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty have shown that they can be performed successfully in a select group of patients. However, safety remains a concern, as a clear pathway, including discharge criteria, is not well described in the literature. This article outlines the stages of care involved in day-case hip and knee arthroplasty and gives insights from University College London Hospital's own evidence-based day-case arthroplasty pathway.

The Same Day Discharges following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Single Surgeon, Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Analysis

This is a retrospective study. As new surgical techniques and improved perioperative care approaches have become available, the same-day discharge in selected total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients was introduced to decrease health care costs without compromising outcomes. This study aimed to compare clinical and functional outcomes between same-day discharge TKA patients and inpatient-discharge TKA patients. A retrospective review of 100 consecutive patients with same-day discharge matched to a cohort of 300 patients with inpatient discharge that underwent TKA by a single surgeon at a tertiary referral center was conducted. Propensity-score matching was performed to adjust for baseline differences in preoperative patient demographics, medical comorbidities, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between both cohorts. All patients had a minimum of 1-year follow-up (range: 1.2-2.8 years). In terms of clinical outcomes for the propensity score-matched cohorts, there was no significant difference in terms of revision rates (1.0 vs. 1.3%, p = 0.76), 90-day emergency department visits (3.0 vs. 3.3%, p = 0.35), 30-day readmission rates (1.0 vs. 1.3%, p = 0.45), and 90-day readmission rates (3.0 vs. 3.6%, p = 0.69). Patients with same-day discharge demonstrated significantly higher postoperative PROM scores, at both 3-month and 1-year follow-up, for PROMIS-10 Physical Score (50 vs. 46, p = 0.028), PROMIS-10 Mental Score (56 vs. 53, p = 0.039), and Physical SF10A (57 vs. 52, p = 0.013). This study showed that patients with same-day discharge had similar clinical outcomes and superior functional outcomes, when compared with patients that had a standard inpatient protocol. This suggests that same-day discharge following TKA may be a safe, viable option in selected total knee joint arthroplasty patients.

Fast Track Protocols and Early Rehabilitation after Surgery in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review

The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) or Fast Track is defined as a multi-disciplinary, peri- and post-operative approach finalized to reduce surgical stress and simplify post-operative recovery. It has been introduced more than 20 years ago by Khelet to improve outcomes in general surgery. Fast Track is adapted to the patient's condition and improves traditional rehabilitation methods using evidence-based practices. Fast Track programs have been introduced into total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery, with a reduction in post-operative length of stay, shorter convalescence, and rapid functional recovery without increased morbidity and mortality. We have divided Fast Track into three cores: pre-, intra-, and post-operative. For the first, we analyzed the standards of patient selection, for the second the anesthesiologic and intraoperative protocols, for the third the possible complications and the appropriate postoperative management. This narrative review aims to present the current status of THA Fast Track surgery research, implementation, and perspectives for further improvements. By implementing the ERAS protocol in the THA setting, an increase in patient satisfaction can be obtained while retaining safety and improving clinical outcomes.

Time for return to sport following total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is being increasingly undertaken in younger and more active patients, with many of these patients wanting to return to sport (RTS) after surgery. However, the percentage of patients RTS and time at which they are able to get back to sport following surgery remains unknown. The objective of this meta-analysis was to determine the time patients RTS after THA.

METHODS

A search was performed on PUBMED, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for trials on THA and RTS, in the English language, published from the inception of the database to October 2020. All clinical trials reporting on to RTS following THA were included. Data relating to patient demographics, methodological quality, RTS, clinical outcomes and complications were recorded. The PRISMA guidelines were used to undertake this study.

RESULTS

The initial literature search identified 1720 studies. Of these, 11 studies with 2297 patients matched the inclusion criteria. 3 studies with 154 patients demonstrated an overall pooled proportion of 40.0% (95% CI, 32.5-47.9%) of patients RTS between 2 and 3 months after surgery. 4 studies with 242 patients demonstrated an overall pooled proportion of 76.9% (95% CI, 71.5-82.0) of patients RTS by 6 months after surgery. Pooled proportion analysis from 7 trials with 560 patients demonstrated 93.9% (95% CI, 82.7-99.5%) of patients RTS between 6 and 12 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Pooled proportion analysis showed increasingly more patients were able to RTS after THA over the first 1 year after surgery. There remains marked inter and intra-study variations in time for RTS but the pooled analysis shows that over 90% of patients were able to RTS at 6-12 months after THA. These finding will enable more informed discussions between patients and healthcare professionals about time for RTS following THA.

