The Freeman femoral component with hydroxyapatite coating and retention of the neck: an update with a minimum follow-up of 17 years

Total Hip Arthroplasty by the Direct Anterior Approach Using a Neck-preserving Stem: Safety, efficacy and learning curve

BACKGROUND

The concept of femoral neck preservation in total hip replacement (THR) was introduced in 1993. It is postulated that retaining cortical bone of the femoral neck offers triplanar stability, uniform stress distribution, and accommodates physiological anteversion. However, data on safety, efficacy and learning curve are lacking.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively assessed all patients who were operated for a THR with a short neck preserving stem (MiniHip) between 2012 and 2014. The safety and learning curve were assessed by recording operative time; stem size; and adverse events including periprosthetic fracture; paresthesia; and limb length discrepancy (LLD). The cohort was divided into equal groups to assess the learning curve effect, and the cumulative sums (CUSUM) test was performed to monitor intraoperative neck fractures. For assessment of efficacy, Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores were compared preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

138 patients with median age 62 years (range 35-82 years) were included with a median followup of 42 months (range 30-56 months). The minimum followup was 2.5 years. The OHS, SF-36 (physical and mental component) scores improved by a mean score of 26, 28, and 27 points, respectively. All patients had LLD of <10 mm (1.9 mm ± 1.3). Adverse events included intraoperative neck fracture (n = 6), subsidence (n = 1), periprosthetic fracture (n = 1), paresthesia (n = 12), and trochanteric bursitis (n = 2). After early modification of the technique to use a smaller finishing broach, the CUSUM test demonstrated acceptable intraoperative neck fracture risk. The second surgery group had a reduced risk of intraoperative neck fracture (5/69 vs. 1/69 P = 0.2), reduced operative time (66 vs. 61 min, P = 0.06), and increased stem size (5 vs. 6, P = 0.09) although these differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The MiniHip stem is safe alternative to standard THR with good functional outcomes but with a learning curve for the surgical technique, implants sizing, and the risk of intraoperative neck fractures.

Medium-term results following large diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: increasing failure after 6 years

PURPOSE

The main aim of our study is to report the medium-term survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) cup and a large modular metal head (MMT) on an uncemented Freeman femoral stem. No results have been reported till date with these implants combinations.

METHODS

A total of 205 metal-on-metal total hip replacements (MoM THRs) were performed on 190 patients from October 2002 to November 2004. Prior to the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) guidelines, the patients were followed up at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively and annually thereafter. Following the MHRA alert in 2010, the patients were followed-up as per the MHRA guidelines.All statistical analyses were conducted using Stata 13.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 10.5 years, a total of 42 out of 205 hips were revised for reasons related to ALTR. The failure rates increased significantly over time (7% at 6 years and 29% at 10-year follow-up). The analysis showed no statistically significant association to age, gender, side, BMI or component size or position (p&lt;0.05). Blood metal ions showed a poor discriminant ability to separate failed from well-functioning MoM hip replacements.

CONCLUSIONS

Large head MoM BHR on an uncemented stem has extremely high failure rate. The authors do not recommend the use of large head MoM articulation in total hip arthroplasty in the wake of this report and similar findings across the world. Continued surveillance of these implants is required as the failure rates increase with time.

Which implant should we use for primary total hip replacement? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Many total hip implants are currently available on the market worldwide. We aimed to estimate the probability of revision surgery at ten years for each individual total hip implant and to compare these estimates with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) benchmark.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of cohort studies. The methodological quality was assessed with use of the Assessment of Quality in Lower Limb Arthroplasty (AQUILA) checklist. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Additionally, national joint registries that were full members of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registers (ISAR) were hand searched. Studies in which the authors reported the survival probability for either the acetabular or the femoral component of primary total hip replacements with use of revision for any reason or for aseptic loosening at ten years as the end point, with at least 100 implants at baseline, and in which at least 60% of the patients had primary osteoarthritis were eligible for inclusion.

RESULTS

The search strategy revealed 5513 papers describing survival probabilities for thirty-four types of acetabular components and thirty-two types of femoral components. Eight types of acetabular cups and fifteen types of femoral stems performed better than the NICE benchmark.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend that surgeons performing a primary total hip replacement use an implant that outperforms the NICE benchmarks.

Minimum 10 year survivorship analysis of a partially coated hydroxyapatite tapered femoral stem in elderly patients with an average age over 75

This is a retrospective, non-comparative study of 212 consecutive patients who underwent Total Hip Arthroplasty with an uncemented hydroxyapatite (HA) coated stem system from November 1997 to March 2000. The objective of the study was to analyze the performance of the implant at a minimum of 10 years in older patients (mean age 79.6 years). The Kaplan-Meier survivorship of the femoral stem at 10 years was 100%, and 97.5% for the whole prosthesis. The mean Merle d'Aubigné clinical score improved from 4.4 ± 2.1 points pre-operatively to 13.39 ± 3.77 points at final follow-up (p<0.05), and the mean VAS score for thigh pain was 1.25. The radiographic analysis showed that there were no significant radiolucent lines or osteolysis compromising the fixation of the implant.

