The long-term results of extendable endoprostheses of the humerus in children after the resection of a bone sarcoma

What Is the Revision-free Survival of Resurfaced Allograft-prosthesis Composites for Proximal Humerus Reconstruction in Children With Bone Tumors?

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of the proximal humerus in children who undergo bone tumor resection is challenging because of patients' small bone size and possible limb length discrepancy at the end of skeletal growth due to loss of the physis. There are several options for proximal humerus reconstruction in children, such as clavicula pro humero, free vascularized fibula grafting, massive bone osteoarticular allografting, endoprostheses, and allograft-prosthesis composites, but no consensus exists on the best method for reconstruction. Resurfaced allograft-prosthesis composites could be an alternative surgical option, but little is known about the results of this surgical technique.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What are the complications and what is the survivorship free from reconstruction failure associated with resurfaced allograft-prosthesis composites in a small, single-center case series? (2) What Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores do patients achieve after reconstructions with resurfaced allograft-prosthesis composites?

METHODS

This study was a retrospective, single-arm case analysis in a single institution. We generally considered resurfaced allograft-prosthesis composites in children with malignant bone tumors involving the metaepiphysis of the proximal humerus in whom there was no evidence of joint contamination and in whom axillary nerve preservation was possible. Between 2003 and 2021, we treated 100 children (younger than 15 years) with bone tumors of the humerus. Thirty children (30%) with diaphyseal tumors (21 children) or distal tumors (9 children) were excluded. Among the potentially eligible children, 52 were not analyzed because they were treated with other procedures such as amputation, modular prostheses, cement spacers, free vascularized fibula grafting, and massive bone osteoarticular allografts. We included 18 children (26% of the potentially eligible children) who were treated with resurfaced allograft-prosthesis composites. There were 9 boys and 9 girls, with a median age of 10 years (range 4 to 15 years) at the time of diagnosis. A long stem (≥ 6 cm) in the resurfaced allograft-prosthesis composite was used in 9 children and a short stem (< 6 cm) was used in the remaining 9. One of the 18 children had a follow-up of less than 2 years. The median follow-up of the remaining 17 children was 4.7 years (range 2 to 19 years). The children' medical records were reviewed for clinical and functional outcomes. We performed a competing risk analysis to calculate the reconstruction failure-free survival of resurfaced allograft-prosthesis composites. Reconstruction failure was defined as removal of the implant or allograft because of implant loosening or breakage and allograft fracture or resorption. We analyzed the children's postoperative complications and functional outcomes at the end of the follow-up period using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional scoring system.

RESULTS

The competing risk analysis revealed that reconstruction failure was 25% (95% confidence interval 7% to 40%) at 3 years, reaching a plateau. Four of 18 children underwent surgical revision with a new reconstruction. The reasons for reconstruction revision were resorption of the allograft at the proximal part (2 children) and fracture of the allograft (2 children). Reconstruction revision was performed in 3 of 9 children who underwent reconstruction with a short stem and in 1 of 9 children who underwent reconstruction with a long stem. Several children had other complications that did not result in removal of the allograft. Allograft resorption was observed in 4 of 18 children, but no additional surgical treatment was performed. Shoulder instability or subluxation was observed in 4 of 18 children, but only 1 child underwent surgery with a reverse shoulder arthroplasty without removal of the resurfaced allograft-prosthesis composite. Limited elbow motion because of plate impingement was observed in 1 child who underwent surgical cutting of the protruding distal part of the plate. Incomplete radial nerve palsy after surgery occurred in 1 child, with spontaneous resolution after 2 months. Screw loosening occurred in 2 children who underwent surgery with removal of loose screws. Two children had a nonunion at the graft-host bone junction; 1 child underwent surgery with bone grafting and refixation of the graft-host bone junction, and the other child with both nonunion and plate breakage was treated with bone grafting and refixation of the graft-host bone junction with a new plate. Among 17 children who had a follow-up longer than 2 years, the median Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional score at the last follow-up interval was 23 of 30 (range 20 to 26); 1 child was considered to have an excellent result (functional score ≥ 26), 15 children were considered to have a good result (functional score 21 to 25), and 1 child was considered to have a fair result (functional score ≤ 20). The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional score did not change after excluding 4 children who underwent replacement of resurfaced allograft-prosthesis composites (24 of 30 [range 20 to 26]). The median angle of flexion of the shoulder was 40° (range 20º to 90°), and the median angle of abduction was 30° (range 20º to 90°).