Orthostatic Intolerance-Type Events Following Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Orthostatic intolerance (OI)-type events following hip and knee arthroplasty increase the risk of falls, hospital length of stay, and health-care costs. There is a limited understanding of the incidence of and risk factors for OI-type events in patients during the acute hospital stay. Our aim was to systematically review the incidence of and risk factors for OI-type events during the acute hospital stay following hip and knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that investigated the incidence of and risk factors for OI-type events was undertaken. A comprehensive search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL from their inception to October 2021. The methodological quality of identified studies was assessed using the modified version of the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies (14,055 patients) were included. The incidence was 2% to 52% for an OI event, 1% to 46% for orthostatic hypotension, and 0% to 18% for syncope/vasovagal events. Two studies reported female sex, high peak pain levels (>5 out of 10) during mobilization, postoperative use of gabapentin, and the absence of postoperative intravenous dexamethasone as risk factors. There was no consensus on the definition and assessment of an OI-type event.

CONCLUSIONS

OI-type events are common during the acute hospital stay following hip and knee arthroplasty, and 4 risk factors have been reported for OI-type events. High-quality prospective cohort studies are required to systematically and reliably determine the incidence of and risk factors for OI-type events.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A Formal Same-Day Discharge Total Joint Arthroplasty Program May Not Be Necessary: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Same-day discharge (SDD) total joint arthroplasty (TJA) programs often have stringent selection criteria. Some patients deemed ineligible may nonetheless be discharged on the day of surgery. This study compares the outcomes between patients enrolled in our SDD TJA program who were SDD to those who did not participate in the program but were also SDD.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who were SDD following TJA from 2015 to 2020. Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on whether they were formally enrolled in our institution's SDD TJA program. Propensity-score matching was performed to limit confounding and independent sample t-tests or Pearson's chi-squared tests were used to compare outcomes of interest between the matched groups.

RESULTS

Of the 1778 patients included, 1384 (78%) completed the SDD TJA program and 394 (22%) were SDD but did not participate in the SDD TJA program. Upon 1:1 propensity-score matching, a total of 550 patients were matched for comparison. The surgical time was significantly longer for patients who did not participate in the SDD TJA program compared to those who participated in the program (109.39 vs 87.29 minutes; P < .001). Discharge disposition (P = .999), 90-day emergency department visits (P = .476), 90-day all-cause readmissions (P = .999), 90-day all-cause revisions (P = .563), and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores for Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores for Joint Replacement at all time points did not significantly differ.

CONCLUSION

Enrollment in a formal SDD TJA program may not be a necessary precursor to achieving similar outcomes following TJA for patients who are SDD without formally enrolling. Therefore, a formal program may no longer be needed at an institution with well-established evidence-based protocols with strong success and an experience with value-based care.

LEVEL III EVIDENCE

Retrospective Cohort Study.

Failure to Meet Same-Day Discharge is Not a Predictor of Adverse Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

As more centers introduce same-day discharge (SDD) total joint arthroplasty (TJA) programs, it is vital to understand the factors associated with successful outpatient TJA and whether outcomes vary for those that failed SDD. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of patients that are successfully discharged home the day of surgery to those that fail-to-launch (FTL) and require a longer in-hospital stay.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who enrolled in our institution's SDD TJA program from 2015 to 2020. Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on whether they were successfully SDD or FTL. Outcomes of interest included discharge disposition, 90-day readmissions, 90-day revisions, surgical time, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as assessed by the FJS-12 (3 months, 1 year, and 2 years), HOOS, JR, and KOOS, JR (preoperatively, 3 months, and 1 year). Demographic differences were assessed with chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests. Outcomes were compared using multilinear regressions, controlling for demographic differences.

