Radiological humeral adaptative changes five years after anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty using a standard-length cementless hydroxyapatite-coated humeral component

Multiplanar analysis of proximal humerus anatomy of patients with rotator cuff arthropathy and relevance to reverse shoulder press-fit stems

Background

Short stems have become increasingly popular in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) due to their ability to preserve bone stock for revision surgery. However, short stems may be more at risk for malalignment or loosening, and commercially available stems have varied designs. The purpose of this study was to perform a multiplanar analysis of proximal humerus anatomy in patients with rotator cuff arthropathy to better define canal geometry and identify differences based on sex.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed of a consecutive series of patients undergoing RSA for rotator cuff arthropathy. A total of 117 patients were identified with preoperative computed tomography scans. Measurements were undertaken following multiplanar reconstruction of the computed tomography scans. Measured parameters included the following: transition point (TP), anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) distances, intramedullary (IM) and bone diameter, and cortical thickness. The TP was defined as the distance from the periosteal border of the greater tuberosity to the level of the IM canal where the endosteal borders became parallel. Measurements started at the metaphysis, and then proceeded 25 and 50 mm distal to the metaphysis followed by 10 mm increments thereafter. Each level was compared to the level above with t tests in the overall cohort and separately by sex. Height was correlated to ML-AP difference and IM diameter with Pearson correlation coefficient. Potential stem sizes that extended 50, 60, 70, and 80 mm from the metaphysis were analyzed to record the percentage of patients in whom the stem would reach past the TP.

Results

The mean TP for all patients was 55.6 ± 7.4 mm (37.5-78.4) from the greater tuberosity, 53.3 ± 6.6 mm (37.5-67.0) in females and 58.1 ± 7.5 mm (41.9-78.4) in males. ML and AP distances and IM diameter became consistent at level 3 (mean, 83 mm distal to the greater tuberosity) in the overall cohort and in both sexes. Height positively correlated with IM diameter. Males had significantly larger IM diameters compared to females at all levels. Cortical thickness remained relatively consistent throughout the proximal humerus. A stem length of 70 mm would extend past the TP in 98% of patients.

Conclusion

Humeral implants in RSA with a stem of at least 70 mm in length would extend distally past the TP in the majority of cases regardless of sex. At this point, the canal's area remains consistent which would facilitate diaphyseal fixation if required.

Outcomes of different stem sizes in shoulder arthroplasty

Background

The successive refinement in implant design and operative technique alongwith improved understanding has resulted in increased incidence of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Simultaneously, the indications of TSA have widened and include a range of shoulder pathologies.

Methods

Using the keywords and relevant literature, we have described an overview of the different stem sizes used in shoulder arthroplasty. Relevant description of clinical and radiological outcome is done with regards to different stem sizes.

Discussion

There are plethora of shoulder replacement systems, based on unique philosophy and having their own advantages and disadvantages. Additionally, the rise in ageing population had increased the need for revision TSA, thereby necessitating the judicious choice of implant at primary TSA. We further present the role of cemented and uncemented humeral stems and discuss the findings of finite element analysis. The choice of humeral stem size and use of cemented or uncemented stems have been reported to affect the clinical and radiological outcomes.

Current Concepts in Humeral Component Design for Anatomic and Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

The history of humeral component design has evolved from prostheses with relatively long stems and limited anatomic head options to a contemporary platform with short stems and stemless implants with shared instrumentation and the ability to provide optimal shoulder reconstruction for both anatomic and reverse configurations. Contemporary humeral components aim to preserve the bone, but they are potentially subject to malalignment. Modern components are expected to favorably load the humerus and minimize adverse bone reactions. Although there will likely continue to be further refinements in humeral component design, the next frontiers in primary shoulder arthroplasty will revolve around designing an optimal plan, including adequate soft tissue tension and providing computer-assisted tools for the accurate execution of the preoperative plan in the operating room.