Fracture of ceramic bearing surfaces following total hip replacement: a systematic review. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:157247. [PMID: 23844356 PMCID: PMC3697280 DOI: 10.1155/2013/157247]

Ceramic bearing surfaces are increasingly used for total hip replacement, notwithstanding that concern is still related to ceramic brittleness and its possible mechanical failure. The aim of this systematic review is to answer three questions: (1) Are there risk factors for ceramic component fracture following total hip replacement? (2) Is it possible to perform an early diagnosis of ceramic component failure before catastrophic fracture occurs? (3) Is it possible to draw guidelines for revision surgery after ceramic components failure? A PubMed and Google Scholar search was performed and reference citations from publications identified in the literature search were reviewed. The use of 28 mm short-neck femoral head carries an increased risk of fracture. Acetabular component malposition might increase the risk of ceramic liner fractures. Synovial fluid microanalysis and CT scan are promising in early diagnosis of ceramic head and liner failure. Early revision is suggested in case of component failure; no consensus exists about the better coupling for revision surgery. Ceramic brittleness remains a major concern. Due to the increased number of ceramic on ceramic implants, more revision surgeries and reports on ceramic components failure are expected in the future. An algorithm of diagnosis and treatment for ceramic hip failure is proposed.

Primary total hip replacement with a Furlong fully hydroxyapatite-coated titanium alloy femoral component

We present the extended follow-up (≥ 20 years) of a series of fully hydroxyapatite-coated femoral components used in 72 primary total hip replacements (THRs). Earlier results of this cohort have been previously published. All procedures were performed between 1986 and 1991. The series involved 45 women and 15 men with 12 bilateral procedures. Their mean age at the time of surgery was 60 years (46 to 80) and the mean duration of follow-up was 22.5 years (20 to 25). At final follow-up, the mean Merle d’Aubigné and Postel hip scores were 5.5 (4.5 to 6), 3.8 (3.5 to 5) and 3.3 (3.0 to 5.0) for pain, mobility and function, respectively. Of the patients 92% were very satisfied at the time of final follow-up.

There were seven revisions: six of the acetabular component for aseptic loosening and one of both the stem and the acetabular component for loosening due to deep infection. The survival of this prosthesis at 22.5 years with revision for any reason as the endpoint was 91.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 84 to 99). Survival with aseptic loosening of the stem as the endpoint was 100% (95% CI 90 to 100).

This prosthesis provides pain relief in the long term. Survival of this component is comparable to the best results for primary THR with any means of fixation.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:467–71.

Neck-preserving femoral stems

BACKGROUND

Surgeons undertaking total hip arthroplasty (THA) routinely perform a distal femoral neck resection. It has been argued that retaining the femoral neck during THA can provide mechanical and biological advantages.

PURPOSES

The objectives of this study were to review: (1) the current evidence on the advantages of femoral neck preservation during THA and (2) the clinical and radiological outcome of neck-preserving femoral stems.

METHODS

A search of the English-language literature on neck-preserving THA and on the individual neck-preserving implants was performed using PubMed, Ovid SP and Science Direct.

RESULTS

Studies have indicated that neck preservation offers superior tri-planar implant stability and allows more accurate restoration of the hip geometry and biomechanics. The trend towards tissue sparing surgery has contributed to the development of bone-conserving short-stem implants that offer variable levels of neck preservation. Despite an initial learning curve, these implants have generated promising early clinical results, with low revision rates and high outcome scores. However, radiological evaluation of some neck-preserving implants has detected a characteristic pattern of proximal femoral bone loss with distal cortical hypertrophy. The long-term implications of this finding are not yet known.

CONCLUSIONS

Preserving the femoral neck during THA has biomechanical advantages. However, long-term outcome data are needed on neck-preserving femoral stems to evaluate on-going bone remodelling and assess implant performance and survival.

Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem/porous-coated acetabulum survivorship at 15 years

At 10 years, we reported survivorship of the Omnifit hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem and the Omnifit-PSL porous-coated dual-radius acetabular shell (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) with polyethylene liners sterilized by gamma radiation in air. Our 15-year follow-up examines survivorship and functional outcomes of this system. Ninety-two patients (98 hips) were identified from our database who had been involved with the prior study. The mean follow-up was 14.7 years (range, 11.8-17.0 years). Survival of the stem and cup was 98.8% and 69%, respectively. Osteolysis was seen in 56% of the proximal femur and 5% of the distal femur. This hydroxyapatite-coated stem continues to perform well at 15 years despite poor acetabular results. The performance of this acetabular component is consistent with previous literature.

Uncemented custom computer-assisted design and manufacture of hydroxyapatite-coated femoral components

We present the 10- to 17-year results of 112 computer-assisted design computer-assisted manufacture femoral components. The total hip replacements were performed between 1992 and 1998 in 111 patients, comprising 53 men and 58 women. Their mean age was 46.2 years (24.6 to 62.2) with a mean follow-up of 13 years (10 to 17). The mean Harris Hip Score improved from 42.4 (7 to 99) to 90.3 (38 to 100), the mean Oxford Hip Score from 43.1 (12 to 59) to 18.2 (12 to 51) and the mean Western Ontario MacMasters University Osteoarthritis Index score from 57.0 (7 to 96) to 11.9 (0 to 85). There was one revision due to failure of the acetabular component but no failures of the femoral component. There were no revisions for aseptic loosening. The worst-case survival in this cohort of custom femoral components at 13.2 years follow-up was 98.2% (95% confidence interval 95 to 99). Overall survival of this series of total hip replacements was 97.3% (95% confidence interval 95 to 99).

These results are comparable with the best medium- to long-term results for femoral components used in primary total hip replacement with any means of fixation.