RESULTS

A total of 1491 patients were included. Of these, 1384 (93%) were successfully SDD while 107 (7%) FTL and required a longer length-of-stay. Patients who FTL were more likely to be non-married (p = 0.007) and ASA class III (p = 0.017) compared to those who were successfully SDD. Surgical time was significantly longer for those who FTL compared to those who were successfully SDD (100.86 vs. 83.42 min; p < 0.001). Discharge disposition (p = 0.100), 90-day readmissions (p = 0.897), 90-day revisions (p = 0.997), and all PROM scores both preoperatively and postoperatively did not significantly differ between the two cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Our results support the notion that FTL is not a predictor of adverse outcomes as patients who FTL achieved similar outcomes as those who were successfully SDD. The findings of this study can aid orthopedic surgeons to educate their patients who wish to participate in a similar program, as well as patients that have concerns after they failed to go home on the day of surgery.

LEVEL III EVIDENCE

Retrospective Cohort Study.

[Outpatient care through cross-sector prehabilitation and rehabilitation concepts in outpatient hip and knee arthroplasty]

Kein noch so flammender Appell eines Gesundheitspolitikers hat alle Versorgungsstrukturen unseres Gesundheitssystems so zur Überprüfung eigener Effizienz und Einsparpotenziale gezwungen, wie das SARS-CoV‑2. Fast-Track-Chirurgie, lange vor der aktuellen Pandemie entwickelt, kann auch unter Einbindung verzahnter Versorgungsstrukturen ein unverzichtbares Element moderner Krankenhausroutinen werden. Durch deutlich kürzere Krankenhausverweildauern, sinkende Komplikationsraten sowie durch zusätzliche Stärkung der Eigenkompetenz und Motivation der betroffenen Patientinnen und Patienten, kann die Patientenzufriedenheit und das klinische Outcome verbessert werden. Krankenhauspersonal könnte entlastet und Gesamtkosten, auch durch Einbindung externer Prähabilitationszentren, gespart werden. Es gilt nun, weiter Standards zum Aufbau und zur Umsetzung entsprechend abgestimmter Prähabilitations- und Rehabilitationskonzepte bei geplanter endoprothetischer Versorgung von Hüft- und Kniegelenken zu entwickeln und idealerweise gleichzeitig Ressourcen durch regionale Vernetzung zu sparen.

Complications of total hip or knee arthroplasty are not significantly more common after ambulatory surgery than after in-patient surgery and enhanced recovery: A case-control study with propensity-score matching

BACKGROUND

Reluctance to perform total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on an ambulatory basis stems from concern that complications might be more common than with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). The objective of this study was to compare the risks of complications, readmission, and reoperation with these two strategies.

HYPOTHESIS

The complication rate is significantly higher after ambulatory surgery (AS) than with ERAS.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent primary unilateral THA or TKA by two senior surgeons to treat a non-traumatic condition between July 2016 and December 2019 were eligible. We developed a propensity score, which we used to individually match each of the 91 patients managed by AS to the 91 patients managed with ERAS (control group). Follow-up was 3 months. The primary outcome was development of a complication within the first 3 months. Secondary outcomes were complication severity as classified according to Clavien-Dindo, re-admissions within 3 months, and re-operations within 3 months.

RESULTS

Complications were not significantly more common after AS than with ERAS (15% and 11%, respectively, p=0.38). No significant differences were found between the two groups for complication severity (2.9±0.5 versus 2.6±0.8), proportion of re-admitted patients (14% versus 9%), or proportion of re-operated patients (14% versus 9%).

DISCUSSION

The risk of complications was not higher after AS than with ERAS. Reluctance to perform AS due to concern about safety does not seem justified by the evidence.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, propensity score-matched case-control study.

Introducing a day-case arthroplasty pathway significantly reduces overall length of stay

Aims

Day-case arthroplasty is gaining popularity in Europe. We report outcomes from the first 12 months following implementation of a day-case pathway for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) in an NHS hospital.