CONCLUSION

Resurfaced allograft-prosthesis composites showed a high risk of complications, but not all complications resulted in removal of the reconstructed allograft. We used this technique mainly for very young children with small bones and for older children who underwent axillary nerve preservation. Although its success may be limited owing to a high risk of complications, a resurfaced allograft-prosthesis composite could be an alternative surgical option in order to preserve the bone stock and achieve good functional outcomes in very young children. We recommend using a long-stem resurfaced allograft-prosthesis composite, which may reduce the risk of complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Biological Prosthesis (Hollow 3D-Printed Titanium Custom-Made Prosthesis and Bone Graft) for Humeral Reconstruction in Pediatric Oncologic Patients: Surgical Indications and Results

This study presents the mid-term outcomes of a novel "biological prosthesis" for pediatric humerus reconstruction after major bone tumor removal. This approach involves a hollow 3D-printed titanium custom-made prosthesis combined with bone grafting. The primary aim was to preserve and revitalize the unaffected autologous proximal or distal humeral stump. Between 2017 and 2021, we treated five pediatric patients (mean age 11.2 years; range 7-17) with humeral bone sarcomas. A one-stage surgical procedure involved tumor resection and implanting a hollow 3D-printed custom-made prosthesis. In two cases, we preserved the proximal humerus; in two, the distal part; and in one, both. Graft materials included homologous bone chips in three cases and free vascularized fibular grafts in two cases. All patients were clinically and radiographically assessed after a mean follow-up of 32.2 months (range of 14-68). No significant complications were observed, and no implant revisions were needed. Osseointegration was evident in all cases within eight months post-surgery; vascular support for the remaining autologous stump was demonstrated in all cases. Our hollow 3D-printed custom-made prosthesis and bone grafting offer the potential for partial or complete articular surface preservation. This approach encourages revascularization of the epiphysis, leading to satisfactory outcomes in humerus reconstruction within the pediatric population.

Reconstruction for bone tumours of the shoulder and humerus in children and adolescents

Reconstructions for paediatric bone tumours of the shoulder girdle and humerus are intended to optimize placement of the hand in space. Given the longevity of paediatric survivors of sarcoma, durability is an important planning consideration. Here, I review a subset of approaches based on anatomical site with an emphasis on function and longevity. Often, biological reconstructions that combine living bone with tendon repairs and transfers best address those goals.

Use of Vascularized Fibular Epiphyseal Transfer with Massive Bone Allograft for Proximal Humeral Reconstruction in Children with Bone Sarcoma

BACKGROUND

The vascularized fibula epiphyseal transfer provides a reconstructive option for longitudinal growth after oncologic resection of the proximal humerus in pediatric patients. However, postoperative fractures and poor shoulder function are common. The purpose of this review was to introduce a composite approach in oncologic reconstruction of the proximal humerus and assess its clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated five children (3 osteosarcoma and 2 Ewing's sarcoma) who underwent biological reconstruction with combination of vascularized fibula epiphyseal transfer and massive bone allograft after oncologic resection of the proximal humerus. The mean follow-up was 46.8 months.

RESULTS

All patients were alive at the last follow-up. There was no graft fracture, hardware failure, or infection. The mean time of osseous union was 2.9 months at fibula-humerus junction and 6.2 months at allograft-humerus junction. Hypertrophy and axial growth were evident in all, except one patient who has avascular necrosis of the fibula head. The mean hypertrophy index was 51.5%, and the mean growth was 4.4 mm per annum. The mean arm discrepancy was 4.6 cm. All reconstruction was in situ with the average abduction of 113° and forward flexion of 69°. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was 85.4% at the final follow-up. All patients experienced dropped foot and resolved spontaneously.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of vascularized fibula epiphyseal transfer with massive allograft bone provides a reliable oncologic reconstruction of proximal humerus in children. It not only offers the ability of longitudinal growth, hypertrophy, and osseous union but also diminishes reconstructive complications and improves shoulder function.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV.