Treatment of completely displaced distal radial fractures with a straight plaster or manipulation under anaesthesia

Is reduction necessary in overriding metaphyseal distal radius fractures in children under 11 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

OBJECTIVE

To determine the necessity of reduction in the treatment of overriding metaphyseal distal radius fractures (DRF) in children under 11 years.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched to retrieve studies published from inception to 2023. Two reviewers independently screened for studies with observational or randomized control design comparing two treatments for overriding metaphyseal DRF in patients under 11 years: simple casting without reduction (SC group) versus closed reduction plus casting or pin fixation (CRC/F group); with varying outcomes reported (CRD471761). The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool.

RESULTS

Out of 3,024 screened studies, three met the inclusion criteria, 180 children (mean age 7.1 ± 0.9 years) with overriding metaphyseal DRF: SC-group (n = 79) versus CRC/F-group (n = 101). Both treatment groups achieved 100% fracture consolidation without requiring further manipulation. The SC-group showed significantly fewer complications (mean difference [MD] 0.08; 95% CI [0.01, 0.53]; I2 = 22%; P < 0.009) and trends towards better sagittal alignment (MD 5.11; 95% CI [11.92, 1.71]; I2 = 94%; P < 0.14), less reinterventions (MD 0.31; 95% CI [0.01, 8.31]; P < 0.48), and fewer patients with motion limitation at the end of follow-up (MD 0.23; 95% CI [0.03,  1.98]; P < 0.18), although these findings were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a limited number of studies comparing SC versus CRC/F in overriding DRF in children under 11 years, this study suggests that anatomical reduction is not necessary. Treating these fractures with SC, even when presenting with an overriding position, leads to reduced complications, shows a trend towards fewer reinterventions, improved sagittal alignment, and less limitation in patient motion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Systematic review of Level-III studies.

Surgically reducing displaced distal radial fractures in children

Displaced fractures of the distal radius in children are usually reduced under sedation or general anaesthesia to restore anatomical alignment before the limb is immobilized. However, there is growing evidence of the ability of the distal radius to remodel rapidly, raising doubts over the benefit to these children of restoring alignment. There is now clinical equipoise concerning whether or not young children with displaced distal radial fractures benefit from reduction, as they have the greatest ability to remodel. The Children's Radius Acute Fracture Fixation Trial (CRAFFT), funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research, aims to definitively answer this question and determine how best to manage severely displaced distal radial fractures in children aged up to ten years.

Distal radius fractures in children aged 5-12 years: a Swedish nationwide register-based study of 25 777 patients

BACKGROUND

Distal radius fracture (DRF) is the most common type of fracture in children. There is no clear consensus on primary treatment for complete DRFs. Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation has been recommended, to avoid the risk of redislocation. However, recent studies have indicated that casting can be sufficient, at least for children with two or more years left to grow. There is no recent study regarding pediatric DRFs and the extent of K-wire fixations in the Swedish population. The purpose of this study was to investigate epidemiology and treatment of pediatric DRFs registered in the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, based on data from SFR for children aged 5-12 years with DRF between January 2015 and October 2022, we investigated epidemiology and choice of treatment. Sex, age, type of DRF, treatment, cause and mechanism of injury, were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 25,777 patients were included, 7,173 (27%) with complete fractures. Number and peak age of girls vs. boys with fractures were 11,742 (46%), 10 years, and 14,035 (54%), 12 years, respectively. Odds ratio (OR) for a K-wire fixation in girls vs. boys was 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-0.89, p < .001). With age 5 -7 years as reference, OR for age group 8-10 years was 0.88 (95% CI 0.80-0.98 p = .019) and OR for age group 11-12 years was 0.81 (95% CI 0.73-0.91 p =  < .001.

CONCLUSION

Casting only was the preferred treatment for all fractures (76%). Boys acquired DRFs more often than girls, with a peak age of 12 years. Younger children and boys with a complete fracture were more likely than older children and girls to receive a K-wire. Further research regarding indications for K-wiring of DRFs in the pediatric population is needed.

Diametaphyseal Distal Forearm Fractures in Children: A STROBE Compliant Comparison of Outcomes of Different Stabilization Techniques Regarding Complications

Diametaphyseal forearm fractures are difficult to treat because standard methods for long-bone fracture stabilization in the metaphyseal or diaphyseal regions are less effective in this transition zone. We hypothesized that there is no difference in outcomes between conservative and surgical treatment of diametaphyseal forearm fractures. This retrospective analysis included 132 patients who had undergone treatment for diametaphyseal forearm fracture between 2013 and 2020 at our institution. The primary analysis compared complications occurring in patients treated conservatively with those occurring in patients managed surgically (ESIN, K-wire fixation, KESIN stabilization, or open reduction and plate osteosynthesis). In a subgroup analysis, we compared the two most frequently applied surgical stabilization techniques in distal forearm fractures (i.e., ESIN and K-wire) with conservative treatment. The mean age of the patients at the time of intervention was 9.43 ± 3.78 years (mean ± SD). Most patients were male (91; 68.9%), and 70 of 132 (53.1%) patients underwent surgical stabilization. The rate of re-intervention or complications was similar after conservative and surgical treatment, and ESIN or K-wire fixation achieved comparable complication rates. Recurrent displacement of fragments was the most frequent reason for re-interventions (13 of 15 patients; 86.6%). There was no permanent damage as a result of a complication. The median time of exposure to image intensifier radiation was comparable between ESIN (95.5 s) and K-wire fixation (85.0 s), but significantly lower during conservative treatment (15.0 s; p = 0.001).

Epidemiology, Treatment, and Treatment Quality of Overriding Distal Metaphyseal Radial Fractures in Children and Adolescents

BACKGROUND

The incidence of completely displaced overriding distal metaphyseal radial fractures in children is unknown, and the optimal treatment is controversial.

METHODS

All completely displaced distal metaphyseal radial fractures in patients <16 years old treated in our tertiary-level institution from 2014 to 2019 were identified with use of the Kids' Fracture Tool Helsinki. Etiology, fracture characteristics, management, and quality of treatment were assessed. A telephone interview with the guardian of the patient was performed for 100 (89%) of 112 patients at 1.5 to 7.2 years (median, 4.6 years) after the injury. Pain during the last month and forearm function were recorded. Treatment satisfaction was assessed with use of a 7-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

A total of 113 completely displaced overriding distal metaphyseal radial fractures in 112 patients (81 of whom were residents of Helsinki) were treated during the 6-year-long study period. The mean annual incidence was 1.42 per 10,000 population. Most (73%) of these fractures occurred in children <11 years old, and most fractures were dorsally displaced and located nearly as far proximally from the distal radial physis as the maximum width of the distal metaphysis. Closed manipulation was attempted in two-thirds of cases in the emergency department, with a failure rate of 46%. Strong opioids were administered in 70 of 112 patients. None of the 26 patients whose fractures were immobilized in an overriding position had secondary interventions, pain, or functional disability. The mean satisfaction with treatment on the Likert scale was 6.2.

CONCLUSIONS

The annual incidence of overriding distal metaphyseal radial fractures patients <16 years old was shown to vary between 0.72 and 2.01 per 10,000 population. Opioids, local and general anesthesia, hospital admission, and secondary interventions can be avoided in prepubescent patients by casting these fractures in an overriding position while the patient is in the emergency department.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Casting in finger trap traction without reduction versus closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation of dorsally displaced, over-riding distal metaphyseal radius fractures in children under 11 years old: a study protocol of a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Distal radius is the most common site of fracture in children, comprising 23%-31% of all paediatric fractures. Approximately one-fifth of these fractures are displaced. Completely displaced distal metaphyseal radius fractures in children have traditionally been treated with closed reduction. Recent evidence suggests that correcting the shortening in over-riding distal metaphyseal radius fractures is not necessary in prepubertal children. To date, no published randomised controlled trial (RCT) has compared treatment of these fractures in children by casting the fracture in bayonet position to reduction and pin fixation.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct an RCT to compare the outcomes of casting the fracture in bayonet position in children under 11 years of age to reduction and percutaneous pin fixation. 60 patients will be randomly assigned to casting or surgery groups. We have two primary outcomes. The first is ratio (injured side/non-injured side) in the total active forearm rotation and the second is ratio (injured side/non-injured side) in total active range of motion of the wrist in the flexion-extension plane at 6 months. The secondary outcomes will include axial radiographic alignment, passive extension of the wrists, grip strength and length of forearms and hands, patient-reported outcome QuickDASH and pain questionnaire PedsQL. Patients not willing to participate in the RCT will be asked to participate in a prospective cohort. Patients not eligible for randomisation will be asked to participate in a non-eligible cohort. These cohorts are included to enhance the external validity of the results of the RCT. Our null hypothesis is that the results of the primary outcome measures in the casting group are non-inferior to surgery group.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The institutional review board of the Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District has approved the protocol. We will disseminate the findings through peer-reviewed publications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04323410.

PROTOCOL

V.1.1, 29 September 2020.

Trends in hospital admissions for childhood fractures in England

PURPOSE

Fractures to the axial and appendicular skeleton are common in children causing loss of opportunities and disability. There are relatively few studies available to quantify the number of children who have their fractures diagnosed in the emergency department and are then admitted to hospital for ongoing management. The purpose of this study is to explore trends of frequency, types and age of children sustaining fractures who were admitted for intervention to National Health Service (NHS) hospitals.

DESIGN

The study uses data from the Hospital Episode Statistics and Office for National Statistics from 2012 to 2019 to calculate the annual incidence of hospital admission for limb, spine, facial and skull fractures per 100 000 children.

RESULTS

During 2012-2019, 368 120 children were admitted to English NHS hospitals with a fracture. 256 008 (69.5%) were upper limb fractures, 85 737 (23.3%) were lower limb fractures and 20 939 (5.7%) were skull or facial fractures. The annual incidence of upper limb fractures was highest in children aged 5-9 (348.3 per 100 000 children) and the highest incidence of lower limb fractures was in children aged 10-15 (126.5 per 100 000 children). The incidence of skull and facial fractures in preschool (age 0-4) children has been increasing at a rate of 0.629 per 100 000 children per year.

IMPLICATIONS

The annual incidence of hospital admission for fractures in children has been shown to be consistent for several fracture types between 2012 and 2019. An increasing trend of admissions with preschool skull fractures was observed, though the study data do not have sufficient granularity to demonstrate if this is due to changes in practice or to accidental or non-accidental causes.