Methods

A total of 47 total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 24 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) patients were selected for the day-case arthroplasty pathway, based on preoperative fitness and agreement to participate. Data were likewise collected for a matched control group (n = 58) who followed the standard pathway three months prior to the implementation of the day-case pathway. We report same-day discharge (SDD) success, reasons for delayed discharge, and patient-reported outcomes. Overall length of stay (LOS) for all lower limb arthroplasty was recorded to determine the wider impact of implementing a day-case pathway.

Results

Patients on the day-case pathway achieved SDD in 47% (22/47) of THAs and 67% (16/24) of UKAs. The most common reasons for failed SDD were nausea, hypotension, and pain, which were strongly associated with the use of fentanyl in the spinal anaesthetic. Complications and patient-reported outcomes were not significantly different between groups. Following the introduction of the day-case pathway, the mean LOS reduced significantly by 0.7, 0.6, and 0.5 days respectively in THA, UKA, and total knee arthroplasty cases (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Day-case pathways are feasible in an NHS set-up with only small changes required. We do not recommend fentanyl in the spinal anaesthetic for day-case patients. An important benefit seen in our unit is the so-called ‘day-case effect’, with a significant reduction in mean LOS seen across all lower limb arthroplasty.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(11):900–908.

Introduction of day case hip and knee replacement programme at an inpatient ward is safe and may expedite shortening of hospital stays of traditional arthroplasties

PURPOSE

We investigated the safety of primary hip and knee replacements with same day discharge (SDD) and their effect on length of stay (LOS) of traditional inpatient arthroplasties at our elective orthopaedic ward.

METHODS

200 patients underwent elective, unilateral primary day case total hip (THA, n = 94), total knee (TKA, n = 60) and unicondylar knee replacements (UKA, n = 46). SDD rates, reasons for failure to discharge, readmission, complication and satisfaction rates were recorded at 6-week follow up. Changes in LOS of inpatient arthroplasties (n = 6518) and rate of patients discharged with only one night stay treated at the same ward were tracked from 1 year prior to introduction of day case arthroplasty (DCA) program to the end of observation period.

RESULTS

166 patients (83%) had SDD while 34 (17%) needed overnight stay. Main reasons for failure to discharge were lack of confidence (4%) fainting due to single vasovagal episode (3.5%), urine retention (3%) and late resolution of spinal anaesthesia (3%). 5 patients (3%) had readmission within 6 weeks, including 1 (0.6%) with a partial and treated pulmonary embolism. 163 patients were satisfied with SDD (98%). After launching the DCA program, average LOS of inpatients was reduced from 2.3 days to 1.8 days and rate of discharge with only 1-night stay increased from 12% to around 60%.

CONCLUSION

Introduction of routine SDD hip and knee arthroplasty programme at an elective orthopaedic centre is safe and also may confer wider benefits leading to shorter inpatient hospital stays.

No increase in postoperative contacts with the healthcare system following outpatient total hip and knee arthroplasty

Background and purpose - Discharge on the day of surgery (DDOS) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been shown to be safe in selected patients. Concerns have been raised that discharging patients on the day of surgery (DOS) could lead to an increased burden on other parts of the healthcare system when compared with patients not discharged on the DOS (nDDOS). Therefore, we investigated whether discharging patients on the day of surgery (DOS) after THA and TKA leads to increased contacts with the primary care sector or other departments within the secondary care sector.Patients and methods - Prospective data on 261 consecutive patients scheduled for outpatient THA (n = 135) and TKA (n = 126) were collected as part of a previous cohort study. 33% of THA patients and 37% of TKA patients were discharged on the DOS. Readmissions within 3 months after surgery were recorded. Contacts with the discharging department, other departments, and primary care physicians within 3 weeks were registered.Results - No statistically significant differences were found when comparing DDOS patients and patients not discharged on the DOS (nDDOS) with regard to readmissions, physical contacts with the discharging department, and contacts with other departments as well as general practitioners. THA DDOS patients had significantly fewer contacts with the discharging department by telephone than THA nDDOS patients. TKA DDOS patients had significantly more contacts with the discharging department by telephone than TKA nDDOS patients.Interpretation - Patients discharged on the DOS following THA or TKA generally have similar postoperative contacts with the healthcare system when compared with patients not discharged on the DOS.

The orthopaedic waiting list crisis : two sides of the story

AIMS

Due to widespread cancellations in elective orthopaedic procedures, the number of patients on waiting list for surgery is rising. We aim to determine and quantify if disparities exist between inpatient and day-case orthopaedic waiting list numbers; we also aim to determine if there is a 'hidden burden' that already exists due to reductions in elective secondary care referrals.

METHODS

Retrospective data were collected between 1 April 2020 and 31 December 2020 and compared with the same nine-month period the previous year. Data collected included surgeries performed (day-case vs inpatient), number of patients currently on the orthopaedic waiting list (day-case vs inpatient), and number of new patient referrals from primary care and therapy services.

RESULTS

There was a 52.8% reduction in our elective surgical workload in 2020. The majority of surgeries performed in 2020 were day case surgeries (739; 86.6%) with 47.2% of these performed in the independent sector on a 'lift and shift' service. The total number of patients on our waiting lists has risen by 30.1% in just 12 months. As we have been restricted in performing inpatient surgery, the inpatient waiting lists have risen by 73.2%, compared to a 1.6% rise in our day-case waiting list. New patient referral from primary care and therapy services have reduced from 3,357 in 2019 to 1,722 in 2020 (49.7% reduction).

CONCLUSION

This study further exposes the increasing number of patients on orthopaedic waiting lists. We observed disparities between inpatient and day-case waiting lists, with dramatic increases in the number of inpatients on the waiting lists. The number of new patient referrals has decreased, and we predict an influx of referrals as the pandemic eases, further adding to the pressure on inpatient waiting lists. Robust planning and allocation of adequate resources is essential to deal with this backlog. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(7):530-534.

PROSPECT guideline for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations

The aim of this systematic review was to develop recommendations for the management of postoperative pain after primary elective total hip arthroplasty, updating the previous procedure-specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) guidelines published in 2005 and updated in July 2010. Randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses published between July 2010 and December 2019 assessing postoperative pain using analgesic, anaesthetic, surgical or other interventions were identified from MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases. Five hundred and twenty studies were initially identified, of which 108 randomised trials and 21 meta-analyses met the inclusion criteria. Peri-operative interventions that improved postoperative pain include: paracetamol; cyclo-oxygenase-2-selective inhibitors; non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; and intravenous dexamethasone. In addition, peripheral nerve blocks (femoral nerve block; lumbar plexus block; fascia iliaca block), single-shot local infiltration analgesia, intrathecal morphine and epidural analgesia also improved pain. Limited or inconsistent evidence was found for all other approaches evaluated. Surgical and anaesthetic techniques appear to have a minor impact on postoperative pain, and thus their choice should be based on criteria other than pain. In summary, the analgesic regimen for total hip arthroplasty should include pre-operative or intra-operative paracetamol and cyclo-oxygenase-2-selective inhibitors or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, continued postoperatively with opioids used as rescue analgesics. In addition, intra-operative intravenous dexamethasone 8-10 mg is recommended. Regional analgesic techniques such as fascia iliaca block or local infiltration analgesia are recommended, especially if there are contra-indications to basic analgesics and/or in patients with high expected postoperative pain. Epidural analgesia, femoral nerve block, lumbar plexus block and gabapentinoid administration are not recommended as the adverse effects outweigh the benefits. Although intrathecal morphine 0.1 mg can be used, the PROSPECT group emphasises the risks and side-effects associated with its use and provides evidence that adequate analgesia may be achieved with basic analgesics and regional techniques without intrathecal morphine.

The safety and efficacy of day-case total joint arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The popularity of day-case arthroplasty has been fuelled by focus on its cost effectiveness for the healthcare system. Safety concerns still remain. The aim of this review was to compare readmission rates after total joint arthroplasty for patients undergoing day-case surgery and for inpatients.

METHODS

A comprehensive online search of databases was performed for all published articles in the English language evaluating readmission rates after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Seventeen studies were deemed eligible and included in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

All studies included in the meta-analysis described readmission rates following THA/TKA. The readmission rate for day-case patients was 1.9% (n=124) whereas for inpatients, it was 2.0% (n=12,399). Compared with inpatient arthroplasty, day-case arthroplasty was associated with lower total readmission rates (odds ratio [OR]: 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63-0.94, p=0.01). Furthermore, day-case surgery conferred a decrease in readmission rates for both THA (1.3% vs 7.0%) and TKA (2.7% vs 4.3%). Moreover, day-case THA and TKA were both associated with a decreased chance of readmission (OR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.17-0.42, p<0.00001; and OR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.42-0.72, p<0.00001 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This review emphasises that with a thoughtful, designated protocol and with careful patient selection, day-case arthroplasty is a safe and effective option.

Rates and Causes of 90-day Complications and Readmissions Following Outpatient Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Analysis of 525 Patients in a Single Institution

BACKGROUND

Outpatient joint arthroplasty (OJA) has gained increasing popularity and success in a well-defined population. Safety concerns, in terms of complications and readmissions, however still exist.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 525 patients (90 primary THAs, 277 primary TKAs, and 158 primary UKAs), initially planned for OJA. All complications and readmissions were evaluated for timing and cause (surgical vs medical) within a 90-day followup. Complications and readmissions were compared by the length of stay (LOS): same-day discharge (SDD) vs ≥1 day. Differences were assessed by the log-rank test. Complications and readmission risk were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The complication rate was 9.9% at 30 days and 15% at 90 days. The readmission rate was 2.5% at 30 days and 4.2% at 90 days. The majority of surgical complications and readmissions were the result of wound discharge (43% and 56%, respectively). Overall, we did not observe different rates between SDD and LOS ≥1. Following THA, but not TKA or UKA, the 90-day complication rate was significantly lower in patients that underwent SDD compared with LOS ≥1. The risk of complications was positively associated with TKA (vs THA and UKA), ASA III (vs ASA I), and Charnley C (vs Charnley A). The risk of readmissions was negatively associated with a BMI ranging from 25-29.9 kg/m2 (vs BMI <25 kg/m2).

CONCLUSION

SDD following OJA did not result in more complications and hospital readmissions compared to a prolonged hospital stay. The majority of complications and readmissions were due to noninfected wound discharge.

A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis to Assess the Outcomes in Pre- and Post-Fast-Track Hip and Knee Elective Prosthesis Patients

Fast-track surgery is a multimodal evidence-based approach to perioperative care aimed at reducing complications and recovery time. We compared a fast-track protocol to standard care in the setting of a small Italian general hospital. Propensity score estimation before and after the study was performed to compare pre-fast-track (pre-FT; January 2013–March 2014) and fast-track (FT; January 2016–December 2016) patients undergoing elective hip and knee replacement surgery with a three-year follow-up (up to January 2020). The primary endpoints were the mean hemoglobin drop, mean predischarge hemoglobin, transfusion and reinfusion rates, pain, ambulation day, hospital length of stay (LOS), and discharge to home/outpatient care or rehabilitation hospital center. The secondary endpoints were the adherence measures to the FT protocol, namely, tourniquet and surgical times, use of drains and catheters, type of anesthesia administered, and complications within three years. The risk difference (RD) and the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) were calculated for each outcome. After the propensity score estimation, we analyzed 59 patients in the pre-FT and 122 in the FT categories. The FT patients, with respect to the pre-FT patients, ameliorated their mean hemoglobin drop from 3.7 to 3.1 g/dl (p < 0.01) and improved their predischarge mean hemoglobin (10.5 g/dL versus 11.0 g/dL; p = 0.01). Furthermore, the aOR of being transfused was reduced by 81% (p < 0,01); the RD of being reinfused was reduced by 63% (p < 0.01); the aOR of having low pain on the first day was increased by more than six times (p < 0.01); the RD of ambulating the first day increased by 91% (p < 0.01); the aOR of admission to a rehabilitation hospital center was reduced by 98% (p < 0.01); the aOR of home discharge increased by 42 times (p < 0.01); the median LOS, tourniquet and surgical times, and use of catheters and drains significantly decreased. Patients with complications at 1 month were 43.1% and 38.2%, respectively, of pre-FT and FT patients (p = 0.63). Complications at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months were significantly lower for the FT patients. This study showed that the uptake of enhanced recovery practices was successful and resulted in the improvement of clinical and organizational outcomes. The fast-track concept and related programs may optimize perioperative care and streamline surgical and rehabilitation care paths.

Day-case total hip arthroplasty: a literature review and development of a hospital pathway

Aims

We present the development of a day-case total hip arthroplasty (THA) pathway in a UK National Health Service institution in conjunction with an extensive evidence-based summary of the interventions used to achieve successful day-case THA to which the protocol is founded upon.

Methods

We performed a prospective audit of day-case THA in our institution as we reinitiate our full capacity elective services. In parallel, we performed a review of the literature reporting complication or readmission rates at ≥ 30-day postoperative following day-case THA. Electronic searches were performed using four databases from the date of inception to November 2020. Relevant studies were identified, data extracted, and qualitative synthesis performed.

Results

Our evaluation and critique of the evidence-based literature identifies day-case THA to be safe, effective, and economical, benefiting both patients and healthcare systems alike. We further validate this with our institutional elective day surgery arthroplasty pathway (EDSAP) and report a small cohort of successful day-case THA cases as an example in the early stages of this practice in our unit.

Conclusion

Careful patient selection and education, adequate perioperative considerations, including multimodal analgesia, surgical technique and blood loss management protocols and appropriate postoperative pathways comprising reliable discharge criteria are essential for successful day-case THA.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(2):93–102.

The association between hospital case volume and in-hospital and one-year mortality after hip fracture surgery

Aims

Hospital case volume is shown to be associated with postoperative outcomes in various types of surgery. However, conflicting results of volume-outcome relationship have been reported in hip fracture surgery. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the association between hospital case volume and postoperative outcomes in patients who had hip fracture surgery. We hypothesized that higher case volume would be associated with lower risk of in-hospital and one-year mortality after hip fracture surgery.

Methods

Data for all patients who underwent surgery for hip fracture from January 2008 to December 2016 were extracted from the Korean National Healthcare Insurance Service database. According to mean annual case volume of surgery for hip fracture, hospitals were classified into very low (< 30 cases/year), low (30 to 50 cases/year), intermediate (50 to 100 cases/year), high (100 to 150 cases/year), or very high (> 150 cases/year) groups. The association between hospital case volume and in-hospital mortality or one-year mortality was assessed using the logistic regression model to adjust for age, sex, type of fracture, type of anaesthesia, transfusion, comorbidities, and year of surgery.

Results

Between January 2008 and December 2016, 269,535 patients underwent hip fracture surgery in 1,567 hospitals in Korea. Compared to hospitals with very high volume, in-hospital mortality rates were significantly higher in those with high volume (odds ratio (OR) 1.10, 95% confidence interval ((CI) 1.02 to 1.17, p = 0.011), low volume (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.32, p < 0.001), and very low volume (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.34, p < 0.001). Similarly, hospitals with lower case volume showed higher one-year mortality rates compared to hospitals with very high case volume (low volume group, OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.19, p < 0.001; very low volume group, OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.14, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Higher hospital case volume of hip fracture surgery was associated with lower in-hospital mortality and one-year mortality in a dose-response fashion. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(10):1384–1391.

Reasons for Unsuccessful Same-Day Discharge Following Outpatient Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: 5½ Years' Experience From a Single Institution

BACKGROUND

Outpatient joint arthroplasty (OJA) is considered safe and feasible in selected patients but should be further optimized to improve success rates. The purposes of this study are to (1) identify the main reasons of unsuccessful same-day discharge (SDD) following hip and knee arthroplasty; (2) determine the hospital length of stay (LOS) following unsuccessful SDD; and (3) assess which independent variables are related to specific reasons for unsuccessful SDD.

METHODS

Five hundred twenty-five patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty between 2013 and 2019 were retrospectively identified. SDD to home was planned in all patients. Specific reasons for unsuccessful SDD and LOS were assessed. Bivariate analysis was performed to find differences in independent variables between patients experiencing a specific reason for unsuccessful SDD and control patients.

RESULTS

One hundred ten patients (21%) underwent unsuccessful SDD. The main reason was postoperative reduced motor function and sensory disturbances (33%). The mean LOS in the unsuccessful SDD group was 1.7 days (standard deviation ± 1.0 days). Postoperative transient reduced motor function and sensory disturbances occurred more often in patients undergoing TKA (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

An option for overnight stay should be available when performing outpatient hip and knee arthroplasty. The main reason for unsuccessful SDD in this study was transient postoperative reduced motor function and sensory disturbance, most likely due to intraoperative local infiltration analgesia in TKA. No other studies have found local infiltration analgesia to be an issue preventing SDD.

Influence of fast-track programs on patient-reported outcomes in total hip and knee replacement (THR/TKR) at Swedish hospitals 2011-2015: an observational study including 51,169 THR and 8,393 TKR operations

Background and purpose - Fast-track care programs have been broadly introduced at Swedish hospitals in elective total hip and knee replacement (THR/TKR). We studied the influence of fast-track programs on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) 1 year after surgery, by exploring outcome measures registered in the Swedish arthroplasty registers.Patients and methods - Data were obtained from the Swedish Knee and Hip Arthroplasty Registers and included TKR and THR operations 2011-2015 on patients with osteoarthritis. Based on questionnaires concerning the clinical pathway and care programs at Swedish hospitals, the patients were divided in 2 groups depending on whether they had been operated in a fast-track program or not. PROs of the fast-track group were compared with not fast-track using regression analysis. EQ-5D, EQ VAS, Pain VAS, and Satisfaction VAS were analyzed for both THR and TKR operations. The PROMs for TKR also included KOOS.Results - The differences of EQ-5D, EQ VAS, Pain VAS, and Satisfaction VAS 1 year after surgery were small but all in favor of fast-track for both THR and TKR, also in subscales of KOOS for TKR except KOOS QoL. However, the effect sizes as measured by Cohens' d formula were < 0.2 for all PROs, in both THR and TKR.Interpretation - Our results indicate that the fast-track programs may be at least as good as conventional care from the perspective of PROs 1-year postoperatively.

Editorial Commentary: Pain After Hip Arthroscopy-Are We Truly Addressing the Problem?

Pain after hip arthroscopy is a significant and challenging issue as is evidenced by the number of publications on this subject. Various analgesic strategies to circumvent this issue have been tried, with variable results. The central problem is that pain experienced by patients after hip arthroscopy is multifactorial in origin. Regarding local injection, an anatomic approach to the nerve supply to the hip with an effective pain relief strategy should take this into consideration and focus on using drugs with a low risk of complications and infiltration techniques that do not cause an unnecessary delay in rehabilitation and discharge of the patient. Furthermore, addressing traction time, surgical technique, and fluid extravasation and applying an individualized approach, keeping the patient's personality and profile in mind, will ensure adequate analgesia after arthroscopic intervention.

[Challenges of fast-track arthroplasty in Germany]

BACKGROUND

While fast-track arthroplasty has been already established in many European countries and the United States, Germany still struggles to introduce appropriate programs. This is due to a variety of reasons.

REASONS

From an organizational and medical scope, the fear of alteration, the adherence to restrictions rooted in historical tradition, the reluctance to interdisciplinary cooperation, and the lack of a willingness to implement externally-guided process analysis tools, stand in the foreground. This is system related, and especially the DRG-system with the continuous devaluation of lump compensation rates in primary hip and knee arthroplasty, also in 2020, hinders the implementation. The resulting fears and concerns that an additional reduction of the length-of-stay by fast-track programs is leading to a consistent reduction of the DRG returns, are understandable. On the other hand, the disconnectedness of the ambulatory, inpatient and rehabilitation sector in Germany inhibits the introduction of fast-track programs.

SOLUTIONS

A well-thought-out change-management is the basic requirement for the successfull establishment of a Fast-Track-Program. Perspectively, a rethinking towards sector-comprehensive care strategies for the implantation of a total hip or knee replacement, including the required rehabilitation procedures, has to be demanded.